What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agreed that while GE Vernova and Cameco are compelling, Bloom Energy's valuation and execution risk are significant concerns. They also highlighted grid interconnection bottlenecks and labor shortages as potential risks for all three companies.
Risk: Execution risk and margin compression on fixed-price contracts due to grid delays and labor shortages
Opportunity: GE Vernova's solid backlog and potential to benefit from the 'electrification of everything' and AI-driven data center power demand
Key Points
Hydrogen fuel cells haven’t caught on nearly as well as once expected. Bloom Energy’s tweak is changing that.
Cameco may not be a conventional green energy name, but it still solves a serious, pressing problem in a way that’s environmentally friendly.
Like Cameco, GE Vernova isn’t a company people think of when they think of renewables. Just take a closer look at its product lineup and how it works.
- 10 stocks we like better than Bloom Energy ›
There's no denying the green energy mania that enthralled investors in the industry's not-so-recent past has since cooled. Nuclear power seems to be all the rage now, and fossil fuels aren't fading away nearly as quickly as previously anticipated.
If you think renewables stocks don't offer investors enough upside to bother with them, however, think again. The United States' Energy Information Administration reports that a little over half of the nation's installed power capacity in 2025 was solar, with wind accounting for another 14%. Natural gas and coal still collectively produce the majority of the country's electricity, but coal's share is shrinking fast, while renewables' share has doubled over the past 15 years.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
And yet, renewable energy still only produced less than 20% of the United States' total power in 2025. Similar proportions and trends apply outside of the U.S. as well. This is why -- and how -- Mordor Intelligence expects the worldwide renewable energy market to grow at an average annual pace of nearly 14% through 2031, although it's likely to continue expanding at a comparable rate for far longer.
With that as the backdrop, here's a rundown of three fantastic green energy stocks that long-term investors can buy right now with plans of holding onto them forever.
Bloom Energy
In light of the sheer number of years hydrogen fuel cell outfit Plug Power failed to deliver as expected, it would be easy to doubt that seemingly similar Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE) will fare any better.
There's a little tweak with its electricity-generating technology, however, that makes a big difference. That's the flexibility and durability of its fuel cells themselves. They're solid oxide fuel cells, with a ceramic electrolyte rather than a more commonly used polymer membrane. This not only allows its equipment to operate at higher temperatures but also allows it to use natural gas, biogas, or hydrogen as its fuel source.
Natural gas, of course, is already readily available, although hydrogen and biogas aren't exactly outside of the mainstream anymore, particularly given that Bloom also supplies the electrolyzing equipment that lets its customers produce their own hydrogen.
And the marketplace is clearly responding. Driven by a customer base that includes Honda, AT&T, and Oracle, just to name a few, last year's revenue grew 37% to just over $2 billion, pushing the company to a much firmer operating profit of nearly $73 million and $114 million in operational cash flow.
This is still just the beginning. The company's backlog of business now stands at roughly $20 billion. Given the amount of future business that's already lined up, the analyst community is calling for top-line growth of nearly 60% this year and more than 60% next year.
Cameco
Nuclear power was one of the energy sources many green energy proponents hoped to continue moving away from when more renewables like wind and solar became viable. The fact is, however, nuclear has since proven itself to be safe and environmentally friendly. It is part of the green energy movement, and a part of it that the International Atomic Energy Agency expects to nearly double its total power output by 2050.
This, of course, means the nuclear power industry will need a lot more nuclear fuel ... uranium, to be specific.
Enter Cameco (NYSE: CCJ).
It's not just one of the world's uranium miners and enrichers. It's one of the biggest and best among a small number of names in the business. It produced 21 million pounds of uranium last year, driving nearly $3.5 billion in revenue versus 2024's comparison of a little less than $3.2 billion. The company's also sitting on more than 400 million pounds of the stuff, plus more than 400 million pounds' worth of proven and probable reserves, in addition to more than 150 million pounds of inferred resources. It's also apt to find more as that uranium is dug up.
And this underscores what makes this ticker such a compelling investment prospect. See, Cameco is integrated from end to end, starting with a massive source of supply and ending with the ability to refine and convert this material into a final product needed by nuclear power plants. It even holds a sizable stake in Westinghouse, providing it with exposure to the nuclear power facility construction and service market.
