By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, with concerns about Bitcoin's liquidity, regulatory risks, and potential decoupling from its 'digital gold' narrative. The discussion highlights the possibility of prolonged drawdowns and retesting of bear lows despite on-chain metrics looking healthy.
Risk: Macro/regulatory tail risk that can abruptly reprice BTC regardless of liquidity metrics
Opportunity: Potential decoupling of BTC upward if Treasury debt issuance succeeds in keeping rates stable
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
Anthony Pompliano, CEO of Professional Capital Management, urged investors on Wednesday to stop paying attention to the recurring declarations that Bitcoin is “dead.”
Pompliano expressed frustration on X about how some bears start “screeching” every four years that Bitcoin is going to zero.
“They are wrong every time. Careful who you listen to,” Pompliano advised investors.
Every 4 years a bunch of bitcoin bears start screeching about how the asset is dying.
They are wrong every time.
Careful who you listen to.— Anthony Pompliano 🌪 (@APompliano) June 2, 2026
Don't Miss:
- Still Learning the Market?These 50 Must-Know Terms Can Help You Catch Up Fast
As of this writing, a website called Bitcoindeaths.com has tracked 472 Bitcoin obituaries, including those by economists Nouriel Roubini and Peter Schiff, as well as business magnates Warren Buffett and Jamie Dimon.
In fact, Schiff tops the list, having declared Bitcoin “dead” as many as 22 times.
The latest obituary came on April 9, when Steve Keen—the Australian economist who accurately predicted the 2008 meltdown—predicted Bitcoin to go to zero.
Chart analysis indicates that obituary counts tend to spike during bear markets, with notably higher numbers in 2022 and during the current market cycle, showing acceleration since November 2025.
Trending: Avoid the #1 Investing Mistake: How Your ‘Safe' Holdings Could Be Costing You Big Time
Pompliano has been a long-standing Bitcoin bull and said earlier this week that the BTC sellers were getting exhausted, citing a set of on-chain metrics.
Not everyone shares this optimism. Veteran commodity strategist and Bloomberg analyst Mike McGlone said Bitcoin is still far from a true bottom, with the next major support zone at $50,000 before potentially falling toward $10,000 in the long term.
More than $600 million in BTC long positions were wiped out in the last 24 hours, while open interest has collapsed nearly 25% over the month, according to Coinglass.
Photo: Memory Stockphoto / Shutterstock
**Read Next: **
- Skip the Regrets: The Essential Retirement Tips Experts Wish Everyone Knew Earlier. - Think you're saving enough for your kids?You might be dangerously off — see why
Building Wealth Across More Than Just the Market
Building a resilient portfolio means thinking beyond a single asset or market trend. Economic cycles shift, sectors rise and fall, and no one investment performs well in every environment. That's why many investors look to diversify with platforms that provide access to real estate, fixed-income opportunities, precious metals, and even self-directed retirement accounts. By spreading exposure across multiple asset classes, it becomes easier to manage risk, capture steady returns, and create long-term wealth that isn't tied to the fortunes of just one company or industry.
Arrived
Backed by Jeff Bezos, Arrived Homes makes real estate investing accessible with a low barrier to entry. Investors can buy fractional shares of single-family rentals and vacation homes starting with as little as $100. This allows everyday investors to diversify into real estate, collect rental income, and build long-term wealth without needing to manage properties directly.
Vinovest
Fine wine and rare whiskey have historically moved independently of the stock market, making them a compelling alternative asset. Vinovest manages authenticated, insured portfolios of investment-grade wine and whiskey starting at $5,000 — sourcing, storage, and insurance all handled for you.
FarmTogether
Farmland has historically held its value through market volatility and delivered returns uncorrelated to stocks and bonds. For accredited investors, FarmTogether offers direct access to high-quality U.S. farmland starting at $15,000 — fully managed, with no landlord headaches.
EquityMultiple
For accredited investors looking beyond stocks and bonds, EquityMultiple provides access to vetted commercial real estate deals starting at $5,000, with only ~5% of opportunities passing their due diligence process.
**Bitcoin IRA **
For investors who want crypto exposure with tax advantages, Bitcoin IRA allows you to trade 60+ cryptocurrencies inside a self-directed IRA or roll over an existing 401(k), with 24/7 trading and institutional cold storage. Minimum $3,000 to start. Crypto investing involves substantial risk of loss and early withdrawal penalties apply.
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Bitcoin’s long-run upside hinges on durable demand catalysts beyond sentiment, not on the perpetual relief of skeptics."
Pompliano’s take is that Bitcoin is not dead and obituary memes are noise. The strongest case against this reading is that BTC remains a volatile, liquidity-sensitive asset whose price has historically spiked on hype but often retraced on macro or regulatory shocks. If US ETF approvals slow, tax/regulatory changes complicate crypto custody, or a risk-off regime returns, BTC could retest the 2024-25 bear lows even if on-chain metrics look healthy today. The piece glosses over the dependence on ongoing demand catalysts (institutions, ETFs, macro regime) and the possibility of prolonged drawdowns amid tightening liquidity.
The bears may have a point this time if macro policy stays tight and regulatory clarity remains negative; BTC's valuation could stay under pressure even as sentiment improves, leaving on-chain metrics as lagging indicators.
"The current decline in open interest and massive liquidation of long positions signal a fundamental deleveraging that transcends mere market sentiment."
