By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, warning that the article oversimplifies the risks of holding Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Realty Income (O), and Hormel (HRL) as decade-long income plays. Key risks include interest rate sensitivity, regulatory/energy transition risks, and potential dividend cuts if cash flow falters.
Risk: Multiple compression in a higher-rate regime and sector-specific shocks
Opportunity: None identified
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
If you are looking for dividend stocks in today's market, you need to be selective. Given that the average stock in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is offering a paltry 1.3% yield, you can easily find higher-yielding investments. But finding high yields from companies you'd want to hold onto for a decade requires deeper consideration.
If your holding period is 10 years or longer, you'll find Hormel (NYSE: HRL), Realty Income (NYSE: O), and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) all worth a closer look today. Here's why.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Hormel's dividend yield is around 3.8%, which is nearly three times the level of the S&P 500 index. It also happens to be near the highest levels in the food maker's history. That said, with a market cap of $16 billion, Hormel is nowhere near the largest food company around. Where it stands toe to toe with the industry giants is its status as a Dividend King, which is a monster-sized achievement.
Hormel has issues to deal with, which is why the yield is so high today. Investors are worried that the future won't be as bright as the past. However, Hormel has an ace in the hole when it comes to dealing with adversity. The not-for-profit Hormel Foundation controls nearly 47% of the company's voting shares. The Hormel Foundation uses the dividends it collects from Hormel to fund its philanthropic efforts, so it has a long-term view that emphasizes conservatism and dividends.
In other words, this food maker doesn't have to make questionable short-term decisions to appease Wall Street. It can take its time and make decisions that will support long-term dividend growth. If that's what you are looking for, you might want to invest alongside The Hormel Foundation and buy Hormel Foods.
Real estate investment trust (REIT) Realty Income has a dividend yield of 5.5%. The dividend has been increased annually for 30 consecutive years. It is a bit of a slow and steady tortoise, with dividend growth over that span coming in at around 4% a year, annualized. However, that is slightly faster than the long-term growth rate of inflation, so the buying power of the monthly dividend has grown steadily over time.
What sets Realty Income apart is its size and diversification. It is, by far, the largest net lease REIT, which means that it owns single-tenant properties for which the tenant is responsible for most property-level expenses. It is a fairly low-risk model across a large portfolio. Realty Income owns over 15,600 properties in the United States and Europe. While the company's vast scale suggests that growth will remain slow, its size also provides it with advantageous access to capital markets and gives it the ability to take on deals (including buying its smaller peers) that competitors can't. If you want reliable income for the next decade, net lease giant Realty Income should be on your short list.
Last up is Enterprise Products Partners, a midstream master limited partnership (MLP) with a huge 7.1% distribution yield. The distribution has been increased year in and year out for 26 consecutive years. Like Realty Income, Enterprise isn't going to wow you with growth, but it has proven to be reliable and has shown that it can change along with the industry in which it operates.
That's notable because growth via ground-up construction was the main focus up until 2016, fueled by frequent sales of MLP units. The goal now, however, is slow and steady growth fueled by internal investment projects funded with internally generated cash. Which is why Enterprise has gone from having its distribution covered by distributable cash flow by 1.2x in 2016 to 1.7x in 2024. That monster coverage ratio gives it both the leeway to put cash toward its capital investments and provides it with a backstop for the distribution, should adversity strike.
Hormel, Realty Income, and Enterprise are monsters in their own unique ways. The riskiest choice here is probably Hormel, which is deeply out of favor on Wall Street today. Realty Income and Enterprise, meanwhile, will likely appeal to even the most conservative investors. But all three are dividend stocks worth buying today and holding onto for a decade, or more.
Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
*Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $623,685! **
Or when
Nvidiamade this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,you’d have $701,781!*Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 906% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 164% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 5, 2025
Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Hormel Foods and Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article overstates the safety of a 10-year hold on HRL, O, and EPD by underplaying dividend sustainability and rate- and cycle-driven risks that could curb both cash flow and valuations."
The piece sells these three as unambiguous decade-long winners, but it glosses over key risks. EPD relies on stable energy demand and a healthy regulatory/contract environment for midstream payouts; Realty Income’s high yield rests on real estate cycles and rate-sensitive valuations; Hormel’s governance via the Hormel Foundation could limit strategic flexibility even as a dividend anchor. Big omissions: the risk of dividend cuts if cash flow falters, multiple compression in a higher-rate regime, and sector-specific shocks (energy volatility, grocery demand shifts, real estate cap-rate moves). The scenario where rates stay high or rise or where consumer preferences shift could erode the upside the article assumes.
Devil's advocate: If inflation cools and rates trend lower, these defensives could re-rate and deliver price appreciation alongside their dividends, making the decade-long hold more appealing than feared.
