By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
Despite short-term headwinds like a stronger USD and geopolitical risks, the panel agrees that silver's supply deficit and industrial demand make it a compelling long-term opportunity. Gold remains near all-time highs, and while there are near-term pressures, the consensus is bullish on both metals.
Risk: Rising real yields and a firmer dollar could pressure gold in the near term.
Opportunity: Silver's supply deficit and industrial demand, particularly in solar and EV sectors, present a strong long-term opportunity.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Some offers on this page are from advertisers who pay us, which may affect which products we write about, but not our recommendations. See our Advertiser Disclosure.
Gold (GC=F) June futures opened at $4,654.50 per troy ounce on Friday, down 0.7% from Thursday’s closing price of $4,685.30. The gold price moved even lower in early trading. At 6:48 a.m. ET, the price of gold was down to $4,555.50.
Silver (SI=F) July futures opened at $77.41 per ounce on Friday, down 9.3% from Thursday’s closing price of $85.32. The price of silver edged upward in early trading, climbing to $78.71 by 6:48 a.m. ET.
Last Friday’s headline was, “Prices headed for weekly gains following positive jobs report.” This morning, gold is primed for a weekly loss, while silver has a chance to climb back to where it started the week, just over $80 an ounce.
Reports on President Trump’s summit in China this week indicate that the face-to-face meetings yielded positive business results for both countries but produced nothing to lift the standstill in peace negotiations with Iran.
As a result, inflation pressure hasn’t subsided, and some market observers have begun to price in a rate increase by the Fed later this year. Currently, the price of Brent crude (BZ=F) and the U.S. dollar index (^NYICDX) are up 7.17% and 1.21%, respectively, over the last five days, according to Yahoo Finance.
The opening price of June gold futures on Friday was down 0.7% from Thursday’s closing price. Here’s a look at how the gold price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
- One week ago: -1.3%
- One month ago: -3.9%
- One year ago: +47.7%
On Jan. 29, gold’s one-year gain was 95.6%.
** 24/7 gold price tracking: **Don't forget you can monitor the current price of gold on Yahoo Finance 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Want to learn more about the current top-performing companies in the gold industry? Explore a list of the top-performing companies in the gold industry using the Yahoo Finance Screener. You can create your own screeners with over 150 different screening criteria.
The opening price of July silver futures on Friday was down 9.3% from Thursday’s closing price. Here’s how the opening silver price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
- One week ago: -4.2%
- One month ago: -3.5%
- One year ago: +138.8%
Learn more: How to invest in silver: A beginner’s guide
A gold investment can add stability and inflation protection to your portfolio. But it can also dilute your gains when stock prices are rising quickly. Finding the right balance between gold’s diversification benefits and profiting from growth potential in other assets can be challenging.
Even the experts are divided on how to achieve the correct balance. Below, five experts explain their recommended gold allocations, which range from 0% to 20%.
Learn more: How to invest in gold in 4 steps
Robert R. Johnson, professor at Creighton University’s Heider College of Business, does not advocate gold investing. In his words, “while having a small position in precious metals may dampen portfolio volatility in the short-run, the tradeoff between slightly dampened volatility and the lost long-term return is certainly not a prudent one, particularly for Gen Z/millennials with long investing time horizons.”
Brett Elliott, director of content and SEO at American Precious Metals Exchange (APMEX), recommends setting an allocation that aligns with your investing goals.
Growth-oriented investors may be comfortable with an allocation of 10% or 15%, according to Elliott. But income investors will prefer a smaller position, because gold provides no yield. A 2% to 5% gold allocation can provide some resiliency without an excessive drag on income potential.
Learn more: Who decides what gold is worth? How gold prices are determined.
Blake McLaughlin, executive vice president at Axcap Ventures, said historical data support a gold allocation of 5% to 8%. “Gold may not offer the outsized return potential of private investments, but the metal holds a set of attributes that are increasingly hard to ignore,” according to McLaughlin. Those attributes include the metal’s resilience amid economic uncertainty and geopolitical unrest.
