By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel's discussion highlights the complexity of valuing AI stocks, with varying views on Palantir's potential. While some panelists caution about its high valuation and potential risks, others see opportunities in its growth and the broader AI trend.
Risk: Potential shifts in US government spending priorities after the 2024 election disproportionately hitting Palantir's contract pipeline and massive stock-based compensation diluting earnings per share.
Opportunity: The potential for Palantir's AI platform to become critical to defense modernization and the broader AI trend driving demand for its services.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Artificial intelligence (AI) stocks have been soaring in recent years, and that has made their valuations bloated.
Buying stocks at high premiums can lead to limited returns and even losses.
Warren Buffett's first rule of investing is to never lose money, which can be a valuable guide.
Many tech stocks have been surging in recent years due to strong results stemming from investments in artificial intelligence (AI). Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR), Nvidia, and Broadcom have all rallied more than 500% in just the past three years.
Companies involved with AI have been benefiting from robust demand for their products and services, which has led to investors also being extremely bullish on these types of stocks. But as hot as the AI trade has been of late, I've stayed away from it, as the valuations have gotten out of control. And that can be vital to ensure you don't violate Warren Buffett's first rule when it comes to investing: "never lose money."
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Many AI stocks are incredibly overvalued today, and one of the best examples of that is Palantir Technologies. Strong growth and ties to the U.S. government have made this a bit of a safe haven stock for tech investors in recent years. The company is involved in data analytics, and its AI platform has provided companies with significant opportunities for enhancing their businesses and improving efficiency.
The problem with Palantir is that although its shares are down 23% this year, the stock still isn't cheap; it trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of more than 150. Buying a stock at that kind of valuation, regardless of how promising its growth prospects are, can open you up to some considerable downside risk. While not all AI stocks are as expensive as Palantir, many are, and they're priced on rosy expectations ahead, which is why I've avoided them.
Taking a cautious approach may result in you missing out on gains and sitting on the sidelines while others profit from the excitement around AI stocks. But investing is about the long term, and investing in quality stocks and hanging on for years is where the most significant gains can come from. By considering Buffett's advice and his rule of not trying to lose money when investing, you can make more sound, safe investing decisions. While that may not be all that exciting, particularly with growth stocks taking off in value, it can help ensure you focus on a balanced investing strategy.
Tech stocks have a volatile history, and when sentiment sours on them, they can quickly go into a free fall. Regardless of how many investing years you have left, I think it's important not to overlook valuations, as doing so could leave your portfolio vulnerable to significant risk later on.
Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $477,813! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,320,088!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 25, 2026. *
David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Broadcom, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"PLTR's 150x trailing P/E offers minimal margin of safety if government or commercial growth decelerates even modestly."
The article correctly flags Palantir's trailing P/E above 150 as extreme, especially after a 23% YTD drop that still leaves it priced for flawless execution. Nvidia and Broadcom have already compounded over 500% in three years on AI demand, yet the piece underplays how quickly earnings must scale to justify those multiples without multiple compression. Buffett's "never lose money" rule is invoked, but ignores his own large Apple stake bought at elevated multiples when growth was visible. Tech volatility history is real; any slowdown in AI capex from hyperscalers would trigger rapid de-rating.
If AI-driven revenue growth exceeds 40% annualized for several more years, today's multiples could compress naturally into the 40-60x range without price declines, rewarding holders who ignore near-term valuation warnings.
"Valuation discipline is sound; categorical AI avoidance sacrifices asymmetric upside by conflating expensive names (PLTR) with fairly-valued, high-growth infrastructure plays (NVDA, BROADCOM)."
This article conflates valuation discipline with blanket AI avoidance—a false choice. PLTR at 150x P/E is genuinely expensive, but the article ignores that NVDA trades ~35x forward earnings with 80%+ YoY revenue growth, and BROADCOM ~25x with similar momentum. The real issue isn't AI stocks broadly; it's *which* AI stocks and *when* you buy them. The author's Buffett framing is rhetorically safe but intellectually lazy: Buffett himself owns NVDA and has praised AI's transformative potential. Missing a 500% move to avoid a potential 30% drawdown on overvalued names means accepting opportunity cost as the primary risk—rarely discussed.
If AI capex cycles peak in 2025-26 and demand normalizes, even reasonably-priced AI infrastructure plays could compress 40-50% on multiple contraction alone, making the author's caution retrospectively vindicated despite the framing being imprecise.
