By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agree that HD, NKE, and CCL are not post-selloff bargains due to macro risks and valuation concerns, with most leaning bearish.
Risk: Macro and cyclicality risk, particularly a softer housing cycle or higher interest rates pressuring consumer spending.
Opportunity: CCL's potential to accelerate deleveraging through sustained booking strength at premium pricing.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
These companies have each faced headwinds in recent years -- but are leaders in their markets.
Now, as they’ve reached key transition points, could be a good time to invest.
The S&P 500 roared higher over the past few years, driven by technology stocks and other high-growth players. But earlier this year, various headwinds put the brakes on that momentum. Investors worried about the conflict in Iran, the pace of interest rate cuts in the U.S., and the soaring valuations of many growth stocks.
All of these concerns weighed on investor sentiment, and therefore, on appetite for stocks, particularly companies that rely on economic growth. But the positive point here is that the sell-off pushed the valuations of many quality companies down, creating buying opportunities for investors.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Let's check out three of the best S&P 500 stocks to buy now after the recent decline.
Home Depot (NYSE: HD) faces various challenges and these are elements that may hold consumers back from home improvement projects or home purchases -- such as higher prices for gas and other goods, as well as housing market conditions. But the company has shown its resilience and, in the recent quarter, had plenty of good news to report.
The retailer reported revenue and net income that surpassed analysts' estimates, with revenue climbing 4.8% to more than $41 billion. Home Depot also reaffirmed its guidance for the year, and in an interview with CNBC, noted positive engagement from the consumer in spite of today's economic headwinds.
Meanwhile, Home Depot continues to aim for growth in the $700 billion professional market -- this means selling to pros such as contractors and building specialists. The company's fleet of more than 2,300 stores, its SRS distribution platform for professionals, and sales force of more than 5,000 offer it a moat, or competitive advantage in this space.
Considering all of this, Home Depot looks like a smart buy at 20x forward earnings estimates.
Nike (NYSE: NKE) has struggled in recent years, dealing with a variety of problems from tariffs to declines in consumer confidence -- and it's also faced strategic problems like focusing on its direct-to-consumer sales channel at the expense of wholesale channels. But the company has been making efforts to come back through its "Win Now" plan, a broad effort encompassing distribution, marketing, and product creation.
In the latest earnings report, Nike spoke of its focus on gaining market share back in the wholesale channel, removing certain inventory from stores, and supercharging "athlete-centered" innovation. Progress in wholesale sales is particularly important since this is where most Nike shoppers buy. In the quarter, wholesale revenue climbed 5% to $6.5 billion, driven by North America, the company's biggest market.
Meanwhile, in spite of its troubles, Nike remains the favorite brand of a group with influence and buying power: teens. Nike was the No. 1 brand in all footwear and clothing in the fall 2025 Piper Sandler Teen Survey.
Nike's recovery may not happen overnight, but the company is making wise moves and has a solid brand that resonates with key shoppers -- such as teens -- offering us a reason to be optimistic about the long term.
After the sell-off, it looks like a buy at 29x forward earnings estimates, down from more than 40x earlier in the year.
Carnival (NYSE: CCL) suffered during early pandemic days, building up a wall of debt to support operations as sailings halted. Since that time, though, the company has made significant progress on paying down debt and has taken steps to favor profitability -- for example, it replaced older ships with newer ones that don't use as much fuel.
On top of this, Carnival has proven its popularity with travelers as bookings and revenue have reached record levels quarter after quarter. In the recent period, Carnival reported record revenue of $6.2 billion, bookings that climbed in the double-digits, and a 50% increase in earnings per share.
The company is clearly optimistic about its future as it announced a $2.5 billion share buyback program and launched a new growth initiative with targets to meet by 2029. Goals include more than 16% return on invested capital and more than 50% adjusted EPS growth from the 2025 level.
Right now, at 11x forward earnings estimates, Carnival is a steal considering all it's accomplished and what it may accomplish over the next few years.
Before you buy stock in Home Depot, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Home Depot wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $477,813! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,320,088!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 25, 2026. *
Adria Cimino has positions in Home Depot and Nike. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Home Depot and Nike. The Motley Fool recommends Carnival Corp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The three stocks' apparent value rests on earnings assumptions that ignore how higher-for-longer rates and discretionary pullbacks could derail the recovery narratives presented."
The article frames HD, NKE, and CCL as post-selloff bargains at 20x, 29x, and 11x forward earnings, citing resilience and market share gains. Yet it underplays macro risks: HD remains tied to a housing market still strained by 6.8% mortgage rates, NKE's wholesale rebound depends on retailer inventory digestion that could stall, and CCL's debt reduction and buyback rest on sustained leisure spending that historically contracts sharply in slowdowns. Record CCL bookings and Nike's teen preference are positive but do not address valuation compression if EPS growth misses the assumed trajectory.
These names could still deliver if consumer spending holds and rate cuts arrive faster than expected, validating the forward multiples the article cites.
"These stocks have fallen into a valuation 'Goldilocks zone' that feels safe but masks unresolved execution risks and cyclical exposure that a slowing economy would expose quickly."
