By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists express strong bearish sentiments regarding the IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI in 2026, citing concerns about overvaluation, unsustainable revenue growth, and potential margin compression.
Risk: Margin compression due to hyperscalers internalizing inference workloads and repricing compute services.
Opportunity: None identified.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
For investors who like that "new stock smell," this could be the greatest time ever. Several of the most highly anticipated initial public offerings (IPOs) in stock market history have either recently been conducted or are right around the corner.
Space Exploration Technologies' (NASDAQ: SPCX) IPO on June 12 lived up to the hype. Anthropic, which developed the powerful Claude AI model, filed a confidential S-1 initial registration document with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 1. ChatGPT creator OpenAI submitted its S-1 around May 22.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Which of these three is the better IPO stock to buy and hold? Here's how SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI stack up against each other.
SpaceX's IPO price valued it at roughly $1.8 trillion. However, the stock soared after going public. SpaceX's valuation topped $2.4 trillion as of early trading on June 19, 2026, making it the sixth-largest company by market cap.
It's no surprise that SpaceX's prospects have excited investors. The company's Starlink unit pioneered the satellite internet service market. SpaceX dominates the launch market with its Falcon 9 rockets. Its Starship vehicle is designed to transport humans to the Moon and Mars.
Much of SpaceX's massive estimated total addressable market of $28.5 trillion, though, is related to its xAI artificial intelligence (AI) business. xAI developed the Grok AI model. It also has recently signed mega-deals to provide compute capacity to Anthropic and Alphabet's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google Cloud.
The big knock against SpaceX, though, is that many analysts don't think its astronomical valuation is justified based on its growth prospects. For example, Morningstar (NASDAQ: MORN) estimates SpaceX's fair valuation is about 66% below its current share price. There are also governance concerns, given that Elon Musk controls over 80% of the company's voting power.
Anthropic was founded in 2021. Its revenue run rate reached $14 billion by February 2026. As of May 28, 2026, the company's revenue run rate had topped $47 billion. And Anthropic's valuation neared $1 trillion.
Claude, the large language model (LLM) developed by Anthropic, has taken the world by storm. It currently ranks as the top AI model across multiple fronts on Vellum's LLM Leaderboard. Claude remains the only frontier AI model that's available on all three of the top cloud platforms.
Anthropic's valuation appears more justifiable, based on its stellar revenue growth, than SpaceX's. However, the company incurs tremendous expenses to build the AI infrastructure needed to support its growth.
Detailed financial information isn't available yet for Anthropic. But CNBC recently reported that the company could generate its first profit in the second quarter of 2026. We'll know more soon about Anthropic moves forward with its anticipated IPO over the next few months.
OpenAI is the company that fired the shot heard 'round the world with its launch of ChatGPT in late 2022. ChatGPT became the fastest-growing consumer application in history, reaching 100 million active users in just two months.
Like Anthropic, OpenAI continues to deliver impressive revenue growth. Within the first year after the launch of ChatGPT, the company's revenue hit $1 billion. By the end of 2024, OpenAI was generating $1 billion in revenue every quarter. As of March 2026, it was raking in $2 billion per month.
Also like Anthropic, though, OpenAI must invest heavily to support its growth. But its situation appears to be more challenging than its rival's. Leaked financial documents, verified by the Financial Times, showed the company posted a loss of $38.5 billion last year on revenue of around $13.1 billion.
One other thing to note about OpenAI is that it was originally founded as a nonprofit organization. It's now a public benefit corporation. The nonprofit OpenAI Foundation will continue to have significant control over the company even after it lists its shares on a stock exchange.
For now, SpaceX is the only IPO stock that investors can buy and hold. However, I think that the stock could pull back sharply later this year once insiders can sell their shares. My view is that waiting for a more attractive valuation before investing in SpaceX makes sense.
The S-1 filings for Anthropic and OpenAI (which haven't been released to the public yet) should be informative about evaluating the strength of these two AI companies. Assuming its planned valuation isn't outrageously high, I suspect Anthropic could be the best overall pick. I like the company's revenue growth and its prospects. Anthropic is the IPO I'm most anticipating.
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $417,305! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,293,148!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 936% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 22, 2026. *
Keith Speights has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Lofty pre-IPO valuations hinge on speculative AI monetization rather than proven earnings, raising the risk of a significant re-rating downside if revenue visibility and capital costs don’t meet expectations."
Take: The piece reads like hype dressed as analysis. It cites SpaceX at a $1.8T–$2.4T valuation, Anthropic revenue run rates near $47B, and OpenAI’s surge to multi-billion monthly revenue, plus a $38.5B loss on ~$13B revenue. Yet these are largely private-market signals, not proven public-market cash flows. The TAM ($28.5T) relies on transformative AI adoption that may never materialize, and the governance risks are real: Musk controls >80% voting power at SpaceX, OpenAI’s nonprofit/control structure could constrain capital flexibility. Without clear profitability paths or credible earnings visibility, the risk of a sharp re-rating in a liquidity-constrained market remains high.
Bull case: if Anthropic and OpenAI convert rapid revenue growth into durable profitability and SpaceX turns Starlink/xAI contracts into steady cash flow, the lofty valuations may be more warranted than they appear.
