What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that while the discussed companies (Realty Income, Enterprise Products Partners, and Verizon) offer attractive yields and have strong dividend histories, they also face significant risks that are not fully addressed in the article. These risks include interest rate sensitivity, sector-specific challenges, and potential headwinds for future growth.
Risk: The potential compression of yields due to rising interest rates, as highlighted by Claude and Gemini, was a major concern for all panelists.
Opportunity: Gemini pointed out that Enterprise Products Partners' cash flow could serve as a defensive moat if global energy demand persists, suggesting an opportunity for investors who believe in this scenario.
Key Points
Realty Income is a landlord with a conservative ethos and a dividend focus.
Enterprise Products Partners operates a toll-taker business in the energy sector.
Telecom giant Verizon has an annuity-like income stream.
- 10 stocks we like better than Verizon Communications ›
If you are looking for income stocks with high yields that can help set you up with a lifetime of reliable dividends, you'll want to focus on the businesses that back the yields. With yields of more than 5%, Realty Income (NYSE: O), Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD), and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) are all worth a deep dive today.
1. Realty Income is The Monthly Dividend Company
Realty Income trademarked the nickname "The Monthly Dividend Company" to highlight the frequency of its dividend and, perhaps more notably, the importance of dividends to the company. It is built from the ground up to be reliable, with over three decades of annual dividend increases already in the books.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
The real estate investment trust (REIT) has an investment-grade credit rating, indicating a strong financial foundation. But that's just the starting point. It owns over 15,500 properties across the United States and Europe. It has exposure to retail and industrial assets, as well as a selection of more unique properties, like vineyards, casinos, and data centers. And the company's average lease length is 8.8 years, which provides stability to the rent roll if there is a recession.
Even the most conservative investors will appreciate Realty Income and its attractive 5.1% dividend yield.
2. Enterprise Products Partners sidesteps commodity prices
Enterprise Products Partners' 5.8% yield is supported by an energy business, which might worry some investors amid rising geopolitical tension in the Middle East. That's less of a worry than you may think because Enterprise's business is to move oil and natural gas around the world, collecting fees for the use of its vital North American energy infrastructure assets. The volume of energy moving through Enterprise's system is more important than the price of what is being moved, and there's no indication that energy market volatility will have a negative impact on Enterprise's volume. In fact, it is more likely to be a net benefit.
Enterprise has increased its distribution annually for 27 consecutive years. It has an investment-grade-rated balance sheet. And the master limited partnership's distributable cash flow covered its distribution by a very strong 1.7x in 2025. If you can look beyond the headlines, Enterprise's toll-taker business model has proven it can support a lofty income stream through good times and bad in the energy sector.
3. Verizon's loyal customers are the key to its dividend success
Telecommunications giant Verizon is likely to be the riskiest stock on this list. That's partly because the cellphone service industry is highly competitive, requiring the company to make massive, ongoing investments just to keep pace with its peers. However, telecom customers tend to be very sticky, creating an annuity-like income stream to support Verizon's capital investment needs and its lofty 5.7% yield. The dividend has been increased annually for 19 years.
The bigger risk is that Verizon has brought in a new CEO and charged them with improving the company's growth rate. This change is relatively new, so the CEO's plans for the future remain untested. That said, the company made sure to point out when it released fourth quarter 2025 earnings that the dividend is one of its highest priorities. If you can stomach a little uncertainty as a new leader takes the reins, Verizon could be a good fit for your high-yield portfolio.
High yields and good businesses are the proper mix
A troubled company won't be able to support a high yield for long. Which is why you need to make sure you dig into the businesses you are buying if you are a dividend investor. Realty Income, Enterprise, and Verizon all generate reliable cash flows to support their lofty yields. And each one looks like it could set you up for a lifetime of reliable and growing dividend checks.
Should you buy stock in Verizon Communications right now?
Before you buy stock in Verizon Communications, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Verizon Communications wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 22, 2026.
Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"High current yield does not equal low forward risk; all three face structural or cyclical headwinds that the article acknowledges but then dismisses too quickly."
This article conflates yield with safety—a dangerous move in a rising-rate environment. O, EPD, and VZ all trade at elevated valuations justified by their yields; if rates compress further or these businesses face structural headwinds, yield alone won't prevent multiple compression. O's retail exposure faces secular e-commerce pressure; VZ's capex intensity and competitive intensity are real, not just 'new CEO uncertainty'; EPD's 1.7x coverage is adequate but not fortress-level. The article also cherry-picks backward-looking dividend-growth streaks without stress-testing forward assumptions. None of these are broken businesses, but 'set you up for life' overstates the margin of safety.
If rates fall or stay low, these 5%+ yields become genuinely scarce and repricing upward is plausible—and all three have demonstrated resilience through cycles, so the dividend-growth track records aren't meaningless.
"Yield-focused investors are currently underestimating the dual risks of tax complexity in MLPs and the persistent pressure of debt-servicing costs on dividend growth for capital-intensive utilities."
