By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agree that while AI presents opportunities for both Micron (MU) and Amazon (AMZN), the cyclical nature of the memory market and geopolitical risks pose significant challenges to MU's long-term prospects. They differ on the extent of these risks and the sustainability of AMZN's margins.
Risk: Geopolitical risks, specifically China's potential retaliatory export controls and supply chain squeezes, pose a significant threat to MU's business.
Opportunity: AI integration and growth in cloud services present opportunities for both MU and AMZN.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Micron is posting tremendous sequential revenue growth as its memory storage solutions enable the AI build-out.
Amazon is using AI to create new products and optimize its existing businesses, which has translated into rising sales and profits.
Buying and holding stocks over the long run can turn you into a millionaire. While you have to invest consistently to amass a seven-figure portfolio -- and there are no guarantees in investing -- certain growth stocks can help you earn your second comma faster than the S&P 500.
These "millionaire makers" AI stocks have already helped many investors beat the market, but they still have more room to run. Interested in investing in AI? Here are two stocks to consider buying and holding.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) produces memory chips that go inside AI chips. This memory storage gives AI chips the bandwidth to handle intense workloads and perform at their best, making Micron an essential part of the AI build-out.
The tech company has delivered impressive growth in recent quarters that is pulling away from its five-year revenue compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.8%. Revenue nearly tripled year over year in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, ended Feb. 26, and was up by 75% sequentially. Micron's net profit margin surged to 57.8% in the quarter, showing sustainable revenue growth.
Micron's future heavily depends on AI chips remaining in demand. The company even exited the consumer business to prioritize high-margin hypergrowth AI infrastructure orders. Grandview Research projects a 30.6% CAGR for the AI industry from now until 2033, suggesting that Micron made the right choice.
The AI company's outlook implies $34.25 billion in revenue in the fiscal third quarter at the midpoint, suggesting 43.5% sequential growth. Micron's recent 30% dividend hike was a sign that management believes these tailwinds will last for a long time, much to the benefit of current shareholders.
While Micron offers memory storage solutions that enable the AI boom, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) knows how to harness AI to expand existing businesses and create new ones. Amazon uses artificial intelligence to optimize its online marketplace, cloud platform, advertisements, streaming platform, and other parts of its corporate profile.
The tech giant also enables other companies to use AI to grow their businesses with Amazon Web Services, which is the world's largest cloud platform. Amazon controls more than one-quarter of the growing cloud infrastructure services market.
AWS customers can create AI agents that handle various tasks in areas such as customer support, financial planning, and logistics. This capability is one of the many reasons customers use AWS and are happy to pay for monthly subscription plans. It's easier for organizations to stay put with AWS than switch to another cloud provider, and Amazon continues to offer attractive features.
That's one of the main reasons AWS revenue growth accelerated to 24% year over year in Q4 2025. It marks AWS' fastest revenue growth rate in 13 quarters, but it's not the only part of Amazon's business that is delivering exceptional results. Net sales improved by 14% year over year, with online advertising revenue up by 23% year over year. Online store sales increased by 10% year over year.
Amazon generates billions of dollars in quarterly profits and is sitting on $86.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents. The company's vast capital makes it easier to invest in new AI opportunities while maximizing its existing businesses. Amazon has a long history of rewarding patient shareholders, and AI appears to be the company's newest catalyst.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia:if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009,you’d have $540,224!Apple:*if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008,you’d have $51,615!Netflix:if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004,you’d have $498,522!
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 26, 2026. *
Marc Guberti has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Micron Technology. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Micron’s current profitability is likely a cyclical peak that masks the long-term commodity risks inherent in memory manufacturing."
The article presents a classic 'pick-and-shovel' narrative, but it ignores the extreme cyclicality of Micron (MU). While HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) demand is currently white-hot, memory remains a commodity business prone to brutal supply gluts once capacity catches up. Micron’s 57.8% net margin is likely a cyclical peak, not a structural baseline. Conversely, Amazon (AMZN) is a more durable play; its AI integration isn't just about selling compute, but about margin expansion in retail and logistics. However, betting on 'millionaire-maker' status ignores that AMZN’s massive market cap makes outsized alpha increasingly difficult to achieve compared to smaller, more nimble AI infrastructure players.
If the AI infrastructure build-out follows a multi-year supercycle rather than a traditional semiconductor boom-bust, Micron’s current valuation could be a deep value entry point despite the cyclical history.
"AMZN's AWS acceleration and cash fortress position it to capture enduring AI infrastructure spend, outpacing the S&P over a multi-year hold."
Amazon's AWS growth at 24% YoY in Q4 2025—its fastest in 13 quarters—validates AI tailwinds, with agents boosting stickiness amid high switching costs; broader strength in 23% ad growth and 10% online sales, plus $86.8B cash for capex, supports long-term compounding. Micron's sequential 75% revenue surge and AI pivot are real, but the 57.8% 'net profit margin' claim is almost certainly a mislabeling of gross margin (memory makers rarely sustain >20-30% net), glossing over the sector's brutal cyclicality and potential HBM oversupply as AI data center buildouts mature.
