By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agreed that TSMC's pricing power is a key factor, but disagreed on its sustainability. They also highlighted the risks of margin compression for Amazon and Lemonade due to infrastructure spending and claims inflation.
Risk: Erosion of TSMC's pricing power due to increased competition from Samsung and Intel, leading to multi-quarter margin hits.
Opportunity: TSMC's pricing power and dominance in 3nm production for AI GPUs.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Taiwan Semiconductor is benefiting from massive hyperscaler spend as a chipmaking partner.
Amazon is demonstrating accelerated growth in many areas, and it's positioning itself for further growth in e-commerce, cloud services, and more.
Lemonade's digital-native platform and AI use provide an alternative to legacy insurance companies.
Over the past few weeks, many artificial intelligence (AI) companies have reported strong growth, fueling renewed confidence and market highs. The S&P 500 is 8% as of this writing.
If you're looking for excellent stocks to add to your portfolio to ride the wave higher, I recommend Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), and Lemonade (NYSE: LMND). They all feature strong AI components, and they also have excellent long-term prospects beyond current trends.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Taiwan Semiconductor, or TMSC, has been reporting fantastic results in a pattern that should make every investor look twice. The chip manufacturer is a partner to most of the major global tech companies, and today it plays a major role in AI development. Every chip company or tech company that's demonstrating strong growth points to continued momentum for TSMC.
Its earnings reports typically precede those of other tech companies and are a good signal of what's to come. In the 2026 first quarter, revenue increased 41% year over year, and gross margin expanded 7.4 percentage points to 66.2%. That's more like a service company, even though TSMC makes hardware. Operating margin was 58.1%, 9.6 percentage points higher than last year.
AI is its strongest growth driver right now. It's part of the high-performance computing segment, which was up 20% quarter over quarter and accounted for 61% of total revenue. As hyperscalers continue to build out and spend, Taiwan Semiconductor will get a piece of the action.
For the second quarter, management is projecting a 35% year-over-year increase in revenue, a 66% gross margin, and a 57.5% operating margin. Although that's a confidence-boosting outlook, it warned that the second half of the year would be tougher. It's dealing with increased prices and its own expansion efforts, including its new U.S.-based facilities. However, it expects the expansion to help it meet soaring demand.
TSMC stock should keep rising alongside AI, which is why it's a great time to buy.
Amazon just reported outstanding first-quarter results with accelerated revenue growth, particularly in Amazon Web Services (AWS). CEO Andy Jassy's reassurance that its spend will pay off is happening, and his belief that customer spend will shift to the cloud seems to be coming true.
There was tremendous growth all over AWS and the AI platform. AWS continues to sign new deals with high-profile clients like U.S. Bank, AT&T, and Bloomberg, and Jassy said that clients engaging with AI through AWS are also spending more on core cloud services.
AI was the showstopper in the report, with triple-digit revenue growth and a plethora of high-value services. The chips business alone has a $20 billion run rate, and it's a complete stand-alone, serving many other companies besides Amazon.
The e-commerce business is also in excellent shape, and Amazon is reaching more customers with same-day shipping. It keeps getting faster, and it can now ship more than 90,000 items to customers in 2,000 cities within three hours.
The ad business is also demonstrating phenomenal performance, with AI leading to improved results and targeted campaigns, and sales were up 24% year over year.
While there were many other excellent updates, one notable one is the development of Amazon Leo, its satellite broadband business that is just getting ready for launch. Amazon is back on the upswing, and you can still get in for the ride.
Lemonade is an AI insurance disruptor that's growing by leaps and bounds. Although it's still a tiny outfit compared with the huge, legacy insurance companies, it presents a clear threat through its digital-native platform.
Customers are already sensing it, and they continue to join at a rapid pace. In the first quarter, in-force premium (IFP), the insurance company's top-line metric, increased 32% year over year, a trend of acceleration that's been ongoing for seven quarters.
The company touts its AI and machine learning algorithms that drive efficiency, so as IFP grows, spending has been roughly flat. That's been leading to improved profitability. And although it's still reporting losses, management is guiding for positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) by the end of this year and positive net income next year.
Lemonade is the only stock on this list that hasn't been getting market love lately, but that just gives smart investors an opportunity to buy more stock before it soars again.
Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 10, 2026. *
Jennifer Saibil has positions in Lemonade and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Lemonade, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and U.S. Bancorp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"TSM and AMZN represent essential infrastructure exposure, whereas LMND is a speculative outlier that lacks the fundamental moat of the other two."
TSM and AMZN are clear-cut structural plays on the AI infrastructure build-out, but grouping them with Lemonade is a category error. TSM is trading at a reasonable forward P/E given its 30%+ growth, effectively acting as the 'picks and shovels' provider for the entire sector. Amazon’s AWS re-acceleration is the real story here, driven by generative AI workloads. However, Lemonade remains a high-beta, speculative play that has yet to prove its loss ratios can consistently outperform legacy incumbents at scale. Investors should distinguish between proven infrastructure giants and 'AI-adjacent' firms that are still burning cash to achieve profitability targets.
TSM faces significant geopolitical risk regarding Taiwan, and Amazon’s retail margins remain razor-thin, making both vulnerable to a broader economic slowdown that would curb cloud and hardware spend.