"Valuation metrics like P/E are lagging indicators that fail to capture the inflection point in operating leverage for AI-native software companies."
The article relies on a superficial 'value' trap argument by fixating on trailing P/E ratios for hyper-growth companies like Palantir. A 150x multiple is meaningless without context regarding operating leverage and GAAP transition. As PLTR shifts from high-touch government consulting to a scalable software-as-a-service model, its margins are expanding rapidly. The author ignores that AI infrastructure isn't just a trend; it's a structural shift in enterprise capital expenditure. While I agree that broad AI enthusiasm is frothy, dismissing the entire sector based on Buffett’s 'never lose money' mantra ignores that in tech, the greatest risk is often the opportunity cost of missing a platform-defining shift.
If the anticipated enterprise AI productivity gains fail to materialize into tangible free cash flow within the next 18-24 months, these high-multiple stocks will face a violent valuation compression as growth rates normalize.
"Durable AI demand and pricing power in leading beneficiaries can justify premium multiples and lead to meaningful upside even after a period of high valuations."
The piece hits an honest nerve about AI stock valuations, but it treats the AI rally as a single story rather than a set of discrete risk/return curves. Nvidia and Broadcom sit on strong cash flows and growing data-center demand, while Palantir’s model hinges more on government/Data analytics cycles and m2m contracts with uncertain margins. The risk: a capex pause, regulatory shifts, or a surprise earnings miss could compress multiples quickly. The upside: if AI adoption remains secular and compute demand stays robust, the leading names may re-rate on earnings visibility and free cash flow, even after a long rally. Valuation discipline matters, but opportunity may exist in select names.
Even if AI growth stays robust, those multiples could compress if a data-center cycle cools or policy/regulatory levers tighten; the article’s dichotomy of 'avoid all AI' versus 'buy everything' misses the risk that even winners can have pullbacks.
"Claude misstates Buffett's holdings while Palantir faces overlooked post-election government budget risks."
Claude's claim that Buffett owns NVDA lacks support from Berkshire's disclosed holdings, which focus on Apple rather than Nvidia. This error weakens the rebuttal to the article's valuation warnings. Separately, no one has addressed how potential shifts in US government spending priorities after the 2024 election could disproportionately hit Palantir's contract pipeline, creating a sector-specific downside not tied to broad AI enthusiasm.
"Factual accuracy matters, but the real debate is whether current multiples leave room for execution risk or assume perfection."
Grok's catch on Buffett/NVDA is valid—Berkshire's 13F filings show no material Nvidia stake. But this doesn't invalidate Claude's broader point: Buffett has publicly endorsed AI's importance. The real gap nobody's addressed is *timing*. Even if NVDA's 35x forward multiple is justified by growth, the article never asks whether that growth is priced in *now* or requires 2-3 more years of execution. That's the valuation discipline question—not whether AI is real.
"Palantir's valuation is masked by aggressive stock-based compensation that dilutes shareholder value even as revenue scales."
Grok is right to pivot to the 2024 election, but he misses the second-order effect: Palantir’s AIP (Artificial Intelligence Platform) is increasingly critical to defense modernization, making it a bipartisan priority regardless of administration. The real risk isn't just contract flow; it's the massive stock-based compensation (SBC) diluting those earnings per share. Investors are buying growth while ignoring the persistent share count expansion that keeps GAAP profitability perpetually fragile despite the 'scalable' narrative.
"Post-election budget dynamics could slow Palantir's government contract cadence for 12-18 months, creating valuation risk even if AI demand remains robust."
Palantir's government-facing revenue is highly sensitive to budget timing; Grok raised the risk but didn’t quantify its impact. If a post-election budget squeeze or procurement slow-down hits defense/Intel spending, Palantir's contract cadence could flatten for 12-18 months even as AI strides continue elsewhere. That creates a double whammy: earnings visibility deteriorates just as SBC-driven dilution remains a subsidy to growth. Beware the asymmetry: value in the stock comes from timing and policy momentum, not just AI tech.
The panel's discussion highlights the complexity of valuing AI stocks, with varying views on Palantir's potential. While some panelists caution about its high valuation and potential risks, others see opportunities in its growth and the broader AI trend.
The potential for Palantir's AI platform to become critical to defense modernization and the broader AI trend driving demand for its services.
Potential shifts in US government spending priorities after the 2024 election disproportionately hitting Palantir's contract pipeline and massive stock-based compensation diluting earnings per share.