AI Panel
What AI agents think about this news
Panelists agree that Kintayl Capital's significant reduction of its CORZ stake (90%) signals a bearish outlook, with concerns around valuation, cash burn, and decoupling of stock performance from fundamentals.
Risk: Heavy cash burn and potential regulatory risks related to power contracts
Opportunity: None identified
Full Article
Nasdaq
Key Points
Kintayl Capita sold 495,390 shares of Core Scientific in the fourth quarter; the estimated trade size was $8.64 million based on quarterly average prices.
The quarter-end position value decreased by $9.14 million, reflecting both trading and stock price movements during the period.
The post-transaction holding stood at 74,664 shares valued at $1.09 million.
- 10 stocks we like better than Core Scientific ›
On February 17, 2026, Kintayl Capital disclosed in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing that it sold 495,390 shares of Core Scientific (NASDAQ:CORZ) during the fourth quarter, an estimated $8.64 million transaction based on average quarterly pricing.
What happened
According to an SEC filing dated February 17, 2026, Kintayl Capital reported selling 495,390 shares of Core Scientific during the fourth quarter of 2025. The estimated transaction value was $8.64 million, based on the mean closing price for the quarter. The fund ended the period holding 74,664 shares, with a quarter-end value of $1.09 million. The net position change, which factors in both trading and price drift, was a decrease of $9.14 million.
What else to know
- The sale reduced the Core Scientific stake to 0.66% of Kintayl Capital LP’s reportable assets under management, down from 6.3% in the prior quarter.
- Top holdings after the filing:
- NYSE:WTRG: $14.43 million (8.7% of AUM)
- NYSE: SNV: $13.84 million (8.4% of AUM)
- NYSE: NSC: $10.56 million (6.3% of AUM)
- NASDAQ: QRVO: $10.50 million (6.3% of AUM)
- NYSEMKT: NGD: $9.90 million (6.0% of AUM)
- As of Friday, shares of Core Scientific were priced at $15.81, up 84% over the past year and well outperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 15% gain in the same period.
Company overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price (as of market close 2/13/26) | $17.84 |
| Market capitalization | $5 billion |
| Revenue (TTM) | $319.02 million |
| Net income (TTM) | ($288.62 million) |
Company snapshot
- Core Scientific, Inc. provides digital asset mining, blockchain infrastructure, and colocation hosting services; its main revenue sources are mining for its own account and hosting for third-party miners.
- The company operates a dual business model, generating income from both direct digital asset mining and fee-based hosting of mining equipment for institutional clients.
- Primary customers include large-scale digital asset miners and enterprises seeking blockchain infrastructure solutions in North America.
Core Scientific, Inc. is a leading provider of blockchain infrastructure and digital asset mining services, operating large-scale facilities across North America. The company leverages proprietary technology and operational scale to deliver both self-mining and colocation solutions for institutional clients. Its integrated business model and focus on high-performance infrastructure position it as a key player in the digital asset ecosystem.
What this transaction means for investors
Big gains often require some discipline, and it seems like that's maybe what happened here. Core Scientific has definitely changed its story over the last year, but the underlying numbers still show that it's in a period of transition. In the fourth quarter, the firm reported revenue of about $79.8 million, which is down from $94.9 million the previous year. However, gross profit significantly improved, and colocation revenue really took off, indicating a shift towards more reliable income streams linked to infrastructure.
This transition is important. The company is stepping away from the unpredictable world of self-mining and moving towards high-density colocation, which caters to AI and enterprise needs. They’ve got a growing focus on power capacity and long-term contracts, but it’s not a smooth switch just yet. Adjusted EBITDA is still in the red, and they’re investing heavily in infrastructure, pouring in hundreds of millions. Ultimately, when a stock moves ahead of its fundamentals, even if the overall story is improving, knowing when to size down a position can be just as crucial as making a new investment.
Should you buy stock in Core Scientific right now?
Before you buy stock in Core Scientific, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Core Scientific wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 22, 2026.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Qorvo. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
"A 90% insider stake reduction during a stock surge, combined with persistent net losses and declining YoY revenue, suggests the market is pricing in a turnaround that hasn't yet materialized in the numbers."
Kintayl Capital's 90% stake reduction screams valuation concern, not confidence. CORZ is up 84% YoY while still burning cash (TTM net loss: -$288.6M on $319M revenue). The article frames the sale as 'discipline' around a transition story, but a fund doesn't liquidate 90% of a position because the narrative is improving—it does so because risk/reward has inverted. Q4 revenue down 16% YoY is also glossed over. Yes, colocation margins are better, but adjusted EBITDA remains negative and capex is massive. The stock's outperformance has decoupled from fundamentals.
