What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on FICO and SPGI due to high P/E multiples, potential regulatory risks, and leveraged buybacks. HD is also viewed negatively due to its high debt levels and housing sensitivity. The panel agrees that these 'quality' businesses may be overvalued and could face headwinds from cyclicality and regulatory pressures.
Risk: High P/E multiples and potential regulatory pressures on FICO and SPGI
Opportunity: None identified
Key Points
Charlie Munger favored buying great businesses when their stocks were trading at a discount.
He would love S&P Global stock, given its wide, well-established margins and its consistent profits.
Fair Issac is firmly entrenched in the loan industry due to its credit-scoring business.
- 10 stocks we like better than S&P Global ›
Charlie Munger was one of the greatest investors to ever live. Sadly, he is no longer with us; however, his investment philosophy lives on. At the core of that philosophy was Munger's desire to buy high-quality stocks at reasonable prices.
With that in mind, I've done some digging; these are the three companies that I think Munger would find irresistible right now.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
S&P Global
First up is S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI). With a history stretching back more than 150 years, Munger would be impressed with the company's staying power. Nowadays, S&P generates a subscription-heavy mix of revenue through several segments. It issues credit ratings, manages benchmark indexes (such as the S&P 500), and provides detailed analytics to financial professionals. In short, the company possesses an unassailable moat around its core businesses, built on its prestige and reputation.
Yet it's not just the company's pedigree or revenue streams that would impress the legendary investor. S&P boasts fat margins. Over the last 10 years, its gross margin has averaged 65%, while its operating margin has hovered near 43%. All in all, S&P Global has the type of underlying business that always captured Munger's attention: It quietly grinds away, compounding income at a steady rate, all while flying under the radar of the latest trends.
Granted, there are areas Munger wouldn't be thrilled with -- for example, the stock's valuation. Shares currently trade with a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 29, which is right around the market average. Yet overall, with shares trading within 10% of their 52-week low, Munger would be eager to buy S&P Global on this most recent dip.
Fair Issac
Next up is another financial stock, Fair Issac (NYSE: FICO). Perhaps even more than S&P Global, Fair Issac fits the bill of a Munger dream investment. The company operates behind a deep, wide moat built around the mortgage application process.
In brief, Fair Issac is the company behind FICO scores, which determine eligibility and lending rates for a wide range of loans, from mortgages to auto loans. In turn, FICO earns a steady stream of business generating those credit scores. In addition, the company operates a subscription-based software unit, focused on fraud detection and customer management.
All this results in exceptional profitability. The company's gross margin now stands at 83%, having grown from 67% a decade ago. In addition, another figure Munger would love is Fair Issac's consistent free-cash-flow growth. Trailing-12-month free cash flow has increased a stunning 394% over the last 10 years and now stands at $718 million.
Munger's main complaint with Fair Issac would probably be its leveraged buyback -- a mechanism in which a company borrows cash to finance its share repurchases. In addition, he wouldn't love the stock's P/E ratio of 44, which remains above the market average.
However, given that, as of this writing (on March 15), shares are trading within 6% of the stock's 52-week low, I think Munger would still see a massive opportunity in Fair Issac stock.
Home Depot
Last, there's Home Depot (NYSE: HD). This stalwart of the home improvement industry has found its stock in the cellar. As of this writing, shares are trading within 4% of a 52-week low. That fact alone might not have drawn Munger's interest, but the company's long history of success, coupled with strong fundamentals, certainly would.
Home Depot is a dominant home improvement retailer, with approximately 2,300 stores. For the last 25 years, the company has delivered a stable gross margin averaging around 32%. In addition, Home Depot generates over $2 billion in quarterly free cash flow.
If there is one thing Munger wouldn't like about Home Depot, it would be its balance sheet. The company's net debt has grown by more than 250% over the last 10 years to nearly $64 billion. Munger would want to see that figure reverse course, and the sooner the better.
Nonetheless, I still think he would jump at the chance to scoop up shares of this iconic retailer at bargain-basement prices. Similarly, those who want to invest like Charlie Munger might consider Home Depot, Fair Isaac, and S&P Global while their stocks are on sale.
Should you buy stock in S&P Global right now?
Before you buy stock in S&P Global, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P Global wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 21, 2026.
Jake Lerch has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Home Depot and S&P Global. The Motley Fool recommends Fair Isaac. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Being near 52-week lows doesn't make an expensive quality stock cheap—it may signal the market has already priced in the quality and is now pricing in slower growth or higher rates."
This article conflates 'Munger would like this' with 'you should buy this now.' The three stocks share a real quality: durable moats, fat margins, pricing power. But the article glosses over why they're near 52-week lows. FICO at 44x P/E isn't cheap—it's expensive relative to its growth rate. HD's $64B net debt (up 250% in a decade) isn't a minor quibble; it's a structural shift in capital allocation that Munger explicitly hated. SPGI at 29x P/E trades at market multiples despite 43% operating margins—suggesting the market already prices in maturity. The article mistakes 'quality business' for 'buy signal,' ignoring that quality businesses can be overvalued.
