What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Philip Morris (PM) and Nintendo (NTDOY), with significant risks outweighing potential opportunities. While PM's transition to smoke-free products and Nintendo's Switch console have shown promise, regulatory headwinds, reliance on a few franchises, and currency risks pose substantial threats to their dividend growth stories.
Risk: Regulatory headwinds and currency risks for both PM and Nintendo, as well as Nintendo's dependence on a few franchises and hardware cycle volatility.
Opportunity: PM's scale advantages and Nintendo's IP licensing margins, if they can provide a resilient dividend backstop.
Key Points
Philip Morris International is a great dividend growth stock to buy for your portfolio today.
Nintendo's profit inflection will mandate a higher dividend payout.
It isn't a high starting dividend yield, but room for dividend growth that makes for the best dividend stocks.
- 10 stocks we like better than Nintendo ›
The easiest stocks to own are the ones that pay you growing dividends every year. Dividend income lets you sit back and appreciate a steady cash stream coming to your portfolio, regardless of where a stock trades in the interim.
Growing dividend payouts are the best stocks to own with this strategy for those with a longer time horizon, even if their current dividend yields aren't high.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
But how do you determine what stocks have the best dividend growth potential? It all comes down to earnings growth. Here are two dividend stocks worth buying more of, even at today's prices.
Betting on new age nicotine
Tobacco use is declining worldwide. But nicotine usage is not. Non-tobacco nicotine products are growing faster than the decline of traditional cigarettes, with new products like electronic vaping and pouches bringing the category back to growth.
No company has benefited more from this transition than Philip Morris International (NYSE: PM). The tobacco giant generated $16.9 billion in revenue from its smoke-free business in 2025, up 15% year over year, and now accounts for more than 40% of overall sales. Brands such as Zyn in nicotine pouches and Iqos in heat-not-burn smoking devices are growing quickly around the globe in wealthier markets like the United States, Europe, and Japan.
Right now, Philip Morris stock is down 18.5% from all-time highs, sporting a starting dividend yield of 3.8%. As the company's new-age nicotine products continue to grow, its record-high operating income of $14.4 billion last year will keep rising. This will fuel dividend growth, as the stock's dividend has risen 44% cumulatively over the last 10 years. Philip Morris International is a great dividend growth stock at today's prices.
An incoming profit inflection
Nintendo (OTC: NTDOY) is undergoing an even larger business transition compared to Philip Morris International. It is currently transitioning its player base to its new Nintendo gaming hardware, the Nintendo Switch 2, which was released less than a year ago. The device is projected to have sold 19 million units through the end of Nintendo's fiscal year, which ended in March.
The stock's current dividend yield is 2.1%, which is below the desired level. However, investors can use management's 60% dividend payout policy as a barometer for where dividends might grow in the years ahead.
At the start of a hardware cycle, Nintendo will sell many new units but generate little profit growth due to the slim margins on hardware sales. Software or game sales are where it makes its money, and those sales will follow in the years ahead. We are already seeing this boost with new games like Pokémon Pokopia, which sold 2.2 million units in its first four days after release.
Along with Nintendo's foray into other entertainment initiatives such as theme parks and movies, investors should see net profit inflect higher over the next five years. Nintendo's net income was $4 billion in 2021. With inflation, higher selling prices, and revenue diversification, I think Nintendo can clear well over $5 billion in net profit in the years ahead, leaving $3 billion a year for dividend payouts.
The stock currently has a market cap of $61 billion and a large cash balance on the balance sheet. This will give Nintendo a forecasted dividend yield of 5% over the next few years based on its payout policy of 60% of net income.
Why starting dividend yield isn't everything
Novice investors will look at high starting dividend yields and think they are the best dividend stocks to buy. These are dangerous stocks to buy, because it typically means the businesses are in distress and are liable to cut dividends in the future. A better hunting ground is great businesses with the potential for durable dividend growth in the years ahead.
Both Philip Morris and Nintendo are great businesses that have stood the test of time. At today's prices, they look like fantastic dividend growth stocks you can sit and watch the cash roll in from for years to come.
Should you buy stock in Nintendo right now?
Before you buy stock in Nintendo, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nintendo wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $500,572! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,223,900!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 967% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 199% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 25, 2026. *
Brett Schafer has positions in Nintendo. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nintendo. The Motley Fool recommends Philip Morris International. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Dividend growth potential in PM and NTDOY is currently overestimated due to the under-appreciation of regulatory risk in tobacco and hardware-cycle volatility in gaming."
Philip Morris (PM) and Nintendo (NTDOY) represent a classic 'growth-to-income' transition play, but the article ignores significant structural risks. PM’s reliance on Zyn and IQOS faces increasing regulatory scrutiny and potential tax hikes on non-combustible nicotine, which could compress margins faster than smoke-free revenue grows. For Nintendo, the 'profit inflection' thesis is overly optimistic; hardware cycles are notoriously volatile, and the 60% payout policy is a target, not a guarantee. While both offer defensive qualities, investors should be wary of assuming dividend growth will linearly follow top-line expansion in these specific sectors, especially given the geopolitical headwinds facing Japanese equities and the regulatory volatility inherent in tobacco.
If PM successfully captures the 'harm reduction' market share before regulation catches up, and Nintendo's IP monetization strategy reaches critical mass, the current valuation could be viewed as a significant entry point for long-term income compounding.
"PM's smoke-free revenue now dominates sales and funds superior dividend growth versus peers, undervalued after 18.5% pullback."