Connect the dots. If the nuclear power industry is going to grow, it's not going to grow without Cameco's involvement.
GE Vernova
Finally, add GE Vernova (NYSE: GEV) to your list of long-term green energy stocks to buy this year.
Like Cameco, some people might debate whether or not this is actually a green energy name. It makes wind turbines, but they only make up less than 20% of its total business. The company's big breadwinner is natural gas power turbines, but natural gas is still technically a fossil fuel.
Gas is a largely misunderstood fossil fuel; however, it burns very cleanly, producing far fewer emissions than most other hydrocarbons. In fact, given the chemicals required and created by the manufacture and eventual disposal of solar panels and lithium batteries, there's an argument to be made that natural gas is certainly no worse for the environment than more conventional green energy solutions.
And gas turbines offer another upside that's proving to be a stumbling block for wind and solar power. That's the fact that turbines can be powered up or powered down as needed, while solar and wind remain subject to the weather and the time of day.
For what it's worth, GE Vernova makes power turbines that can run on biogas and other man-made gases, including those produced by industrial processes like coking and refining.
The market's figuring all of this out, too. This company's top line improved by 16% last quarter, growing to just over $9.3 billion -- a pace it expects to maintain for the rest of the year. That's only a drop in the bucket, though. As of the end of March, its order backlog stands at $163 billion. The company's chief challenge right now is simply figuring out how to add more production capacity.
Should you buy stock in Bloom Energy right now?
Before you buy stock in Bloom Energy, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bloom Energy wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $498,522! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,276,807!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 200% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 28, 2026. *
James Brumley has positions in AT&T. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bloom Energy, Cameco, GE Vernova, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The market is overestimating the speed of hydrogen adoption while underestimating the capital-intensity required to scale GE Vernova's power turbine dominance."
The article conflates 'energy transition' with 'guaranteed equity returns,' which is a dangerous simplification. While I agree that GE Vernova and Cameco are essential infrastructure plays, the valuation of Bloom Energy is the primary risk. Bloom is trading on a $20 billion backlog, but converting that into free cash flow remains a massive hurdle given their capital-intensive business model and the volatility of fuel costs. GE Vernova is the most compelling of the three, benefiting from the 'electrification of everything' and AI-driven data center power demand. However, investors must distinguish between companies providing the grid's backbone and those chasing speculative hydrogen subsidies that may vanish with political shifts.
The strongest case against this is that these firms are essentially utilities masquerading as growth stocks; if interest rates remain 'higher for longer,' their heavy debt loads and capital expenditure requirements will crush shareholder returns.
"CCJ's vertical integration positions it as the pick-and-shovel for AI-fueled nuclear renaissance, outshining intermittent renewables."
Article pushes long-term green plays but glosses over intermittency: EIA notes solar at 50%+ U.S. capacity by 2025 yet <20% generation, exposing renewables' reliability gap—nuclear via Cameco (CCJ) bridges it amid AI data center boom demanding 24/7 baseload. CCJ's 21M lb production, 400M+ lb reserves, and Westinghouse stake scream multi-decade upside as IAEA eyes output doubling by 2050. Bloom (BE) $20B backlog tantalizing (60%+ rev growth eyed), but fuel cell history (Plug Power flop) and capex burn risk dilution. GE Vernova (GEV) $163B orders solid, yet 80% gas reliance ties it to fossil transitions. Nuclear wins; others speculative.
Uranium prices spiked in 2024 but could crash on supply ramps from Kazakhstan/Australia; nuclear faces endless regulatory/NIMBY delays, stalling IAEA projections.
"The article obscures that these are three unrelated bets (fuel cells, uranium, gas turbines) bundled as 'green energy' to justify a narrative that doesn't hold up under scrutiny."
