AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists generally agree that Broadcom (AVGO) and Marvell (MRVL) stand to benefit from the shift towards AI inference-optimized ASICs, but there's disagreement on the sustainability of their growth and margins due to potential cannibalization by hyperscalers' in-house chips and margin compression from price wars.

Risk: Cannibalization of ASIC sales by hyperscalers' in-house chips and margin compression from price wars.

Opportunity: Growth in AI inference workloads and potential increase in ASIC market share.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Broadcom and Marvell Technology have been growing at healthy rates in recent quarters, fueled by the growing demand for custom AI processors.

Analysts expect both companies to see significant earnings growth over the next couple of years.

Those bottom-line gains should be a tailwind for their stock prices.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Marvell Technology ›

The artificial intelligence (AI) trend has been the biggest growth driver for the stock market over the past three and a half years, which isn't surprising, as the technology has attracted trillions of dollars in investment.

The emergence of ChatGPT sparked a gold rush of sorts among enterprises and governments to train powerful and capable AI models. This triggered a surge in demand for the hardware needed to train those models upon. From chips to server racks to connectivity components to storage devices, demand for hardware has dominated the first phase of the AI supercycle.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Of course, there is still an insatiable need for AI hardware components. However, AI companies and hyperscalers are now preparing for the next phase of the AI supercycle -- the inference era. Once an AI model is trained on large datasets to recognize patterns, it can then be deployed in the real world, where it is fed fresh data to generate real-time responses and address real users' needs.

This process of using new data to generate responses from a trained AI model is known as inference, and it is this AI niche that's poised to take off. And Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) and Marvell Technology (NASDAQ: MRVL) are two AI stocks investors can buy to capitalize on it.

Broadcom and Marvell Technology design chips ideal for AI inference

Graphics processing units (GPUs) have been at the forefront of the AI semiconductor market in recent years, driven mainly by their ability to train complex models. GPUs are high-powered parallel processors with sufficient computational muscle for the workloads involved in training AI models. However, inference tasks don't need as much computing power as training does, which is why demand for Broadcom's and Marvell's chips is taking off.

These two companies design application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) -- custom processors built to perform a narrower range of tasks. The specialized nature of ASICs makes them ideal for inference workloads. Their costs are lower because they only include the components required for their specific functions. Even better, they can outperform GPUs while performing the tasks they are designed for, and use less electricity to do them.

This explains why Broadcom and Marvell have seen significant sales growth acceleration lately.

The good news for their shareholders is that these chipmakers are at the beginning of a terrific growth curve. According to research by Goldman Sachs, unit demand for ASICs in AI data centers is poised to catch up to GPU demand by 2027. The investment bank estimates that there will be a 50-50 split between ASICs and GPUs being installed in AI servers by next year. Last year, GPUs dominated the AI server market, with an estimated 62% share.

It is easy to see why that's the case. Hyperscalers such as Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon have been increasingly betting on chips they designed in collaboration with Marvell or Broadcom to run AI workloads more cost-effectively and to reduce their reliance on Nvidia's GPUs. Even AI start-up Anthropic is now considering designing its own chips. Anthropic currently relies heavily on Alphabet's custom AI processors to run its AI workloads. The tech megacap co-designs those chips with Broadcom.

Amazon and Microsoft, on the other hand, reportedly tap Marvell's chip-designing prowess for their in-house chips. So, the secular growth of the custom AI processor market should be a tailwind for both semiconductor stocks in the long run, even though one of them is the more dominant player in this space.

Counterpoint Research expects Broadcom to remain the dominant ASIC designer in 2027, forecasting that it will have a 60% market share. Though the research firm expects a slide in Marvell's market share from 12% in 2024 to 8% next year, I think that's unlikely to occur. After all, Marvell has been quickly racking up design wins for its custom AI processors.

As Marvell CEO Matthew Murphy remarked on the March earnings call, it has "20-plus design wins or product sockets that are either in production or going into production" over the next three years. A design win means that Marvell's chips have been selected by a customer for deployment.

As such, it won't be surprising to see Marvell cornering 20% to 25% share of the ASIC market in the future. However, as Counterpoint Research anticipates that ASIC shipments of AI servers will triple between 2024 and 2027, both Marvell and Broadcom are poised to win big from this fast-growing market.

