By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Planet Labs and BlackSky, citing capital intensity, government budget cycles, and potential supply glut from lower launch costs as significant risks. While both companies have promising backlogs and AI integration, their dependence on government contracts and the uncertainty around rapid monetization of AI-enabled services raise concerns about their current valuations.
Risk: Supply glut due to lower launch costs commoditizing satellite imagery and crushing pricing power.
Opportunity: Successful conversion of backlog and commercial demand growth before government budget freezes.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
It's hard to overstate the impact of Space Exploration Technologies and its record-setting IPO on the stock market. SpaceX raised nearly $86 billion in its IPO on June 12, making it the largest IPO in history and giving Elon Musk's company a $2 trillion valuation.
SpaceX has arguably been the biggest narrative in the stock market this summer, as even some major indexes have changed their rules to allow large IPO stocks like SpaceX to join more quickly than usual. But it's far from a perfect stock -- SpaceX already carries an extremely high valuation, and it will be years before it turns a profit. Meanwhile, IPO stocks are notoriously volatile, and many of them need several quarters of performance before they start generating consistent gains.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
However, some interesting artificial intelligence (AI) space stocks already have a track record of performance. Planet Labs (NYSE: PL) and BlackSky Technology (NYSE: BKSY) are two that are worth considering right now.
There's a lot of activity around the Earth -- thousands of satellites are already in orbit, with more coming online every year. They include surveillance satellites operated by nation-states such as the U.S., as well as commercial satellites that provide internet access, communications, and Earth imagery.
That's where Planet Labs comes in. The company specializes in Earth imaging for agriculture, forestry, mapping, and government use. It operates about 200 Earth-imaging satellites and records the planet's landmass every day.
The company's Pelican-class satellites use AI to process images and quickly identify subjects, and have incorporated Claude AI from Anthropic into its platform to help non-expert users use information from the company's satellites.
Revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2027 (ended April 30) was $94 million, up 42% from a year ago. It reported a quarterly loss of $1 million, adjusted for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), and its backlog grew 72% to more than $906 million.
Planet Labs stock is up more than 45% so far this year.
BlackSky is another Earth imaging company. BlackSky uses its constellation of high-resolution satellites and AI-enabled software, delivered through its Spectra platform, to provide real-time Earth observation and analytics.
Spectra uses artificial intelligence to automatically detect and classify vessels, vehicles, and aircraft, and can translate raw pixels into AI-driven analytics in less than 90 minutes. Its capabilities have allowed BlackSky to win government contracts valued up to $2.7 billion.
BlackSky won $160 million in contracts in the first quarter of the year, and built on that this week when it announced it won a series of U.S. government contracts to use its AI-enabled object detection algorithms and automated battle damage analytics to help its customers evaluate damage inflicted on targets after military engagements.
The stock is up 40% so far this year.
Before you buy stock in Planet Labs PBC, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Planet Labs PBC wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $407,004! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,244,599!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 924% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 10, 2026. *
Patrick Sanders has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends BlackSky Technology and Planet Labs PBC. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article's foundational premise regarding a SpaceX IPO is factually incorrect, rendering the entire comparative analysis fundamentally flawed."
The article contains a glaring factual error: SpaceX is not a public company, has not had an IPO, and certainly does not trade on major exchanges. This disqualifies the premise of comparing PL and BKSY to a non-existent public SpaceX offering. Setting that aside, both Planet Labs and BlackSky are essentially 'data-as-a-service' plays. While their AI integration is trendy, the real hurdle is capital intensity. Planet Labs’ $94M quarterly revenue against a $1M adjusted EBITDA loss shows they are nearing operational break-even, but they remain vulnerable to government budget cycles. These are speculative bets on defense-sector spending, not pure-play AI tech stocks.
The strongest case against this bearish outlook is that these companies are effectively 'moated' by government contracts that create high switching costs and long-term recurring revenue streams that defy traditional P/E valuation metrics.
"BlackSky and Planet Labs are government contractors first, AI companies second—and their valuations now reflect that thesis being fully priced in."
