By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
Despite a 85% drop in Q2 net income due to one-time charges, Eversource reaffirmed its 5-7% EPS growth target through 2030. However, regulatory risks, particularly the Connecticut rate hike request and potential IRS clawbacks on offshore wind tax credits, threaten the achievability of this guidance.
Risk: Regulatory risks, particularly the Connecticut rate hike request and potential IRS clawbacks on offshore wind tax credits, could make Eversource's 5-7% EPS growth target unattainable without equity issuance.
Opportunity: Eversource's massive transmission pipeline and rate-base expansions could drive long-term EPS growth if regulatory headwinds ease.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
*This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily **Utility Dive newsletter**.*
Eversource Energy's second-quarter income plunged to $53.7 million from $352.7 million in the year-ago quarter, largely due to several one-time charges, the electric and gas utility company said Friday.
The charges included $111.4 million on Eversource's Aquarion sale, $62 million for a pending transmission return on equity refund and $164 million for increased liability from Eversource's investment in the offshore Revolution Wind project.
Eversource's second-quarter earnings per share fell to 14 cents from 96 cents in the same period last year. The company reaffirmed its expectations that it will earn $4.57/share to $4.72/share in ongoing income this year. The Springfield, Massachusetts-based company also said it continues to expect its earnings per share will grow by 5% to 7% a year through 2030, based on its adjusted 2026 non-GAAP earnings guidance midpoint of $4.65/year.
By the numbers: Eversource Energy Q2 '26
$700M
Eversource's share of a $2.2 billion transmission project tentatively selected by ISO New England in a competitive solicitation.
$1.7B
Potential capital expenditures not included in Eversource's $26.6 billion, five-year capital expenditure plan.
$1.7B
Proceeds from Eversource's just completed Aquarion sale, which the company plans to use to cut parent company debt.
$451M
Connecticut Power and Light's 11% rate hike request filed on July 14 at the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority.
The 704-MW Revolution Wind offshore wind project is 97% complete and is slated to come online by the end of the year, according to Joseph Nolan, Eversource chairman, president and CEO.
However, because of two stop-work orders issued by the Trump administration, the project was delayed, increasing Eversource's potential costs related to the project, Nolan said during the company's second-quarter earnings conference call on Friday.
Nolan said he is confident the project, which is being built by Ørsted, will be finished this year, noting it is already delivering 300 MW to ISO-NE.
"The remaining pieces of the installation are very straightforward," Nolan said. "There's no uncertainty around it."
ISO-NE on July 22 tentatively selected a proposal by Avangrid and Eversource to build $2.2 billion in transmission that could deliver 1.2 GW of wind from Maine into Massachusetts with a 2032 in-service date, Nolan noted during the conference call.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Q2 earnings plunge is driven by one-time, largely non-cash charges; reaffirmed 5-7% EPS growth guidance through 2030 leaves the long-term investment case largely unchanged."
Eversource's Q2 net income collapsed 85% y/y to $53.7M, driven by $337M in one-time charges: Aquarion sale loss, transmission ROE refund, and $164M offshore wind liability increase. Despite this, the company reaffirmed 2026 EPS guidance midpoint of $4.65 and 5-7% long-term growth through 2030. The 704 MW Revolution Wind project is 97% complete and already delivering 300 MW; a $2.2B transmission project was tentatively selected. The $1.7B Aquarion proceeds will deleverage the balance sheet. Apparent headline weakness is largely non-recurring; core regulated utility earnings trajectory remains intact. Ticker: ES (article typo EEFT).
If Revolution Wind's remaining costs balloon further or Trump-era delays trigger additional material liabilities beyond the $164M already booked, and if ISO-NE's tentative $2.2B transmission award is overturned or faces multi-year regulatory and cost-overrun risks, Eversource's 5-7% EPS growth guidance through 2030 could prove unattainable, pressuring the multiple.
"Eversource is successfully de-risking its portfolio by offloading offshore wind exposure, but its long-term growth guidance is now entirely dependent on securing aggressive rate increases in a hostile political climate."
Eversource’s Q2 results are a classic 'kitchen-sinking' event, clearing the decks of offshore wind liabilities and regulatory refunds to focus on core rate-base growth. While the 85% drop in net income looks catastrophic, the reaffirmation of 5-7% EPS growth through 2030 is the real signal. The company is pivoting back to its bread-and-butter: massive transmission investment, underscored by the recent $700M ISO-NE win. However, the $451M Connecticut rate hike request is a political powder keg. If regulators slash this request to appease ratepayers, the 5-7% growth target becomes mathematically impossible without further equity dilution.
The company’s reliance on capital-intensive transmission projects assumes a favorable regulatory environment that may not materialize if political pressure to curb utility bills outweighs infrastructure necessity.