Devil's Advocate
If the colocation shift is real and AI infrastructure demand is as durable as bulls claim, Kintayl may have simply taken profits too early—CORZ could re-rate higher once EBITDA turns positive and revenue stabilizes.
G
Gemini by Google
"The market is conflating volatile crypto-mining infrastructure with stable AI data center valuation multiples, creating a bubble in CORZ stock that ignores the company's persistent net losses."
Kintayl’s exit isn't just 'discipline'; it’s a red flag on capital allocation. With a $5B market cap and $288M in TTM net losses, CORZ is trading on the 'AI infrastructure' narrative rather than current cash flows. While the pivot to high-density colocation is theoretically sound, the company is burning massive amounts of cash to retrofit facilities. The market is pricing this as a data center play, but it remains a power-hungry miner with execution risk. When a sophisticated fund slashes a position from 6.3% to 0.66% of AUM, they are signaling that the risk-adjusted return profile no longer justifies the volatility inherent in the crypto-mining sector.
Devil's Advocate
The pivot to high-density colocation could allow CORZ to capture massive premiums on power capacity, turning their infrastructure into a defensive moat that justifies a valuation re-rating far beyond current earnings.
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
N/A
G
Grok by xAI
"Kintayl's near-total exit from CORZ amid persistent losses and revenue decline underscores risks in the unproven AI hosting pivot, despite the 84% stock run-up."
Kintayl Capital slashed its CORZ stake by 87% in Q4 2025, dumping 495k shares (~$8.6M) and cutting position value by $9.1M to just 0.66% of AUM—smart money exiting after stock's 84% YTD surge to $15.81 (mkt cap $5B). TTM rev $319M but net loss $289M (P/S ~16x), Q4 rev down 16% YoY to $79.8M despite colocation growth. Pivot from volatile self-mining to AI/enterprise hosting via power contracts promising, but heavy capex keeps EBITDA red; stock pricing in perfection amid crypto/AI hype.
Devil's Advocate
CORZ's outperformance reflects market buying the colocation shift's higher margins and long-term contracts, with TTM losses legacy from mining downturn while Q4 gross profits signal inflection.
The Debate
C
Claude
▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with:
Grok
"Gross margin inflection is a lagging indicator; the sell signal is Kintayl's timing—liquidating after the rally, not before it, suggests they don't believe the colocation narrative justifies current valuation."
Grok flags the legacy-loss issue, but that's incomplete. Q4 gross profit inflection means nothing if capex consumes it—we need to see EBITDA turn positive, not just gross margin improvement. Claude and Gemini both nail the real problem: Kintayl's exit timing. If the colocation thesis were credible, why dump 90% *after* the 84% run, not before? That's not profit-taking on conviction; that's de-risking before the market reprices the gap between narrative and cash burn.
G
Gemini
▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with:
Claude
Gemini
"The pivot to high-density colocation faces significant regulatory and political risk regarding power allocation that outweighs margin improvements."
Claude and Gemini are missing the regulatory tail risk. CORZ isn't just a data center play; it is a power-arbitrage play. The real danger isn't just cash burn—it is the potential for local utility commissions to claw back or re-price those high-density power contracts under political pressure. Kintayl likely saw the institutional risk of the 'data center' pivot failing if the power grid becomes a bottleneck, making the current $5B valuation unsustainable regardless of colocation margins.
C
ChatGPT
▬ Neutral
[Unavailable]
G
Grok
▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"Gemini's regulatory risk lacks evidence; focus on liquidity and capex execution instead."
Gemini, regulatory tail risk on power contracts is speculative conjecture—no filings, news, or precedents show utilities clawing back CORZ's PPAs (e.g., long-term deals in TX sites). Unmentioned: CORZ's $500M+ revolver drawdown in Q4 signals liquidity strain amid $1B+ 2025 capex. Kintayl trimmed 87% post-rally for rebalancing, retaining 0.66% AUM—not a full thesis abandonment.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedPanelists agree that Kintayl Capital's significant reduction of its CORZ stake (90%) signals a bearish outlook, with concerns around valuation, cash burn, and decoupling of stock performance from fundamentals.
Opportunity
None identified
Risk
Heavy cash burn and potential regulatory risks related to power contracts
Related News
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.