Thomas Winmill, portfolio manager at Midas Funds, believes most investors will benefit from a long-term gold allocation of 5% to 15%. Winmill specifically advocates investing in gold mining companies through a mutual fund.
Your risk tolerance and current mix of financial versus hard assets can guide you to an appropriate allocation, according to Winmill.
- Risk tolerance:Keep your allocation percentage low if you tend to panic in volatile cycles. - Financial vs. hard assets:Financial assets are stocks and bonds. Hard assets include tangible items like real estate, gold, collectibles, classic cars, and equipment. If you have no home equity and your wealth is primarily in financial assets, you can set your gold allocation higher. Or, if your home is paid for and more valuable than your stock portfolio, gold investing may not be necessary.
Learn more: Thinking of buying gold? Here's what investors should watch for.
Vince Stanzione, CEO and founder at First Information, recommends a 20% gold allocation, specifically in physical gold or a gold ETF. Stanzione argues for a higher exposure to gold as a wealth protection strategy. As he says, “gold keeps with inflation and gold retains its purchasing power,” while paper currencies are devaluing around the world.
Learn more: Gold IRA: Benefits, risks, and how it differs from a traditional IRA
Whether you’re tracking the price of gold or silver since last month or last year, the price-of-gold chart and the price-of-silver charts below show the precious metal’s change in value so far this year.
**More silver coverage from the Yahoo Finance team: **
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The sharp decline in precious metals is a direct consequence of the strengthening dollar and the market pricing in higher real interest rates, which fundamentally undermines the non-yielding gold and silver value proposition."
The 9.3% single-day drop in silver futures is a classic liquidity-driven liquidation event, likely exacerbated by margin calls following the recent volatility. While the article cites geopolitical tension and Fed rate hike expectations as catalysts, the primary driver is likely a shift in the cost of carry as the U.S. dollar index (^NYICDX) strengthens. With gold down nearly 50% from its January peak, we are seeing a structural unwinding of the 'safe haven' trade. Investors are rotating out of non-yielding hard assets into higher-yielding dollar-denominated instruments, signaling that the inflation hedge thesis is currently failing against the reality of a hawkish Fed policy shift.
If Iran negotiations collapse entirely or the China summit results fail to materialize into tangible trade deals, the resulting geopolitical risk premium could trigger a massive short-squeeze in precious metals, rendering current technical weakness irrelevant.
"Weekly losses are a minor correction in a +47-139% YOY uptrend fueled by inflation and geopolitics, presenting a dip-buy for allocations up to 20%."
Gold (GC=F) and silver (SI=F) futures are set for weekly losses—GC=F down 1.3% WoW to $4,555, SI=F down 4.2% to $78.71—amid stalled Iran talks, persistent inflation, USD index +1.21%, and Brent crude +7.17% over five days, pricing in Fed rate hikes. Yet this ignores massive YOY gains (gold +47.7%, silver +138.8% from levels implying hyperinflation or crisis), dwarfing the dip. Article conflates Trump-China business wins with Iran deadlock, missing potential escalation risks reigniting haven flows. Expert allocations (5-20%) signal institutional buying on weakness; monthly losses minor at -3-4%. Short-term USD strength caps upside, but second-order geopolitics favors bulls.
If Fed hikes materialize sooner amid oil-driven inflation, real yields could spike and crush non-yielding metals further, extending losses beyond weekly pullback. Silver's 9.3% Thursday plunge hints at leveraged unwind, not just fundamentals.
"Weekly losses are a USD-driven correction, not a reversal of the 12-month bull market, but the Fed rate-hike signal is the real test—if credible, it breaks the bull case entirely."
