By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on the article's recommendation to buy Planet Labs (PL), BlackSky (BKSY), and Redwire (RDW) as cheaper alternatives to SpaceX. They argue these companies are riskier, dependent on government contracts, and vulnerable to SpaceX's launch cost decisions.
Risk: Dependency on SpaceX's launch costs and potential margin compression across the ecosystem.
Opportunity: Potential volume elasticity and increased data demand due to cheaper launch costs (as argued by Grok).
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
SpaceX is going public on June 12, but at a steep valuation.
Planet Labs, BlackSky, and Redwire are three alternatives that provide space and AI exposure.
Planet Labs and BlackSky are Earth-imaging companies, and Redwire manufactures space infrastructure.
The SpaceX IPO is days away.
The popular space company is planning to go public on June 12 at a share price of $135 and a valuation of $1.77 trillion. The ticker symbol will be SPCX, trading on the Nasdaq Global Markets exchange.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
SpaceX generated $18.7 billion of revenue in 2025, so the company's valuation is a big talking point, as it will premiere at about 95 times sales. Morningstar recently valued SpaceX at less than half that ($780 billion).
If you're interested in SpaceX because it provides space and AI exposure, it's not the only game in town. Here are three other space stocks to consider, all trading at cheaper valuations.
Founded by ex-NASA scientists, Planet Labs (NYSE: PL) aims to image all of Earth's landmass every day. It operates over 200 imaging satellites, and it sells Earth observation data to customers across several industries, including agriculture, defense, and finance.
AI powers the analytics layer that uses satellite images to provide structured data. Planet Analytics tools detect buildings, roads, vessels, and aircraft, provide early identification of new construction, and identify geographic features. For an example of how this can be beneficial, agricultural companies partnered with Planet Labs can use its data to optimize fertilizer usage and irrigation.
Planet Labs recently reported earnings for the first quarter of its 2027 fiscal year, which ended April 30, 2026. Revenue jumped 42% year over year to a record $94.2 million, and its backlog grew 72% to over $906 million, indicating strong current and future demand. However, Planet Labs hasn't reached profitability yet, and it isn't cheap, trading at 32 times trailing sales (as of June 5). That's a high multiple, but still far below SpaceX's projected valuation.
Another option in the Earth observation realm is BlackSky (NYSE: BKSY), a smaller and more specialized satellite imaging company than Planet Labs. It focuses primarily on defense, intelligence, and global security. Partners include the U.S. Department of Defense, NASA, and the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office.
BlackSky stands out for its speed and high-resolution imaging. Its Gen-3 satellites provide 35-centimeter resolution, allowing objects as small as 35 centimeters to be identified. For comparison, Planet Labs satellites provide 200-to-300-centimeter resolution. With the AI-enhanced BlackSky Spectra platform, Gen-3 satellites can deliver intelligence in as little as 60 minutes, which is crucial for organizations that need near-immediate targeting or battle-damage assessments.
Governments are increasingly prioritizing real-time, AI-powered tactical intelligence, driving growth in BlackSky's top-line and backlog. In the first quarter of 2026, it won up to $160 million in new contracts and reported $20.8 million in revenue, with 45% of those sales coming from the U.S. federal government and agencies. It also reported a backlog of $351.6 million. BlackSky doesn't have an out-of-this-world valuation, trading at 12 times trailing sales.
Redwire (NYSE: RDW) builds space infrastructure, including spacecraft, guidance systems, power systems, antennas, and camera systems. It also manufactures drones and other defense technology.
Redwire uses AI across several areas of its business, and its flagship AI product is Acorn 2.0, a modeling and simulation software platform. Acorn 2.0 uses agent-based modeling tools to simulate complex systems for defense and aerospace customers. Redwire launched Acorn 2.0 last year for select customers, one of them being DeepSat, a space observation company using the platform to optimize its satellite constellations.
This space company has been building momentum, and revenue jumped 58% year over year to $97 million in Q1 2026. Gross margin expanded to 26.6% compared to 14.7% a year prior, and Redwire also reported a record backlog of $498.1 million.
However, Redwire is losing money, and its first-quarter earnings of -$0.40 per share missed expectations. A large portion of the loss came from equity-based compensation, not operational issues, but it's still a sign of the risk this company poses. On a positive note, Redwire trades at 7 times trailing sales, the lowest valuation on this list.
The space sector offers plenty of interesting investment opportunities, even as the SpaceX IPO dominates the headlines right now. Keep in mind that space stocks are in the early stages, which makes them inherently riskier than more established businesses. Be prepared for volatility and size your investments accordingly.
When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 941%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500.
They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 8, 2026. *
Lyle Daly has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends BlackSky Technology and Planet Labs PBC. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Valuations in space/AI-focused stocks are not justified by near-term cash flow and profitability; investors should demand clearer earnings visibility and cash-generation timelines before chasing IPO-driven hype."
SpaceX IPO hype ignores the math: a $1.77 trillion valuation at about 95x 2025 sales implies outsized profitability or a unique strategic moat not visible in current data. The three cheaper peers—Planet Labs, BlackSky, and Redwire—are far from profitable, and their revenue visibility depends on defense and commercial data cycles that can swing with budgets. The article glosses over execution risk, competitive pressure, and potential equity dilution, and it omits forward-looking revenue and free-cash-flow trajectories plus how AI monetization actually translates imagery into margins. Missing context: forward multiples, cash generation timelines, and policy-driven demand.
