AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists generally agreed that the State Street thesis of small caps and emerging markets outperforming the S&P 500 is flawed, with risks including rate sensitivity, geopolitical tensions, and lack of pricing power in small caps. They also highlighted the potential for stagflation to hurt small caps and the risk of liquidity crises in ETFs.

Risk: Stagflation and geopolitical risks hurting small caps and emerging markets

Opportunity: Potential re-rating of small caps due to US fiscal tailwinds

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

State Street Advisors expect the S&P Small Cap 600 and the MSCI Emerging Markets indexes to beat the S&P 500 over the next three to five years.

State Street argues small cap and emerging market stocks will outperform due to strong earnings growth and cheaper valuations.

The S&P 500 crushed the S&P Small Cap 600 and the MSCI Emerging Markets indexes over the past decade, and the same outcome is possible over the next decade.

  • 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index ›

In April, State Street updated its long-term asset class forecasts. The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is projected to return 7.1% annually during the next three to five years, while the S&P Small Cap 600 and MSCI Emerging Markets indexes are projected to return 7.6% and 7.5% annually, respectively.

Investors can get exposure to those indexes by purchasing shares of the Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (NYSEMKT: VIOO) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT: EEM). Here are the important details.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF

The Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF tracks 600 U.S. companies that meet the definition of small-cap stock, which currently includes equities with market values ranging from $1.2 billion to $8 billion. The index fund owns stocks from all 11 market sectors, but its assets are concentrated in financial (18%), industrial (17%), consumer discretionary (13%), and technology (12%) stocks.

The five largest positions in the Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF are as follows.

Eastman Chemical:0.5%Element Solutions:0.5%Primoris Services:0.5%Viavi Solutions:0.5%Argan:0.4%

The Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF returned 180% (10.8% annually) in the past decade, while the S&P 500 posted a total return of 315% (15.2% annually). One reason small-cap stocks underperformed during that period was high interest rates, which typically have a disproportionate impact on small businesses because they rely more heavily on floating-rate debt.

The Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF has a reasonable expense ratio of 0.07%, meaning shareholders will pay $7 annually over every $10,000 invested. While that is well below the average for U.S. index funds, it is still more expensive than the 0.03% expense ratio of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF tracks about 1,225 companies across emerging market economies. It's most heavily exposed to China, Taiwan, South Korea, and India, but also includes stocks from Brazil, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia. The fund has a large percentage of its assets invested in three sectors: technology (32%), financials (21%), and consumer discretionary (10%).

The five largest positions in the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF are as follows.

Taiwan Semiconductor:14.1%Samsung Electronics:6%SK Hynix:4%Tencent:3.2%Alibaba Group:2.3%

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF returned 133% (8.8% annually) in the last decade, while the S&P 500 posted a total return of 315% (15.2% annually). The primary reason U.S. stocks outperformed over that period was the dominance of U.S. technology stocks, particularly the "Magnificent Seven" stocks.

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has a relatively high expense ratio of 0.72%, which means investors will pay $72 annually on every $10,000 invested in the fund.

Why investors should still prioritize an S&P 500 index fund (or U.S. large-cap stocks)

State Street believes U.S. small-cap stocks will beat the S&P 500 (U.S. large-cap stocks) in the next three to five years because of cheaper valuations and strong earnings growth. Indeed, small-cap earnings in 2026 are forecast to grow faster than large-cap earnings for the first time in years, according to FactSet Research.

However, small-cap companies are also more vulnerable to high interest rates, and the Iran war has made interest rate cuts much less likely. Investors entered the year expecting the Federal Reserve to cut rates by at least 50 basis points, so the Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF has more than doubled the return of the S&P 500 in 2026. But if rate cuts fail to materialize, that outperformance could reverse.

Meanwhile, State Street also believes emerging market equities will outperform the S&P 500 over the next three to five years due to the devaluation of the U.S. dollar (which increases investment returns denominated in foreign currencies when converted back to U.S. currency), strong earnings growth, and relatively cheap valuations.

