By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is that while CrowdStrike's sequential revenue growth is impressive, Fortinet's higher profitability and cash flow generation make it a more attractive investment. The key risk is CrowdStrike's ability to maintain growth while improving margins, while the key opportunity is the potential for CrowdStrike's AI module rollouts to compress the profitability gap.
Risk: CrowdStrike's ability to maintain growth while improving margins
Opportunity: CrowdStrike's AI module rollouts
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Fortinet consistently reports higher total revenue than CrowdStrike throughout the observed periods.
CrowdStrike demonstrates steady quarter-over-quarter revenue growth, while Fortinet shows a generally upward trajectory with more quarter-over-quarter volatility.
Investors should watch whether CrowdStrike maintains its sequential growth streak or if the revenue gap between the two companies begins to widen.
Fortinet (NASDAQ:FTNT) primarily generates revenue by selling integrated cybersecurity hardware, software licenses, and subscription services to enterprise customers.
It recently expanded its lineup with new firewall models and faced shareholder legal investigations, while reporting an approximately 29% net income margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.
CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) earns revenue mostly by selling cloud-based subscriptions for its security modules that protect endpoints, identity, and data.
It authorized a $500 million share repurchase increase and announced a 5% workforce reduction, and generated an approximately 5% net income margin for the quarter ended Jan. 31, 2026.
Revenue represents the total amount of money a business brings in from its core operations before any expenses are subtracted. Tracking this metric helps investors measure a company's total customer sales volume and baseline growth trajectory over time.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
| Quarter (Period End) | Fortinet Revenue | CrowdStrike Revenue | |---|---|---| | Q2 2024 | $1.4 billion (period ended June 2024) | $921.0 million (period ended April 2024) | | Q3 2024 | $1.5 billion (period ended Sept. 2024) | $963.9 million (period ended July 2024) | | Q4 2024 | $1.7 billion (period ended Dec. 2024) | $1.0 billion (period ended Oct. 2024) | | Q1 2025 | $1.5 billion (period ended March 2025) | $1.1 billion (period ended Jan. 2025) | | Q2 2025 | $1.6 billion (period ended June 2025) | $1.1 billion (period ended April 2025) | | Q3 2025 | $1.7 billion (period ended Sept. 2025) | $1.2 billion (period ended July 2025) | | Q4 2025 | $1.9 billion (period ended Dec. 2025) | $1.2 billion (period ended Oct. 2025) | | Q1 2026 | $1.8 billion (period ended March 2026) | $1.3 billion (period ended Jan. 2026) |
Data source: Company filings. Data as of May 28, 2026.
Comparing revenue between Fortinet and CrowdStrike provides interesting insights to investors. As the older company, Fortinet’s total sales are higher than CrowdStrike’s. It is also seeing year-over-year revenue growth, which is a sign that its business is growing.
However, the trend over the past two years reveals CrowdStrike is experiencing consistent revenue growth nearly every quarter, while sequential quarterly sales are lumpy for its cybersecurity rival. For CrowdStrike to deliver an increase every quarter is impressive, and indicates strong customer demand for its cybersecurity solutions. If this sales trend continues, CrowdStrike is likely to overtake Fortinet in total sales over time.
CrowdStrike appears to be making the right moves to do so. Its Project QuiltWorks focuses on the security risks around artificial intelligence, and has gone beyond protecting against hackers and into insurance for AI’s penchant to make mistakes that can cause a business to suffer financial liability. The cybersecurity giant partnered with leading insurance providers, such as Liberty Mutual Insurance.
Before you buy stock in Fortinet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fortinet wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $463,900! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,294,401!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 30, 2026. *
Robert Izquierdo has positions in CrowdStrike. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends CrowdStrike and Fortinet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Fortinet's 29% net margins versus CrowdStrike's 5% indicate sustained earnings superiority even if revenue growth remains more volatile."
The article emphasizes CrowdStrike's smoother sequential revenue growth as a path to overtaking Fortinet, yet it underplays the stark profitability gap. Fortinet posted a 29% net margin in Q1 2026 versus CrowdStrike's 5%, reflecting hardware-plus-subscription economics versus pure SaaS. This means Fortinet converts revenue into earnings far more efficiently even with lumpier quarters. Investors focused solely on top-line momentum risk overlooking how FTNT's higher margins could preserve earnings leadership longer than the revenue crossover narrative implies, especially if CRWD's AI-related expansions pressure near-term profitability.
CrowdStrike's scale advantages and share repurchases could drive rapid margin expansion, allowing it to close both the revenue and earnings gaps faster than margins alone would suggest.
"Comparing revenue without profitability metrics is analytically hollow; FTNT's 29% net margin vs CRWD's 5% suggests the 'growth story' may be trading profitability for topline velocity."
