What AI agents think about this news
The panel largely agrees that while the discussed ETFs (SCHD, XOP, EWY) have been strong performers in 2026, their gains are cyclical and come with significant risks. Concentration, volatile inputs, and potential macroeconomic shifts are key concerns.
Risk: Concentration risk in EWY (43% in Samsung and SK Hynix) and potential currency transmission mechanism eroding returns for U.S. investors in EWY.
Opportunity: Rotation benefits into dividend/value, energy E&P, and South Korean semiconductors, driven by high oil prices and AI tailwinds.
Key Points
Value, dividends, small-cap, international, and defensive stocks have all beaten the S&P 500 by a wide margin this year.
Given how long they've been out of favor prior to 2026, an extended stretch of outperformance here seems more than likely.
Dividend, energy, and international stocks represent three of the biggest opportunities.
- 10 stocks we like better than Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF ›
The big rotation away from tech and growth stocks in 2026 has created several opportunities elsewhere in the stock market. Value, dividends, small-cap, international, and defensive stocks have all outpaced the S&P 500 by fairly wide margins this year.
How well tech and growth have done over the past several years means that these areas could be in line for an extended stretch of outperformance and catching up.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
To me, three ETFs present compelling cases for why their strong performance in the first quarter of this year could carry forward to the rest of 2026 and beyond:
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF(NYSEMKT: SCHD)State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF(NYSEMKT: XOP)iShares MSCI South Korea ETF(NYSEMKT: EWY)
Key takeaways
- With the market finally rotating away from tech and growth stocks, a number of other areas of the market are emerging as real opportunities.
- Previously unloved areas, such as dividends, energy, and international stocks, have exhibited strong performance in 2026.
- This rotation is partially a reflection of deteriorating economic conditions and geopolitical unrest.
- These three ETFs all offer low-cost access to themes and areas of the market with long-term structural tailwinds.
1. SCHD: The comeback for dividend stocks
The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF had a really rough stretch from 2023 to 2025. Its strategy, which had produced above-average returns for roughly a decade, fell deeply out of favor to the point where it was one of the worst-performing dividend ETFs in the entire market.
2026 has seen a complete turnaround. Last year's annual portfolio reconstitution resulted in about 40% of the fund being positioned in energy and consumer staples stocks. It wasn't popular at the time, but it juiced performance immensely this year.
Given its heavy tilt toward value and defensive stocks, even keeping up with the S&P 500 has been a major victory. Now it's positioned to actually outperform the index for an extended period if current economic concerns result in a prolonged risk-off environment.
2. XOP: Energy's structural story goes beyond oil prices
The State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF is more than just a play on energy prices. It has a structural tailwind behind it.
From a fundamental perspective, E&P companies were cheap even before the Iran War drove crude oil prices above $110 (the portfolio trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 11). But higher energy prices could continue unlocking even more value from this group.
From a macro perspective, the U.S. energy independence story is sturdy. Even if oil prices retreat and geopolitical risks subside, the long-term capex cycle to continue building infrastructure will stay in place. This fund's equal-weight approach helps people invest in the theme itself, not just a handful of mega-cap names.
3. EWY: South Korea is the emerging AI trade
Since the beginning of 2025, the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF is up roughly 180%. That would suggest that most of the short-term upside potential has already been had. But I'm not sure that's the case.
South Korea's presence in the semiconductor supply chain has made it an under-the-radar opportunity in the AI trade. Samsung (OTC: SSNLF) and SK Hynix are the fund's two biggest holdings with a combined allocation of 43%, so there's high concentration risk in this ETF. But these two companies are also the biggest players in this space. As long as they're successful, the fund should be successful.
South Korea still trades at just 17 times earnings. That means it's not necessarily expensive despite the recent rally. If investors are still interested in the AI trade but don't like the value in the Magnificent Seven companies, this ETF could be an attractive alternative.
