The panel is divided on the outlook for refiners, with bullish cases resting on persistent supply constraints and bearish views focusing on demand destruction from high prices and electrification. The key debate centers around the duration of elevated margins, with some arguing for a multi-year windfall and others warning of a shorter-lived boom.
Risk: Accelerated EV adoption and policy-driven electrification could cap liquid-fuel demand and reprice margins lower than expected.
Opportunity: Integrated refiners with captive crude access and high utilization rates may capture outsized crack spreads on diesel and jet fuel.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Goldman Warns Nightmare Refining Crisis Could Prolong Diesel, Gas Price Pain Through 2027
Goldman energy analyst Nikhil Bhandari warned in a note on Monday that the global refining system is too stretched to support a full recovery in fuel demand while inventories rebuild. This suggests that fuel prices will remain elevated into next year.
Bhandari told clients that …
Read more
Goldman Warns Nightmare Refining Crisis Could Prolong Diesel, Gas Price Pain Through 2027
Goldman energy analyst Nikhil Bhandari warned in a note on Monday that the global refining system is too stretched to support a full recovery in fuel demand while inventories rebuild. This suggests that fuel prices will remain elevated into next year.
Bhandari told clients that refining margins must remain elevated to restrain consumption and limit restocking, keeping demand within the industry's ability to supply diesel, gasoline and jet fuel.
On an ex-China basis, Bhandari expects 300,000 barrels a day of refining capacity additions in 2026 to be offset by 600,000 barrels a day of closures, leaving another year of net capacity losses.
Bhandari said if demand rebounds to 1% above 2025 levels while buyers attempt to replace half of this year's inventory draws, refinery utilization would have to reach unprecedented levels. This is a territory that he said, "We do not view as operationally realistic."
To keep utilization near the highest level seen this decade, the analyst says one possible combination would require demand to remain 1% below 2025 levels and no inventory rebuilding in 2027.
In other words, an uncomfortable reality is setting in: fuel prices need to stay high enough to keep consumption subdued.
He provided clients with three scenarios spanning different recovery paths for refinery operations and global oil demand but warned global refined-product inventories could fall even more by the end of the year, possibly to 2015 levels measured in days of consumption during the fourth quarter of 2026.
Bhandari expanded on his refining supply-demand framework:
Scenario 1 assumes global refinery runs back to normal levels by March 2027, followed by the resolution of Middle East refinery outages by June 2027 and Russian disruptions by December 2027, paired with a robust 2.9 mb/d recovery in global oil demand in 2027.
Scenario 2 models a prolonged disruption, delaying the normalization of global refinery runs to October 2027. Under this scenario, Middle East and Russian refinery outages remain elevated at 5.0 mb/d above seasonal norms through the remainder of 2026 and 2027, paired with a sluggish global demand growth of 0.5 mb/d.
Scenario 3 mirrors the refinery runs and outage normalization timeline as Scenario 1, but assumes a more modest global oil demand growth of 1.5mb/d.
Across all 3 scenarios, we assume refinery utilization of the operating fleet returns to the highest 3-month average seen over the past 5 years post refinery runs normalization (Exhibit 4-Exhibit 5).
We note total global product inventories could fall below the lowest days-of-use levels since 2015 in 4Q26 across all 3 scenarios (Exhibit 6), and OECD product inventories (inclusive of strategic reserves) in 2Q27 could fall below their historical minimum days-of-use level last seen around 2003 (Exhibit 7).
For refiners with access to steady crude flows, tight global refining capacity could create perfect conditions of strong margins and substantial cash generation. Bhandari highlights Valero and Marathon Petroleum in the US, S-Oil and Thai Oil in Asia, and Repsol, Neste and Helleniq Energy in Europe as potential beneficiaries.
Diesel and jet fuel remain at the epicenter of the global supply squeeze. Bhandari's warning of a global refining system "stretched for longer" suggests those favorable refining economics could come alongside elevated fuel costs that would pinch consumers' pocketbooks.
Last week, Goldman commodity experts Yulia Zhestkova Grigsby and Daan Struyven warned that the diesel crisis is setting up the next squeeze: gasoline.
Professional subscribers can read the full note here at our new Marketdesk.ai portal.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 - 14:10
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“A sustained supply-demand gap in refining could lift margins for years, making refiners attractive even amid oil-price volatility.”
Goldman argues the global refining system remains too stretched to fully rebuild demand, implying inventories could tighten and fuel prices stay elevated into 2027. The case for refiners is constructive: with steady crude flow, margins could stay elevated as capacity remains underutilized. However, the thesis rests on fragile assumptions: persistent outages, a slow demand rebound, and limited new capacity. If outages resolve or demand rebounds faster than expected, refinery utilization could normalize and margins compress. Additional risks include geopolitical shifts, OPEC+ production changes, and policy moves toward electrification or biofuels that could cap liquid-fuel demand long-term.
The biggest counter is that once margins reward capex, new capacity or faster demand normalization could close the gap sooner than modeled, eroding the long-duration squeeze and undermining the bull case for refiners.
“The refining sector is facing a terminal demand risk where high margins in the short term act as a catalyst for permanent, structural demand destruction via rapid electrification.”