Pompliano’s dismissal of 'Bitcoin obituaries' relies on survivorship bias. While Bitcoin has historically recovered from cyclic drawdowns, conflating past price action with future institutional viability ignores the shifting regulatory and macroeconomic landscape of 2026. The collapse of $600 million in long positions and a 25% drop in open interest suggests a structural deleveraging event, not just a 'screeching bear' narrative. Investors should focus on the liquidity crunch rather than the sentiment of pundits. If Bitcoin fails to hold the $50,000 support level identified by McGlone, the 'digital gold' narrative faces a severe test of its store-of-value thesis during high-interest-rate regimes.
Bitcoin’s resilience is not merely sentiment-driven; it is backed by increasing institutional adoption and supply-side constraints that render traditional valuation models like McGlone’s obsolete.
"Pompliano's observation that long-term Bitcoin bears have been wrong on direction is true but irrelevant to whether current prices offer acceptable risk-adjusted returns given ongoing liquidations and collapsing open interest."
This article is promotional noise masquerading as analysis. Pompliano's 'bears are wrong every time' claim is unfalsifiable—it ignores that Bitcoin has crashed 65-80% multiple times, and timing matters enormously for real investors. The Bitcoindeaths.com tracker is a rhetorical weapon, not evidence: yes, perma-bears have been wrong on direction, but that doesn't mean current valuations or risk/reward are attractive. McGlone's $50k-$10k range deserves more weight than it gets. The real issue: we're in June 2026 with $600M in longs liquidated in 24 hours and open interest down 25% monthly—that's capitulation or exhaustion, but the article conflates 'bears are wrong eventually' with 'now is a good time to buy.' It isn't the same thing.
If Bitcoin's four-year cycle is real and we're in early recovery, Pompliano's historical pattern (bears always wrong *eventually*) could be directionally correct even if the timing and entry point remain terrible for most retail investors.
"Accelerating obituaries since late 2025 reflect real adoption fatigue rather than routine noise, supporting lower cycle lows."
The article positions recurring Bitcoin obituaries as noise to ignore, yet obituary spikes align with bear markets and have accelerated since November 2025 alongside $600 million in long liquidations and 25% open-interest collapse. Pompliano's exhaustion thesis clashes with McGlone's $50,000 support and $10,000 downside case. Credible repeat critics like Schiff (22 declarations) and Keen suggest structural doubts around adoption, regulation, and competition from ETFs or stablecoins, not mere timing errors. Survival through 472 prior obituaries does not guarantee value accrual if macro or tech headwinds intensify.
Bitcoin has repeatedly recovered from identical bearish cycles and 472 obituaries, implying this round of warnings will again prove premature as on-chain metrics stabilize.
"Macro/regulatory tail risks can abruptly reprice BTC even when on-chain metrics look healthy, a blind spot in the obituary-focused narrative."
Claude, the core flaw in that line of thinking is treating on-chain health and obituary talk as leading indicators. The real risk is macro/regulatory tail risk that can abruptly reprice BTC regardless of liquidity metrics. A 25% drop in open interest may reflect liquidity draining rather than durable demand; if regulators tilt hawkishly or ETF approvals stall, BTC could stay tethered to risk-off flows even with favorable on-chain data. That dynamic isn't captured by the obituary narrative.
"Bitcoin's price trajectory in 2026 depends more on Treasury liquidity dynamics than on the technical support levels or sentiment-based obituary counts cited by the panel."
Gemini and Claude are fixated on the $50k support level and liquidations, but you are all missing the second-order effect of the 2026 fiscal environment. If the Treasury increases debt issuance to fund the deficit, Bitcoin’s correlation with liquidity, not just interest rates, becomes the primary driver. The obituary narrative is a sideshow; the real risk is whether BTC acts as a hedge against currency debasement or remains a high-beta proxy for tech stocks in a liquidity-constrained environment.
"BTC's 2026 behavior hinges on whether it acts as a risk-on proxy or inflation hedge—and recent correlation data suggests the former, making Treasury dynamics secondary to equity sentiment."
Gemini's Treasury/liquidity angle is underexplored, but conflates two separate risks. Yes, debt issuance affects liquidity broadly—but BTC's correlation with tech equities in 2025-26 suggests it's tracking risk appetite, not currency debasement. If Treasury issuance *succeeds* in keeping rates stable, BTC could decouple upward. If it *fails* and rates spike, BTC gets dragged down with equities regardless. The real question: does BTC behave as a store-of-value hedge or a risk-on proxy? Current data suggests the latter, which undermines the 'digital gold' thesis everyone's implicitly assuming.
"Treasury issuance failure could flip BTC from equity proxy to debasement hedge, invalidating current downside assumptions."
Claude's equity-beta framing underplays how Treasury debt issuance could invert that correlation. Failed auctions would spike yields, triggering further liquidations and open-interest contraction, yet simultaneously accelerate flows into non-sovereign assets if debasement fears dominate. The $50k-$10k debate then hinges on whether fiscal dominance overrides the 2025-26 risk-on pattern rather than on obituary counts or on-chain metrics alone.
The panel consensus is bearish, with concerns about Bitcoin's liquidity, regulatory risks, and potential decoupling from its 'digital gold' narrative. The discussion highlights the possibility of prolonged drawdowns and retesting of bear lows despite on-chain metrics looking healthy.
Potential decoupling of BTC upward if Treasury debt issuance succeeds in keeping rates stable
Macro/regulatory tail risk that can abruptly reprice BTC regardless of liquidity metrics