"Eversource's guidance assumes favorable rate outcomes and offshore wind completion in a deteriorating political environment for renewables; downside risks to both are material and underpriced."
Eversource's Q2 collapse is almost entirely non-recurring: $337M in one-time charges (Aquarion sale, transmission ROE refund, Revolution Wind liability) against $53.7M reported income. Strip those out and normalized earnings track the reaffirmed $4.57–$4.72 guidance. The real story is regulatory risk. Connecticut's $451M rate hike request (11% for CL&P) faces pushback in a high-rate environment. Revolution Wind's $164M liability spike signals cost overruns on a project already delayed by Trump admin stop-work orders—and offshore wind faces existential political headwinds. The $2.2B transmission project with Avangrid (2032 in-service) is tentative, not approved. Eversource's 5–7% EPS CAGR through 2030 assumes regulatory tailwinds that may not materialize.
The article frames one-time charges as temporary noise, but $164M Revolution Wind liability increases suggest structural cost inflation on offshore projects—this may recur. Regulatory approval timelines and political risk to renewables are severely underweighted.
"Core regulated earnings and a large, front-loaded transmission/wind pipeline underpin mid-single-digit EPS growth through 2030, even after normalized one-off charges."
Eversource’s Q2 plunge is dominated by one-time charges (Aquarion sale, ROE refund, Revolution Wind liability), not a collapse in its regulated earnings base. The core story remains: ~5–7% annual EPS growth through 2030 anchored by a large transmission pipeline and rate-base expansions, with a 2026 non-GAAP EPS midpoint around $4.65. The stock-market risk is near-term headline drag and regulatory/policy risk around offshore wind and rate cases (e.g., CT 11% rate hike request). If these headwinds ease or are offset by accretive rate-base growth, the long-run thesis holds; if delays or cost overruns mount, multiple could compress more meaningfully.
The one-offs could be signaling deeper regulatory or project execution risk, especially if Revolution Wind costs rise or ROE refunds persist; a delayed or underperforming transmission/wind program could erode the assumed rate-base growth and EPS trajectory.
"Tax-credit recapture risk on Revolution Wind could erase Aquarion deleveraging benefits and break the long-term EPS guidance."
Claude correctly flags the tentative nature of the $2.2B transmission selection, but nobody has linked the $164M Revolution Wind liability spike to potential clawbacks on already-collected federal tax credits. If IRS begins recapturing credits on delayed offshore projects post-election, Eversource's deleveraging math from the $1.7B Aquarion sale reverses quickly, making the 5-7% EPS CAGR structurally unattainable without equity issuance.
"Regulatory rate-case failure will force dilutive equity issuance to fund capital projects, regardless of the Aquarion sale."
Grok, your focus on IRS tax credit clawbacks is the real tail-risk, but you're ignoring the cost of capital. Even if the $1.7B Aquarion sale closes, Eversource’s debt-to-capital ratio remains elevated. If the Connecticut rate case is slashed—as Gemini fears—the company will be forced to fund that $2.2B transmission project with expensive debt or dilutive equity. The 5-7% EPS growth target is essentially a hostage to interest rates and regulatory goodwill, not just operational execution.
"Connecticut's rate case outcome directly determines whether the $2.2B transmission project gets regulatory air cover; a cut rate hike doesn't just tighten capital—it signals regulators won't fund the growth thesis at all."
Gemini and Grok are both correct but missing the sequencing risk. The $451M CT rate case decision comes *before* the $2.2B transmission project gets fully funded. If regulators deny or materially cut the rate hike, Eversource loses the regulatory precedent needed to justify transmission capex costs downstream. That's not just a capital-cost problem—it's a credibility collapse with ISO-NE and state commissions. The Aquarion deleveraging becomes irrelevant if the transmission pipeline stalls.
"The real gating item is Connecticut's rate decision—the CT hike outcome will determine who bears downstream capex risk and whether funding gaps arise, not just project costs."
Responding to Claude: sequencing matters, but the CT decision is the real gating item. A material cut to the 451M hike would force who bears downstream capex risk and could trigger funding gaps, pressuring debt costs and possibly equity dilution before the Aquarion sale’s benefits materialize. In that sense, deleveraging isn’t irrelevant—it's the cushion that may be needed to weather a regulatory downside and still fund the 2.2B plan.
Despite a 85% drop in Q2 net income due to one-time charges, Eversource reaffirmed its 5-7% EPS growth target through 2030. However, regulatory risks, particularly the Connecticut rate hike request and potential IRS clawbacks on offshore wind tax credits, threaten the achievability of this guidance.
Eversource's massive transmission pipeline and rate-base expansions could drive long-term EPS growth if regulatory headwinds ease.
Regulatory risks, particularly the Connecticut rate hike request and potential IRS clawbacks on offshore wind tax credits, could make Eversource's 5-7% EPS growth target unattainable without equity issuance.