However, the vast majority of the largest technology companies are domiciled in the U.S., which means the U.S. economy is arguably best positioned to benefit from the artificial intelligence revolution. In turn, U.S. stocks (especially large-cap stocks in the S&P 500) may continue to outperform emerging market equities in the coming years.

Here's the bottom line: I think State Street makes good arguments for owning small-cap and emerging market funds, but I would still prioritize an S&P 500 index fund (or U.S. large-cap stocks) over those options. The S&P 500 offers exposure to the most consequential companies in the world, which makes it a very compelling long-term investment.

Should you buy stock in S&P 500 Index right now?

Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $496,473! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,216,605!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 4, 2026. *

Trevor Jennewine has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FactSet Research Systems, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Tencent, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, and Viavi Solutions. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"Mean reversion in valuation is a dangerous strategy when the underlying ROIC and balance sheet quality of the S&P 500 remain structurally superior to the small-cap and emerging market cohorts."

The State Street thesis relies on a classic mean-reversion argument: small caps and emerging markets are cheap, while the S&P 500 is expensive. However, this ignores the 'quality trap.' Small-cap indices like the S&P 600 often contain a higher concentration of 'zombie' companies that are structurally unable to refinance debt at current rates, regardless of future cuts. Furthermore, the EEM ETF is essentially a proxy for China's geopolitical risk and Taiwan's semiconductor dominance. Betting on these as a broad 'index' play ignores the fact that the S&P 500's outperformance is driven by superior capital efficiency and ROIC (Return on Invested Capital), not just valuation multiples.

Devil's Advocate

If the U.S. dollar enters a secular bear market, the currency tailwind for emerging markets could overwhelm domestic fundamental weaknesses, making the S&P 500's valuation premium look like a liability.

broad market
G
Grok by xAI
▼ Bearish

"The thesis for VIOO and EEM beating S&P 500 falters on macro vulnerabilities and costs that dwarf State Street's marginal projected returns."

State Street's forecasts project razor-thin edges—7.6% annualized for S&P Small Cap 600 (VIOO), 7.5% for MSCI Emerging Markets (EEM), vs. 7.1% for S&P 500—but ignore execution risks. VIOO's small caps (18% financials, heavy floating-rate debt) remain vulnerable if Fed delays cuts amid geopolitics (e.g., 'Iran war' tensions). EEM's 0.72% expense ratio devours over half its edge, with 14% TSMC and China bets (Tencent, Alibaba) exposed to US-China strife and Taiwan risks. Decade-long underperformance (10.8%/8.8% vs. 15.2%) reflects structural US tech dominance, not just rates. Slim spreads likely within forecast error.

Devil's Advocate

If Fed cuts rates aggressively as markets hope and USD weakens, small caps' superior 2026 EPS growth (FactSet) and EM currency gains could indeed materialize the modest outperformance.

VIOO, EEM
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"State Street's 50bps outperformance forecasts don't justify the concentration risk and rate sensitivity of small-caps and EM when the base case is stable-to-higher rates."

State Street's 7.6% small-cap and 7.5% EM forecasts versus 7.1% for the S&P 500 are marginal — within noise given forecast uncertainty. More troubling: the article itself undermines its own thesis. Small-caps got hammered last decade partly due to rate sensitivity, and the article admits rate cuts are now 'much less likely' due to geopolitical risk. EM is 32% tech but dominated by semiconductor exposure (Taiwan Semi at 14.1% of EEM alone), making it a concentrated China-Taiwan bet rather than diversified emerging growth. The article's own conclusion prioritizes the S&P 500 anyway.

Devil's Advocate

If the Fed does cut rates materially in late 2024-2025, small-caps could re-rate sharply given their 40% valuation discount to large-caps; EM's AI exposure through TSMC could outperform if geopolitical tensions ease and semiconductor demand surges.

