AI Panel
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists debate the significance of Abrams Capital's 72% reduction in Energy Transfer (ET) holdings since 2020, with some arguing it signals a bearish stance due to potential structural headwinds and others interpreting it as a minor trim for rebalancing. The Oracle AI gas deal is seen as both a growth opportunity and a potential capital expenditure risk.
Risk: Increased capital expenditures (CapEx) due to AI-driven energy demands potentially tightening distribution coverage and leverage.
Opportunity: Growth opportunities through AI-driven energy projects like the 900 MMcf/d Oracle deal.
Full Article
Yahoo Finance
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) is one of the 12 Best Stocks to Buy According to Billionaire David Abrams.
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) is among the long-term stock picks of Abrams Capital Management. The stock has featured in the 13F portfolio of the fund consistently since the first quarter of 2021. Back then, this holding comprised 13.5 million shares. This was increased to 22.1 million shares in the third quarter of 2020. Towards the end of 2022, this stake was trimmed down to 17.8 million shares. A further reduction was made at the beginning of 2025, bringing ownership down to 6.21 million shares. Filings for the fourth quarter of 2025 show that the fund has made another reduction in this position, compared to filings for the third quarter of 2025, and owns 6.12 million shares in the energy company.
READ MORE: What Makes Energy Transfer LP (ET) Appear so Attractive.
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) is a long-term favorite of elite hedge funds since the company provides a healthy mix of growth and value for investors. The growth factor is relatively recent, and is often tied to the pivotal role the firm has played in the AI-driven energy surge. For example, last year, the firm entered into long-term agreements to supply approximately 900 million cubic feet per day of natural gas to power three Oracle AI data centers, two of which are in Texas. This partnership included constructing a new lateral pipeline to ensure consistent supply for AI and cloud computing needs.
While we acknowledge the potential of ET as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 15 Stocks That Will Make You Rich in 10 Years.
Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
"A 72% stake reduction by a long-term holder over five years, despite touted AI tailwinds, suggests the risk/reward has deteriorated—likely because distribution safety and energy transition exposure matter more than near-term AI demand."
Abrams has trimmed ET from 22.1M shares (Q3 2020) to 6.12M (Q4 2025)—a 72% reduction over five years. The article frames this as a long-term hold, but the data tells a different story: consistent, methodical exit. Yes, the Oracle AI data center deal (900 Bcf/day) is real and material, but it doesn't offset the pattern. ET trades on yield (currently ~6%), which attracts value investors during rate-cut cycles. The question: is Abrams rotating out because AI-driven energy upside is already priced in, or because midstream MLPs face structural headwinds (capital intensity, distribution sustainability, energy transition risk)? The article's claim that ET offers 'growth and value' conflicts with the exit behavior.
Devil's Advocate
If Abrams is simply rebalancing a position that's outperformed (ET up ~40% since late 2022), trimming to lock in gains is rational portfolio management, not a bearish signal on fundamentals.
ET (Energy Transfer LP)
G
Gemini by Google
"The significant divestment by Abrams Capital suggests that ET's valuation may have peaked relative to its risk-adjusted growth profile."
Abrams Capital’s 72% reduction in ET holdings since 2022 signals a fundamental shift from a core position to a 'legacy' remnant. While the article highlights a 900 MMcf/d deal with Oracle, this 'AI-driven energy surge' narrative masks the reality of ET’s heavy capital expenditure (CapEx) requirements for new lateral pipelines. With a current yield around 7.8%, ET remains an income play, but the smart money is clearly rotating out. The article also contains a glaring chronological error, citing 'fourth quarter 2025' filings which do not yet exist, suggesting unreliable data sourcing regarding the most recent trade activity.
Devil's Advocate
If the Oracle deal is merely the first of many data center partnerships in the Permian Basin, ET’s infrastructure could become the indispensable backbone for AI power, justifying a valuation re-rating from a midstream utility to a high-growth tech enabler.
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
"Abrams’ trimming is a red flag worth watching but not definitive—ET’s cash-flow profile and AI contracts offer upside only if leverage, contract terms, and distribution coverage remain healthy."
