What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agree that Broadcom's extended TPU deal with Alphabet and Anthropic reduces insourcing risk, but they differ on whether it guarantees future growth and improved unit economics. The $100B FY2027 custom AI chip target is questioned due to lack of disclosed terms and contingent orders.
Risk: Commoditization of AI chip design, competition intensifying, and potential margin compression due to pricing pressure.
Opportunity: Diversifying AI revenue away from the volatile merchant silicon market, securing a lead in the custom ASIC market, and capturing a 'certainty premium' due to supply chain access.
Key Points
Broadcom's extended partnership with Alphabet is a game changer.
The biggest worries about the company's growth prospects have now been removed.
- 10 stocks we like better than Broadcom ›
Sometimes, news comes along that fundamentally changes how investors should view a stock moving forward. However, this news may not always be obvious. That was certainly the case when Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) revealed in a filing that it extended its agreement with Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) to develop and supply future generations of Alphabet's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs).
On the surface, this may not seem like a big deal, as Alphabet and Broadcom have partnered on TPUs for more than a decade. However, the agreement just removed one of the biggest bearish arguments against Broadcom's stock. Broadcom and Alphabet have long been tied at the hip with TPUs, and it's become one of the biggest growth drivers for both companies. While there seemed to be little reason to mess with this mutually beneficial partnership, there was growing concern that Alphabet would eventually look to ditch Broadcom.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
While Broadcom's intellectual property and chip expertise play a big role in the success of Alphabet's TPUs, the chips are ultimately designed to Alphabet's specifications, giving it considerable control. Investors have increasingly feared that Alphabet could bring more of the work in-house or shift to another, cheaper vendor. However, Broadcom's ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) platform is comprehensive, making it sticky. This deal helps erase those concerns and comes at a critical time, when demand for TPUs is starting to skyrocket.
Explosive growth ahead
In addition to their extended partnership, the two companies also announced that they were expanding their partnership with Anthropic, giving the large language model (LLM) maker access to 3.5 gigawatts of TPUs starting in 2027. The TPUs will be deployed both through Google Cloud and directly supplied by Broadcom. There does seem to be some flexibility in the agreement, with the announcement saying it is dependent on Anthropic's commercial success. Anthropic already has an order with Broadcom to deploy $21 billion worth of TPUs this year.
Broadcom previously projected that it would deliver $100 billion in custom AI chip revenue alone in fiscal 2027, and with this announcement, that number may be light. TPUs are a huge driver of this growth, and importantly, on its lastearnings call Broadcom said TPU sales will carry gross margins similar to the rest of its semiconductor business. Meanwhile, the company continues to gain new ASIC customers, including OpenAI, who are looking to not be completely beholden to Nvidia and its graphics processing units (GPUs).
Broadcom is set to see explosive growth in the coming years, and the two biggest bear arguments -- lower margins and losing its TPU business -- just got debunked. That makes it one of the best growth stocks to buy right now.
Should you buy stock in Broadcom right now?
Before you buy stock in Broadcom, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Broadcom wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026. *
Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Alphabet and Broadcom. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The extension removes tail risk of insourcing but does not validate the $100B+ revenue thesis or protect against margin erosion as custom AI chips become commoditized."
The article conflates contract extension with demand certainty. Yes, Broadcom locked in Alphabet through a future generation—that's real. But the filing doesn't specify volume commitments, pricing, or exclusivity terms. The $100B custom AI chip revenue projection for FY2027 predates this deal; the article assumes the extension *increases* it, not merely *preserves* it. Critically: Anthropic's 3.5GW order is contingent on 'commercial success'—a vague escape clause. Broadcom's gross margins on TPUs matching 'the rest of its semiconductor business' (~50%) is lower than pure-play fabless peers. The real risk: this deal removes *one* bear case (insourcing) but leaves intact the harder one—commoditization as AI chip design becomes table-stakes and competition intensifies.
If Alphabet was genuinely confident in Broadcom's stickiness and TPU demand, why extend now rather than wait? Early extension often signals either (a) Broadcom demanded it to lock in pricing before margin compression, or (b) Alphabet wanted optionality off the table—neither necessarily bullish for AVGO shareholders long-term.
"Broadcom has successfully transitioned from a commodity component supplier to an indispensable architectural partner for the world's largest AI infrastructure spenders."
The extension of the Alphabet-Broadcom TPU partnership is a structural victory for AVGO, securing its lead in the custom ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) market. By locking in Google and potentially OpenAI, Broadcom is diversifying its AI revenue away from the volatile merchant silicon market dominated by Nvidia. The article notes a $100 billion revenue target for 2027; at current enterprise value to EBITDA multiples, this implies significant valuation support. However, the market often ignores that custom silicon has longer lead times and higher R&D intensity than off-the-shelf chips, which could pressure free cash flow if scaling costs outpace the 2027 delivery timeline.