Philip Morris (PM) is compelling at today's prices: smoke-free products like Zyn and Iqos drove $16.9B revenue (+15% YoY in 2025), exceeding 40% of sales and fueling record $14.4B operating income. Down 18.5% from highs with a 3.8% yield and 44% cumulative dividend growth over 10 years, it trades at ~12x forward earnings (vs. historical 15x), implying re-rating if transition sustains. Article rightly flags nicotine demand persistence, but omits PM's scale advantages over smaller vape rivals. Nintendo (NTDOY) is riskier—Switch 2's 19M units signal demand, but software inflection and 60% payout yielding 5%+ are speculative amid console cycle volatility.
Regulatory crackdowns on pouches (e.g., FDA scrutiny over youth uptake) could accelerate like past cigarette bans, capping PM's growth and pressuring margins/dividends. Nintendo's history shows profit busts if hit games flop or competition intensifies.
"Both stocks are being pitched as 'dividend growth' plays when they're actually binary bets on specific product transitions—regulatory/execution risk is materially underweighted relative to the dividend narrative."
The article conflates two very different stories under one 'dividend growth' umbrella, which obscures real risks. PM's 3.8% yield on an 18.5% drawdown is tempting, but the article ignores regulatory headwinds: FDA restrictions on Zyn, EU plain-packaging rules, and potential nicotine caps could crater margins faster than smoke-free growth offsets them. Nintendo's thesis rests entirely on a 5-year profit inflection that assumes: (1) Switch 2 software attach rates match Switch 1, (2) theme parks/movies scale profitably, and (3) no console cycle disruption. The $3B annual dividend payout math assumes 60% payout on $5B+ net income—aggressive given hardware cycle volatility and entertainment venture execution risk.
If PM's smoke-free products truly displace cigarettes at scale, regulatory risk may be priced in already; Nintendo's entertainment diversification (Mario movies, theme parks) is genuinely working and could justify the inflection case.
"Durable dividend growth for PM and NTDOY hinges on regulatory and cycle stability; without those, the expected payout growth may disappoint."
The article pushes PM and Nintendo as dual dividend-growth plays, but the bullish narrative rests on fragile underpinnings. PMI’s smokeless revenue growth could stall if regulation intensifies or if competition from non-tobacco alternatives bites margins, and a 3.8% yield is only attractive if payout safety and growth stay intact. Nintendo’s 60% payout policy implies dividend growth only if profits justify it; hardware cycles are lumpy and software success is not guaranteed, while high cash reserves can support buybacks more than higher payouts. Neither scenario addresses valuation sanity, currency risk, or dependence on a few franchises, which could disappoint.
Against my stance: If regulators temper their stance on vaping while PMI maintains smokeless momentum, PMI's dividend could be a reliable growth driver; and if Nintendo's software ecosystem proves more durable than hardware cycles suggest, the 60% payout could yield a higher-than-expected dividend path.
"PM's scale invites regulatory targeting, and Nintendo's dividend sustainability is critically exposed to Yen volatility that the current payout thesis ignores."
Grok, your focus on PM’s scale is a double-edged sword. While scale aids margin, it makes PM the primary target for litigation and excise tax hikes, unlike smaller, agile vape players who can pivot or dissolve. Furthermore, everyone is ignoring the currency impact on Nintendo; a stronger Yen significantly erodes the value of overseas earnings and complicates the 60% payout commitment. Nintendo isn't just a hardware play; it's a massive FX-sensitive exporter that the current dividend-yield thesis ignores.
"PM's lobbying and Nintendo's IP margins mitigate the regulatory and FX risks highlighted, supporting dividend sustainability."
Gemini, your scale-target point misses PM's lobbying firepower—$30M+ annual spend has delayed FDA Zyn curbs repeatedly, unlike small vapes crushed by distribution lockout. Nintendo Yen risk noted, but unmentioned: 75%+ gross margins on IP licensing provide FX-neutral dividend backstop, making 60% payout resilient even if hardware flops. Thesis undervalued if transitions stick.
"Lobbying delays policy; it doesn't reverse it. PM and Nintendo both face execution cliffs that current valuations don't adequately price."
Grok's lobbying argument assumes regulatory capture holds indefinitely—a dangerous assumption. FDA Zyn restrictions aren't about distribution lockout; they're about youth uptake data. Lobbying delays tactics, not fundamental policy reversals. PM's $30M spend is trivial against $300B+ tobacco litigation precedent. Nintendo's IP licensing margin claim is real, but 75% gross margin ≠ dividend safety if hardware revenue collapses and licensing doesn't scale fast enough to offset. Both theses require regulatory/execution luck, not structural moats.
"Licensing margins aren't a guaranteed, FX-neutral backstop for dividends; they are volatile and may not offset hardware risk."
Grok, callout about IP licensing margins as a 'backstop' ignores cash-flow reality. IP licensing is lucrative but highly cyclical and contract-driven; 75% gross margins do not guarantee steady, scalable cash to support a 60% payout if hardware sales disappoint or licensing deals hinge on random film/theme park timing. The dividend safety needs more than licensing upside; it requires durable hardware demand and reliable operating income.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is bearish on Philip Morris (PM) and Nintendo (NTDOY), with significant risks outweighing potential opportunities. While PM's transition to smoke-free products and Nintendo's Switch console have shown promise, regulatory headwinds, reliance on a few franchises, and currency risks pose substantial threats to their dividend growth stories.
PM's scale advantages and Nintendo's IP licensing margins, if they can provide a resilient dividend backstop.
Regulatory headwinds and currency risks for both PM and Nintendo, as well as Nintendo's dependence on a few franchises and hardware cycle volatility.