The panelists agreed that tokenization is a real trend, but its upside hinges on regulatory clarity and scalable on-chain settlement. They debated the pace of adoption and the role of incumbents like the DTCC, with some seeing retail tokenization as a potential disruptor and others warning about regulatory risks and enforcement halts.
Risk: Regulatory enforceability and incumbents' response to retail tokenization
Opportunity: Scalable on-chain settlement and capturing retail flow
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Key Points
- CFTC Chair Michael Selig believes that asset tokenization is about to go into overdrive.
- That has bullish implications for Robinhood as well as Solana.
- Launchpads and other crypto projects also stand to benefit.
- 10 stocks we like better than Solana ›
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig said on …
Read more
Key Points
- CFTC Chair Michael Selig believes that asset tokenization is about to go into overdrive.
- That has bullish implications for Robinhood as well as Solana.
- Launchpads and other crypto projects also stand to benefit.
- 10 stocks we like better than Solana ›
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig said on Sept. 22 that regulators (and thus investors) must prepare for "mass tokenization" of assets, and he went on to conjecture that tokenization and the 24/7 trading it enables will reshape markets at a pace faster than any other such changes over the prior decades.
He probably isn't wrong; the consultancy McKinsey is expecting as a base case that the sum of tokenized assets will be worth $1.9 trillion by 2030, up from $38.6 billion of tradable assets today.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
Tokenization is the process of representing the ownership information of an asset, such as a stock, as a digital token managed on a blockchain. So what's the best way to get ahead of the trend and get some upside?
It won't work to buy tokenized assets directly
Some investors might be inclined to simply buy tokenized assets, such as tokenized stocks, to gain exposure to the growth of tokenization. That won't work, just like buying food wrapped in plastic doesn't enable a buyer to benefit from rising sales of food-safe plastic wrap.
The value created by tokenization is most commonly captured by the services that charge for handling the tokenization process itself and by the blockchain networks on which the tokenized assets are held and traded. Every time a tokenized asset changes hands, the network it's parked on captures some transaction fees. In some cases, those fees are routed in ways that benefit the price of the network's native token, and when that happens, the frequency of tokenized asset trading is directly linked to the scale of the benefit to the token's price.
Solana (CRYPTO: SOL), for example, is a leading network in stock tokenization, with $491.1 million in tokenized stocks on its chain as of Sept. 25. Because it's a fast and inexpensive chain, it's a good fit for assets like stocks, which tend to be swapped fairly often (at least by the institutional investors who command most of the capital). So, it could be a good fit for an investment thesis centered on tokenization.
But it's far from perfect. At present, Solana permanently destroys only half of each base fee it charges to users. A recent proposal by its developers estimated that Solana destroys approximately 648 SOL daily as a result of its on-chain activity, while also issuing roughly 60,000 SOL of new supply to pay the network's validators.
That could change in the future, but recent proposals have attempted to address the issue directly, only to be rebuffed in governance votes.
So what's the best way to invest in tokenization?
The best tokenization play that's currently available might not be a cryptocurrency at all.
Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) just launched its new blockchain, the Robinhood Chain, intended primarily as a vehicle for trading tokenized stocks. The company that issues the stock captures the fee revenue from its chain directly, and because it's offered to investors as a share of stock and not as a cryptocurrency, there's a clear link between owning a share and owning a slice of the economic upside from its business activities, including those related to tokenized assets.
But Robinhood's network is new, having only launched this summer. Its chain fees were $35.2 million for the first 25 days of September alone, up from $6.7 million for all of August. Going for a full quarter at that pace, if it's possible to do so, would generate a decently sized slice of Robinhood's $1.3 billion revenue in Q2, so there's definitely enough activity happening to stimulate some upside for those who buy the stock now.
It's also possible to get even more direct exposure to tokenization via crypto launchpad projects. But the risks involved are much higher.
One illustrative example is Pons (CRYPTO: PONS), Robinhood Chain's biggest meme coin launchpad, which lets creators pair new meme coins with tokenized stocks. It also launched this summer, and it spends most of its revenue buying back and destroying its own token.
It saw $31.5 million in fees for August. But its revenue has proven highly variable, ebbing and flowing with the speculative mood among crypto investors, and it's unclear if it has a long-term investment thesis.
As other crypto projects demonstrate they're generating good returns by providing tokenization as a service or by serving as a venue for trading tokenized assets, it'll be worth seeing whether they're sustainable enough to warrant investment.
For now, the best approach here is to own Robinhood or Solana.
Should you buy stock in Solana right now?
Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $383,680! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,382,954!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 937% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of September 26, 2026. *
Alex Carchidi has positions in Pons and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“Institutional tokenization will require permissioned, compliant blockchain environments that look nothing like the speculative crypto-trading venues currently driving fee growth for SOL or HOOD.”
The article conflates 'tokenization' with speculative crypto-trading volume. While the CFTC’s interest in tokenization is a legitimate institutional tailwind, the $1.9 trillion McKinsey projection refers to RWA (Real World Assets) like Treasury bills and private credit, not meme-coin launchpads. Robinhood (HOOD) is a smart play on the infrastructure layer, but its success depends on regulatory approval for on-chain equities, which remains a massive hurdle. Solana’s utility as a settlement layer is undeniable, yet the article ignores the 'trilemma' of decentralization vs. compliance. Institutional adoption requires permissioned pools, not the permissionless, volatile environment currently driving Solana’s fee revenue. Investors are buying the infrastructure, but the product-market fit for tokenized securities is still in its infancy.
Tokenization may never achieve mass adoption if legacy systems like DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corp) simply upgrade their existing databases, rendering public blockchains redundant for institutional asset settlement.
