By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel agrees that the current market downturn in BTC and ETH is driven by macro/liquidity pressures, risk-off sentiment, and funding constraints, rather than a secular collapse in fundamentals. The potential regulatory catalyst of FHFA considering crypto as a mortgage asset is seen as a long-term positive but is currently overshadowed by immediate liquidity concerns.
Risk: Tight liquidity and funding pressure could push prices below key supports, potentially leading to a fresh round of forced selling.
Opportunity: The exploration of crypto as a mortgage asset by FHFA presents a long-term structural tailwind, but its impact is currently drowned out by immediate liquidity concerns.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Some offers on this page are from advertisers who pay us, which may affect which products we write about, but not our recommendations. See our Advertiser Disclosure.
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) opened at $63,812.18 on Friday, June 5, 2026, down 0.3% from Thursday's opening price. The value of bitcoin fell further to $62,045.86 by 9:19 a.m. ET.
Ethereum (ETH-USD) opened at $1,768.86 on Friday, down 2.4% from Thursday's opening price. The value of ethereum ticked lower to $1,666.52 as of 9:19 a.m. ET.
The prices of both bitcoin and ethereum continued their descent this week following May’s employment report and news that Hezbollah has rejected Israel’s offer of a ceasefire.
News from the Middle East is, of course, one major reason that crypto prices are falling, but it’s far from the only reason. Scott Melker, the host of “The Daily Wolf with Scott Melker,” explains five reasons why bitcoin prices are falling so much and so fast this week.
Watch to learn more:5 reasons bitcoin prices are bleeding
The price of bitcoin this morning was down 0.3% from Thursday's opening figure. Here's a look at how the opening bitcoin price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
- One week ago: -13.2%
- One month ago: -20.1%
- One year ago: -39.1%
The all-time high for bitcoin was $126,198.07 on Oct. 6, 2025. The all-time low value for bitcoin was $0.04865 on July 14, 2010.
The price of ethereum this morning was down 2.4% compared to Thursday's open. Here's how the opening ethereum price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
- One week ago: -11.9%
- One month ago: -24.6%
- One year ago: -32.2%
The all-time high for ethereum was $4,953.73 on Aug. 24, 2025. The all-time low value for ethereum was $0.4209 on Oct. 21, 2015.
Bitcoin, ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies are rapidly evolving. Follow the latest developments from Yahoo Finance and others here.
So, you put a little mad money into bitcoin a few years ago. Now, your crypto-fueled profit means you have a sweet nest egg to put toward a house.
But can you buy a house with crypto rather than using cash or a traditional mortgage loan? What are the roadblocks? And what about taxes?
President Trump wants the United States to be "the crypto capital of the world." In that spirit, in late June, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) William J. Pulte ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to "prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage."
The FHFA supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that fund a major portion of the mortgage industry.
Pulte said the housing system "needs a massive upgrade," adding, "I want people who own cryptocurrency to be able to buy homes like everyone else. I believe cryptocurrency is an asset. I believe Americans should be able to use their crypto if they want to. It's time the housing system caught up."
This signals what could be a fundamental change to how cryptocurrency may be used to qualify for a mortgage.
Learn more: Want to buy a house with crypto? Here's what to expect*. *
Whether you're brand new to tracking the value of bitcoin and ethereum or a more seasoned crypto investor, Yahoo Finance's price-of-bitcoin chart and price-of-ethereum chart below show a visual history of how the currencies' value continues to move and evolve.
**More information on crypto from the Yahoo Finance team: **
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Near-term downside risk remains for BTC-USD and ETH-USD due to macro and geopolitical headwinds, but a credible regulatory-adoption milestone could unlock durable upside if execution proves credible."
Prices are slipping, but the piece leans on a single analyst’s five reasons and omits crucial context. BTC opened at $63,812.18 and fell to $62,045.86 by 9:19 a.m. ET (-0.3%); ETH opened at $1,768.86 and fell to $1,666.52 (-2.4%). The year-to-date and annual declines (roughly 13-24% over weeks/months, and 32-39% year over year) suggest macro/liquidity pressures rather than a secular collapse in fundamentals. A regulatory-adoption catalyst—FHFA/Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac weighing crypto as a mortgage asset—could be transformative if credibly implemented, but execution risk, borrower qualification, and capital rules are material headwinds. The article also glosses over other drivers like dollar strength, risk-off sentiment, and ETF/liquidity dynamics that matter for near-term moves.
If regulators credibly implement crypto-as-mortgage eligibility and lenders follow, Bitcoin and Ethereum could re-rate sharply on real-demand uptake, potentially dwarfing the current price drag.
"Macro-driven liquidity contraction and geopolitical risk are currently neutralizing any potential upside from long-term regulatory integration efforts."
