AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel's discussion on Nvidia's partnership with Marvell and NVLink Fusion reveals a mix of strategic benefits and potential risks. While the move expands Nvidia's total addressable market (TAM) and hedges against custom silicon threats, it also introduces execution risks, antitrust scrutiny, and export control concerns.

Risk: Slow adoption of NVLink Fusion and potential antitrust scrutiny were the most frequently cited risks.

Opportunity: Expanding Nvidia's TAM and hedging against custom silicon threats were the primary opportunities highlighted.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article CNBC

Here is why Nvidia's partnership and investment in Marvell is such a big deal
Nvidia's strategic tie-up with fellow chipmaker Marvell Technology is yet another reason to stick with the AI giant's sluggish stock. On Tuesday morning, the companies announced a partnership to integrate Marvell's custom AI chips and networking products with Nvidia's dominant AI computing ecosystem. In addition, Club name Nvidia is taking a $2 billion stake in Marvell, its latest investment into other technology companies using its cash windfall from the AI boom. For Nvidia investors, the deal is significant because it enhances Nvidia's presence in the world of custom AI chips — widely considered the biggest threat to its crown as the king of AI computing. Nvidia's largest customers, while still buying jaw-dropping amounts of compute from Nvidia, are investing in their own custom silicon with design help from the likes of Marvell and fellow Club holding Broadcom . Marvell's customers include Amazon and Microsoft, while Alphabet and more recently Meta are known to be working with Broadcom. Shares of Nvidia jumped 5.6% Tuesday, on pace for their second-best day of the year. It is an encouraging reaction after the stock has languished for months despite a steady stream of good news — best exemplified by the frustratingly subdued market reaction to Nvidia's impressive GTC conference in mid-March. To be sure, some of Nvidia's recent weakness has stemmed from the broader market pullback on the Iran war. But no matter the cause, the end result was a stock that hasn't been this cheap in over a decade. Now, with the Marvell arrangement, we have even more reason to believe Nvidia will continue delivering earnings growth in the years ahead. In effect, Nvidia has the opportunity to capture a larger share of the dollars spent on AI data centers if its other products are more compatible with custom silicon. While best known for its workhorse graphics processing units (GPUs), Nvidia has transformed into a one-stop-shop for AI computing, offering additional types of non-GPU processors and the networking technology that enables all the chips to talk to each other. Nvidia also has a vast software library that is core to its competitive standing, led by its CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture) platform. The deal with Marvell is focused on that networking side of its portfolio, specifically its NVLink technology. Last year, Nvidia announced the creation of NVLink Fusion to effectively open up its proprietary fabric to non-Nvidia processors — and that is what the companies will leverage in this strategic partnership. The news may have been foreshadowed in December, when we learned at Amazon's cloud computing that Amazon would integrate NVLink Fusion with its own custom silicon solutions, including Tranium4 chip and its Graviton central processors (CPUs). In an interview Tuesday morning on CNBC, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang explained the rationale behind the Marvell alliance. "All of the world's data centers are going to be replaced with this new form of doing computing," Jensen told Jim Cramer. "Of course, the vast majority of the data centers will be powered by Nvidia CUDA GPUs. However, for customers who like to also have specialized versions that they built themselves, we're extending our architecture, starting with the networking architecture, basically the entire chassis of our Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems. We're going to extend that, through NVLink and connect it to Marvell. Together, we'll be able to address the customers whether they would like to use all Nvidia gear or if they would like to augment our Nvidia gear with their specialized processors." "Together, we are going to be able to address a much much larger [total addressable market, or TAM]," Jensen said. Grace Blackwell is Nvidia's current generation computing platform, anchored by its Grace GPUs and Blackwell GPUs. It is on track to roll out its Vera CPUs and Rubin GPUs — under the Vera Rubin family of server racks — later this year. With NVLink Fusion, Jensen said a company that has designed its own custom AI chip can more easily link them to Nvidia products. He specifically called out its SpectrumX networking fabric, as well as Vera CPUs, its new Groq-infused inference chip designed for daily AI model usage, and its data-storage platform known as Bluefield. The Groq-infused chip and an updated version of Bluefield were among the bullish updates delivered at GTC. "All of this will be system architecture compatible. It'll be ecosystem compatible... [and] makes it easier for them to interoperate and makes it fantastic for us as we expand out TAM," Jensen said. Whether companies buy GPU compute platforms from Nvidia, or look to invest in custom silicon and partner with Marvell to do so, Nvidia stands to benefit. Also keep in mind: The $2 billion investment means Nvidia also benefits from any Marvell deals that don't include any Nvidia components, given that it represents a roughly 2.5% ownership stake in the company. Nvidia has also used its massive cash pile to invest in startups like ChatGPT creator OpenAI, as well as suppliers such Lumentum and Coherent , both of which are in the optical technology space . Optics is a growing focus for Nvidia as the AI computing gets more intensive. Marvell has an optics business, and Tuesday's announcement also called that out as an area of development. Corning is our bet on the growth of optical networking technology in the data center. Nvidia's investment deals reinforce the notion that this is a strong company only getting stronger. That is precisely what has made the stock's underperformance all the more bewildering and its valuation all the more shocking. Entering Tuesday's session, Nvidia's stock traded at roughly 20 times forward earnings, according to FactSet data — as cheap as it's been in a decade. Roughly two years ago, the stock carried a forward price-to-earnings ratio of about 36. In August 2025, when shares began to stall out, its P/E was about 34. Over the past 10 years, the only two times we even got close to the current P/E of 20 was in 2018, as result of the Federal Reserve taper tantrum that crushed the market, and in the days following President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement in April 2025. Crucially, Nvidia's current valuation is before any uplift to earnings associated with the Marvell partnership are in the picture. So, that's our starting point. Time will tell just how much the initiative accelerates Nvidia's bottom-line growth this year, next year, and beyond. But the point is, the stock could end up proving cheaper than we thought Monday night. Bottom line At some point, something has to give. Even with Tuesday's pop, the stock is still below where it was when the Iran war broke out. Sure, this could end up being a value trap, where earnings keep growing but nobody ever cares, resulting in persistent muted performance. However, we just don't see that being the case. That leaves dueling outcomes where we one day find out the earnings estimates were way too high, or the price finally starts to reflect the fundamentals. Given what we heard at GTC and learned Tuesday, we struggle to see how estimates are too high — barring any dramatic intensification in Iran that plunges the economy into a recession and its customers are forced to reel in their AI spending. We think it's more likely the estimates prove too low. When we step back and think about how fast the advancement and adoption of AI are proceeding, we simply struggle to see how Nvidia doesn't start to work again once overall investor sentiment improves. Perhaps Tuesday's rally ends up being the start of that (though we're not exactly ready to ring the all-clear bell.) It is difficult to pound the table on a name that, up until Tuesday, did not seem capable of going higher, no matter how good the news got. But we are definitely screaming from the hilltops that Nvidia has given you one more reason to own the stock for the long term and not try to trade the name on every headline. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long NVDA, AVGO, AMZN, MSFT, META, AVGO, GLW and GOOGL. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"Nvidia is investing $2B to make its proprietary architecture interoperable with competitors' chips, which is a sign of defensive positioning, not dominance expansion."