"The current valuations of these AI-heavy IPOs are untethered from fundamental cash flow realities and rely on speculative, long-term infrastructure dominance that remains unproven."
The article presents a distorted landscape of 2026 tech valuations. SpaceX at a $2.4 trillion market cap implies a massive premium on its xAI integration, yet investors are ignoring the execution risk of Starship and the volatility of Musk-controlled governance. While Anthropic’s $47 billion revenue run rate is impressive, it likely masks unsustainable customer acquisition costs and heavy reliance on hyperscaler partnerships. OpenAI’s $38.5 billion loss on $13 billion revenue suggests a broken business model that relies on endless capital raises. Investors should be wary of these IPOs; they are priced for perfection in a market that is clearly over-indexing on AI hype over tangible free cash flow.
If these firms achieve a 'moat' through proprietary compute efficiency, their current losses are merely R&D investments that will yield monopolistic margins once the infrastructure build-out phase concludes.
"This article contains unverified claims about future IPO dates, revenue run rates, and financial losses, making it unsuitable for investment decisions until actual SEC filings are public."
This article is fundamentally unreliable as investment guidance. SpaceX's $2.4T valuation is presented without a single DCF or comparable company analysis—just a Morningstar estimate claiming 66% overvaluation. Anthropic's $47B revenue run rate is unverified; if real, that's a 3x jump in three months (Feb $14B to May $47B), which demands scrutiny. OpenAI's $38.5B loss on $13.1B revenue is catastrophic and barely discussed. The author's preference for Anthropic hinges entirely on S-1 filings 'not yet released'—pure speculation. Most damning: these aren't IPOs yet. SpaceX's June 2026 date appears fabricated (article claims June 2026 as 'early trading'), and Anthropic/OpenAI S-1s are 'confidential' or 'around May'—no actual prospectuses exist to evaluate.
If these revenue figures are real and sustainable, Anthropic's growth trajectory could justify a premium valuation despite current losses—the AI infrastructure capex burden is temporary. The author's skepticism might simply reflect fear of missing a generational opportunity.
"Anthropic's revenue acceleration does not yet demonstrate a sustainable margin trajectory once full infrastructure costs are visible in its S-1."
The article positions Anthropic as the strongest of the three IPOs due to its revenue run-rate jumping from $14B to $47B by May 2026 and a valuation near $1T. This reading ignores that all three face identical structural problems: compute costs scaling faster than revenue, with OpenAI already showing $38.5B losses on $13.1B revenue. SpaceX's $2.4T post-IPO cap already bakes in speculative xAI and Starship outcomes that Morningstar views as 66% overvalued. Anthropic's multi-cloud edge and leaderboard ranking are real, yet they do not solve the shared risk of margin compression once hyperscalers internalize more inference workloads.
Anthropic could still deliver first profits in Q2 2026 and sustain faster monetization than OpenAI if its Claude model maintains technical leadership across all three major clouds.
"Margin compression from hyperscalers internalizing compute could erode the AI moats and trigger faster public-market re-rating than currently assumed."
Gemini, you call out CAC and hyperscaler dependence as potential red flags. My tweak: the bigger, unspoken X-factor is margin compression as hyperscalers internalize inference workloads and push for more favorable terms. Even with a multi-cloud stance, Anthropic/OpenAI revenue growth may stall if cloud giants reprice or bundle compute with other services. That could hollow out the 'moat' thesis and justify a faster dilution/discount in public markets than you imply.
"The valuation of these firms is secondary to the macro liquidity risk, as high interest rates will punish capital-intensive, loss-making IPOs."
Claude, you hit the nail on the head regarding the fabricated timelines, but we are ignoring the macro liquidity trap. Even if revenue figures are accurate, these companies are burning cash at a rate that requires a massive, sustained bull market to absorb their IPO supply. If the Fed keeps rates at 4.5% or higher through 2026, the 'growth at any cost' model collapses. We are looking at a liquidity crunch, not just a valuation problem.
"Macro liquidity is a timing risk, not a kill-shot—but unverified revenue figures pose an immediate credibility crisis that no amount of Fed easing fixes."
Gemini's liquidity trap is real, but it's a timing issue, not a structural one. The macro headwind matters only if these IPOs hit in 2025–early 2026 during a rate-hold regime. But if Fed cuts begin in late 2025 (current market pricing ~3 cuts by end-2026), the window reopens. The bigger risk: none of us have verified the revenue figures. Claude's right that Anthropic's $14B→$47B jump in three months is extraordinary and unverified. If those numbers collapse post-IPO, liquidity becomes irrelevant.
"Unverified revenues plus margin pressure make macro timing irrelevant for these IPOs."
Claude correctly identifies the unverified Anthropic revenue surge as a critical gap, but overlooks how this uncertainty amplifies the margin compression ChatGPT noted. If those run rates prove inflated, hyperscaler repricing will accelerate losses beyond OpenAI's $38.5B level. Even anticipated Fed cuts won't sustain valuations when public investors scrutinize actual cash flows post-IPO, turning timing into a secondary concern.
The panelists express strong bearish sentiments regarding the IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI in 2026, citing concerns about overvaluation, unsustainable revenue growth, and potential margin compression.
None identified.
Margin compression due to hyperscalers internalizing inference workloads and repricing compute services.