The article's premise—that consistent sequential growth signals superiority—conflates growth *rate* with growth *quality*. CRWD's 19.4% YoY revenue growth (Jan 2025 to Jan 2026: $1.1B to $1.3B) is solid, but FTNT's net margin (29%) dwarfs CRWD's (5%), suggesting FTNT converts revenue to profit far more efficiently. The article ignores profitability entirely. CRWD's 5% workforce reduction + $500M buyback signal margin pressure, not strength. The 'lumpy' FTNT revenue may reflect deal timing, not weakness. Crossover timing is speculative—at current margins, FTNT could be more valuable at lower absolute revenue.
If CRWD's cloud-native model achieves operating leverage faster than expected, and FTNT's hardware-heavy mix faces secular decline, CRWD's lower current margin could compress further before expanding—making the crossover thesis premature and masking deteriorating unit economics.
"The massive disparity between Fortinet's 29% net income margin and CrowdStrike's 5% margin suggests that CrowdStrike's revenue growth is being bought at an unsustainable cost to shareholder value."
The article’s focus on top-line revenue growth masks a massive divergence in operational quality. Fortinet’s 29% net income margin demonstrates a mature, highly efficient business model that generates real cash flow, whereas CrowdStrike’s 5% margin suggests a 'growth at all costs' strategy that remains vulnerable to scaling inefficiencies. While CrowdStrike’s sequential consistency is impressive, investors are paying a premium for a cloud-native narrative that ignores the cyclicality of hardware-integrated security. If enterprise IT budgets tighten, CrowdStrike’s high-burn model faces more downside risk than Fortinet’s diversified, profitable base. I am skeptical that revenue growth alone justifies CrowdStrike’s valuation when profitability metrics are this disparate.
CrowdStrike’s superior recurring revenue model offers better long-term visibility and lower churn than Fortinet’s hardware-reliant business, which faces constant replacement cycles and commoditization risks.
"Fortinet's current scale and margins make a near-term overtaking by CrowdStrike unlikely."
The piece frames Fortinet as bigger but choppier and CrowdStrike as a steady grower. But for investors, the bigger signal is profitability and mix: Fortinet's 29% net margin in Q1 2026 is a meaningful cushion versus CrowdStrike's 5%, implying more cash flow and buybacks for FTNT. Yet the article hints at a Catch-22: Cloud-native CRWD should scale faster and possibly command a premium, while FTNT's hardware/software bundle faces ongoing capital expenditure pressure and potential secular outsourcing. Also, the data window (Q2 2024 through Q1 2026) obscures ARR growth, churn, and billings. The missing context matters for how durable the trend is.
The strongest counter-argument is that CRWD's cloud-native, subscription-first model can scale faster than FTNT's hardware-led mix, potentially narrowing the gap much sooner if ARR growth accelerates and margins improve.
"CRWD's capital returns may accelerate AI-driven margin expansion rather than signal weakness."
Claude's read of the $500M buyback plus headcount cut as pure margin pressure misses the possibility that these moves fund CRWD's AI module rollouts, which could lift gross margins above 75% within two years and compress the profitability gap faster than FTNT's hardware mix allows. Supply-chain exposure in FTNT's deferred revenue remains an unpriced risk if component costs spike.
"CRWD's margin expansion thesis requires sustained growth *and* cost discipline simultaneously—a harder combo than Grok's timeline implies."
Grok's AI-margin thesis hinges on gross margins hitting 75% within two years—but CRWD's current gross margin is already ~72-74%, so the uplift is modest. More critically: even if CRWD reaches 29% net margin, that's a 4-year+ journey at current burn rates. Fortinet's supply-chain risk is real but priced into cyclical hardware exposure; CRWD's execution risk on margin expansion while maintaining growth is the bigger wildcard. The buyback-plus-headcount move looks defensive, not offensive.
"CrowdStrike's single-agent architecture provides superior operating leverage compared to Fortinet's capital-intensive hardware model."
Claude, you’re right that CRWD’s 75% gross margin target is modest, but you’re ignoring the operating leverage inherent in their single-agent architecture. Unlike FTNT, which must maintain a massive, capital-intensive hardware supply chain, CRWD’s incremental cost to add modules like Charlotte AI is near zero. The buyback isn't just defensive; it’s a signal of confidence in free cash flow conversion. FTNT’s hardware-heavy model is a legacy anchor that will struggle to match CRWD’s software-defined scalability.
"AI-margin uplift to 75% gross margins within two years is too optimistic given incremental costs."
Responding to Grok's AI-margin thesis: credible that CRWD benefits from AI, but assuming gross margins rise to 75% within two years relies on near-zero incremental costs for Charlotte AI modules—a stretch. Realistically, additional R&D, data-privacy/compliance, integration, and sales incentives will weigh on margins. Even with buybacks, net margin expansion hinges on disciplined SG&A control and stickiness of ARR; this is a longer, bumpy path, not a straight line.
The panel consensus is that while CrowdStrike's sequential revenue growth is impressive, Fortinet's higher profitability and cash flow generation make it a more attractive investment. The key risk is CrowdStrike's ability to maintain growth while improving margins, while the key opportunity is the potential for CrowdStrike's AI module rollouts to compress the profitability gap.
CrowdStrike's AI module rollouts
CrowdStrike's ability to maintain growth while improving margins