By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on AGNC and Annaly (NLY), warning that these mortgage REITs, despite their high yields, are total-return plays with significant risks. Key risks include volatile income, capital destruction via book-value swings, hedging inefficiency, and liquidity crunch leading to fire sales of MBS assets.
Risk: Liquidity crunch leading to fire sales of MBS assets
Opportunity: None identified
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Annaly Capital and AGNC Investment are both mortgage real estate investment trusts.
AGNC Investment has a yield of 13.9%, while Annaly Capital's yield is 12.9%.
Both mREITs have complex dividend histories and may not be appropriate for many dividend investors, but they could be valuable additions for the right investor.
Dividend investors often start their search for stocks by looking at dividend yields. That's a logical move given their income focus, but there's a risk that yield becomes more important than other factors that can also have a material impact on an investor's long-term results. Annaly Capital (NYSE: NLY) and AGNC Investment (NASDAQ: AGNC), with their huge double-digit yields, need extra careful vetting.
For reference, the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is yielding roughly 1.1% today. The average financial stock yields 1.5%. The average real estate investment trust (REIT) yields 3.6%. Mortgage REITs Annaly and AGNC yield 12.9% and 13.9%, respectively. Here are some key things to consider before buying either of these two mortgage REITs, and why you might prefer one over the other.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
A property-owning REIT buys physical assets, such as office buildings, and then leases them to tenants. The core business of mortgage REITs like Annaly and AGNC is owning mortgage securities that have been pooled together into bond-like investments. In some ways, a mortgage REIT, which manages a portfolio of mortgage securities, is similar to a bond fund. Notably, both Annaly and AGNC highlight total return as a key goal.
This is important for dividend lovers. While most property-owning REITs focus on providing reliable, and often steadily growing, dividends, the dividend histories of Annaly and AGNC have been highly volatile. There have been long periods where dividends have steadily declined.
If you are trying to live off the income your portfolio generates, neither of these two mREITs will be good choices for you, despite their massive yields. Worse, the stock prices of these mREITs have tended to follow their dividends both higher and lower. Overall, investors who spent the dividend have been left with less income and less capital. However, that does not mean that these companies are poorly run.
Investors that reinvested their dividends, focusing on total return, have been well rewarded. Both Annaly and AGNC have delivered total returns similar to those of the S&P 500 index. Notably, the return profiles of both mREITs differ from that of the S&P 500, so they may provide valuable diversification benefits for investors focused on asset allocation.
Assuming you focus on total return rather than a consistent income stream, your choice between Annaly and AGNC will likely come down to one key preference. AGNC is fully focused on owning and managing its portfolio of agency mortgage securities. The term "agency" indicates that these mortgages are guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. The key is that there is no credit risk associated with such loans. That said, the portfolio's value fell 5.6% in the first quarter of 2026. That resulted in a negative 1.8% economic return for investors, as the $0.50 per share drop in book value more than offset the $0.36 in dividends paid in the quarter. Diversification has its benefits.
Annaly's business is heavily focused on its portfolio of agency mortgage securities, but it also operates two other lines of business. Annaly's residential credit business oversees a portfolio of non-agency mortgages. It makes loans, securitizes loans, and manages a portfolio of loans. Annaly also operates a mortgage servicing business, which simply collects fees for processing mortgage payments. It is a fairly consistent cash flow generator and provides some offset for the increased risk associated with the company's non-agency mortgage operation. In the first quarter, Annaly's economic return was 1.5%, with a book value decline of $0.39 per share more than offset by dividends of $0.70.
At the end of the day, investors seeking exposure to agency mortgage-backed securities will likely prefer AGNC Investment. Investors that focus on diversification, however, will probably lean toward Annaly and its more diverse business model.
Annaly and AGNC have double-digit yields, but neither is a particularly reliable dividend stock. That should keep most dividend investors on the sidelines. However, they both have solid total return histories, with AGNC being the more focused business and Annaly the more diversified operation. If you are using an asset allocation approach, either of these two mREITs could be a good fit for your portfolio. Your choice between them will likely boil down to your diversification preferences.
Before you buy stock in Annaly Capital Management, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Annaly Capital Management wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $477,813! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,320,088!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 23, 2026. *
Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Both mREITs embed more interest-rate and spread risk than their past total-return records suggest, making current double-digit yields a warning rather than an opportunity."
The article correctly flags AGNC's 13.9% and NLY's 12.9% yields as unsustainable for income investors given volatile dividends and book-value erosion, yet it underplays how both remain leveraged bets on agency MBS spreads. AGNC's Q1 economic return of -1.8% versus NLY's +1.5% already shows the cost of AGNC's narrower focus when prepayments or rates shift. Total-return parity with the S&P 500 over long periods does not guarantee future results if the Fed pauses cuts or credit spreads widen. Diversification via NLY's residential-credit and servicing arms offers only modest offset, not insulation, from sector-wide duration risk.
Historical total returns for both names have matched the S&P 500 while providing low correlation, so the diversification benefit the article cites could still materialize even if near-term book values remain pressured.
"A 13.9% yield that produced -1.8% economic return in Q1 2026 signals the dividend is unsustainable without further rate declines, making both mREITs poor choices for income and risky for total return unless you can time a rate reversal."