If rates fall sharply or credit stress eases, FICO and SPGI could re-rate higher on multiple expansion, and HD's debt becomes manageable if free cash flow accelerates. The article's picks may simply be ahead of a macro inflection.
"High-quality businesses with wide moats are not automatically 'investable' at any price, and the current multiples for FICO and SPGI suggest they are priced for perfection rather than value."
The article conflates 'quality' with 'value' in a way Charlie Munger would likely find intellectually lazy. While SPGI and FICO possess the 'moats' Munger prized—high barriers to entry and pricing power—labeling them 'on sale' based on 52-week lows ignores their current valuation multiples. Trading at 29x and 44x P/E respectively, these are premium-priced assets, not bargain-bin finds. Munger famously preferred 'fair companies at wonderful prices' over 'wonderful companies at fair prices.' Paying 44x for FICO, even with its cash flow growth, assumes perfection in a volatile credit environment. The article glosses over the fact that these 'moats' are increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny and potential disruption from alternative credit data providers.
One could argue that for businesses with such extreme pricing power and recurring revenue, the P/E multiple is a secondary concern to the long-term compounding of their dominant market positions.
"S&P Global’s durable moat and cash flow justify attention, but current multiples and macro/regulatory risks make it a hold until clearer earnings and balance-sheet confirmation."
Munger’s checklist—durable moat, high margins, predictable cash flow—fits S&P Global (SPGI) and FICO, and Home Depot has a retail moat, but the article glosses over cyclicality and valuation. SPGI’s subscription/ratings mix and 40%+ operating margins are attractive, yet a 29x P/E near a 52‑week low isn’t a clear bargain if macro-driven revenue (ratings, index/licensing) slows. FICO’s 44x P/E and leveraged buybacks raise capital-allocation questions; Home Depot’s profitability is offset by ~ $64B net debt and housing sensitivity. Key signals to watch: organic revenue growth, free cash flow conversion, margin stability, and regulatory or fintech-disruption headlines.
One could argue buying SPGI/FICO/HD at recent pullbacks captures long-duration cash flows at only a modest premium and that their high FCF and pricing power will re-rate multiples higher over 3–5 years.
"FICO's 44x P/E and leveraged buybacks make it the least Munger-like pick despite its moat, demanding a recession-proof economy for justification."
This Motley Fool piece name-drops Munger to hype SPGI, FICO, and HD as 'irresistible' near 52-week lows, touting moats, 65% gross margins for SPGI, 83% for FICO, and HD's $2B quarterly FCF. But Munger sought great businesses at true bargains—think sub-15x P/E—not SPGI's 29x (market average) or FICO's lofty 44x amid leveraged buybacks he despised. HD's 250% debt surge to $64B ignores housing's multi-year slump from 7%+ mortgage rates. Article omits sector risks: credit cycle downturns hit FICO/SPGI, while HD faces DIY slowdown. Solid compounders, yes—but no screaming Munger buys without deeper discounts.
If Fed cuts rates spark a housing rebound and credit expansion, HD's store network and FICO's scoring monopoly could compound FCF at 15-20% annually, easily supporting current multiples.
"FICO's valuation hinges entirely on credit-cycle immunity that doesn't exist; buyback-funded multiples are fragile."
Everyone's fixated on current multiples, but nobody's quantified the buyback math. FICO's 44x P/E assumes earnings don't shrink—yet leveraged buybacks (Grok flagged this) compress equity value if credit cycles turn. OpenAI's right on cyclicality, but the real question: does FICO's FCF conversion survive a 10% credit delinquency spike? That's the stress test missing from all four takes.
"Regulatory intervention poses a greater existential threat to FICO and SPGI's margins than cyclical credit delinquency spikes."
Anthropic, your focus on buyback math is the right pivot. However, we are ignoring the regulatory 'sword of Damocles' over FICO and SPGI. If the CFPB or SEC forces transparency in scoring or ratings methodologies, those 40%+ margins aren't just cyclical—they're structural targets. Buying now assumes the current monopolistic pricing power is immutable. If regulatory pressure compresses those premiums, the current high P/E multiples become value traps rather than compounding opportunities.
[Unavailable]
"HD's massive debt service is the unaddressed structural risk devouring FCF in a housing slowdown."
Google's regulatory Damocles sword has dangled over FICO/SPGI for years—CFPB lawsuits since 2022, yet margins hold at 40%+. The real sleeper: HD's $64B debt at ~5% yields $3.2B annual interest, consuming 50% of recent FCF amid flat housing sales. Munger's debt aversion screams louder here than vague reg threats.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is bearish on FICO and SPGI due to high P/E multiples, potential regulatory risks, and leveraged buybacks. HD is also viewed negatively due to its high debt levels and housing sensitivity. The panel agrees that these 'quality' businesses may be overvalued and could face headwinds from cyclicality and regulatory pressures.
None identified
High P/E multiples and potential regulatory pressures on FICO and SPGI