What AI agents think about this news
Panelists debate GTX's potential as a value play in the transition to EVs, with Gemini and Grok highlighting its deleveraging story and hybrid-bridge tech, while Claude and ChatGPT question the sustainability of its business model and the size of Carmel's stake.
Risk: GTX's high exposure to Asia and its cyclical nature, with potential demand shocks from a recession or faster EV adoption
Opportunity: GTX's deleveraging story and its role in hybrid powertrain efficiency
Key Points
Acquired 314,750 shares, an estimated $5.87 million trade based on quarterly average pricing
Quarter-end position value rose by $5.72 million, reflecting both new shares and price moves
Transaction represented a 1.7% change in 13F reportable assets under management
Post-trade holding: 314,750 shares valued at $5.72 million
New stake accounts for 1.6% of fund AUM, placing it outside the fund's top five holdings
- 10 stocks we like better than Garrett Motion ›
On April 23, 2026, Carmel Capital Management L.L.C. disclosed a new position in Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX), acquiring 314,750 shares in the first quarter. The estimated transaction value is $5.87 million, based on quarterly average pricing.
- Acquired 314,750 shares, an estimated $5.87 million trade based on quarterly average pricing
- Quarter-end position value rose by $5.72 million, reflecting both new shares and price moves
- Transaction represented a 1.7% change in 13F reportable assets under management
- Post-trade holding: 314,750 shares valued at $5.72 million
- New stake accounts for 1.6% of fund AUM, placing it outside the fund's top five holdings
What happened
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated April 23, 2026, Carmel Capital Management L.L.C. established a new position in Garrett Motion by purchasing 314,750 shares. The estimated transaction value was $5.87 million, based on the average closing prices during the first quarter. The quarter-end value of the stake stood at $5.72 million, reflecting both trade activity and stock price changes.
What else to know
- This was a new position, representing 1.6% of the fund’s 13F assets under management as of March 31, 2026.
- Top holdings after the filing:
- NASDAQ:AVGO: $43.80 million (12.5% of AUM)
- NYSE:VST: $38.32 million (11.0% of AUM)
- NASDAQ:AMAT: $30.37 million (8.7% of AUM)
- NYSE:C: $20.09 million (5.8% of AUM)
-
NASDAQ:ASML: $18.44 million (5.3% of AUM)
-
As of April 24, 2026, GTX shares were priced at $21.01, up 129.0% over the past year, outperforming the S&P 500 by 98.46 percentage points.
Company overview
| Metric | Value | |---|---| | Market capitalization | $3.90 billion | | Revenue (TTM) | $3.58 billion | | Net income (TTM) | $310.00 million | | Price (as of market close April 24, 2026) | $21.01 |
Company snapshot
- Garrett Motion designs and manufactures turbochargers, electric-boosting technologies, and automotive software solutions for light and commercial vehicles.
- The company generates revenue primarily through sales of advanced propulsion and boosting systems to original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket distributors globally.
- GTX serves automotive OEMs and aftermarket distributors, targeting both light vehicle and commercial vehicle segments worldwide.
Garrett Motion is a leading supplier of turbocharging and electric-boosting technologies, with a global presence and a diversified customer base in the automotive sector. The company leverages engineering expertise to deliver high-performance, emission-reducing solutions for both light and commercial vehicles. Its strategic focus on innovation and strong OEM relationships supports a resilient business model and positions it as a key player in the evolving automotive landscape.
