What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agree that the 'hold forever' thesis on AAPL, AXP, and KR is oversimplified and risks overlooking significant risks and valuation concerns.
Risk: The high valuation of Apple (AAPL) and the potential regulatory scrutiny it faces.
Opportunity: The potential for Berkshire Hathaway to deploy its cash pile opportunistically through buybacks or new investments at attractive valuations.
Warren Buffett is widely considered one of the world's best investors. His success spans decades via his holding company, Berkshire Hathway, one of today's largest corporations. Inside Berkshire, Buffett and his team manage a massive stock portfolio worth over $385 billion.
Investors can learn a lot from following how Berkshire manages it. One clear takeaway is Buffett's affinity for the U.S. consumer. For example, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), American Express (NYSE: AXP), and Kroger (NYSE: KR) combine for over half of the entire portfolio.
Here is what makes these stocks special and why investors can buy and hold them forever.
1. Apple
The personal electronics giant is Berkshire's largest holding by a country mile. Apple is 43.1% of Berkshire's portfolio despite Buffett trimming shares this past quarter. Buffett has called Apple the second-best business Berkshire owns, pointing to consumers' loyalty to Apple devices. Buffett could be right; there are over 2.2 billion active Apple devices worldwide today.
Apple's product ecosystem is a beast. Not only do consumers buy phones, accessories, and computers every few years to keep up with the latest technology, but there are multiple ways Apple monetizes its users. It sells various subscription services and takes a cut of all money spent on its app store. Collectively, Apple is a financial juggernaut that generates over $381 billion in annual sales and $101 billion in free cash flow.
CEO Tim Cook returns many profits to shareholders like Buffett, paying dividends and repurchasing shares. The company has reduced its share count by a whopping 36% over the past decade alone, which means Berkshire's massive stake represents more ownership in the business. Apple's best growth days might be over, but its generosity in returning cash to shareholders makes it a stock you can tuck away in your long-term portfolio.
2. American Express
Borrowing money has been a core pillar of American consumerism since the credit card was invented decades ago. American Express didn't invent the credit card, but it's one of today's most famous credit card companies. American Express makes money as one of America's four prominent payment networks. It's also a bank that provides financial services and carries the loans people accumulate on their American Express cards.
American Express is famous for its service and lucrative rewards programs. The company ranks first among U.S. card issuers in customer satisfaction. The company is also profitable enough to pay a steadily increasing dividend and has bought back enough stock to retire over 30% of its shares this decade. Again, powerful brands and returning profits to shareholders are classic Buffett stock traits.
Credit cards are not going out of style anytime soon. Credit card debt in the United States is at all-time highs. Meanwhile, American Express's management has noted in earnings calls that millennial and Gen Z consumers are its fastest-growing customer demographic. The future looks bright for American Express, so consider adding the name to your long-term portfolio.
3. Kroger
A grocery store chain isn't as flashy as Apple or American Express, but Kroger is every bit a classic Buffett stock. Kroger is the largest-supermarket company in the United States and second only to general retailer Walmart in annual grocery sales. Its store footprint spans over 2,700 stores and multiple brands. Kroger could soon grow larger; the company is battling a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission over a $24.6 billion merger with Albertsons. If the merger succeeds, Kroger will have over 5,000 locations.
Buffett bought shares in 2019 before the merger came up. The investment thesis is simple: Food and medicine are basic consumer staples. Kroger's business is recession-proof, evidenced by the company's history dating back to the 1800s. Kroger's size gives it a competitive advantage against smaller competitors who can't source products and sell them at prices as low as Kroger's.
It probably goes without saying at this point, but yes, Kroger generously returns profits to the company's investors. The company's management has raised the dividend by nearly 300% over the past decade while repurchasing over a quarter of its outstanding shares. Whether or not the merger ultimately goes through, Kroger remains a blue chip business worth holding onto.
Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now?
Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $751,670!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 2, 2024
American Express is an advertising partner of The Ascent, a Motley Fool company. Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Kroger. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Investors are currently paying a premium for the 'Buffett stamp of approval' on stocks that are facing either regulatory headwinds, cyclical exhaustion, or valuation compression."
The article leans on the 'Buffett halo effect,' but investors should be wary of conflating Berkshire’s historical cost basis with current valuations. Apple (AAPL) is trading at a significant premium relative to its historical P/E, and the recent share reduction by Buffett suggests he is harvesting gains, not just rebalancing. American Express (AXP) is a high-quality play on consumer credit, but it faces significant cyclical risk if the U.S. consumer finally cracks under the weight of record-high debt. Kroger (KR) is the most speculative of the three; its thesis rests entirely on the Albertsons merger, which faces massive regulatory hurdles that could leave the stock overleveraged and stagnant if blocked.
Buffett’s genius has never been about 'buying low' in the traditional sense, but about buying 'wonderful companies at fair prices' that compound cash flow regardless of short-term valuation multiples.
"Kroger's growth narrative over-relies on the uncertain $24.6B Albertsons merger amid FTC opposition, downplaying thin margins and intensifying competition from Walmart."
