Applied Materials Is Silently Powering the AI Boom. Here's Why.
By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on Applied Materials (AMAT) with concerns about its high P/E ratio, cyclical nature, and reliance on capex-driven growth. Gemini highlights the recurring revenue from services as a cushion, but others argue it's not enough to mitigate risks.
Risk: Sharp decline in AI-driven capex or delays in customer fab builds due to geopolitical factors or demand softness.
Opportunity: Recurring, high-margin revenue from services, which provides a buffer against cyclicality.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Nvidia and Micron Technology have drawn significant investor attention as they power AI infrastructure, but savvy investors may also want to turn some of that attention to Applied Materials (NASDAQ: AMAT). Applied Materials doesn't make chips, but it designs vital equipment that chipmakers use to create their chips.
In short, Applied Materials is an enabler of chipmakers, but that's not the only thing you need to know when deciding if the stock is a good buying opportunity.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Applied Materials isn't the only company that produces equipment chipmakers need to create their chips, but it is the largest semiconductor equipment provider in the U.S.
The company's fiscal 2026 second-quarter results highlighted several customer partnerships that suggest accelerated revenue growth is on the way. In its release, Applied Materials mentioned agreements and partnerships with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Micron, and SK Hynix. All of these companies have been working together for years, and the parabolic revenue growth they are seeing should translate into higher revenue growth for Applied Materials.
The company delivered 11% year-over-year revenue growth in its fiscal 2026 second quarter, which ended April 26, but it expects at least 30% revenue growth for its semiconductor business in calendar 2026. Semiconductor revenue made up $5.965 billion of the company's $7.91 billion of its second-quarter revenue, which comes to 75% of total revenue.
That segment only had 10.4% year-over-year revenue growth in the quarter, so guidance for 30% revenue growth throughout calendar 2026 implies substantial acceleration in upcoming quarters.
Not every investor is waiting around for Applied Materials to deliver at least 30% revenue growth in calendar 2026. The stock has more than doubled year to date, resulting in a P/E ratio that soared from the mid-teens just a year ago to over 50 right now.
While the current valuation leaves a lower margin of safety, Applied Materials can fit nicely into its new valuation if it delivers on guidance. The company's guidance for 30% revenue growth for its semiconductor segment in calendar 2026 does not mean it will maintain a 30% revenue growth rate for the rest of the year.
Applied Materials has to achieve 40% to 50% revenue growth in future quarters to offset an 11% year-over-year revenue jump in its Q2. The company has maintained high net profit margins, reaching 35.5% in the most recent quarter, so net income should meaningfully advance in calendar 2026.
Applied Materials' fundamentals are set to strengthen thanks to a multiyear AI supercycle. That can address the valuation and make it more attractive in the near future. Investors who buy now, anticipating what the company can become, may be making a wise decision.
Before you buy stock in Applied Materials, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Applied Materials wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $400,101! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,212,683!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 911% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 2, 2026. *
Marc Guberti has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Applied Materials, Micron Technology, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"AMAT is currently priced for a best-case scenario that ignores the historical volatility of semiconductor capital expenditure cycles."
The article’s optimism hinges on a 30% growth acceleration in 2026, yet it glosses over the cyclicality of the semiconductor capital equipment market. While Applied Materials (AMAT) is essential for advanced packaging and gate-all-around (GAA) transistor architectures, a P/E ratio exceeding 50 is historically aggressive for a cyclical hardware provider. If the AI infrastructure build-out hits a plateau or if TSMC and Samsung delay capacity expansion due to geopolitical cooling or oversupply, AMAT’s margins will compress rapidly. The stock is currently priced for perfection, assuming an uninterrupted capex supercycle that ignores the inherent 'lumpiness' of semiconductor equipment orders and potential inventory corrections.
If the transition to 2nm nodes and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) creates a permanent, non-cyclical floor for equipment demand, AMAT’s current valuation may simply be the new 'fair' multiple for a critical infrastructure monopoly.
"AMAT's valuation assumes zero capex cycle risk and sustained customer demand acceleration—both historically unreliable assumptions in semiconductor equipment."
AMAT's 30% semiconductor revenue guidance for calendar 2026 requires 40-50% quarterly growth ahead—a material acceleration from 10.4% YoY in Q2. At 50x P/E, the stock prices in flawless execution. The real risk: TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are all capex-cycling together. If any major customer delays or consolidates fab builds due to demand softness, AMAT's backlog evaporates faster than it filled. The article assumes capex stays parabolic; it doesn't. Also, ASML (Netherlands) and Tokyo Electron compete directly—AMAT's market share isn't guaranteed despite current dominance.