Amazon's massive AI capex could pressure free cash flow if ROI disappoints, while Azure and Google Cloud erode AWS dominance with aggressive AI pricing and features.
"Both stocks are legitimate AI beneficiaries, but the article ignores memory chip cyclicality and the risk that AWS margin expansion stalls once AI infrastructure capex normalizes."
The article conflates two very different AI plays. Micron's 57.8% net margin and 75% sequential growth are real, but memory chip cycles are notoriously volatile—the article doesn't mention that DRAM/NAND pricing is cyclical and already showing early softness in spot markets. Amazon's AWS acceleration to 24% YoY is solid, but it's being driven partly by AI infrastructure capex that may not translate to durable margin expansion if competition (Azure, GCP) intensifies. The 'millionaire maker' framing is marketing noise masking the fact that both stocks are already priced for significant AI upside.
Micron's exit from consumer and pivot to AI infrastructure is irreversible capital allocation, not optionality—if AI capex disappoints in 2027-28, the company has no fallback. Amazon's $86.8B cash hoard looks strong until you realize it's being deployed into AI capex at a scale that may not generate returns above cost of capital for years.
"AI-driven demand for MU's memory and AMZN's AWS is cyclical and data-center capex-sensitive; a slowdown in AI spending could derail earnings and compress valuations despite near-term growth."
While the AI hype fuels optimism for MU and AMZN, the core risk is cyclical. MU's moat is technology-dependent memory pricing; a memory glut or price compression could erode margins just as AI demand cools, and the claim of a 30%+ AI CAGR to 2033 rests on aggressive adoption forecasts. For AMZN, AWS is a cash cow but remains capital-heavy and subject to margin pressure; cloud growth has shown volatility, and regulatory or cost headwinds could bite profitability. A sharp deceleration in data-center capex or a pullback in AI spending could derail earnings and compress multiples. The article treats AI as a one-way driver; reality is choppier.
If AI capex remains resilient and cloud demand accelerates, MU and AMZN's earnings power could surprise and re-rate even if current fears materialize. In a world where AI budgets don’t pull back, memory pricing stabilizes at higher levels and AWS margins expand, the stocks could outperform.
"Micron’s reliance on global supply chains makes it a geopolitical hostage, a risk far more immediate than the cyclical memory glut discussed by other panelists."
Grok and Claude are fixated on margin sustainability, but both miss the geopolitical risk. Micron is uniquely exposed to China’s retaliatory export controls on critical minerals and potential bans on domestic use of their chips. While Amazon operates globally, its AI infrastructure is predominantly US-based. Micron’s 'AI pivot' is a strategic liability if Beijing decides to squeeze supply chains. The cyclicality is secondary; regulatory and trade-war friction is the real, unpriced tail risk for MU.
"US export bans have minimized MU's China risk, shifting focus to differentiated HBM for AI, but Korean competitors pose the bigger supply threat."
Gemini overstates Micron's China exposure—US export controls since 2023 have banned sales of advanced chips there, slashing revenue share to under 10% and redirecting HBM capacity to NVIDIA/AMD for US hyperscalers like AMZN. Unpriced risk: SK Hynix and Samsung's aggressive HBM ramps could flood supply by 2026, compressing MU's pricing power despite current leadership.
"HBM demand elasticity—not just supply competition—will determine whether Micron's current margins survive 2026."
Grok's SK Hynix/Samsung supply risk is concrete, but both miss the demand-side pressure. HBM adoption is still early—most AI clusters still run on standard GDDR6. If hyperscalers find HBM ROI marginal versus cheaper alternatives, capacity additions become stranded assets. Micron's 75% sequential growth assumes sustained HBM attach rates; that's the real cyclical vulnerability, not just supply flooding.
"AI capex slowdown and weaker attach rates could erode MU pricing more than supply glut would bolster it."
Grok’s supply-glut argument misses the bigger risk: demand fragility and HBM pricing still hinges on AI adoption, which could disappoint. Even if SK/Samsung ramp capacity by 2026, MU’s pricing power may erode if hyperscalers pursue more memory-efficient architectures or switch to cheaper alternatives. The real risk is a multi-quarter capex slowdown and lower attach rates, not a simple supply flood becoming a tailwind.
The panelists agree that while AI presents opportunities for both Micron (MU) and Amazon (AMZN), the cyclical nature of the memory market and geopolitical risks pose significant challenges to MU's long-term prospects. They differ on the extent of these risks and the sustainability of AMZN's margins.
AI integration and growth in cloud services present opportunities for both MU and AMZN.
Geopolitical risks, specifically China's potential retaliatory export controls and supply chain squeezes, pose a significant threat to MU's business.