By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel largely agrees that Alphabet's venture portfolio, particularly its stake in SpaceX, is overvalued and illiquid, with potential dilution and exit barriers. However, there's disagreement on whether these investments offset the existential threat of AI-driven search cannibalization.
Risk: Illiquidity of venture holdings and potential dilution
Opportunity: Potential operating leverage from SpaceX's orbital data for Alphabet's mapping and ad-targeting stack
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
When most investors think of Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL)(NASDAQ: GOOG), they likely envision its globally dominant internet search engine (Google), ultra-popular streaming platform (YouTube), or the world's No. 3 cloud infrastructure services platform (Google Cloud). But what they may not realize is what a truly phenomenal investor Google has been.
While retail investors have seemingly tripped over each other to gain exposure to Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) (NASDAQ: SPCX) following its record-setting initial public offering (IPO), Google has been a stakeholder for well over 11 years. This initial investment is now worth more than the GDP of Costa Rica.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Google initially invested $900 million into Elon Musk's space infrastructure company in January 2015, valuing SpaceX at approximately $12 billion. This gave it a roughly 7.5% stake in what's now the seventh-largest publicly traded company on Wall Street.
However, following several rounds of additional funding, designed to fuel SpaceX's satellite broadband ambitions (Starlink) and further its reusable rocket technology, Alphabet's stake in SpaceX shrank to about 4.9%.
Though notably smaller than its initial position, a 4.9% stake in SpaceX still packs a punch. As of today, Google parent Alphabet's SpaceX shares are worth $110.3 billion. For those of you keeping score at home, this works out to a 12,156% return over 11.5 years.
It should also be noted that Alphabet holds a stake in artificial intelligence coding start-up, Cursor, which is being acquired by SpaceX for $60 billion in an all-stock transaction. Assuming Alphabet still has this stake, it could translate into even more SpaceX shares.
But SpaceX represents just one of a long list of investment wins for Alphabet.
In October 2023, Google invested $2 billion in Anthropic, the company behind the Claude large language model. Less than two years later, in January 2025, Google invested an additional $1 billion in Anthropic. The most recent investment round in April 2026 saw Alphabet commit another $40 billion, with $10 billion upfront and the additional $30 billion dependent on performance milestones.
Today, Alphabet holds a roughly 14% stake in Anthropic, which could change a bit depending on whether additional investment rounds are held. However, based on Anthropic's private market valuation of $965 billion, Google's cumulative investment has ballooned to about $135.1 billion. At worst, it's 10X'd its investment, including the latest $10 billion.
Wall Street's second-largest publicly traded company is also a major shareholder of satellite-based cellular broadband services provider AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ: ASTS). During the first quarter of 2025, Alphabet acquired more than 8.9 million shares of AST. Though we don't know the exact purchase price of these shares, AST SpaceMobile spent most of the first quarter of 2025 hovering around $25 per share.
As of today, AST SpaceMobile is trading at nearly $89 per share. Alphabet has netted an estimated 250% gain on AST over 15 to 18 months, translating to a $571 million unrealized profit.
You'd struggle to find a more successful money manager on Wall Street than Alphabet.
Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $400,101! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,212,683!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 911% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 3, 2026. *
Sean Williams has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AST SpaceMobile and Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Alphabet's touted $110B SpaceX position and Anthropic gains rest on unverifiable private valuations that ignore illiquidity and dilution risks the article omits."
The article celebrates Alphabet's SpaceX stake growing from $900M in 2015 to $110B today at a 12,156% return, plus wins in Anthropic and ASTS. However, SpaceX remains private with no IPO, making the valuation and 4.9% stake size unverifiable mark-to-market figures subject to dilution from later rounds. Anthropic's $40B round and $965B valuation also appear inflated or projected. These are illiquid holdings whose paper gains cannot be easily monetized without discounts or lockups, overstating Alphabet's edge versus public-market investors.
Even if valuations are private and illiquid, Alphabet's early entry into Starlink and Claude ecosystems could deliver strategic synergies and data advantages that public markets cannot replicate, justifying the premium.
"The market is dangerously overvaluing Alphabet by conflating speculative, illiquid venture gains with the diminishing quality of its core search-advertising cash flow."
Alphabet’s venture portfolio is being framed as a core value driver, but this is a dangerous distraction for shareholders. While the SpaceX and Anthropic gains are headline-grabbing, they represent 'paper wealth' in highly illiquid, private-market valuations that are notoriously difficult to exit without triggering massive tax events or market volatility. More importantly, Alphabet’s core search business is facing an existential threat from AI-driven query shifts. Investors are essentially being asked to value Google as a diversified venture capital firm rather than a tech operating company. If the regulatory environment shifts or if these private 'unicorns' fail to achieve liquidity, Alphabet’s valuation could face a sharp contraction as the market re-prices its core business fundamentals.