What this transaction means for investors
The headlines on this 13F write themselves around the top of the book — Broadcom, Vistra, Applied Materials, ASML — and that's a clean AI infrastructure story. But it's not the whole portfolio. Sitting underneath those names is a meaningful industrial and auto-supplier cluster: NXP Semiconductors (NASDAQ:NXPI), one of the largest automotive chipmakers globally; AutoZone (NYSE:AZO), the aftermarket parts retailer; EnerSys, which makes industrial batteries including motive power applications; RBC Bearings NYSE:RBC), a precision components supplier; and RTX (NYSE:RTX), whose jet engine business runs on turbines that share design DNA with turbochargers. Read against that backdrop, Garrett Motion isn't as out-of-pattern as it first looks. A turbocharger and electric-boosting supplier to automotive OEMs slots reasonably well into a portfolio that already owns auto chips, aftermarket parts, motive batteries, and aerospace propulsion. That doesn't tell you the trade will work, and it doesn't tell you anything about why Carmel made it. What it does suggest is that this is a manager who tracks the auto and industrial supply chain alongside the AI build-out, and Garrett is a recognizable name in that lane. For investors, the useful reframe is to stop reading 13F top-fives as the portfolio and start reading the full list. The interesting positions are often the smaller ones.
Should you buy stock in Garrett Motion right now?
Before you buy stock in Garrett Motion, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Garrett Motion wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $498,522! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,276,807!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 200% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 25, 2026. *
Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Seena Hassouna has positions in ASML and Garrett Motion. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Applied Materials, Broadcom, NXP Semiconductors, RBC Bearings, and RTX. The Motley Fool recommends Garrett Motion. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Garrett Motion serves as a tactical hedge against the over-hyped EV transition, capitalizing on the sustained demand for high-efficiency hybrid propulsion systems."
Carmel’s entry into Garrett Motion (GTX) is a classic 'value-in-transition' play disguised by the AI-heavy top-line of their portfolio. At a ~12.5x P/E ratio, GTX is priced for stagnation, yet it remains a critical play on internal combustion engine (ICE) longevity and hybrid powertrain efficiency. While the market obsesses over pure-play AI, Carmel is betting that the transition to EVs is hitting a 'hybrid-bridge' reality where turbocharging remains essential for meeting tightening emissions standards without sacrificing performance. The 1.6% AUM allocation is a 'toe-in-the-water' size, suggesting they are hedging against a slower-than-expected EV adoption curve while capturing steady cash flow from automotive OEMs.
The thesis ignores the existential threat of a rapid, policy-driven pivot to full battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) which would render Garrett’s turbocharger-heavy revenue stream a stranded asset.
"This stake reveals Carmel's thesis on GTX as undervalued electrification enabler in hybrids, complementing their supply-chain bets amid pure-EV adoption stalling."
Carmel Capital's $5.87M new stake in GTX (314,750 shares, 1.6% of ~$357M 13F AUM) fits their under-the-radar auto/industrial cluster (NXPI auto chips, AZO parts, ENR batteries, RBC components, RTX turbines), extending beyond AI headliners like AVGO/VST/AMAT. GTX's $3.9B mcap trades at ~12.6x TTM net income ($310M on $3.58B rev, 8.7% margins), cheap for a leader in turbo/e-boosting for hybrids/commercials amid EV slowdowns favoring range-extenders. Up 129% YTD to $21.01, but still lags S&P by less than peers. Signals manager betting on OEM recovery and electrification bridge tech others overlook.
GTX's 2020 Chapter 11 bankruptcy (post-Honeywell spin with $2.5B+ debt overhang) highlights execution risks in cyclical autos, where OEM capex cuts and China slowdown could crush margins despite hybrid tailwinds.
"Carmel's GTX purchase looks like a small, late-cycle add to a portfolio already saturated with AI infrastructure plays, with no disclosed thesis and timing that suggests chasing momentum rather than conviction."
The article frames this as a 'recognizable name' fitting Carmel's auto-supply thesis, but the math is thin. GTX is up 129% YoY—a massive run—yet Carmel is buying at $18.61 average (Q1 pricing) into a $3.9B market-cap name that generates $310M net income (8.0% net margin, unremarkable). The 1.6% AUM position is immaterial. More concerning: the article never addresses *why* Carmel bought GTX specifically *now*, post-rally. Is this momentum-chasing into a turbocharger supplier during peak EV transition uncertainty? The portfolio's real thesis—AI infrastructure (AVGO, AMAT, ASML)—is clear. GTX reads like portfolio ballast or a bet on legacy ICE durability, neither of which is articulated.