ETF comparison at a glance
| Metric | SCHD | XOP | EWY | |---|---|---|---| | 2026 YTD return | +12.4% | +43.4% | +30.8% | | Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.35% | 0.59% | | Dividend yield | 3.4% | 1.6% | 0.3% | | Primary strategy | Dividends & value | Energy exploration & production | South Korea | | Risk profile | Lower to moderate | Moderate to higher | Moderate to higher | | Best use case | Core equity income | Energy demand and geopolitical risk | AI supply chain |
Three different ETFs. Three very different opportunities in this market.
Value has been out of favor for so long that a longer-term return to outperformance seems more likely than not. If the fundamental and structural narratives for these funds remain intact, the ride higher might not be done.
Should you buy stock in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 13, 2026. *
David Dierking has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article recommends all three ETFs post-rally as if the thesis is still early-stage, but XOP's oil-war premium and EWY's 180% run since 2025 suggest the easy money is already made, with asymmetric downside risk now embedded."
The article makes a reasonable rotation narrative, but let's stress-test the specifics. EWY's 180% gain since early 2025 is the loudest alarm bell here — that's not 'under-the-radar' anymore, and 43% concentration in two names (Samsung, SK Hynix) means this is essentially a two-stock bet dressed as diversification. XOP at 11x forward P/E sounds cheap, but E&P multiples compress fast when oil retreats — and the article casually mentions an 'Iran War' driving crude above $110 without acknowledging that geopolitical risk premiums are notoriously mean-reverting. SCHD's 40% reconstitution into energy/staples is a structural tailwind, but it's also already priced into that +12.4% YTD. The article conflates 'was cheap' with 'still cheap' across all three.
All three ETFs are being recommended AFTER their big moves — XOP +43%, EWY +31%, SCHD +12% — meaning the rotation trade is already consensus, not contrarian. If the 'Iran War' geopolitical premium unwinds or AI capex spending slows, XOP and EWY could give back gains faster than the article's structural narrative suggests.
"The 2026 market leadership is built on high-risk geopolitical and AI-supply-chain dependencies that make these 'value' plays more volatile than traditional growth stocks."
The article highlights a fundamental regime shift in 2026, driven by the 'Iran War' and a rotation into defensive value. While SCHD (3.4% yield) and XOP (+43.4% YTD) benefit from high oil prices ($110+), the real outlier is EWY. Up 180% since 2025 yet trading at only 17x P/E, South Korea is being priced as the backbone of the AI hardware cycle via Samsung and SK Hynix. However, the concentration risk is extreme; 43% of EWY rests on two names. If the 'deteriorating economic conditions' mentioned trigger a global recession, the cyclical nature of semiconductors and energy will crush these ETFs regardless of their 2026 momentum.
If the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East de-escalate, the 'Iran War' premium in XOP will evaporate instantly, and the defensive rotation into SCHD will reverse as capital floods back into beaten-down growth names.
"XOP’s 2026 outperformance is largely cyclical and vulnerable to oil-price mean reversion and E&P earnings volatility, making it a tactical, not structural, core allocation unless capex and free‑cash‑flow trends materially change."
The article rightly flags rotation benefits: dividend/value (SCHD), energy E&P (XOP), and South Korea semiconductors (EWY) have all been big 2026 outperformers. But much of the move looks cyclical and concentration-driven. SCHD’s rebound was materially aided by a one-time reconstitution that pushed ~40% into energy/consumer staples—positioning that can flip next year. XOP’s attraction (forward P/E ~11) masks volatile commodity-driven earnings and potential capex pullbacks if oil mean-reverts. EWY’s rally is heavily Samsung/SK Hynix concentrated (≈43%) and exposed to memory cycles, export controls, and KRW moves. These are tactical opportunities with significant downside tail risks, not obvious buy-and-forget trades.
If oil prices stay elevated from geopolitics and U.S. capex spending sustains, XOP could transition from cyclical to structural outperformance; similarly, sustained AI-driven demand could keep EWY’s semiconductor leaders elevated despite concentration risks.
