3 Dividend Stocks Built to Last a Lifetime and Pay You the Whole Way

Nasdaq 25 Apr 2026 10:23 ▬ Mixed Original ↗

Dividend Kings top buys KO CL PEP

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

While 'Dividend Kings' like KO, CL, and PEP offer defensive stability and reliable income, their low-single-digit organic growth and high forward P/E ratios make them expensive. The existential threat of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs and escalating sugar taxes pose significant risks to their long-term pricing power and dividend sustainability.

Risk: Erosion of pricing power due to GLP-1 drugs and sugar taxes, potentially leading to dividend cuts if organic growth stalls.

Opportunity: Reliable income amid inflation, with forward yields of 2.52-3.6%

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Coca-Cola combines an iconic global brand with pricing power and a 64-year dividend-growth streak that’s hard to match.

Colgate-Palmolive sells must-have everyday essentials with massive global penetration and decades of reliable dividend growth.

PepsiCo pairs a dominant snacks business with beverage scale, supporting a higher yield and dividend increases.

10 stocks we like better than Coca-Cola ›

Investing in consumer staples with dependable demand can be a smart way to boost dividend income. Many of the iconic brands you see in the grocery store have been paying shareholders a growing stream of dividends for decades.

If you want more income, Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL), and PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) have the brand recognition and global scale to keep paying you for years to come.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

1. Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola is an iconic brand that has been around for over a century, and it has one of the best dividend records you'll find. The company is a Dividend King, a title reserved for companies that have increased their annual dividend for at least 50 consecutive years. In Coca-Cola's case, the company has increased its dividend for 64 consecutive years, one of the longest streaks in the market. Its 2.78% forward yield and steady growth make it a top candidate for an income investment that could pay you for a lifetime.

Longtime company veteran Henrique Braun is taking over as CEO. Management plans to continue balancing volume growth with smart pricing, while using artificial intelligence (AI) to run the business more efficiently and to sharpen its consumer targeting worldwide.

Coca-Cola can point to just one down year in sales volume in the last 50 years (2020). That kind of consistency gives it room to invest, including its largest marketing campaign ever for the FIFA World Cup, and AI to analyze data and drive more customer engagement in local markets internationally.

Analysts expect earnings to grow about 7% annually, supporting continued dividend increases. Coca-Cola has grown its dividend per share at a 5% annualized rate over the past three years, bringing the quarterly payment to $0.53 (about $2.12 annually) with a sustainable payout ratio of 67%. It's a standout consumer staple for building passive income.

2. Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive is another strong dividend stock because it sells products people buy year round. Colgate toothpaste is the top brand globally, and the company's portfolio spans personal care, oral care, and pet nutrition. Its strong brand portfolio has supported a 63-year streak of dividend growth. Like Coca-Cola, Colgate is a Dividend King.

Colgate has grown its dividend per share by about 3.5% annually over the past three years. It recently announced another 1.9% increase, bringing the quarterly payment to $0.53 and the forward yield to 2.52%.

Even with inflation, tariffs, and cautious consumers, results were solid in 2025. Full-year organic sales grew 1.4%, and adjusted earnings rose 3%. Colgate generated $4.2 billion in cash from operations and returned $2.9 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.

CEO Noel Wallace cited "improved momentum" to end the year, with sales growth across all categories in the fourth quarter. With leading brands in essential categories and innovation across price points, Colgate looks like a reliable lifetime dividend holding.

3. PepsiCo

PepsiCo owns far more than its namesake soda, with powerhouse brands like Quaker, Lay's, Gatorade, and Mountain Dew. That diversity supports the steady revenue and earnings needed for long-term dividend income. PepsiCo has increased its dividend for 54 straight years and offers a 3.6% forward yield.

Pepsi's North American food business has faced a challenging operating environment, as inflation has hurt consumer spending. The recent results demonstrate the business's resiliency. Management credited innovation and value initiatives for driving 2% volume growth in the recent quarter. Organic revenue rose 2.6% year over year, while adjusted earnings increased 5% -- solid gains for a tough environment.

PepsiCo also saw improving momentum internationally. This sets up an additional tailwind once the North American food business picks up. A key advantage is that its brands usually command top-shelf space in retail stores, making it easier to market them and drive consistent growth that fuels dividend increases.

The current dividend is $5.69 annually ($1.4225 quarterly), representing roughly 66% of expected earnings this year. PepsiCo has grown its dividend by about 7.5% annually over the past three years. With top brands, global reach, and strong retail visibility, it can be a solid long-term investment.

Should you buy stock in Coca-Cola right now?

Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $500,572! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,223,900!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 967% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 199% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 25, 2026. *

John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Colgate-Palmolive. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Gemini by Google

▼ Bearish

"The valuation premium on these consumer staples is currently unjustified given the long-term volume risks posed by shifting consumer health trends and GLP-1 adoption."

While these 'Dividend Kings' offer defensive stability, investors are conflating 'safety' with 'total return' potential. KO, CL, and PEP are effectively bond proxies in the current rate environment. With forward P/E ratios hovering in the 22x-25x range, you are paying a significant premium for low-single-digit organic growth. The article ignores the existential threat of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, which directly target the core consumption volumes of sugary beverages and processed snacks. Unless these companies successfully pivot their product mix toward healthier alternatives, their long-term pricing power will erode as volume growth stalls, making these dividend payouts increasingly expensive to maintain relative to declining cash flow generation.