The article conflates two separate narratives: AI adoption and space infrastructure. Planet Labs' Claude integration is a UI layer—nice-to-have, not transformative. The real story is backlog growth (72% YoY to $906M) and path to profitability (near-breakeven EBITDA). BlackSky's $2.7B contract pipeline and sub-90-minute analytics are genuinely differentiated, but the article buries the critical detail: these are government contracts, meaning revenue recognition is lumpy, multi-year, and subject to appropriations cycles. Both stocks are up 40-45% YTD—already pricing in significant upside. The article's framing as 'AI space stocks' is marketing; they're really government-dependent Earth imaging plays with emerging commercial traction.
If government spending on defense/intelligence contracts cools (budget pressures, geopolitical thaw, or policy shifts), both companies face sudden revenue headwinds. The backlog doesn't guarantee cash conversion, and neither company has proven it can scale commercial revenue beyond government.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"The hype around AI-enhanced Earth-imaging stocks may outpace fundamentals; unless PL and BKSY convert backlog into durable profits and secure steady government demand, near-term upside is likely limited."
This piece reads like hype bait: it misstates SpaceX’s public status, blends AI-imaging hype with guaranteed profits, and treats Planet Labs and BlackSky as obvious growers rather than speculative bets. PL's Q1 FY2027 revenue was $94 million (up 42%), but it posted a $1 million net loss and carries a $906 million backlog that may not convert quickly if government spending softens. BlackSky highlights large government contracts, yet wins have been lumpy and depend on cyclical defense budgets. The article glosses over capital intensity, ongoing cash burn, and competitive pressure in a crowded market. Without rapid monetization of AI-enabled services, a near-term re-rating looks fragile.
However, a counterargument is that AI-enabled data products can unlock durable revenue streams as institutions increasingly consume analytics. If backlog conversion accelerates and government budgets remain stable, these names could re-rate despite the hype.
"Lowered launch costs will lead to a supply glut in satellite imagery, eroding the pricing power of current incumbents."
Claude, you’re missing the critical 'launch-cost' variable. While you focus on backlog conversion, the real risk is the commoditization of satellite imagery. As SpaceX’s Starship lowers launch costs, the barrier to entry for new constellations collapses, potentially crushing pricing power for Planet Labs and BlackSky. These firms aren't just government-dependent; they are vulnerable to a supply glut. If supply outpaces demand, those 'moated' contracts will be renegotiated downward, making their current valuations look like a classic value trap.
"Starship disruption is real but lagged; near-term downside comes from government budget cycles, not supply competition."
Gemini's launch-cost commoditization argument is sharp, but it conflates two timelines. Starship cost reductions are years away from material impact; meanwhile, Planet and BlackSky have 3-5 year government contracts locked in. The real risk isn't supply glut—it's that government budgets freeze before backlog converts. Commoditization is a 2027+ tail risk; appropriations cycles are a 2025 headwind. Which kills the thesis first matters for valuation.
[Unavailable]
"Launch-cost reductions are a long-tail risk; near-term revenue risk comes from government budget cycles and backlog conversion timing, not a looming pricing glut from Starship."
Gemini, your launch-cost worry is a tail risk, not an imminent threat. Starship economics may matter, but 2025–27 is too soon to expect a pricing glut in Earth imaging; backlog conversion and commercial demand still drive revenue, and supply gluts could be countered by data specialization and service layers. The bigger near-term risk is government budget cycles and revenue recognition timing, which can derail the path to cash flow break-even despite 'moat' contracts.
The panel consensus is bearish on Planet Labs and BlackSky, citing capital intensity, government budget cycles, and potential supply glut from lower launch costs as significant risks. While both companies have promising backlogs and AI integration, their dependence on government contracts and the uncertainty around rapid monetization of AI-enabled services raise concerns about their current valuations.
Successful conversion of backlog and commercial demand growth before government budget freezes.
Supply glut due to lower launch costs commoditizing satellite imagery and crushing pricing power.