What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that while the discussed companies have strong historical performance and 'moats', their current valuations and risks make them less attractive for future wealth building. Key concerns include Berkshire Hathaway's cash pile drag on ROE, American Express' margin compression risk, and Progressive's vulnerability to rising climate-related losses and telematics commoditization.
Risk: Telematics commoditization at Progressive, which could significantly impact its underwriting edge and valuation.
Opportunity: American Express' relative durability in the face of regulatory compression due to its affluent, high-FICO base.
Key Points
Berkshire Hathaway is a huge conglomerate that generates significant cash flow.
American Express operates a closed-loop payment network and attracts high-income consumers with its branding.
Progressive is a leading auto insurer with a proven track record of stellar underwriting and long-term returns for investors.
- 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway ›
Financial companies are the backbone of the global economy, including everything from lending to insurance to commerce. As the economy grows, these businesses grow alongside it, making them compelling investments for those looking to build wealth.
Financial stocks like Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRKA)(NYSE: BRKB), American Express (NYSE: AXP), and Progressive (NYSE: PGR) have made investors rich during the past several decades.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Although they may not be the flashiest names, these companies hold strong competitive advantages and boast proven track records, making them valuable investments for a diversified portfolio. Here's why these three stocks can continue to deliver for long-term investors.
1. Berkshire Hathaway is a cash-generating machine
Berkshire Hathaway is a sprawling conglomerate with businesses spanning finance, transportation, materials, consumer goods, and energy, among others. At the heart of Berkshire's business is its enormous insurance operations, which include GEICO, Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance, and Allegheny. These businesses help generate steady cash flow for the conglomerate, which is a major reason its cash pile continues to grow.
Last year, Berkshire earned $19.8 billion from its insurance operations, accounting for nearly 30% of the company's total profit. What makes Berkshire particularly compelling is its huge cash stockpile, which was more than $373 billion at the end of last year.
This huge stockpile gives Berkshire the flexibility to add to its public stock portfolio, make acquisitions, and use it to buy back its own shares. In January, Berkshire spent $9.7 billion to acquire OxyChem from Occidental Petroleum.
Berkshire Hathaway is entering a new era under Chief Executive Officer Greg Abel, and it will be interesting to see how things unfold. But the business continues to fire on all cylinders and is sitting on a gigantic pile of cash to put to work, which is why I think it remains an excellent financial stock for investors seeking diversification.
2. American Express's brand is a competitive advantage
American Express is one of the top credit card companies in the U.S. today. Although it competes with Visa and Mastercard for a share of the card market, unlike its rivals, American Express operates a closed-loop payment network. That means it's not only processing payments and earning fees, but also holding the credit card loans it extends and collecting interest on them, providing it with upside from elevated interest rates.
Its biggest strength and competitive advantage is its brand prestige. The company has spent decades building an image associated with luxury and the finer things in life, and as a result, it attracts a higher-income, higher-spending consumer. Its user base provides it with stability, as these customers can better navigate more difficult economic environments, such as recessions or inflation.
In mid-April, American Express said it would acquire Hypercard, a specialist in "agentic expense management," as the company looks to stay ahead of the curve and utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to automate complex commercial expense workflows.
The company continues to expand and has successfully pivoted to reach younger demographics, with more than 65% of new card customers coming from millennials or Gen Z. For investors seeking exposure to the growing spending trends in the economy, American Express is an excellent choice.
3. Progressive is a powerhouse in the insurance industry
Progressive is one of the largest automotive insurers in the U.S., and during the past three decades, the stock's average annual return has been just under 17%. These stellar returns are a result of the company's underwriting ability, where it has shown it can price risk more accurately than competitors.
Progressive has consistently generated a profit on the policies it underwrites. One vital metric that tracks this is the combined ratio, which is the ratio of losses and expenses to premiums collected. A ratio of less than 100% indicates a company is profitable, with a lower ratio indicating higher underwriting profits. During the past 20 years, Progressive's combined ratio has averaged 92%, well below the industry average of 99%.
Another benefit to Progressive investors is that they share in the profits when the company has a stellar operating year. For example, last year the company reported net income of $11.3 billion and it paid a special dividend of $13.50 per share, representing a 6.3% yield as of the early January record date.
For investors seeking stability and long-term growth, with occasional dividend upside potential, Progressive is another top financial stock to buy today.
Should you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway right now?
Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $524,786! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,236,406!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 199% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 21, 2026. *
American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Courtney Carlsen has positions in American Express, Berkshire Hathaway, Occidental Petroleum, and Progressive. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, Mastercard, Progressive, and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends Occidental Petroleum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Historical underwriting and operational excellence are being priced at levels that leave zero margin for error regarding future interest rate volatility and climate-driven loss inflation."
While these three names are classic 'compounders,' the article ignores the valuation cliff currently facing financial stalwarts. Berkshire Hathaway’s $373 billion cash pile is a drag on ROE (Return on Equity) in a high-interest environment, and its succession risk under Greg Abel remains an unpriced variable. American Express faces significant margin compression if consumer credit fatigue hits its affluent base, while Progressive’s 92% combined ratio is vulnerable to rising climate-related loss severity in auto insurance. Investors are paying premium multiples for historical performance that may not account for the current shift in interest rate regimes and inflationary pressures on claims costs.
The 'safety' of these firms is precisely what makes them immune to market volatility, as their pricing power allows them to pass inflationary costs directly to consumers.
"Elite businesses with real edges, but current valuations and succession risks make them holds rather than buys."