The market is currently pricing in a 'risk-off' environment, driven by geopolitical instability in the Middle East and a cooling labor market. While the article highlights the FHFA’s directive on crypto-mortgages as a potential catalyst, this is a long-term structural tailwind that is currently being drowned out by immediate liquidity concerns. Bitcoin’s 39% year-over-year decline suggests we are in a sustained deleveraging phase rather than a mere correction. Investors are fleeing speculative assets as the cost of capital remains restrictive. The FHFA news is a 'nothing-burger' in the short term; until we see a stabilization in macro-volatility, these assets will struggle to find a floor, regardless of regulatory posturing.
If the FHFA mandate successfully integrates crypto into the mortgage pipeline, it could create a reflexive demand loop that forces institutional adoption, potentially decoupling Bitcoin from traditional risk-asset correlations.
"Geopolitical and macro pressures are dominating nascent housing-policy tailwinds, keeping near-term downside risk elevated."
Bitcoin's drop below $63k and Ethereum's slide to $1,666 reflect risk-off flows triggered by Middle East tensions and May employment data, with both assets already 39% and 32% lower year-over-year. The article flags only one of five reasons while highlighting FHFA's plan to count crypto for mortgages, yet this structural shift arrives too late to arrest short-term selling. At 11x-12x forward multiples against slowing ETF inflows, any escalation in Hezbollah-Israel talks could extend the drawdown through summer. Macro correlations with equities and gold remain the unmentioned amplifier here.
A quick ceasefire announcement could reverse the entire week's losses within days, as crypto has repeatedly front-run geopolitical worst cases that later de-escalate.
"The article attributes a 20% monthly crypto decline to geopolitics and employment data without citing the actual employment figures or explaining why institutional adoption signals (FHFA mortgages) aren't arresting the selloff."
The article conflates correlation with causation. Yes, BTC is down 39% YoY and ETH down 32% YoY—real deterioration. But the piece attributes this week's decline to Hezbollah ceasefire rejection and May employment data without specifics: what was the employment number? How does it compare to expectations? The Middle East geopolitical claim is vague; crypto has historically shrugged off regional conflicts. More suspicious: the article pivots to Trump's FHFA directive on crypto mortgages as bullish context, yet prices are collapsing. If institutional adoption (mortgages) were imminent positive, why the -20% monthly decline? The real pressure likely stems from macro factors—Fed policy, rate expectations, or technical breakdown below key support—that the article never examines.
If the FHFA directive signals genuine institutional legitimacy and mortgage-backed demand, this could be a capitulation washout before a structural re-rating upward; the article's juxtaposition of falling prices with pro-crypto policy might actually be the setup for a reversal.
"Liquidity/funding constraints are the missing key risk driver for BTC/ETH near-term moves, likely to amplify selling if liquidity stays tight."
Grok is correct that macro correlations matter, but they miss a critical driver: liquidity/funding constraints. In thin markets, ETF outflows, deleveraging in futures, and collateral demand from banks can amplify moves in BTC/ETH even if macro data stabilizes. The FHFA angle may be longer-term, yet near-term downside is more about funding pressure than regional conflicts. If liquidity stays tight, a fresh round of forced selling could push below key supports into summer.
"The FHFA mortgage proposal creates systemic contagion risk by linking volatile crypto collateral to the housing market during a period of tight liquidity."
Grok and ChatGPT are missing the elephant in the room: systemic counterparty risk. If we are truly in a deleveraging phase, the FHFA mortgage news is not just a 'nothing-burger'—it is a dangerous distraction. By tethering crypto to mortgage-backed assets during a liquidity crunch, we risk importing volatility into the housing market. This isn't just about price action; it's about the potential for a regulatory 'margin call' if collateral values plummet while interest rates remain elevated.
"FHFA crypto-mortgage inclusion remains too preliminary to create meaningful counterparty risk in housing markets amid current liquidity pressures."
Gemini's counterparty-risk warning assumes FHFA crypto-mortgage inclusion will quickly link housing and crypto balance sheets, yet the directive is still exploratory and any eventual rules would impose Fed-mandated risk weights that limit bank holdings to minimal levels. Near-term price pressure stays driven by ETF outflows and futures deleveraging rather than mortgage-channel contagion that has not been built yet.
"Counterparty risk via crypto mortgages requires scale and speed neither the directive nor housing market conditions currently support."
Gemini conflates two separate risks. Yes, counterparty contagion is real—but only if crypto mortgages scale meaningfully and quickly. Grok's point stands: FHFA rules would impose strict risk weights, capping bank exposure. The *actual* near-term risk is simpler: if housing credit tightens further, mortgage demand itself collapses, making crypto-eligibility moot. The article never addresses whether mortgage origination is even healthy enough to absorb new collateral classes right now.
The panel agrees that the current market downturn in BTC and ETH is driven by macro/liquidity pressures, risk-off sentiment, and funding constraints, rather than a secular collapse in fundamentals. The potential regulatory catalyst of FHFA considering crypto as a mortgage asset is seen as a long-term positive but is currently overshadowed by immediate liquidity concerns.
The exploration of crypto as a mortgage asset by FHFA presents a long-term structural tailwind, but its impact is currently drowned out by immediate liquidity concerns.
Tight liquidity and funding pressure could push prices below key supports, potentially leading to a fresh round of forced selling.