While these three are classic 'dividend aristocrat' candidates, the article ignores the interest rate sensitivity inherent in these models. Realty Income (O) faces significant cap rate compression risks if the 'higher-for-longer' rate environment persists, making its 5.1% yield look less attractive compared to risk-free treasury alternatives. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) is a solid midstream play, but it operates as a Master Limited Partnership (MLP), which introduces complex K-1 tax reporting burdens for retail investors that the article conveniently omits. Verizon (VZ) remains a value trap; its massive debt load and heavy capital expenditure requirements for 5G/fiber infrastructure leave little room for meaningful dividend growth, regardless of management's stated priorities.
In a recessionary environment, these companies provide essential services and real assets that offer a defensive floor that growth-heavy tech stocks entirely lack.
"High yields on O, EPD, and VZ are supported by real cash-flow characteristics, but they come with concentrated risks (rate sensitivity, energy-transition/regulatory exposure, and heavy telecom capex/new leadership) that require active monitoring before committing for 'lifetime' income."
The article highlights three high-yield names — Realty Income (O, 5.1%), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD, 5.8%), and Verizon (VZ, 5.7%) — that have credible cash flows and long histories of payout increases. Those qualities matter: Realty's 8.8-year average lease term and investment‑grade rating, EPD's 27-year distribution streak and 1.7x distributable cash flow coverage, and Verizon's sticky subscriber base all support yields. But yields this high also signal risk; interest‑rate sensitivity for REITs, energy‑demand/regulatory shifts for a midstream MLP, and heavy, ongoing telecom capex under a new CEO for Verizon are underplayed. Due diligence on balance sheets, coverage ratios, and capital-allocation priorities is essential.
These yields largely reflect market skepticism — a sustained recession, a faster-than-expected energy demand decline, or a misstep by Verizon's new management could force dividend cuts; this trio could be income traps rather than lifetime dividend setters.
"Reliable dividends are table stakes, but limited growth and sector headwinds make these poor vehicles for 'lifetime' wealth beyond pure income replacement."
Realty Income (O), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Verizon (VZ) offer 5.1-5.8% yields backed by investment-grade balance sheets, long dividend increase streaks (30+ for O, 27 for EPD, 19 for VZ), and stable models—O's 8.8-year leases, EPD's 1.7x DCF coverage, VZ's sticky subscribers. But the article glosses over growth hurdles: O's retail/industrial mix vulnerable to e-commerce/recession; EPD's midstream tied to fossil fuels amid energy transition; VZ's capex intensity (~$18B/year implied) and new CEO untested amid T-Mobile competition. High yields signal stagnant appreciation, competing with 4-5% Treasuries in a rate-cut world.
These toll-taker businesses have thrived through cycles with pristine dividend records, and anticipated Fed rate cuts could spark re-ratings, delivering 10-15% total returns via yield plus modest multiple expansion.
"Tax complexity and capex intensity are real, but 'value trap' requires forward earnings deterioration—not yet evident in the data."
Gemini flags the K-1 tax burden for EPD correctly, but understates its severity: retail investors face annual complexity that institutional holders don't, yet the article markets these as 'set it and forget it'—that's material friction. However, Gemini's 'value trap' label for VZ overshoots; VZ's debt-to-EBITDA sits ~2.3x (manageable for utilities), and 5G capex is front-loaded, not perpetual. The real issue: none of you quantified what dividend coverage looks like if telecom ARPU (average revenue per user) compresses another 2-3% or if O's occupancy dips below 96%.
"EPD’s global energy logistics exposure provides a more durable defensive moat than the domestic retail or telecom sectors."
Claude, your focus on ARPU compression at Verizon is the right catalyst to watch, but you’re ignoring the 'toll-booth' nature of midstream assets. EPD isn't just an MLP; it’s a logistics play on global energy demand that remains decoupled from domestic retail spending. While you and Gemini fixate on tax friction and debt, you’re missing the geopolitical floor under EPD’s volumes. If global energy demand persists, EPD’s cash flow remains the only true defensive moat here.
[Unavailable]
"EPD's cash flows remain vulnerable to US production volatility despite partial fee-basing, undermining the defensive moat claim."
Gemini, EPD's touted 'geopolitical floor' ignores its 70% fee-based but 30% variable contracts tied to US shale throughput—Permian rig counts down 20% (as in 2020) crushes DCF coverage below 1.5x. Global demand helps exports, but domestic policy (methane rules, frac bans) and OPEC swings hit volumes harder than toll-booths imply. Stress-test: $50 WTI sustains 1.7x; sub-$40 breaks it.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agreed that while the discussed companies (Realty Income, Enterprise Products Partners, and Verizon) offer attractive yields and have strong dividend histories, they also face significant risks that are not fully addressed in the article. These risks include interest rate sensitivity, sector-specific challenges, and potential headwinds for future growth.
Gemini pointed out that Enterprise Products Partners' cash flow could serve as a defensive moat if global energy demand persists, suggesting an opportunity for investors who believe in this scenario.
The potential compression of yields due to rising interest rates, as highlighted by Claude and Gemini, was a major concern for all panelists.