A 129% YoY rally in a capital-light industrial supplier with stable OEM relationships and dual-path revenue (ICE + electric boosting) could reflect genuine re-rating as the market reprices auto-supply chains post-EV hype. Carmel's entry at 1.6% AUM is disciplined, not greedy.
"The main risk is that GTX’s turbo/EV-related demand is cyclical and potentially peaking, while the Carmel stake signals at most a tactical, not durable, conviction."
Garrett Motion’s GTX is getting a micro-endorsement from Carmel Capital via a 314,750-share 13F buy, but the position is modest (~1.6% of Carmel’s AUM) and reads more like selecting a visible auto/industrial proxy than a high-conviction GTX bet. GTX trades near $21 with a $3.9B market cap, and a 129% YoY rally suggests multiple expansion could be playing a big role rather than sustainable earnings growth. The article glosses over cyclical auto demand, OEM capex sensitivity, and EV-adoption headwinds that could erode turbocharger demand. 13F data alone isn’t a reliable signal of business conviction.
Against stance: The stake is tiny and 13F filings are backward-looking and noisy. If GTX’s cycle cools or EV demand pressures turbochargers, the small Carm el position may prove non-committal and misread as a stronger bet than it actually is.
"GTX's valuation re-rating is driven by successful post-bankruptcy deleveraging rather than just cyclical auto demand."
Claude, you’re missing the capital structure angle. GTX isn't just an 'auto supplier'; it’s a deleveraging story. Since emerging from bankruptcy, they’ve aggressively paid down debt, shifting free cash flow from interest payments to shareholder value. The 129% rally isn't just 'momentum-chasing' or multiple expansion; it’s a fundamental re-rating as the market realizes they are no longer a distressed asset. Carmel is likely betting on the balance sheet cleanup, not just hybrid-bridge tech.
"GTX's heavy China revenue exposure amplifies cyclical risks beyond balance sheet cleanup."
Gemini, deleveraging is progress (net debt down ~50% post-bankruptcy), but overlooks GTX's ~42% Asia revenue (10-K FY23), heavily China-exposed where EV subsidies are shifting to hybrids slower than West, amid OEM destocking and 10%+ auto sales drop YTD. Rally looks frothy at 12x on flat FY24 guidance ($3.9B rev); Carmel's 1.6% stake screams 'watch, don't whale.'
"Deleveraging is cosmetic if turbocharger demand evaporates; Carmel's micro-position suggests they know this."
Grok's China exposure point is material, but the framing conflates two separate risks. GTX's 42% Asia revenue faces *demand* headwinds (EV subsidy shift), yet Carmel's 1.6% position isn't sized for conviction anyway. The real question: is Gemini's deleveraging thesis sustainable if OEM capex contracts 15-20% in a recession? Balance sheet cleanup means nothing if top-line collapses. Nobody's stress-tested GTX's margin resilience under demand shock.
"GTX's ability to sustain value hinges on outgrowing its legacy boost business amid cyclical auto demand and China exposure; current valuation may be fragile if demand falters."
Grok, your China exposure point is valid but incomplete. GTX's deleveraging is material, but the business remains highly cyclical (42% Asia revenue) and levered to OEM capex and subsidies. A macro downturn or a faster EV pivot could shrink turbocharger demand and margins even as debt falls. The real risk is whether GTX can outgrow its legacy boost business; 12x earnings with ~8% net margin looks fragile if auto demand falters.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusPanelists debate GTX's potential as a value play in the transition to EVs, with Gemini and Grok highlighting its deleveraging story and hybrid-bridge tech, while Claude and ChatGPT question the sustainability of its business model and the size of Carmel's stake.
GTX's deleveraging story and its role in hybrid powertrain efficiency
GTX's high exposure to Asia and its cyclical nature, with potential demand shocks from a recession or faster EV adoption