If AI capex moderates in late 2025 or chipmakers face demand destruction (weaker LLM monetization, oversupply of GPUs), AMAT's guidance becomes unachievable, and a 50x multiple compresses brutally. The article treats the AI supercycle as inevitable; it isn't.
"AMAT needs flawless execution on an aggressive growth ramp to justify its current 50x valuation."
The article correctly flags AMAT's customer ties to TSMC, Micron, and SK Hynix and the jump from 11% to 30% semiconductor revenue guidance for calendar 2026. Yet that 30% full-year target requires 40-50% sequential acceleration in coming quarters simply to offset the modest Q2 print. With the stock already at a 50-plus P/E after doubling YTD, any delay in AI-driven capex or share loss to Lam Research or KLA would compress multiples quickly. High 35% net margins help, but the semi-equipment cycle remains lumpy and geopolitically exposed.
If hyperscale AI buildouts accelerate beyond current roadmaps, equipment orders could exceed even the 30% target and justify the multiple within two quarters.
"AMAT could re-rate if calendar-2026 revenue accelerates to 30% with durable margins, but the risk of a sharp multiple contraction remains if AI capex slows or earnings miss expectations."
Applied Materials (AMAT) sits at the center of AI-driven chip fabs, with 30% calendar-2026 semiconductor revenue growth guidance and a 35%+ margin profile that could lift earnings if the cycle persists. The setup hinges on sustained hyperscaler capex and the big customers noted (TSMC, Micron, SK Hynix). Yet the article glosses over the fragility: a 50x+ multiple leaves little room for error; Q2’s 11% YoY growth in the segment and the 30% target imply a sharp acceleration that may not materialize every quarter. A downturn in AI demand or a capex pause would compress margins and valuations fast.
Valuation risk: a 50x+ P/E leaves little cushion if 2026 growth softens or if AI capex slows. The bull case could evaporate quickly on any earnings miss or macro weakness.
"The growth of recurring service revenue creates a valuation floor that renders historical cyclical P/E comparisons obsolete."
Claude, you’re missing the shift in capital allocation. While you focus on cyclicality, you overlook that AMAT’s 'Services' revenue—now nearly 25% of total sales—provides a recurring, high-margin buffer that didn't exist in previous cycles. This annuity-like stream mitigates the 'lumpiness' Gemini and Grok fear. Even if fab construction slows, the installed base requires constant maintenance and upgrades. This structural change justifies a higher 'floor' multiple than historical averages, making the 50x P/E less speculative than it appears.
"Services revenue provides margin stability, not capex cycle immunity—it lags, not leads, fab spending downturns."
Gemini's Services buffer argument is structurally sound—25% recurring revenue does cushion cyclicality. But it doesn't solve the core problem: if fab capex collapses 40%, Services demand follows within 12-18 months as utilization drops and customers defer maintenance. The annuity is real, but it's a lagging indicator of capex health, not a hedge against it. AMAT still needs the 30% semiconductor growth to justify 50x; Services just softens the landing if it misses.
"Services growth is too slow and lagging to help hit the semiconductor revenue target that justifies current valuation."
Gemini claims services revenue cushions the cycle, but the 30% 2026 target is explicitly for semiconductor systems revenue—largely equipment. Services typically grows in the mid-single digits and lags utilization drops by 12-plus months, so it cannot deliver the 40-50% quarterly acceleration required to support a 50x multiple if capex from TSMC or Micron slips.
"The 25% Services cushion cannot guarantee a floor for AMAT's earnings or the multiple if capex slows; it lags demand and may not offset a sharp drop in equipment orders."
Gemini's Services cushion is a useful nuance, but it isn’t a floor. Services is still linked to capex cycles, and upgrades/maintenance often lag any slowdown by a year or more. If AI capex softens or customers defer builds, installed-base demand could fall even as Services grows, pressuring margins. A 50x multiple assumes relentless growth; a sharp miss could trigger quick multiple compression despite a 25% services mix.
The panel is divided on Applied Materials (AMAT) with concerns about its high P/E ratio, cyclical nature, and reliance on capex-driven growth. Gemini highlights the recurring revenue from services as a cushion, but others argue it's not enough to mitigate risks.
Recurring, high-margin revenue from services, which provides a buffer against cyclicality.
Sharp decline in AI-driven capex or delays in customer fab builds due to geopolitical factors or demand softness.