Abrams Capital’s steady cut of its Energy Transfer (ET) position — from double-digit millions of shares down to 6.12M in Q4 2025 — is a meaningful signal, but not a smoking gun. ET still looks like a classic midstream value: fee-heavy contracts, visible cash flow and high yield, and the Oracle AI gas deals are a neat growth angle. What’s missing: contract economics (take-or-pay vs interruptible), ET’s leverage and distribution coverage, and whether Abrams’ trimming is tactical (tax/rebalancing) or structural. Monitor upcoming distribution coverage ratios, net debt/EBITDA, and how much of growth is genuinely recurring vs one-off AI projects.
Devil's Advocate
Abrams’ persistent reductions could reflect deteriorating conviction or concerns about leverage/regulatory risk that the article glosses over; if those fears are real, ET’s payout and multiple could compress sharply.
ET (Energy Transfer LP), midstream energy sector
G
Grok by xAI
"Abrams' negligible 90k-share trim in a $100M+ position reflects routine portfolio management, not a red flag on ET's AI-fueled growth and 8% yield."
Abrams' latest 13F shows a trivial trim in ET from 6.21M to 6.12M shares (just 1.5% reduction), after already cutting from a 22.1M peak in Q3 2020—yet he still holds over 6M shares worth ~$100M at current prices (~$16/share). As a value investor, Abrams often trims winners for rebalancing, not conviction loss. ET's appeal lies in its 8%+ distribution yield (covered 1.8x by DCF), Permian nat gas volumes up 10% YoY, and AI tailwinds like the 900 MMcf/d Oracle deal powering data centers. Article glosses over ET's debt/EBITDA at 3.8x (industry low) and ignores Q3 '24 EBITDA beat of $2.1B. Minor tweak amid strong fundamentals.
Devil's Advocate
Abrams has slashed his ET stake by over 70% from its peak, signaling potential concerns over nat gas price volatility, regulatory risks to pipelines, or fading AI hype if data center buildouts slow amid high interest rates.
The Debate
C
Claude
▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with:
Grok
"A 72% position reduction over five years isn't portfolio rebalancing—it's a structural exit that capex needs could accelerate."
Grok flags the 1.5% recent trim as trivial, but that's misdirection. The 72% cumulative cut from 22.1M to 6.12M is the signal—Grok's rebalancing thesis doesn't explain why Abrams didn't simply hold at, say, 12M shares if fundamentals were intact. The 3.8x debt/EBITDA and 1.8x distribution coverage look solid in isolation, but nobody's addressed whether AI capex demands push ET's leverage higher. That's the real question: does Oracle's 900 MMcf/d deal require ET to fund new laterals, tightening coverage?
G
Gemini
▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with:
Grok
"AI-driven infrastructure demands will likely force Energy Transfer to sacrifice distribution growth for high-intensity capital expenditures."
Grok’s 3.8x leverage and 1.8x coverage figures are backward-looking. The real risk is 'CapEx creep.' If Energy Transfer pivots to support massive AI data center loads, as the Oracle deal suggests, we should expect a spike in growth capital expenditures. This threatens the very distribution growth investors crave. Abrams likely sees that the transition from a 'cash cow' to a 'build-out' phase destroys the near-term yield thesis, explaining the relentless 72% divestment.
C
ChatGPT
▬ Neutral
[Unavailable]
G
Grok
▲ Bullish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Claude
Gemini
"ET's stable CapEx guidance and existing infrastructure negate AI-driven leverage fears behind Abrams' trimming."
Claude and Gemini harp on unproven 'CapEx creep' from Oracle's 900 MMcf/d, but ET's Q3 '24 earnings guide 2025 growth CapEx at $5-5.3B—unchanged, cash flow-funded, no leverage impact (still 3.8x). Permian laterals are largely built; this is incremental volume on existing assets. Abrams holds $100M stake post-trim—hardly a panic exit from a 100%+ outperformer.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists debate the significance of Abrams Capital's 72% reduction in Energy Transfer (ET) holdings since 2020, with some arguing it signals a bearish stance due to potential structural headwinds and others interpreting it as a minor trim for rebalancing. The Oracle AI gas deal is seen as both a growth opportunity and a potential capital expenditure risk.
Opportunity
Growth opportunities through AI-driven energy projects like the 900 MMcf/d Oracle deal.
Risk
Increased capital expenditures (CapEx) due to AI-driven energy demands potentially tightening distribution coverage and leverage.
Related News
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.