The article glorifies AAPL, AXP, and KR as Buffett's eternal consumer bets, but omits critical risks: Berkshire trimmed AAPL shares last quarter amid slowing iPhone growth (2% YoY revenue lately) and looming antitrust scrutiny on App Store fees. AXP benefits from millennial uptake, yet U.S. credit card debt at $1.13T record highs risks surging delinquencies if recession hits—AXP's charge-off rate already ticking up per Q1 earnings. KR's recession-proof claim ignores thin ~2% net margins, Walmart's grocery dominance, and the FTC-blocked Albertsons merger stalling scale gains. Solid buybacks/dividends, but 'hold forever' ignores valuations (AAPL ~28x forward P/E) and cycle peaks.
Buffett's long-term success stems from owning durable moats like these through multiple downturns, with buybacks shrinking shares by 25-36% amplifying returns regardless of near-term macro or regulatory noise.
"The article misreads Buffett's recent *reduction* in Apple as confidence when it's the opposite—his record cash pile and selective buying suggest he views current valuations as unattractive, not 'forever hold' territory."
This article conflates Buffett's historical picks with a 'hold forever' thesis without acknowledging his massive recent Apple trimming—he's sold ~13% of his stake since Q3 2023, signaling conviction erosion despite the 43% portfolio weight claim. The piece treats Berkshire's holdings as static endorsements rather than dynamic positions. More critically: AAPL trades at 33x forward P/E (vs. 10-year avg ~18x), AXP faces credit cycle headwinds with delinquencies rising, and KR's merger uncertainty plus grocery margin compression are real risks. The article omits Berkshire's $325B+ cash hoard—a signal Buffett sees limited value at current prices. 'Hold forever' is marketing, not analysis.
Buffett's trimming could simply reflect valuation discipline at all-time highs, not loss of faith; these three stocks have genuinely durable competitive moats and pricing power that justify premium multiples in a low-rate environment.
"The 'hold forever' thesis is fragile because Berkshire's portfolio is highly concentrated in a few names (notably Apple), making it vulnerable to growth slowdowns or regulatory headwinds that could trigger multiple compression."
The piece underscores Buffett’s ‘hold forever’ ethos via Apple, AmEx, and Kroger, but it glosses over real risks. Berkshire’s colossal concentration in Apple (and a heavy tilt toward consumer/fintech) makes the portfolio vulnerable to iPhone-cycle slowdowns, regulatory cracks, and margin pressures from services integration. AmEx faces credit-cycle risk and competitive disruption in payments; Kroger’s upside hinges on a potentially blocked merger and rising costs in a competitive grocery landscape. The article omits Berkshire’s buyback dynamics and scenario risks—no guarantee a ‘forever’ hold withstands a recession, policy shifts, or a secular mix shift in consumer behavior.
Apple could suffer slower device demand and tighter regulatory scrutiny, compressing margins. AmEx and Kroger both face meaningful regulatory/competitive headwinds that could undermine the 'forever' hold thesis.
"Berkshire's record cash pile indicates that Buffett views current equity valuations as inferior to risk-free cash returns, undermining the 'hold forever' strategy."
Claude, you’re right to highlight the $325B cash hoard, but you’re missing the second-order effect: Berkshire is effectively acting as a massive money market fund. By holding cash instead of deploying it into these 'moats,' Buffett is signaling that the risk-adjusted return on T-bills currently beats the equity risk premium of even his favorite stocks. The 'hold forever' narrative is failing because the opportunity cost of capital is at a decade-high, making these equity positions look like anchors.
"Berkshire's cash hoard fuels accretive buybacks, countering the 'idle money market' narrative and supporting long-term value creation."
Gemini, framing Berkshire's cash as a 'money market fund' ignores its primary use: opportunistic buybacks totaling $9.4B YTD through Q2 at an average 1.3x book value, accretive to remaining shareholders. This isn't signaling poor equity prospects but valuation discipline—deploying when BRK trades below intrinsic value. T-bill yields (5%+) are a floor, not a ceiling, for Buffett's long-game compounding.
"Buyback accretion at 1.3x book masks the real signal: Buffett's cash hoard reveals he sees better risk-adjusted returns in cash than in deploying fresh capital into equities, even his favorites."
Grok's buyback math is sound, but it dodges Gemini's core point: Berkshire is buying back at 1.3x book while sitting on $325B cash. That's not 'valuation discipline'—it's admission that even at those prices, equity deployment elsewhere looks worse. If Buffett truly believed AAPL, AXP, KR offered superior risk-adjusted returns to T-bills, he'd be deploying that cash pile, not hoarding it. The buybacks are shareholder-friendly but don't refute the opportunity-cost signal.
" Berkshire’s cash hoard represents option value and strategic flexibility, not idle cash, so deployment timing matters more than the headline cash balance."
Gemini, calling Berkshire’s $325B cash hoard a money-market fund understates option value but ignores timing risk. The key question is whether BRK can deploy swiftly in a drawdown to buy quality at discounts. The $9.4B buybacks at ~1.3x BV help, but in a recession with equities rallying, opportunity costs rise and cash becomes a strategic option, not merely idle. That nuance matters for risk premium assessments.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agree that the 'hold forever' thesis on AAPL, AXP, and KR is oversimplified and risks overlooking significant risks and valuation concerns.
The potential for Berkshire Hathaway to deploy its cash pile opportunistically through buybacks or new investments at attractive valuations.
The high valuation of Apple (AAPL) and the potential regulatory scrutiny it faces.