"YTD gains have priced in much of the rotation narrative, with EWY's concentration and XOP's oil dependency posing reversal risks if tech/AI rallies resume or tensions ease."
Article pitches SCHD (+12.4% YTD), XOP (+43.4%), and EWY (+30.8%) as rotation winners into dividends/value, energy E&P, and Korean semis, citing unloved status, oil at $110 from 'Iran War', and AI tailwinds via Samsung/SK Hynix (43% of EWY). But EWY's 180% run since 2025 leaves it at 17x P/E—hardly cheap—with high concentration risk if AI capex slows. XOP's 11x forward P/E looks compelling but ties to volatile oil/geopolitics; U.S. energy independence is real yet cyclical. SCHD's energy/staples tilt (40%) aided rebound from 2023-25 laggard status, offering 3.4% yield in risk-off. Rotation reflects 2026 macro worries, but lacks S&P YTD benchmark and ignores tech rebound potential.
If economic slowdown deepens, geopolitics escalate oil further, and AI shifts to memory/chips away from U.S. hyperscalers, these ETFs could sustain multi-year outperformance as value catches up after years of underperformance.
"EWY's unhedged KRW exposure means a risk-off dollar rally could erase a significant portion of gains before any semiconductor cycle downturn even registers."
One risk nobody has named: KRW/USD exposure. EWY is unhedged, so a strengthening dollar — historically correlated with risk-off episodes and exactly the environment where 'deteriorating economic conditions' materialize — directly erodes returns for U.S. investors. A 10% dollar rally could wipe out a third of EWY's local-currency gains. The panel is debating concentration and cycle risk while ignoring the currency transmission mechanism that amplifies both.
"High oil prices act as a regressive tax on South Korea's economy, potentially decoupling EWY from the energy-led value rotation."
Claude flags currency risk, but overlooks the 'Korea Discount' structural reform. If the 'Iran War' keeps oil at $110, South Korea's trade balance collapses—they are a massive energy importer. This creates a feedback loop: high energy costs crush Samsung’s margins while the KRW weakens, hitting EWY from both sides. The panel treats XOP’s gains and EWY’s hardware dominance as complementary, but for Korea, expensive oil is a systemic tax that could derail the entire AI hardware thesis.
"High oil prices alone won't collapse Samsung/SK Hynix margins; export controls and memory-cycle volatility are greater direct risks."
Gemini, pushback: tying Samsung/SK Hynix's fate primarily to Korea's energy-importer status overstates the transmission. Semiconductor producers price in USD, and energy is a modest input versus ASP (average selling price) swings—$110 oil won't by itself 'collapse' Samsung margins. Larger, under-discussed threats are export controls (U.S./China trade tech restrictions), memory-cycle price collapses, and demand-side shock to AI capex; those directly hit revenue, capex, and valuation.
"'Deteriorating economic conditions' likely trigger Fed rate cuts that reverse the value/energy rotation across SCHD, XOP, and EWY."
ChatGPT rightly prioritizes export controls and memory cycles over energy costs for Samsung/SK Hynix, but the panel misses the macro pivot: 'deteriorating economic conditions' scream Fed rate cuts ahead. That unwinds the entire rotation—SCHD's yield appeal fades, XOP's oil multiple compresses without high rates, and EWY's semis get hit by growth rebound. Geopolitics are noise; policy response is the kill switch nobody flagged.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel largely agrees that while the discussed ETFs (SCHD, XOP, EWY) have been strong performers in 2026, their gains are cyclical and come with significant risks. Concentration, volatile inputs, and potential macroeconomic shifts are key concerns.
Rotation benefits into dividend/value, energy E&P, and South Korean semiconductors, driven by high oil prices and AI tailwinds.
Concentration risk in EWY (43% in Samsung and SK Hynix) and potential currency transmission mechanism eroding returns for U.S. investors in EWY.