Devil's Advocate

The 'bond proxy' critique ignores the massive moat these companies possess through global distribution networks that no startup can replicate, allowing them to pass inflation costs to consumers indefinitely.

KO, CL, PEP

Grok by xAI

▬ Neutral

"Impressive dividend streaks ensure income reliability, but slow growth and health trend headwinds cap total returns versus higher-yield or growth alternatives."

KO, CL, and PEP boast Dividend King status with 54-64 year streaks, sustainable 66-67% payout ratios, and forward yields of 2.52-3.6%, making them reliable for income amid inflation. However, the article downplays tepid growth—KO's 7% EPS forecast, CL's 1.4% organic sales, PEP's 2.6% revenue—versus premium valuations (KO ~25x forward P/E historically) and unmentioned risks like GLP-1 drugs curbing soda/snack volumes long-term. Motley Fool's own top-10 list excludes KO, signaling better opportunities elsewhere for total returns.

Devil's Advocate

In a recession, these defensive staples with entrenched brands and pricing power could outperform cyclicals, delivering steady dividends that compound superior to volatile growth stocks.

KO, CL, PEP

Claude by Anthropic

▬ Neutral

"These three are reliable income vehicles, not growth engines—suitable for retirees seeking cash flow, not for investors seeking wealth accumulation over 20+ years."

This article conflates dividend reliability with total return potential—a critical distinction. Yes, KO, CL, and PEP have fortress balance sheets and pricing power. But the article's 2.5–3.6% yields imply low capital appreciation expectations. At current valuations, you're largely buying the dividend, not the growth. The 7% EPS growth cited for KO is solid, but it's already priced in at ~27x forward P/E. Colgate's 1.4% organic growth is anemic. PepsiCo's North American food business faces structural headwinds (consumer spending pressure, private label competition). The article ignores that 'lifetime' dividend payers can underperform for decades—see utilities post-2010. These are sleep-well-at-night stocks, not wealth builders.

Devil's Advocate

Dividend aristocrats have historically outperformed on a total-return basis precisely because reinvestment compounds through recessions, and pricing power is genuinely durable in consumer staples. The article's omission of total return data doesn't invalidate the thesis.

KO, CL, PEP

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▬ Neutral

"Long-term dividend growth for KO/CL/PEP hinges on continued earnings momentum; without that, the 'lifetime' narrative and high single-digit total returns are at risk."

The article sells KO, CL, and PEP as durable, lifetime-dividend bets, but it glosses over material risks. Even with iconic brands, consumer staples face slower demand in mature markets, currency volatility, and higher input costs (commodities, packaging). Forward yields of 2.5–3.6% aren’t generous versus a rising-rate backdrop, and payout ratios around 60–70% leave little room for error if earnings growth stalls. In a recession or inflation stress scenario, price/tactics power can weaken, volumes can drop, and dividend growth may decelerate. The AI angle reads as marketing hype rather than a driver of long-run cash flow. Longevity depends on ongoing earnings growth, not an eternal tailwind.

Devil's Advocate

These names have decades of dividend raises, but a sustained macro slowdown could compress earnings and cap future increases; in a high-rate environment, the relative allure versus bonds could fade, making the 'lifetime' claim dubious.

KO, CL, PEP (consumer staples dividend-growth stocks)

The Debate

Gemini ▬ Neutral

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

"Comparing consumer staples to utilities ignores the fundamental difference in capital intensity and pricing power."

Claude, your comparison to utilities is flawed. Utilities are capital-intensive, regulated, and historically sensitive to interest rate fluctuations that compress their net margins. Conversely, KO and PEP operate as global marketing machines with high-margin, asset-light distribution models. The real risk isn't the 'utility trap'—it's the potential for these firms to over-leverage their balance sheets to fund share buybacks, artificially propping up EPS while organic volume growth remains flat. That is where the dividend safety actually breaks.

Grok ▼ Bearish

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

"Buyback leverage risk is minimal; global sugar taxes pose a stealthier volume threat to pricing power."

Gemini, your buyback-overleveraging fear ignores KO's pristine balance sheet: net debt/EBITDA at 1.9x, FCF of $10.5B covering dividends ($8B) plus $3B repurchases with 20% cushion. Real unaddressed risk? Escalating sugar taxes in 50+ countries (e.g., Mexico's 10% soda tax slashed KO volumes 10% post-2014), eroding pricing power faster than GLP-1 alone, with no quick pivot.

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"Tax-driven volume loss is recoverable via pricing; GLP-1-driven category substitution is not, and this distinction matters for long-term payout sustainability."

Grok's sugar-tax precedent is sharper than GLP-1 speculation. Mexico's 10% volume drop is *observed*, not modeled. But Grok conflates two different margin pressures: taxes erode volume (unit economics), while GLP-1 erodes *demand itself* (category shift). KO survived taxes by raising prices; it can't price its way out of consumers switching to zero-calorie alternatives. The buyback concern Gemini raised deserves scrutiny—if organic growth truly stalls, maintaining 60%+ payouts on flat cash flow forces either debt or buyback cuts, both dividend-negative.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"Payout sustainability is the real risk to these stocks if organic growth stalls, not sugar-tax shocks alone."

Grok highlights sugar taxes as a growth dampener, but the evidence base is weaker than it looks. KO's footprint and reformulation capability blunt solo tax shocks; price hikes and mix shifts can offset volume losses, and GLP-1 risk is distant and uneven across markets. The principal threat is cash-flow stability: if organic growth stalls, 60–70% payout ratios becoming unsustainable could force buyback cuts or leverage, puncturing total return.