“Tokenization's growth is plausible, but the article mistakes regulatory tailwinds for revenue certainty and underestimates the risk that traditional finance builds competing infrastructure that bypasses these crypto-native platforms.”
The article conflates regulatory optimism with inevitable adoption. Yes, Selig's Sept 22 comments signal openness, and McKinsey's $1.9T projection by 2030 is eye-catching. But that's a 49x growth from $38.6B today—requiring not just regulatory approval but institutional participation at scale. HOOD's Robinhood Chain shows early traction ($35.2M in 25 days of September fees), but annualizing that gives ~$500M revenue on a $1.3B base—material but not transformative. The article also glosses over execution risk: Solana's governance has already rejected fee-burning proposals, undermining its tokenization thesis. PONS is explicitly flagged as speculative with 'highly variable' revenue. The real risk: tokenization adoption could happen without benefiting these specific plays if traditional finance builds competing infrastructure.
Regulatory approval ≠ market adoption. The SEC and banking regulators haven't moved in lockstep with CFTC, and institutional custody/compliance frameworks for tokenized assets remain unsettled. HOOD and SOL could capture fees from a $100B tokenization market by 2030 instead of $1.9T, making current valuations aggressive.
“Current fee spikes on Robinhood Chain and Solana likely overstate sustainable tokenization-driven revenue given tokenomics and regulatory overlap.”
The article highlights CFTC Chair Selig's Sept. 22 comments and McKinsey's $1.9T tokenized assets base case by 2030 as tailwinds for HOOD's new chain and SOL's $491M in tokenized stocks. Yet it glosses over Solana's net issuance of ~60k SOL daily versus only 648 SOL burned, plus Robinhood Chain's $35.2M fees in just 25 days of September that may reflect launch hype rather than durable volume. Broader risks include overlapping SEC jurisdiction on tokenized securities and competition from Ethereum or institutional platforms that could capture fee share without benefiting retail-facing tokens or stocks.
Even if regulatory friction slows rollout, Solana's low fees already position it as the default chain for high-frequency tokenized equity trading, and Robinhood's direct fee capture via HOOD shares could compound faster than projected if volumes scale with 24/7 settlement.
“Tokenization's real upside comes from network and services revenue and sustained on-chain activity, not merely owning tokenized assets; regulatory clarity and adoption velocity are the critical gates to material upside.”
Tokenization is real, but the upside hinges on regulatory clarity, custody, and scalable on-chain settlement. The article leans into asset-token ownership gains while underplaying who captures value: transaction fees flow to networks and service providers, not to holders of tokenized assets. Robinhood's chain revenue shows early usage, but sustainability requires cross-chain liquidity, stable governance, and profitable unit economics. Solana is fast and cheap, but its tokenomics—burn dynamics, fresh supply, and governance risk—plus strong Ethereum competition could erode moat. The $1.9 trillion base case assumes rapid, unconstrained adoption; real-world cadence is likely slower, with regulatory and tech bottlenecks.
The biggest risk is regulatory pushback and slower-than-expected adoption; tokenization revenue may be cannibalized by protocol fees or competing networks, and a macro downturn could crush volumes.
The Debate
Responding to Gemini
“Institutional incumbents upgrading existing databases to DLT poses an existential threat to public blockchain settlement layers.”
Gemini, your skepticism regarding the DTCC is the critical missing piece. If the DTCC adopts DLT for T+0 settlement, they effectively privatize the 'blockchain' benefit, rendering public chains like Solana irrelevant for institutional equities. Everyone here is focusing on 'who wins' in crypto, but the real risk is that the incumbent financial plumbing simply absorbs the tech. If the infrastructure is internal, HOOD and SOL lose their primary value proposition as settlement layers.
Responding to Gemini
“DTCC internalization is a 3–5 year risk, not an immediate threat; Robinhood's retail moat buys runway.”
Gemini's DTCC internalization risk is real, but it assumes the DTCC moves fast. History suggests otherwise—they've resisted blockchain adoption for a decade. Meanwhile, Robinhood's $35.2M September fees aren't just launch hype; they're capturing real retail flow that the DTCC doesn't service (24/7 trading, fractional shares, sub-penny settlement). The race isn't HOOD vs. DTCC—it's whether retail tokenization scales before incumbents respond. If it does, HOOD captures fees regardless of institutional adoption.
Responding to Claude
“SEC enforcement risk on custody and 24/7 settlement could halt HOOD retail volumes regardless of DTCC response speed.”
Claude assumes retail tokenization on HOOD escapes DTCC timelines, but ignores SEC jurisdiction overlap. Equity-like tokens trigger custody, AML, and disclosure rules the CFTC cannot waive. Robinhood Chain's 24/7 fractional settlement lacks those frameworks, so volumes could face enforcement halts even if incumbents lag. This stalls fee capture before any institutional absorption occurs.
Responding to Grok
“Regulatory enforceability, not tech rollout or DTCC timing, will cap near-term tokenized-fee revenue.”
Grok raised the SEC overlap; I’d push further: regulatory enforceability is the real bottleneck, not adoption pace. Even with DTCC delays, custody, AML/KYC, and disclosures across tokenized equities will throttle volumes and fees. The 24/7 settlement promise hinges on a harmonized, enforceable rulebook—absent that, Robinhood’s Chain could see spikes in pilot phases but no durable revenue. The long runway exists, but near-term upside is far from assured.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panelists agreed that tokenization is a real trend, but its upside hinges on regulatory clarity and scalable on-chain settlement. They debated the pace of adoption and the role of incumbents like the DTCC, with some seeing retail tokenization as a potential disruptor and others warning about regulatory risks and enforcement halts.
Scalable on-chain settlement and capturing retail flow
Regulatory enforceability and incumbents' response to retail tokenization
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.