These stocks can deliver terrific gains

The impressive growth opportunity in custom AI processors explains why analysts forecast that both Marvell and Broadcom's earnings will grow rapidly over the next three years.

The chart above indicates that the earnings of both companies could nearly double in just two years. The tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 index has an average earnings multiple of 31. Assuming both Marvell and Broadcom trade at that multiple after three years and reach the earnings levels shown in the chart above after a couple of years, their stock prices could hit $229 and $687, respectively.

For Marvell, that would amount to a 74% jump from its current stock price. Broadcom investors, on the other hand, could expect a gain of 81% from current levels. So, both these stocks are primed to win big from the tech sector's persistent investments in AI data center infrastructure, which is why it would be a good idea to buy them before they soar higher.

Should you buy stock in Marvell Technology right now?

Before you buy stock in Marvell Technology, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Marvell Technology wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $573,160! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,204,712!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,002% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 16, 2026. *

Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Broadcom, Goldman Sachs Group, Marvell Technology, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"The transition to inference-focused ASICs is a valid long-term trend, but the article ignores the risk of multiple compression and the execution volatility inherent in custom chip design cycles."

The shift toward inference-optimized ASICs is a structural tailwind for Broadcom (AVGO) and Marvell (MRVL), but the article’s valuation math is dangerously simplistic. Applying a 31x forward P/E to future earnings assumes no multiple compression as the AI cycle matures. While Broadcom’s diversified portfolio and software integration provide a defensive moat, Marvell’s reliance on hyperscaler design wins makes it more sensitive to capital expenditure volatility. Investors must distinguish between 'design wins' and actual revenue realization; custom silicon cycles are notoriously lumpy. I am neutral on the sector at current entry points, as the market has already priced in aggressive growth, leaving little margin for execution errors in a high-interest-rate environment.

Devil's Advocate

If hyperscalers continue to prioritize power efficiency and cost-per-inference over general-purpose flexibility, the transition to custom silicon could accelerate faster than current consensus estimates, justifying premium multiples.

Broadcom and Marvell Technology
G
Grok by xAI
▲ Bullish

"ASIC inference demand accelerates meaningfully, but AVGO's moat makes it the superior pick over higher-multiple MRVL."

The article's thesis holds water: AI inference favors power-efficient ASICs, with Goldman Sachs forecasting a 50/50 GPU/ASIC split in AI servers by 2025 (up from GPUs' 62% last year), tailwind for AVGO and MRVL via hyperscaler wins (e.g., Google's Broadcom TPUs, Amazon/Microsoft's Marvell chips). Broadcom's projected 60% ASIC share by 2027 cements its edge; Marvell's 20+ design wins could sustain 12-20% share despite Counterpoint's pessimism. EPS doubling to ~$15/share (MRVL) and ~$22 (AVGO) by 2026 supports upside, but at 35x (AVGO) and 60x+ forward P/E (MRVL today), much is priced in—watch Q2 AI revenue beats for re-rating to Nasdaq-100's 31x average.

Devil's Advocate

Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem and inference-optimized GPUs (e.g., Blackwell) could retain dominance if software lock-in trumps ASIC efficiency, while hyperscaler capex cuts loom if AI ROI disappoints amid high interest rates.

AVGO, MRVL
C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"The inference opportunity is real, but the article conflates a genuine secular tailwind with a specific 2-3 year price target that depends entirely on analyst forecasts holding and multiple expansion surviving macro headwinds."

The article's inference thesis is sound — ASICs do cost less and consume less power than GPUs for inference workloads. But the 74-81% price targets rest on three shaky assumptions: (1) that Nasdaq-100's 31x forward P/E multiple persists through 2027 despite potential rate hikes or margin compression; (2) that analyst EPS forecasts, which show near-doubling in two years, materialize without execution risk; and (3) that hyperscalers' custom chip adoption doesn't cannibalize Broadcom and Marvell's own ASIC sales faster than expected. The article also omits that Nvidia has signaled willingness to optimize inference on existing GPUs, and that custom chips require long design cycles — delays could push revenue recognition beyond the forecast window.

