AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel generally agrees that while NEE and PG are quality stocks, they may not be the best choices for a market crash buying opportunity due to their high valuations, interest rate sensitivity, and regulatory risks. The 'buy the dip' strategy might turn into a value trap if risk-free rates structurally shift.

Risk: Regulatory risk for NEE, specifically populist backlash against utility rate hikes leading to caps on allowed Return on Equity (ROE), crushing their growth forecasts.

Opportunity: PG's resilience and dividend track record, despite potential headwinds from input costs, freight, or currency.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Investors often act like lemmings, rushing into and out of individual stocks and the broader market.

Long-term investors who prepare in advance can take advantage of investor emotions.

Market crashes are a great time to buy well-run companies like NextEra Energy and Procter & Gamble.

  • 10 stocks we like better than NextEra Energy ›

I've lived through two material bear markets, the dot-com crash at the turn of the century and the market downturn that accompanied the Great Recession. At the time, they were terrible, but in hindsight, they were great times to buy stocks.

There will eventually be another market crash; that's just how Wall Street works. Preparing ahead with a short list of stocks you would love to own if they were only cheaper will prepare you to buy while everyone else is selling. I suggest you put NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) on your short list. Here's why.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

NextEra Energy is two businesses in one

The foundation of NextEra Energy's business is Florida Power & Light. It is a regulated utility in the state of Florida. Florida has long benefited from in-migration as U.S. citizens look for a warmer climate and lower taxes (Florida has no state income tax). So the company's regulated utility operation has a growth bias, with regulators seemingly happy to work with the company on its capital investment plans and rates. That alone makes NextEra Energy attractive, since its customers will continue to buy electricity even in a market downturn, but there's another part of the business.

In addition to the regulated utility operations, NextEra Energy is also one of the world's largest generators of solar and wind power. This is the company's big growth driver. Oil and natural gas will remain important power sources for decades to come, but the longer-term shift is still toward cleaner energy alternatives. NextEra Energy has proven to be a good steward of shareholder capital, having used its unique combination of businesses to support decades of annual dividend increases.

Dividend increases should continue, given the company has projected 8% annualized earnings growth through 2030. In 2026, dividend growth is expected to be 10%, with 6% in the two years thereafter. These are solid numbers for a utility, but NextEra Energy's stock is normally afforded a premium. Right now, however, the yield is 2.5%, which is inline with the average utility yield. NextEra is reasonably attractive now, but a market crash could make the stock extra attractive.

Procter & Gamble is an industry leader

Procter & Gamble is one of the world's largest consumer staples companies. It is also a Dividend King, with over 50 years of annual dividend increases. P&G can stand toe-to-toe with any competitor when it comes to marketing, brand strength, and distribution. Where it really shines is innovation.

The company is always bringing out new and improved products. It wants to offer customers superior products and grow the categories in which it competes. This focus keeps P&G ahead of the consumer products pack and makes the company a valuable partner for its retailer customers.

Adding to the allure is the nature of the products P&G sells. You aren't going to stop buying deodorant and toilet paper during a market crash or recession. That makes the business very resilient, highlighted by the 3% organic growth it achieved in the fiscal third quarter of 2026 despite increasingly budget-conscious consumers. The dividend yield is 2.9%, which is fairly attractive compared to the 2.2% average for the consumer staples sector. It is worth looking at now, but a deep market sell-off would be an even better opportunity to buy this industry-leading consumer staples company.

Prepare ahead so you'll act when the time is right

Market crashes are a normal feature on Wall Street. You can't avoid them if you are going to be a long-term investor, but you can prepare to take advantage of them. Create a wish list before the next market crash, and you'll increase your chances of buying when most investors are selling out of fear.

I think two good additions for your wish list are NextEra Energy and Procter & Gamble. You could probably justify buying each one right now, but you'll likely get an even better opportunity if there is a deep bear market.

Should you buy stock in NextEra Energy right now?

Before you buy stock in NextEra Energy, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and NextEra Energy wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $496,473! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,216,605!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 4, 2026. *

Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Procter & Gamble. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends NextEra Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"The utility and consumer staple sectors are facing structural valuation headwinds from interest rate volatility that a simple 'buy-the-dip' strategy fails to account for."

While the article correctly identifies NEE and PG as defensive stalwarts, it glosses over the interest rate sensitivity inherent in both. NEE's aggressive renewable build-out requires massive capital expenditure; if the 'higher-for-longer' rate environment persists, their debt service costs could compress margins despite projected earnings growth. Similarly, PG is currently navigating a consumer environment where price elasticity is hitting a wall, as evidenced by slowing organic volume growth. Buying these during a crash assumes a 'reversion to mean' valuation, but if we see a structural shift in risk-free rates, the historical P/E multiples these companies enjoyed may never return, rendering the 'buy the dip' strategy a value trap.

Devil's Advocate

If the market crashes due to an exogenous shock that forces a rapid central bank pivot to easing, the lower discount rates would disproportionately benefit NEE's long-duration renewable assets and boost PG's valuation multiples.

NEE, PG
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"While NEE and PG offer stability and growth, rate sensitivity and competitive pressures mean current valuations lack margin of safety without a crash discount."