"These companies are not immune to macroeconomic shifts and require rigorous monitoring of their cost of capital and margin sustainability rather than blind 'buy-and-hold' faith."
While these three picks are classic 'sleep-well-at-night' income plays, the article ignores the massive interest rate sensitivity inherent in Realty Income (O) and the regulatory/energy transition risks facing Enterprise Products Partners (EPD). Specifically, for O, the spread between its cap rates and the cost of debt has compressed significantly, limiting FFO (Funds From Operations) growth. Hormel (HRL) is being treated as a value trap for a reason; its margins are under pressure from input inflation and a lack of pricing power in a consumer-constrained environment. These aren't 'set it and forget it' stocks; they are yield-sensitive instruments that require active monitoring of debt maturity ladders and payout ratios.
If you are a long-term income investor, the 'risk' of these stocks is actually their greatest strength: their boring, defensive nature provides a necessary hedge against the high-beta volatility of the broader S&P 500.
"High yield is often the market's way of pricing in permanent margin erosion, not an opportunity—especially in processed food where HRL faces both input cost inflation and secular demand shift."
The article conflates 'high yield today' with 'safe for 10 years,' a dangerous elision. HRL trades at 3.8% yield because the market is pricing in structural headwinds in processed foods—margin compression, input costs, shifting consumer preferences toward fresh/plant-based. The Hormel Foundation's 47% stake is presented as a moat; it's actually a red flag for minority shareholders if the foundation prioritizes philanthropy over shareholder returns during stress. O and EPD are genuinely defensive, but the article ignores rising rate sensitivity for REITs and the energy transition risk for midstream MLPs over a decade-long horizon. None of these are 'monsters'—they're mature cash cows with real secular headwinds.
If inflation persists above 3% annually, these 4-7% yields genuinely beat real returns on bonds, and the article's picks have proven 25+ years of distribution resilience that most growth stocks can't match.
"These names face sector headwinds and structural limits that make 10-year dividend reliability less assured than the yields alone suggest."
The article spotlights HRL's 3.8% yield, O's 5.5% monthly payout, and EPD's 7.1% distribution as decade-long holds based on Dividend King status and coverage ratios. Yet it glosses over HRL's exposure to shifting protein demand and input cost volatility, O's sensitivity to 10-year Treasury yields above 4%, and EPD's MLP tax drag plus slower growth after pivoting from unit sales to internal funding. Scale advantages cited for O and EPD may not offset capex needs or tenant/volume risks over 10 years.
If interest rates fall sharply and energy demand stays resilient, O and EPD could deliver total returns above the S&P 500 while sustaining hikes, validating the low-risk narrative the article promotes.
"Extended high-rate regimes create price risk for these yields through multiple compression and refinancing risk, not just cash-flow durability."
Point to Grok: the tax drag on O and EPD is real, but the bigger, underappreciated risk is a regime where real growth stays weak and rates stay high for longer, driving multiple compression across all three. If 10Y yields settle around 4.5-5% for an extended period, dividend kings can still pay, but price returns fade unless cash-flow growth accelerates. The article underweights refinancing risk in a tight credit cycle.
"Dividend mandates force EPD and O to prioritize payouts over the capital flexibility required to navigate a 10-year secular shift in energy and real estate."
Claude, your focus on the Hormel Foundation is vital; it creates a 'governance discount' that the market is already pricing in, which is why HRL trades at a lower multiple than its peers. However, everyone is ignoring the capital allocation trap: EPD and O are forced to distribute cash to maintain their dividend status, limiting their ability to pivot during energy transitions or REIT consolidation. They are essentially cannibalizing their long-term growth to satisfy income-starved retail investors.
"EPD and O aren't cannibalizing growth; they're executing their mandate—income investors should expect stagnation, not pivots."
Gemini's 'capital allocation trap' argument conflates constraint with inevitability. EPD and O *choose* distributions to maintain status; they could cut and redeploy. The real question: would they? History suggests no—these are mature entities optimizing for current shareholders, not future pivots. But that's a feature for income investors, not a bug. The trap exists only if you expect them to behave like growth companies. They won't, and shouldn't.
"Payout rigidity at EPD and O amplifies risks in a high-rate environment by limiting buffers against volume or tenant declines."
Claude, the 'feature not bug' framing misses how payout rigidity at EPD and O interacts with ChatGPT's high-rate regime. Sustained 4.5%+ yields compress FFO multiples while capex for maintenance still requires external funding, raising leverage. This setup leaves little buffer if energy volumes soften or retail tenants consolidate, unlike pure growth names that retain cash.
The panel consensus is bearish, warning that the article oversimplifies the risks of holding Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Realty Income (O), and Hormel (HRL) as decade-long income plays. Key risks include interest rate sensitivity, regulatory/energy transition risks, and potential dividend cuts if cash flow falters.
None identified
Multiple compression in a higher-rate regime and sector-specific shocks