"Lemonade's disruption thesis faces existential threats from cat loss volatility and regulatory hurdles that the article understates."
Lemonade's 32% YoY IFP growth marks seven straight quarters of acceleration, with AI/ML enabling flat spending for better efficiency amid scale-up. Management's guide to positive EBITDA by end-2026 and net income in 2027 is ambitious but hinges on sustained trends. Article glosses over key risks: insurance's vulnerability to catastrophe losses (e.g., weather events spiking claims), regulatory probes into AI underwriting fairness, and legacy giants like Progressive rapidly digitizing with deeper pockets. Recent stock underperformance signals market doubt on profitability timeline in a low-margin industry.
Yet, if Lemonade sustains growth acceleration and hits EBITDA targets, its digital-native model could capture meaningful share from inefficient incumbents with 20%+ combined ratios.
"The article assumes AI spending is structurally permanent, but all three stocks are priced for that thesis—downside risk is asymmetric if capex cycles normalize or profitability timelines slip."
This article conflates three unrelated theses—TSMC as a cyclical capex play, Amazon as a diversified growth engine, and Lemonade as a profitability inflection story—under a single 'AI tailwind' umbrella. TSMC's 41% YoY growth and 58% operating margin are real, but management explicitly warned H2 will be 'tougher' due to pricing pressure and capex drag. Amazon's AWS growth is genuine, but the article cherry-picks Q1 results without acknowledging margin compression risks from AI infrastructure spending. Lemonade's 32% IFP growth is impressive, but the path to profitability depends entirely on loss ratios staying benign—insurance is cyclical, and one bad underwriting quarter invalidates the thesis.
If hyperscaler capex moderates (Nvidia's guidance already suggests caution), TSMC's H2 warning becomes a harbinger of a broader slowdown; Amazon's AI infrastructure capex could consume margin gains for years; Lemonade's profitability timeline assumes no adverse selection or claims inflation as it scales.
"AI optimism in these stocks is vulnerable to a cyclical and regulatory backdrop that could erode margins and slow the pace of earnings improvement."
The article makes a clear bull case for TSM, AMZN, and LMND based on AI-driven growth, but the strongest risk is that the AI rally in these names may not be sustainable. TSMC’s upside hinges on hyperscaler capex and margin expansion, yet 2H could bring pricing pressure and higher fab costs as expansion accelerates, plus geopolitical/tariff risks. Amazon faces AWS normalization, cloud competition, and regulatory headwinds that could cap multiple expansion even with solid near-term results. Lemonade’s profitability relies on AI-driven underwriting gains that may take longer to materialize, with ongoing capital burn and fundraising risk if losses persist.
The AI hype could already be priced in, so any softer-than-expected growth or regulatory shocks could trigger sharp reversals in these names; LMND in particular may fail to achieve positive EBITDA as promised, despite optimistic guidance.
"TSMC's unique supply-side monopoly allows it to pass on cost pressures that will crush margins for downstream AI adopters like Amazon and Lemonade."
Claude is right to highlight the 'capex drag' on TSMC, but misses the second-order effect: TSMC possesses pricing power that Amazon and Lemonade lack. While AWS and LMND are vulnerable to margin compression from infrastructure spend or claims inflation, TSMC can pass fab costs to customers because there is no viable alternative for 3nm production. The real risk isn't just 'tougher' H2 margins; it's whether hyperscalers eventually blink on their massive GPU-driven capex budgets.
"Samsung and Intel's node advances erode TSMC's pricing power and moat faster than acknowledged."
Gemini, your defense of TSMC's pricing power ignores Samsung's SF3 3nm node, now in mass production with yields rivaling TSMC's and clients like Qualcomm onboard. Intel's 18A ramps next year add pressure. Hyperscalers won't pay up forever—H2 pricing weakness (per mgmt) signals eroding moat, amplifying Claude's capex drag into a multi-quarter margin hit nobody else emphasized.
"Samsung's competitive gains matter, but TSMC's real vulnerability is demand destruction from capex moderation, not supply-side competition."
Grok's Samsung/Intel competitive pressure is real, but overstates near-term risk. SF3 yields are *approaching* parity—not there yet—and Qualcomm's adoption doesn't displace TSMC's hyperscaler AI GPU dominance. The capex drag Claude flagged remains the actual risk: if Nvidia's guidance slowdown cascades, TSMC's H2 weakness becomes structural, not just pricing. That's the inflection point nobody's watching closely enough.
"The real risk to TSMC is erosion of its pricing power from Samsung/Intel competition, not merely capex drag or near-term margins."
Grok, I buy your concern about capex drag, but you may underplay the speed at which Samsung/Intel can erode TSMC's pricing moat. If SF3 yields scale and Intel's 18A ramps, hyperscalers could bid multi-vendor, compressing TSMC's premiums even with solid demand. The cliff isn't just H2 margin—it's if pricing power weakens while volumes stay strong, which would derail the 'picks and shovels' thesis faster than you expect.
The panelists agreed that TSMC's pricing power is a key factor, but disagreed on its sustainability. They also highlighted the risks of margin compression for Amazon and Lemonade due to infrastructure spending and claims inflation.
TSMC's pricing power and dominance in 3nm production for AI GPUs.
Erosion of TSMC's pricing power due to increased competition from Samsung and Intel, leading to multi-quarter margin hits.