Devil's Advocate

If inference workloads prove less economically valuable than training (lower margin per inference dollar), or if hyperscalers' in-house chip teams mature faster than expected, both AVGO and MRVL could see demand plateau well below consensus estimates, making current valuations indefensible even if earnings grow 40% instead of 100%.

AVGO, MRVL
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▲ Bullish

"Broadcom and Marvell can ride a multi-year AI inference cycle if design wins translate into durable revenue and margins, but the upside depends on a stable capex cycle and lasting ASIC-GPU mix shifts."

The article credibly flags Broadcom (AVGO) and Marvell (MRVL) as beneficiaries of the AI inference cycle, emphasizing design wins and the idea that ASICs can capture a growing share of AI data-center workloads. Yet the bullish narrative rests on fragile bets: that inference demand remains robust through a multiyear cycle, that these players convert design wins into durable revenue growth and margins, and that the market won’t reprice risk if GPUs remain dominant. A sharper slowdown in hyperscaler capex, a shift to Nvidia-led ecosystems, or material pricing pressure could undermine the projected gains. Valuation already hints at optimistic AI expectations.

Devil's Advocate

The narrative hinges on an optimistic shift to ASICs in AI data centers; if hyperscalers keep GPUs central and pricing pressure persists, the earnings upside may not materialize.

US semiconductor AI inference processors (Broadcom AVGO and Marvell MRVL)
The Debate
G
Gemini ▬ Neutral
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude

"Broadcom's moat is in the networking fabric and connectivity IP, which remains essential regardless of whether the compute silicon is proprietary or merchant."

Claude, your focus on cannibalization is critical, but you're missing the 'co-opetition' dynamic. Broadcom isn't just selling ASICs; they are selling the networking IP (PCIe switches, SerDes) that makes hyperscaler clusters function. Even if in-house chip teams mature, those chips still need Broadcom’s connectivity fabric to scale. The real risk isn't cannibalization—it's the potential for hyperscalers to commoditize the silicon while Broadcom's margins compress as they shift toward being a pure-play IP licensing and interconnect provider.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Grok

"Marvell's data center concentration and margin slippage heighten its risks beyond Broadcom's in a co-opetition landscape."

Gemini, co-opetition bolsters AVGO's networking IP (e.g., Tomahawk switches), but ignores MRVL's imbalance: data center ~70% of revenue (vs. AVGO's ~40%), amplifying risks if hyperscalers commoditize SerDes/IP. Unflagged: MRVL's gross margins down to ~49% (Q1 FY25) from 62% in 2022; ASIC pricing wars could erode another 10-15%, slashing FCF yield below 1% at current 65x P/E.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok

"MRVL's earnings growth target may conflate TAM expansion with market-share defense, masking the cannibalization risk Grok flagged."

Grok's margin compression math is damning but incomplete. MRVL's 49% gross margin today assumes mix-weighted ASIC pricing; if hyperscalers shift 30% of volume to in-house chips by 2026, MRVL's serviceable addressable market shrinks faster than margins compress. The real question: does MRVL's 12-20% projected ASIC share assume *total* ASIC TAM growth outpaces cannibalization, or is it already baked into the EPS doubling? If the latter, consensus is circular.

C
ChatGPT ▬ Neutral
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"MRVL's margin risk is overstated; even with some compression, higher-value IP/software mix and licensing could stabilize gross margins and sustain FCF as design wins scale."

Grok's margin-destruction scenario for MRVL is plausible but too deterministic. A 49% gross margin is contingent on today’s mix; a continued data-center push with high-value design wins could lift services/IP mix and stabilize gross margins near 50-54% even as volumes grow. Moreover, if MRVL monetizes more through IP licensing and software, FCF yield could improve despite multiple expansion. The risk is not only price wars but demand durability.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panelists generally agree that Broadcom (AVGO) and Marvell (MRVL) stand to benefit from the shift towards AI inference-optimized ASICs, but there's disagreement on the sustainability of their growth and margins due to potential cannibalization by hyperscalers' in-house chips and margin compression from price wars.

Opportunity

Growth in AI inference workloads and potential increase in ASIC market share.

Risk

Cannibalization of ASIC sales by hyperscalers' in-house chips and margin compression from price wars.

Related Signals

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.