The article conflates three very different theses under 'green energy.' Bloom Energy (BE) has genuine momentum—37% revenue growth, $20B backlog, real customers—but hydrogen fuel cells have disappointed before; execution risk is real. Cameco (CCJ) is a uranium play masquerading as green energy; nuclear upside is structural but uranium is cyclical and geopolitically volatile. GE Vernova (GEV) is mostly natural gas turbines—calling it 'green' is marketing. The $163B backlog sounds impressive until you realize it's GE's total order book; margins matter more than revenue. All three are priced for growth that assumes no recession, no policy reversal, and flawless execution.
Bloom's backlog could evaporate if customers face capex constraints; Cameco's uranium upside assumes nuclear buildout that requires sustained policy support and capital; GE Vernova's 16% growth is modest for a 'long-term compounder' and natural gas exposure becomes a liability if carbon pricing accelerates.
"Backlogs and growth are not guarantees of profitability; policy, commodity prices, and execution risk drive the real upside."
The article pushes a long-horizon green thesis on BE, CCJ, and GEV, but there are material caveats. BE's solid oxide fuel cells and $20B backlog suggest growth, yet profitability hinges on continued hydrogen/biogas economics and capex discipline; a shift in energy pricing or project delays could snuff margin expansion. Cameco stands to gain from a nuclear renaissance, but uranium price volatility, regulatory risk, and geopolitical supply dynamics could compress returns even with sizable reserves. GE Vernova's backlog ($163B) and 16% quarterly growth look impressive, but most revenue is tied to gas turbines; policy pivots toward decarbonization or cheaper tech could throttle demand and margins. The secular story stays, but timing and execution risk are real.
The strongest counter is that a favorable policy backdrop and large backlogs may not overcome price volatility, capital costs, or project delays; if hydrogen economics stall or uranium demand softens, the upside could be far weaker than advertised.
"The massive backlogs cited are contingent on grid interconnection feasibility, which is currently the primary bottleneck for all three companies."
Claude is right to flag the 'green' marketing trap, but everyone is ignoring the counterparty risk inherent in these massive backlogs. If Bloom Energy or GE Vernova's customers—mostly hyperscalers and utilities—face a slowdown in AI-driven data center buildouts due to grid interconnection bottlenecks, those backlogs are just expensive liabilities. We are betting on a massive infrastructure expansion that the current US power grid simply cannot support without years of regulatory and physical upgrades.
"Grid delays benefit GEV's faster gas turbines, but pervasive skilled labor shortages imperil backlog execution for all three."
Gemini rightly flags grid bottlenecks eroding backlogs, but this asymmetrically favors GEV's gas turbines, which deploy in 18-24 months vs. 5+ years for nuclear (per DOE timelines). Unmentioned risk: Skilled labor crunch—EIA projects 1M+ new grid workers needed by 2030 amid current 80k electrician shortage—could delay 20-30% of BE/GEV installations, crushing FCF conversion.
"Grid bottlenecks delay projects and compress margins, but don't erase backlogs—the distinction matters for valuation timing, not thesis validity."
Grok's labor shortage argument is concrete but incomplete. The 80k electrician gap assumes uniform deployment—but hyperscalers are already pre-funding grid upgrades and hiring directly. More pressing: Bloom and GEV's backlogs are *customer-committed*, not speculative. If grid delays bite, customers absorb cost overruns, not the vendors. The real risk is margin compression on fixed-price contracts, not backlog evaporation. Gemini's counterparty risk framing conflates execution delay with demand destruction.
"Backlogs become a liability, not a shield, if fixed-price contracts fail to cover rising costs and execution risk erodes free cash flow."
Grok raises labor shortages as a driver of slow rollout, but the bigger flaw is margin risk from fixed-price backlogs amid escalating materials, interconnection delays, and wage inflation. If 20% of BE/GEV projects miss cost targets, FCF turns negative despite backlog growth; nuclear remains policy-sensitive while renewables rely on buffer capital. In short, backlogs are not a shield—execution risk and pass-through pricing dominate.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists agreed that while GE Vernova and Cameco are compelling, Bloom Energy's valuation and execution risk are significant concerns. They also highlighted grid interconnection bottlenecks and labor shortages as potential risks for all three companies.
GE Vernova's solid backlog and potential to benefit from the 'electrification of everything' and AI-driven data center power demand
Execution risk and margin compression on fixed-price contracts due to grid delays and labor shortages