The article touts BRK.B, AXP, and PGR as timeless financial winners via moats like BRK's insurance float and $373B cash pile (plausible including short-term investments, though Q1 2024 dipped to ~$189B), AXP's affluent closed-loop network, and PGR's elite 92% average combined ratio. Solid histories, but glosses key risks: unverified 'OxyChem acquisition' (BRK bought OXY shares, not the unit), post-Buffett transition under Greg Abel unproven, AXP's consumer credit exposure if high-end spending cracks, PGR's premium pricing vulnerable to softening auto market. Valuations stretched—BRK.B at 1.55x tangible book, AXP 19x forward P/E, PGR 24x—demand flawless execution amid macro uncertainty.
These battle-tested compounders have delivered 15-17% annualized returns over decades through cycles, with moats widening via AI pivots at AXP and PGR's pricing power, justifying premiums for patient capital.
"Past outperformance in a 40-year bull market doesn't predict future returns when valuations are full and secular headwinds (auto repair inflation, credit normalization, rate-sensitive deposit bases) are intensifying."
This article conflates 'made investors rich historically' with 'will make them rich going forward'—a classic recency bias trap. BRK trades near all-time highs with a $373B cash pile that hasn't deployed meaningfully in years, suggesting Buffett sees limited opportunities at current valuations. AXP's closed-loop model is real, but the article ignores rising credit losses and delinquencies as rates stay elevated; the 65% millennial/Gen Z customer growth claim needs scrutiny—are these high-margin customers or acquisition bait? PGR's 92% combined ratio is impressive but faces headwinds: auto repair inflation, EV adoption (lower claims frequency = margin compression), and competitive pricing pressure. All three are mature, fairly valued, not obvious wealth-builders from here.
These three have genuinely durable moats and proven capital allocation discipline. If rates stay elevated longer, AXP's net interest margin expands further; PGR's underwriting edge could widen as weaker competitors exit; BRK's optionality on $373B is worth a premium multiple.
"Long-run upside hinges on favorable macro conditions and disciplined capital allocation; a shift in rates, underwriting cycles, or competitive dynamics could limit gains."
Opening read pins three 'moat' bets: Berkshire Hathaway on cash flow alchemy (insurance yields, buybacks), American Express on a closed-loop premium brand, Progressive on underwriting discipline. But the strongest counter is that the thesis rests on a serene macro backdrop: Berkshire's $373B cash pile is powerful only if management deploys it well; at high-rate regimes, passive cash yields compete with buybacks and acquisitions, blunting ROIC. AmEx's moat could erode as competition intensifies and consumer debt cycles tighten, despite a brand premium. Progressive's 92% combined ratio sounds excellent, yet auto insurance pricing is cyclical and catastrophe costs or AI-driven claims could erode underwriting margins.
All three stocks may be priced as if the moat were inexhaustible; in a slower growth, higher-regulation backdrop, Berkshire's cash deployment may underwhelm, and AmEx/Progressive face cyclical and competitive threats that could cap long-run returns.
"Regulatory pressure on the credit card industry disproportionately protects AXP's premium margin profile compared to mass-market peers."
Claude, you’re missing the regulatory tailwind for AXP. While you focus on credit risk, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s scrutiny on late fees and credit card industry margins creates a 'moat-within-a-moat' scenario. AXP’s affluent, high-FICO base is less sensitive to the regulatory compression hitting mass-market issuers like Capital One. This isn't just about spending; it's about the durability of their net interest margin in an environment where smaller competitors are being squeezed by compliance costs.
"CFPB late-fee caps erode AXP fee income directly, and PGR's telematics edge is vulnerable to competitive catch-up."
Gemini, CFPB's proposed $8 late-fee cap is a headwind for all issuers—AXP generated ~$1.5B in late/annual fees in 2023 (10-K), affluent base or not. Your 'moat-within-a-moat' ignores direct hit to non-interest revenue. Unflagged elsewhere: PGR's telematics advantage fading as rivals like Geico deploy similar tech, pressuring that 92% combined ratio long-term.
"AXP's regulatory moat is relative, not absolute—but PGR's telematics advantage erosion is the unpriced risk in this trio."
Grok's $1.5B late-fee hit is real, but Gemini's underlying point survives: AXP's affluent base has lower fee sensitivity and higher spend elasticity than mass-market competitors facing identical CFPB caps. The moat isn't immunity—it's relative durability. However, Grok correctly flags telematics commoditization at PGR, which nobody has quantified. If telematics shrinks PGR's underwriting edge by 50-100 bps, that 24x multiple collapses faster than AXP's fee compression.
"CFPB late-fee caps erode AXP's non-interest income and threaten the 'moat-within-a-moat' thesis, because fee-based revenues aren't as robust as assumed and regulatory limits constrain repricing and cross-sell levers in a downturn."
Regulatory caps on late fees erode AXP's non-interest income, undercutting Claude's 'moat-within-a-moat' thesis. Affluent customers aren’t immune if fee income contracts and cross-sell economics compress in a slower-growth, higher-compliance environment. AXP's profitability hinges on repricing flexibility, which CFPB limits; this risk is understated in the article. In a downturn, revenue could shift toward higher pricing or different products, but those levers bring regulatory and competitive frictions.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agreed that while the discussed companies have strong historical performance and 'moats', their current valuations and risks make them less attractive for future wealth building. Key concerns include Berkshire Hathaway's cash pile drag on ROE, American Express' margin compression risk, and Progressive's vulnerability to rising climate-related losses and telematics commoditization.
American Express' relative durability in the face of regulatory compression due to its affluent, high-FICO base.
Telematics commoditization at Progressive, which could significantly impact its underwriting edge and valuation.