The sheer scale of these stakes provides Alphabet with unique strategic moats and data access that could solidify its competitive advantage in the AI ecosystem, potentially justifying a conglomerate valuation premium.
"Alphabet's venture gains are unrealized, heavily diluted, and cherry-picked—conflating illiquid paper wealth with operational investing skill misleads shareholders about capital efficiency."
The article conflates unrealized paper gains with actual returns, a critical distinction for investors. Alphabet's $110.3B SpaceX stake and $135.1B Anthropic position are illiquid, unvested, and subject to dilution—they cannot be monetized at claimed valuations. The 12,156% SpaceX return assumes a static 4.9% stake, but future funding rounds will further dilute it. More troubling: the article cherry-picks wins (SpaceX, Anthropic, AST) while ignoring Alphabet's broader venture portfolio performance. The real question isn't whether some bets paid off—it's whether Alphabet's capital allocation beats its core business reinvestment rate or public market alternatives. The framing as 'phenomenal investor' obscures that these are founder bets on Musk and Amodei, not systematic investing skill.
If Alphabet's venture arm genuinely outperforms professional VCs on a risk-adjusted basis, that's material to the stock thesis—but the article provides zero data on portfolio-level returns, J-curves, or opportunity cost versus buybacks.
"The article's claimed gains rely on dubious private-market valuations, which are opaque, unverified, and subject to dilution and write-downs."
Strongest concern: the piece treats private, illiquid rounds as if they were market-disseminated public valuations. If Alphabet owns 4.9% of SpaceX, a reported $110.3B value implies a SpaceX enterprise value near $2.25T—an implausible figure given SpaceX's private fundraising history and lack of a public float. Likewise, the Anthropic and AST SpaceMobile figures look inflated (e.g., Anthropic valuation cited at ~$965B; public reporting has it far lower), which makes the claimed five-digit returns untrustworthy. The analysis ignores dilution, milestone-based vesting, option pools, and potential write-downs. Liquidity risk, mark-to-market sensitivity, and key dependencies on SpaceX milestones remain unaddressed.
SpaceX is private; using a 4.9% stake to imply a $2.25 trillion SpaceX valuation is not credible. If the private valuations cited (e.g., Anthropic at $965B) are inflated, Alphabet's purported returns may be illusory.
"Strategic data synergies from SpaceX holdings create operating leverage that liquidity critiques ignore."
The panel overstates exit barriers while underplaying how SpaceX's orbital data could feed directly into Alphabet's mapping and ad-targeting stack, creating operating leverage that public-market holders of Starlink suppliers cannot match. Claude correctly notes dilution but misses that even a reduced 3% stake at lower marks still supplies non-replicable telemetry for Google Earth and logistics AI. That linkage, not headline multiples, is the durable edge.
"Alphabet's venture bets are capital-intensive distractions that risk diluting ROIC rather than providing meaningful operational synergies."
Grok, your focus on 'telemetry' synergies is speculative at best. Alphabet’s core business is search and ad-tech, not space-based logistics. Integrating Starlink data into Google Maps is a secondary moat compared to the primary risk: the cannibalization of search revenue by AI. By fixating on these 'strategic' linkages, you ignore that Alphabet is essentially using its balance sheet to subsidize its competitors' capital-intensive moonshots, which historically dilutes ROIC rather than enhancing it.
"Venture illiquidity and search cannibalization are orthogonal risks; owning Anthropic may actually hedge the latter, not worsen it."
Gemini conflates two separate risks: illiquidity of venture holdings versus search cannibalization. The first is a valuation problem; the second is an existential business problem. Alphabet's venture bets don't cause search decay—AI competition does. If anything, owning Anthropic stakes gives Alphabet earlier warning and potential leverage over Claude's trajectory. The real question: does venture upside offset search margin compression? That's not addressed here.
"Illiquid private stakes and dilution risk render the article’s 'telemetry synergy' narrative non-credible without quantified exit paths."
Responding to Grok: the 'telemetry synergy' thesis is speculative and untestable without numbers. The article’s 12,156% return rests on illiquid, privately valued stakes that will dilute on future rounds; even a 3% stake could be worth far less if SpaceX raises at a lower valuation or stalls exits. Before any operating leverage matters, you need dilution risk, exit timelines, and regulatory constraints on AI dominance to be quantified; otherwise it's a paper story, not a confidence signal.
The panel largely agrees that Alphabet's venture portfolio, particularly its stake in SpaceX, is overvalued and illiquid, with potential dilution and exit barriers. However, there's disagreement on whether these investments offset the existential threat of AI-driven search cannibalization.
Potential operating leverage from SpaceX's orbital data for Alphabet's mapping and ad-targeting stack
Illiquidity of venture holdings and potential dilution