The article frames this as a yield comparison, but buries the real story: both mREITs are total-return vehicles masquerading as income plays. AGNC's Q1 2026 economic return of -1.8% despite a 13.9% yield is the canary. The article correctly warns that dividend-focused investors will get crushed, yet the headline still leads with yield. What's missing: rate environment sensitivity. If the Fed cuts aggressively, mortgage duration extends and book values compress further. AGNC's -5.6% Q1 portfolio decline suggests rates haven't stabilized. Annaly's diversification into non-agency mortgages and servicing adds complexity—credit risk that agency mREITs don't carry. The S&P 500 total-return comparison is misleading without volatility or drawdown analysis.
If rates stabilize or decline from here, both mREITs' portfolios could recover sharply, and the 13%+ yields would deliver genuine total returns. The article's own data shows reinvested-dividend holders matched S&P 500 returns historically.
"These stocks are not income investments but leveraged interest-rate derivatives that require active management of book value volatility, not just yield chasing."
The article correctly highlights that NLY and AGNC are total-return plays rather than income vehicles, but it glosses over the brutal reality of interest rate volatility. These mREITs are essentially levered bets on the spread between short-term funding costs and long-term mortgage rates. With the yield curve remaining unpredictable, book value erosion is a constant threat that dividend payouts often fail to mask. NLY’s move into mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) provides a hedge—as MSRs generally gain value when rates rise—but it adds operational complexity. AGNC remains a pure-play interest rate hedge, which is only attractive if you believe the Fed is done hiking and volatility will compress.
If we see a 'soft landing' where long-term rates stabilize and the yield curve steepens, these mREITs could see a massive book value recovery that makes current entry points look like generational bargains.
"Double-digit yields in AGNC and Annaly reflect significant capital and income risk; they are more suited to tactical diversification than as stable core income."
The article spotlights AGNC and Annaly for their double-digit yields but underemphasizes the real risk: volatile income and capital destruction via book-value swings. In Q1 2026, AGNC’s BV fell 5.6% with a negative economic return (-1.8%), and Annaly faced BV pressure despite dividend support. Hedging costs, leverage, prepayment risk, and rate moves can erode both yield and total return, so the high payouts may be more compensation for risk than a stable income source. Agency exposure helps credit risk, but not rate/ liquidity risk. For asset allocation, small tactical mREIT exposure might add diversification; as core income, they look unattractive.
The strongest counter is that the yields already embed substantial risk premiums; if rates stay high or volatility persists, BV erosion could continue and dividends could be curtailed, making the payoff unattractive even for diversification. If rates normalize or hedges perform, there is upside—but that hinges on uncertain financing conditions.
"NLY's positive Q1 return already shows diversification at work, yet it risks amplifying losses if credit spreads widen."
Grok flags the Q1 economic return gap but misses its implication for hedging efficacy. NLY's +1.5% versus AGNC's -1.8% already embeds the servicing and credit arms' offset against duration shocks. If prepayment speeds accelerate under any Fed pause, that modest edge could flip quickly since MSRs carry their own operational leverage. The panel underweights how quickly those non-agency exposures can amplify rather than dampen book-value swings when credit spreads widen.
"NLY's servicing arm is a correlation hedge only in isolated rate-shock scenarios, not in stagflation or credit stress where both agency and MSR books compress."
Grok's MSR amplification risk is real but underspecified. NLY's servicing portfolio gained ~$200M in Q1 2026 as rates rose, yet that offset only 36% of agency portfolio losses. If credit spreads widen 50bps—plausible in a recession—MSR values compress *and* agency spreads widen simultaneously. That's not a hedge; it's correlation breakdown. The article never quantifies MSR sensitivity to credit cycles, which is the actual tail risk.
"Repo market liquidity constraints represent a systemic risk to mREIT book values that outweighs interest rate sensitivity."
Claude is right about the correlation breakdown, but everyone is missing the repo-market liquidity risk. These firms rely on short-term repo financing to lever agency MBS. If liquidity dries up, the 'spread' trade collapses regardless of rate direction. While you all focus on duration and credit, the real tail risk is a funding squeeze that forces fire sales of MBS assets. That's how book value evaporates overnight, rendering yield-based arguments entirely irrelevant.
"Funding liquidity shocks (repo stresses) can trigger rapid deleveraging and BV destruction in mREITs that eclipses rate or MSR-based hedges."
Gemini raises an important funding stress risk, but focusing on MSR hedges or rate moves misses the root scarring: repo-based leverage can collapse in a liquidity crunch, forcing fire sales of MBS regardless of expected spread moves. In crisis-like conditions, funding costs spike and leverage contracts, making BV erosion exceed what models based on credit spreads or MSR offsets imply. A true tail risk, not just hedging inefficiency.
The panel consensus is bearish on AGNC and Annaly (NLY), warning that these mortgage REITs, despite their high yields, are total-return plays with significant risks. Key risks include volatile income, capital destruction via book-value swings, hedging inefficiency, and liquidity crunch leading to fire sales of MBS assets.
None identified
Liquidity crunch leading to fire sales of MBS assets