Goldman’s thesis on structural refining deficits is a classic 'margin-for-longer' play, favoring complex refiners like Valero (VLO) and Marathon (MPC). However, the market is mispricing the political response to sustained $4.00+ gasoline. While Goldman focuses on physical constraints, they ignore the elasticity of demand in a high-rate environment. If fuel prices remain elevated through 2027, we aren't just looking at 'subdued consumption'; we are looking at an acceleration of EV adoption and industrial electrification that permanently impairs long-term demand. The 'nightmare' for refiners isn't a supply squeeze—it's the demand destruction that follows when consumers are forced to pivot away from internal combustion engines.
The bull case for refiners is that global infrastructure is too rigid to pivot to alternatives quickly, meaning demand will remain inelastic regardless of price, sustaining record margins for years.
“Goldman's refining crisis thesis is real but time-bound: it works only if crude stays $60-75/bbl, demand doesn't crater, and refiners can't squeeze more throughput—three assumptions that are fragile and could all break simultaneously.”
Goldman's thesis rests on a structural supply deficit persisting through 2027, which would be genuinely bullish for refiners with captive crude access (MPC, VLO, REPSOL) but bearish for consumers and demand-sensitive sectors. The critical flaw: the analysis assumes refinery utilization can't exceed 5-year highs without breaking operationally. That's testable and contestable. Refiners have shown surprising flexibility under margin pressure. More importantly, the article conflates 'tight capacity' with 'permanently tight capacity'—it ignores that $50-60/bbl oil (vs. current levels) would crush demand enough to ease the squeeze within 12 months, collapsing the entire thesis. The scenarios assume demand grows 0.5-2.9 mb/d in 2027; if recession hits or EV adoption accelerates, that assumption crumbles.
If refinery utilization can actually push 5-10% higher than historical averages through debottlenecking and maintenance optimization, or if crude prices collapse to $40/bbl on recession fears, the supply crunch evaporates and refined-product margins compress sharply by mid-2027—making the 'elevated fuel prices through 2027' call premature.
“Structural capacity deficits and inventory draws will keep refining margins elevated into 2027, supporting VLO and MPC earnings even if demand growth disappoints.”
Goldman’s three scenarios all point to global product inventories hitting multi-year lows by late 2026, with net refining capacity still shrinking in 2026. This setup favors integrated refiners that can secure crude and run near 95%+ utilization. Valero and Marathon stand to capture outsized crack spreads on diesel and jet, while European names like Repsol face more outage risk. The overlooked angle is that sustained high prices could trigger faster substitution in trucking and aviation than the models assume, capping the duration of the margin windfall.
Persistent high diesel and gasoline prices may accelerate fleet turnover to EVs and efficiency retrofits, cutting distillate demand growth below even Goldman’s lowest 0.5 mb/d case and forcing utilization cuts by mid-2027.
The Debate
Responding to Gemini
“The windfall could end sooner if EV adoption and policy shifts accelerate demand down more quickly than anticipated.”
Gemini’s emphasis on demand destruction is a valid counterpoint, but the bigger, underappreciated risk is the speed of policy-driven electrification and fleet modernization that permanently caps liquid-fuel demand. In a high-rate world, price elasticity could reprice demand faster than refiners can adjust, not just gradually. If EV adoption accelerates meaningfully, the windfall could short-circuit well before 2027, forcing margins to re-rate lower than distressed-committee expectations. The bets hinge on demand trajectory as much as supply.
Responding to Claude
“Geopolitical energy security mandates will artificially prop up refinery margins regardless of demand destruction or EV adoption.”
Claude and Gemini are missing the 'energy security' pivot. Governments aren't just letting demand destruction happen; they are actively subsidizing domestic refining to avoid the inflationary shocks of imported products. This creates a floor for margins that isn't purely market-driven. Even if EV adoption accelerates, the geopolitical necessity of maintaining a domestic fuel supply chain means governments will prioritize refinery survival over pure efficiency, keeping margins higher than a standard supply-demand model suggests.
Responding to Gemini
“Government support slows refinery exits but doesn't prevent margin compression if crude stays elevated while demand softens.”
Gemini's government-subsidy floor is real but overstated. EU refiners face actual closures despite policy support—Petroplus, Total's exits. Subsidies slow decline, not reverse it. More critically: nobody's modeled what happens if crude stays $70-80/bbl while refined products normalize. Refiners' margin compression could be brutal even with tight supply if crude stays elevated and demand weakens. That's the scenario Goldman's base case doesn't stress-test.
Responding to Gemini
“Subsidies will fund refinery exits, not sustain margins, once crude stays elevated and demand softens.”
Gemini's energy-security subsidy floor underestimates how quickly even protected European refiners have closed when crack spreads failed to offset elevated crude input costs. If OPEC+ adds barrels and crude holds near $70 while product demand slips from fleet turnover, those same subsidies will likely fund orderly exits rather than margin floors, compressing utilization faster than any 2027 base case assumes.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panel is divided on the outlook for refiners, with bullish cases resting on persistent supply constraints and bearish views focusing on demand destruction from high prices and electrification. The key debate centers around the duration of elevated margins, with some arguing for a multi-year windfall and others warning of a shorter-lived boom.
Integrated refiners with captive crude access and high utilization rates may capture outsized crack spreads on diesel and jet fuel.
Accelerated EV adoption and policy-driven electrification could cap liquid-fuel demand and reprice margins lower than expected.
Related News
Oil prices head for second weekly rise as U.S. vows to turn up economic pressure on Iran
BP Just Returned to Venezuela. Brilliant Bet or a Big Mistake?
Morgan Stanley Expects Chevron (CVX) to Hit a New High. Can the Oil Giant Keep Rallying?
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.