The article conflates two unrelated narratives—a weekly price dip with geopolitical risk—but misses the real signal. Gold down 1.3% weekly and silver down 4.2% is noise; the year-over-year gains (+47.7% gold, +138.8% silver) reveal the actual trend. The Iran standstill is presented as bullish for gold, yet prices fell. The USD strength (+1.21% in 5 days) and Brent crude spike (+7.17%) are the actual headwinds—a stronger dollar makes gold more expensive for foreign buyers, directly suppressing demand. The article's expert allocation advice (0–20%) is generic boilerplate that obscures the real question: are we in a correction within a bull market, or is the bull exhausted?
If the Fed genuinely signals rate hikes later this year (as the article hints), real yields rise, making non-yielding gold structurally less attractive regardless of geopolitical noise. The dollar strength may persist if rate expectations harden, which would cap gold's upside.
"Near-term gold faces headwinds from rising real yields and a firmer dollar, with Iran-related risk as a potential catalyst that could reverse the downside."
In the article, gold and silver are described as slipping with inflation pressures and Fed hike bets weighing on the metals, while a stronger dollar and higher Brent crude pressure risk assets. Yet the price quotes look inconsistent (GC=F opening at 4,654.50 vs a later print around 4,555). That data noise argues for caution in taking the headline numbers at face value. The macro setup suggests near-term pressure for gold from rising real yields and a firmer dollar, but geopolitical risk remains a potential catalyst: a renewed Iran-related risk premium could snap a gold rebound despite today’s trend.
But if Iran tensions escalate or the Fed delays hikes, gold could rebound sharply even as today's numbers imply weakness; the article's data quirks also risk misreading the signal.
"Gemini's 50% drawdown claim is factually false, and the current price action represents a consolidation in a secular bull market rather than a structural failure."
Gemini’s claim that gold is down 50% from its January peak is factually incorrect and dangerously misleading; gold is currently trading near all-time highs, not in a 50% drawdown. This error invalidates the 'structural unwinding' narrative. We are seeing a healthy consolidation within a secular bull market, not a collapse. The real risk isn't a shift in the 'safe haven' trade, but rather the market’s inability to price in the fiscal dominance implications of current U.S. debt levels.
"Silver's structural supply deficit from industrial demand creates a bullish case independent of gold's macro pressures."
Panel overlooks silver's (SI=F) acute supply crunch: Silver Institute data shows 2024 deficit of ~215M oz (demand 1.2B oz vs mine supply 1B oz), driven by solar PV (+24% YoY) and EV demand outpacing gold's haven role. 138% YOY gain isn't hype—it's scarcity pricing. Short-term USD headwinds temporary; industrial tailwinds make silver's 9.3% drop a buy.
"Silver's supply deficit and industrial tailwinds make its 9.3% drop a structural buying opportunity, distinct from gold's macro headwinds."
Gemini's 50% drawdown claim is indefensible—gold near all-time highs invalidates the 'structural unwinding' thesis entirely. But Grok's silver supply deficit (215M oz) is real and material; it's NOT just dollar strength. Industrial demand (solar +24% YoY, EVs) decouples silver from gold's macro headwinds. The 9.3% Thursday plunge looks like forced liquidation of leveraged longs, not fundamental repricing. That's a buy signal for silver specifically, not a broad metals capitulation.
"Gemini's 50% gold drawdown claim is false; the real opportunity is silver's supply deficit and industrial demand, which could drive a bullish tilt for silver even if gold remains bid."
Gemini's assertion that gold is 50% from January's peak is factually wrong and undercuts the panel's 'structural unwind' thesis. Gold remains near all-time highs; the real actionable point is silver's supply deficit (~215 Moz) and industrial demand (solar, EV) which supports a bullish tilt for silver even if gold cools. If Fed real yields rise materially, gold could still weaken; this keeps the silver case interesting but hedged.
Despite short-term headwinds like a stronger USD and geopolitical risks, the panel agrees that silver's supply deficit and industrial demand make it a compelling long-term opportunity. Gold remains near all-time highs, and while there are near-term pressures, the consensus is bullish on both metals.
Silver's supply deficit and industrial demand, particularly in solar and EV sectors, present a strong long-term opportunity.
Rising real yields and a firmer dollar could pressure gold in the near term.