The article pitches NEE and PG as crash-proof defensives: NEE's Florida Power & Light utility rides population growth and renewables for 8% EPS growth through 2030 with 10% dividend hike in 2026; PG, a Dividend King, posted 3% organic sales in FQ3'26 amid budget squeezes, yielding 2.9% vs. staples' 2.2% avg. Yields are attractive now (NEE 2.5% inline utilities), but normally premium multiples suggest crash dips could sweeten deals. Omitted: NEE's heavy capex/debt exposes it to rising rates (utilities fell 20%+ in 2022), PG faces innovation costs and private-label competition eroding pricing power.

Devil's Advocate

NEE and PG have decades of dividend growth through multiple crises, proving unmatched resilience that justifies buying now before the next crash locks in gains as others panic.

NEE, PG
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"NEE and PG are already priced as crash-hedges, so their valuations may compress *less* during downturns, not more, making them mediocre crash-buying opportunities relative to beaten-down cyclicals."

This article conflates two separate theses: (1) market crashes are buying opportunities, which is broadly true, and (2) NEE and PG are the right vehicles for that thesis, which is debatable. The author cherry-picks favorable data—NEE's 2.5% yield 'inline with utility average' obscures that utilities typically trade at premium valuations during downturns due to flight-to-safety flows, meaning NEE may not actually cheapen much. PG's 3% yield versus 2.2% sector average sounds attractive until you realize defensive stocks compress valuations *less* in crashes, not more. The real risk: both stocks are already positioned as crash-proof, meaning they're priced for that role. A true crash might reward cyclicals, not these two.

Devil's Advocate

If the next crash is severe enough to break investor confidence in 'safe' dividend stocks—say, a fiscal crisis forcing rate hikes or dividend cuts—NEE and PG could underperform. The article assumes crashes are uniform; they're not.

NEE, PG
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▼ Bearish

"Even high-quality dividend growers can underperform in a market crash if higher rates and policy/tax risks depress valuations and blunt growth, so a crash-buy thesis requires a clear risk-adjusted plan rather than a reflex."

While NEE and PG are quality, the article treats them as automatic crash-buyers rather than conditional bets. A true market pullback tests not just yield but discount rates; rising rates can compress multiple expansions even for defensives, especially if growth assumptions for NextEra's 8-10% earnings or PG's 3% organic growth prove optimistic. NEE's Florida-regulated business is insulated yet vulnerable to rate cases and capital-intensive renewables, and its valuation is sensitive to long-term interest rates and policy shifts. PG's resilience can stall if input costs, freight, or currency headwinds bite, or if inflation cools consumer demand, despite the dividend track record. The piece lacks valuation context relative to peers and sensitivity to rate moves.

Devil's Advocate

But defensive blue chips often weather crashes better than expected, with PG’s pricing power and NEE’s regulated earnings providing visible cash flows. A sharp rate surprise or liquidity crunch could still pressure equities, but resilience argues for overweighting defensives versus more cyclical or growth names.

NEE, PG; utilities and consumer staples sectors
The Debate
G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Gemini Grok ChatGPT

"Regulatory risk in Florida is an overlooked variable that could decouple NEE's earnings from its historical growth trajectory during a market downturn."

Claude is correct that these are priced for safety, but everyone is missing the regulatory risk. NEE isn't just interest-rate sensitive; it is politically sensitive. If a crash triggers populist backlash against utility rate hikes, Florida regulators could cap NEE’s allowed Return on Equity (ROE), crushing their 8-10% EPS growth forecast regardless of interest rates. Buying these as 'safe' ignores that their revenue streams are essentially political contracts, not just market-driven cash flows.

G
Grok ▲ Bullish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"NEE's ROE approvals stay strong amid data center demand outpacing regulatory pushback."

Gemini flags NEE's regulatory risk, but Florida PSC has consistently approved ROE above peers at ~11% (vs 9.5% avg), driven by 15GW+ data center queues in Southeast powering AI boom. Crash might dent residential loads, but hyperscalers' capex surges with cheaper equity, making NEE's growth moat resilient versus pure utilities.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"NEE's data center growth thesis is pro-cyclical, not defensive—it fails precisely when crashes force capex cuts."

Grok's data center thesis is compelling but inverts the crash scenario. If equities crater 25%+, hyperscalers' capex freezes before it accelerates—see 2022-23 tech pullback. NEE's 8-10% growth assumes sustained AI buildout funding, which evaporates in a true liquidity crunch. Florida PSC's 11% ROE approval is backward-looking; regulatory risk compounds during crashes when populist pressure peaks and utilities become political targets. The AI moat is real but cyclical, not crash-proof.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Regulatory risk can meaningfully compress NEE's growth even if rate moves look favorable, challenging the idea that equities in crash scenarios are simply rate-driven beneficiaries."

Gemini raised the ROE/caps on NEE; I’d push back on how stable that hurdle is. Even with 11% ROEs in Florida, a shift to performance-based or cap-cost regulation could compress allowed returns and delay equity-funded renewables, reducing NEE's growth moat. Population and AI demand help, but the regulatory regime adds a non-linear risk knob: if rate relief stalls, debt costs rise faster than earnings, pressuring margins more than headline growth implies.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panel generally agrees that while NEE and PG are quality stocks, they may not be the best choices for a market crash buying opportunity due to their high valuations, interest rate sensitivity, and regulatory risks. The 'buy the dip' strategy might turn into a value trap if risk-free rates structurally shift.

Opportunity

PG's resilience and dividend track record, despite potential headwinds from input costs, freight, or currency.

Risk

Regulatory risk for NEE, specifically populist backlash against utility rate hikes leading to caps on allowed Return on Equity (ROE), crushing their growth forecasts.

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.