The bull case would argue SpaceX’s platform dominance, relentless launch cadence, and the AI/data ecosystem could justify a premium if orders materialize and long-term contracts lock in value.
"The article's premise regarding a SpaceX IPO is factually false, which undermines the credibility of the entire investment thesis presented."
Before diving into these picks, we must address the elephant in the room: the article claims SpaceX is IPOing on June 12, 2026, at a $1.77 trillion valuation. This is factually incorrect—SpaceX remains a private company, and any 'SPCX' ticker mentioned is a red flag for potential misinformation. Investors should be wary of 'alternative' space plays pitched as substitutes for a non-existent IPO. While Planet Labs (PL), BlackSky (BKSY), and Redwire (RDW) offer genuine exposure to the burgeoning space economy, they are essentially high-burn, speculative infrastructure plays. Their valuations, while lower than the hypothetical SpaceX figure, are still heavily dependent on government contract cycles and massive capital expenditure requirements.
The strongest case against my caution is that the space sector is currently in a 'land grab' phase where early-mover advantage in satellite constellations and manufacturing capacity justifies high cash burn and speculative multiples.
"The article presents valuation arbitrage (cheaper multiples) as a substitute for fundamental risk mitigation, when all three are pre-profitable, government-dependent, and vulnerable to the same macro and policy shocks as SpaceX."
The article's framing—'forget SpaceX, buy these instead'—is marketing disguised as analysis. Yes, SpaceX at 95x sales looks stretched versus Planet Labs at 32x or BlackSky at 12x. But the article conflates valuation with investment merit. Planet Labs and BlackSky are pre-profitable, burning cash, and dependent on government contracts (BlackSky: 45% federal revenue). Redwire's Q1 miss and -$0.40 EPS despite 58% revenue growth signals margin pressure, not just stock comp. The real risk: these three are not cheaper alternatives—they're smaller, riskier bets on the same secular tailwind. If defense spending contracts or AI-satellite ROI disappoints, all four crater together.
If geopolitical tension drives sustained defense spending and these companies reach profitability within 24 months, their current valuations could look prescient; the article's three picks do have stronger backlogs and government demand signals than most pre-revenue AI plays.
"These stocks carry unacknowledged profitability and concentration risks that make them poor substitutes for SpaceX exposure."
The article pushes PL, BKSY, and RDW as cheaper SpaceX proxies for space-plus-AI exposure, citing revenue growth and backlogs. Yet all three remain unprofitable, with PL at 32x sales and RDW missing EPS estimates. The piece omits execution risks in satellite deployment, customer concentration (BKSY's heavy U.S. government reliance), and potential share dilution from ongoing losses. SpaceX's scale ($18.7B revenue) dwarfs these names, making direct valuation comparisons misleading. Volatility in early-stage space tech could erase near-term gains even if AI analytics demand rises.
Rapid backlog expansion at all three could signal path to breakeven faster than peers if defense budgets hold, undermining the risk narrative.
"A misreported IPO premise undermines the article’s credibility and should prompt investors to reevaluate its valuation thesis."
Gemini, your point about SpaceX's IPO status highlights a credibility risk in the piece. If the premise is wrong, investors should discount the rest of the thesis and question the reliability of the valuation narrative. The core concern remains: even cheap-sounding names like PL, BKSY, and RDW ride government demand and cash burn, while SpaceX's private-valuations are opaque. Don't anchor on a misreported IPO to justify back-tested multiples.
"The article’s valuation comparison is a category error because PL and BKSY lack the vertical integration that makes SpaceX a platform rather than just a satellite operator."
Claude, you hit the critical point: these aren't 'cheaper' alternatives, they are fundamentally different risk profiles. By comparing them to a hypothetical SpaceX valuation, the article creates a false sense of value. I’d add that the real danger is the 'Space-as-a-Service' business model itself. Unlike SpaceX, which owns the launch infrastructure, PL and BKSY are at the mercy of launch costs and satellite lifespan, effectively making them high-beta plays on SpaceX's own success.
"PL, BKSY, and RDW face inverted leverage to SpaceX's innovation—cheaper launches compress their margins, not expand addressable markets."
Gemini nails the structural trap: PL and BKSY aren't cheaper SpaceX proxies—they're dependent on SpaceX's launch capacity and pricing. If Starship drives launch costs down 70%, margins compress across the entire ecosystem. The article frames this as tailwind; it's actually a scissor. Nobody flagged that these three companies' unit economics hinge on a competitor's capex decisions, not their own execution.
"Lower launch costs could expand market volume enough to benefit these firms despite margin pressure."
Claude's Starship margin-scissor overlooks volume elasticity—70% lower launch costs could multiply deployments and data demand for PL and BKSY, accelerating scale if contracts follow. This dependency on SpaceX thus embeds upside optionality via cheaper constellations and real-time AI use cases, not solely downside pressure on unit economics. The article misses both directions of the launch-cost dynamic.
The panel consensus is bearish on the article's recommendation to buy Planet Labs (PL), BlackSky (BKSY), and Redwire (RDW) as cheaper alternatives to SpaceX. They argue these companies are riskier, dependent on government contracts, and vulnerable to SpaceX's launch cost decisions.
Potential volume elasticity and increased data demand due to cheaper launch costs (as argued by Grok).
Dependency on SpaceX's launch costs and potential margin compression across the ecosystem.