The 'flexibility' in the Anthropic deal—contingent on their commercial success—means Broadcom is effectively underwriting the startup's survival in a hyper-competitive LLM market. If Anthropic fails to gain market share against OpenAI, Broadcom's projected $21 billion windfall could evaporate, leaving them with stranded capacity.
"The Alphabet extension removes a major downside risk for Broadcom’s TPU exposure but does not by itself prove the $100B 2027 AI‑chip revenue outcome because key commercial and capacity details remain unknown."
Broadcom’s renewed TPU deal with Alphabet and the Anthropic supply framework materially reduces the tail risk that Google would insource or switch vendors — that’s a positive risk re-rating. But the disclosure is thin: terms, exclusivity, duration, pricing, and revenue recognition are undisclosed; Anthropic access is contingent on its commercial success; Google still controls TPU specs and could pivot later. Operationally Broadcom must scale wafer, packaging, and test capacity and absorb capex and supply-chain strain while competing with Nvidia and potential in‑house ASIC efforts. This is validation of relevance, not a guaranteed bridge to the $100B number the article touts.
The extension may be non‑exclusive or short‑term and largely PR-focused, leaving Alphabet free to migrate later; and Broadcom’s $100B fiscal‑2027 projection assumes best‑case adoption, pricing, and customer wins that could easily fall short.
"Alphabet extension and Anthropic scale-up validate Broadcom's sticky ASIC platform, supporting $100B FY27 AI revenue and margin stability."
Broadcom's (AVGO) extended TPU agreement with Alphabet (GOOGL) formalizes a decade-long partnership, quelling valid fears of in-sourcing or vendor switch despite Alphabet's design control. Anthropic expansion—$21B TPUs this year plus conditional 3.5GW from 2027—bolsters the $100B FY27 custom AI chip target, with margins matching semis. OpenAI wins diversify ASIC exposure. Positive catalyst removing overhangs, but article ignores AVGO's stretched valuation (forward P/E north of 30x per recent data), VMware integration costs pressuring FCF, and cyclical service provider segment weakness offsetting AI gains. Incremental bullish, not game-changing.
Alphabet could still tweak specs or negotiate harder on pricing given its leverage, while Anthropic's commitment depends on uncertain LLM commercialization success amid rising AI efficiency reducing overall chip demand.
"Valuation risk is real, but the margin structure on captive ASIC production remains underexplored—extension timing matters more than headline revenue."
Grok flags valuation stretch (30x forward P/E) and VMware drag—fair headwinds—but misses that AVGO's custom ASIC margins may *exceed* 50% if Broadcom captures design-to-manufacturing premium vs. pure fabless. The real question: does Alphabet's extension signal confidence in AVGO's execution, or desperation to lock pricing before margin compression kicks in? Nobody's addressed whether this deal actually improves AVGO's unit economics or just preserves existing ones.
"Broadcom’s margins will be protected by its role as a supply-chain aggregator in a capacity-constrained environment."
Claude and Grok both treat the 50% margin as a floor or a risk, but they are ignoring the CoWoS (Chip on Wafer on Substrate) bottleneck. Broadcom’s value isn't just design; it’s their prioritized supply chain access. If AVGO is acting as the procurement shield for Alphabet and Anthropic against TSMC capacity constraints, they aren't just earning a margin—they are charging a 'certainty premium.' This makes the $100B target less about volume and more about pricing power during a hardware deficit.
"Broadcom’s current ‘certainty premium’ from packaging bottlenecks is likely temporary as supply scales and hyperscalers retain leverage."
Gemini’s “certainty premium” overplays Broadcom’s long‑term pricing leverage. CoWoS and packaging are tight now, but TSMC, substrate specialists and test/assembly partners are scaling 2.5D/3D capacity fast; hyperscalers can also multi‑source or internalize once supply loosens. Alphabet’s design control and scale cap AVGO’s ability to sustain scarcity rents — any premium from today’s bottleneck looks transitory, likely compressing within a 2–4 year horizon.
"Broadcom's capacity ramp risks FCF destruction if AI demand falters, amplifying valuation vulnerability."
Gemini-ChatGPT premium debate overlooks Broadcom's capex surge for CoWoS/3D packaging capacity—recent quarters show $5B+ annualizing, ramping to support $100B target amid VMware drag. This ties to my FCF warning: if Anthropic contingency fails or AI efficiency curbs demand, stranded assets crush margins below 50%. At 32x forward P/E (per latest data), that's not priced in.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agree that Broadcom's extended TPU deal with Alphabet and Anthropic reduces insourcing risk, but they differ on whether it guarantees future growth and improved unit economics. The $100B FY2027 custom AI chip target is questioned due to lack of disclosed terms and contingent orders.
Diversifying AI revenue away from the volatile merchant silicon market, securing a lead in the custom ASIC market, and capturing a 'certainty premium' due to supply chain access.
Commoditization of AI chip design, competition intensifying, and potential margin compression due to pricing pressure.