VIOO, EEM
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"The strongest case for the article's call rests on a favorable macro regime (rates easing and a weak dollar); without it, the cheaper valuations in small caps and EM may not translate into meaningful outperformance versus the S&P 500."

State Street argues small-cap (S&P Small-Cap 600) and EM (MSCI EM) can beat the S&P 500 over 3-5 years with projected annual returns of 7.6% and 7.5% vs 7.1% for the S&P 500. That implies only modest upside relative to valuation gaps, but ignores regime risk: small caps and EM are more rate- and currency-sensitive, and a persistent strong dollar or delayed rate cuts could crush expected outperformance. Fees matter (EM ETF ~0.72% vs small-cap ~0.07% vs S&P 500 ~0.03%), and AI-driven mega-cap leadership in the US could keep compounding for longer. The piece understates drawdown risk and macro-dynamics that could derail the tilt.

Devil's Advocate

The expected outperformance depends on a favorable macro regime; if rate cuts stall or the dollar stays firm, EM and small caps could underperform the S&P 500 despite cheaper valuations.

S&P 500 (SPY) as the benchmark; potential exposure to VIOO (S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI EM ETF) as complements
The Debate
G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok Claude

"The S&P 600's lack of pricing power makes it a poor hedge against stagflation compared to the S&P 500's high-margin incumbents."

Grok and Claude focus on index-level flaws, but you are all ignoring the 'quality' factor within the S&P 600. The index is not a monolith; it is heavily tilted toward regional banks and cyclical industrials. If we enter a period of stagflation—which the 'geopolitical' risk mentioned suggests—these companies won't just struggle with debt; they will see earnings collapse. The real risk isn't just valuation; it's the lack of pricing power in the S&P 600 compared to the S&P 500's moat-heavy giants.

G
Grok ▲ Bullish
Responding to Gemini

"S&P 600 benefits from peaking US infrastructure spending in 2025, a tailwind ignored amid quality concerns."

Gemini rightly flags S&P 600's regional bank/cyclical tilt, but all panelists overlook small caps' edge in US fiscal tailwinds: IIJA (Infrastructure Act) disbursements peak 2025, boosting 22% industrials/materials exposure (vs S&P 500's 8%). Stagflation hurts, yet domestic spending insulates better than EEM's China bets. If GDP holds 2%+, this drives re-rating.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"IIJA spending helps small-cap revenues but doesn't solve the stagflation margin-squeeze problem or narrow the moat gap versus large-cap tech."

Grok's IIJA tailwind is concrete, but timing matters critically. Peak disbursements in 2025 assume no political delays or reallocation. More importantly: small-cap industrials/materials benefit only if input costs stay manageable. Stagflation (Gemini's scenario) means those companies face margin squeeze despite revenue uplift. The fiscal boost doesn't solve the pricing-power gap Claude and Gemini identified. It's a near-term cyclical offset, not a structural rerating.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"ETF liquidity and stress can erase the projected 7.5% EM edge, even with IIJA tailwinds."

Grok, your IIJA tailwind is real but not a guarantee; execution and capex drag could offset the uplift, especially if cost pass-through erodes margins. More importantly, the article glosses over liquidity risk: VIOO and EEM rely on ETF liquidity that can crater in stress, widening spreads and triggering tracking error. In a risk-off regime, a 0.72% EM fee and outflows could erase the 7.5% edge.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panelists generally agreed that the State Street thesis of small caps and emerging markets outperforming the S&P 500 is flawed, with risks including rate sensitivity, geopolitical tensions, and lack of pricing power in small caps. They also highlighted the potential for stagflation to hurt small caps and the risk of liquidity crises in ETFs.

Opportunity

Potential re-rating of small caps due to US fiscal tailwinds

Risk

Stagflation and geopolitical risks hurting small caps and emerging markets

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.