This article conflates valuation compression with opportunity, but the three picks reveal the trap. HD at 20x forward P/E isn't cheap—it's in-line with its 5-year median despite margin headwinds in housing. NKE at 29x is still elevated for a turnaround story with wholesale execution risk; 'Win Now' is aspirational, not proven. CCL at 11x looks tempting until you remember cruise debt-to-EBITDA remains ~3x (vs. pre-pandemic ~1.5x), and booking strength doesn't guarantee pricing power in a consumer slowdown. The article mistakes 'down from peaks' for 'undervalued.' Timing matters—if rates stay higher longer, cyclicals face structural headwinds.
All three are genuinely improving operationally and trading at reasonable multiples relative to forward growth; if the consumer holds and rate cuts materialize, mean reversion could deliver 15-25% upside over 18 months.
"The article conflates cyclical recovery with structural value, ignoring that these companies face permanent shifts in competitive moats and interest rate sensitivity."
This article frames a 'buy the dip' narrative for HD, NKE, and CCL, but it ignores the macro reality of a consumer discretionary sector under severe duress. While HD’s 20x forward P/E looks reasonable, it assumes a housing market recovery that remains elusive as mortgage rates stay 'higher for longer.' NKE at 29x forward earnings is egregiously expensive for a turnaround story facing structural competition from Hoka and On Holding. CCL is the only one showing genuine operational momentum, yet its debt-to-EBITDA ratio remains a massive overhang. Investors should be wary of these 'value traps' until we see actual margin expansion rather than just top-line revenue growth.
If interest rates drop faster than the market anticipates, the resulting housing market thaw and surge in consumer confidence could make these 'expensive' valuations look like bargain-basement entry points.
"The implied rebound path for HD, NKE, and CCL hinges on an unproven macro backdrop and company-specific fixes that may not materialize."
The piece labels HD, NKE, and CCL as after-sell-off bargains, but the strongest counter is macro and cyclicality risk: HD and NKE are consumer-spend proxies whose demand hinges on a resilient labor market and housing outlook; a softer housing cycle or higher interest rates could pressure homeowner and pro spending, and Nike's profits hinge on China exposure, wholesale margins, and currency moves that may not rebound quickly. Carnival remains highly levered to travel demand and fuel costs; even at 11x forward earnings, a recession or renewed health concerns could derail earnings and require more capital discipline. The article glosses over these explicit downside paths.
Counterpoint: if inflation abates and policy eases, HD's pro-channel growth, Nike's DTC margin leverage, and Carnival's leaner cost structure could drive faster-than-expected earnings resurgence.
"CCL's record bookings enable faster deleveraging than peers' cyclical exposures allow, supporting re-rating potential."
Gemini flags CCL's debt-to-EBITDA as an overhang but overlooks how sustained booking strength at premium pricing could accelerate deleveraging beyond current projections. With fuel hedging in place and capacity returning, a 20% EBITDA uplift in 2025 might drop leverage to 2.2x, inviting multiple expansion from 11x toward historical averages. This path differs from HD and NKE's cyclical dependencies on housing and wholesale channels.
"CCL's deleveraging thesis depends on pricing power surviving a downturn—historically the first casualty in leisure demand cycles."
Grok's CCL deleveraging math assumes booking strength sustains at premium pricing—but that's precisely what breaks in a consumer slowdown. Fuel hedging helps, but doesn't solve the core problem: leisure demand is procyclical. A 20% EBITDA uplift requires both volume AND pricing power simultaneously. Historical cruise cycles show pricing collapses before volume does. The debt overhang isn't just a number—it constrains CCL's ability to absorb a demand shock that HD and NKE face but can weather through cost cuts.
"CCL is benefiting from a structural shift in consumer spending priorities that makes its current valuation more defensible than the cyclical headwinds facing HD and NKE."
Claude, you’re missing the shift in cruise demographics. CCL is no longer just a procyclical play; it’s capturing a massive 'experience-over-goods' pivot that is cannibalizing the very spending HD and NKE rely on. While you fear a pricing collapse, the booking curve is lengthening, suggesting structural demand, not just a cyclical blip. The debt is a hurdle, but the cash flow conversion at these yields is superior to the margin-dilutive turnaround risks plaguing Nike.
"A 20% EBITDA uplift for CCL hinges on pricing staying robust in a downturn, but history shows pricing deteriorates before volume in recessions, risking stalled deleveraging."
Claude, your 20% EBITDA uplift for CCL hinges on pricing staying robust in a downturn, but history shows pricing deteriorates before volume in recessions, risking stalled deleveraging even with hedges and capacity normalization. The risk is a cyclical demand shock could crush pricing power, leaving debt uncomfortable and multiples stuck near 11x unless volumes magically hold and pricing resilience persists.
The panelists generally agree that HD, NKE, and CCL are not post-selloff bargains due to macro risks and valuation concerns, with most leaning bearish.
CCL's potential to accelerate deleveraging through sustained booking strength at premium pricing.
Macro and cyclicality risk, particularly a softer housing cycle or higher interest rates pressuring consumer spending.