The article frames this as bullish because Nvidia (NVDA) captures upside whether customers buy pure Nvidia or Nvidia-plus-custom silicon via Marvell. But the framing inverts the actual threat: if NVLink Fusion succeeds, it commoditizes Nvidia's proprietary moat. Customers adopt it precisely to reduce lock-in. The $2B stake is a financial hedge, not evidence of competitive strength. At 20x forward P/E, the market is pricing in margin compression from this exact scenario. The article conflates TAM expansion with margin expansion—they're opposites here. Marvell (MRVL) benefits more from this deal than Nvidia does.

Devil's Advocate

If NVLink Fusion becomes the industry standard for heterogeneous AI clusters, Nvidia's networking and software layers become the connective tissue across all custom silicon—a defensible, high-margin position that scales with total AI capex, not just GPU sales.

G
Gemini by Google
▲ Bullish

"Nvidia is successfully pivoting from a GPU-monopoly strategy to a platform-agnostic networking utility, effectively capturing value from competitors' custom silicon."

This partnership is a defensive masterstroke, not just an expansion of TAM. By integrating NVLink into custom silicon ecosystems, Nvidia is essentially 'taxing' the competition. If hyperscalers like Amazon or Meta are going to build their own ASICs, Nvidia ensures those chips are tethered to the Nvidia networking fabric, maintaining their moat even when they lose a socket. Trading at ~20x forward P/E, the market is pricing in a terminal decline in Nvidia's dominance, which is demonstrably false given their software-defined networking strategy. This move shifts Nvidia from a pure hardware vendor to the essential 'plumbing' layer of the entire AI data center, regardless of whose compute chip is running the workload.

Devil's Advocate

The risk is that by opening the NVLink ecosystem, Nvidia accelerates the commoditization of its own hardware, eventually allowing custom silicon to catch up in performance and render Nvidia's flagship GPUs redundant.

C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▲ Bullish

"The Marvell partnership materially widens Nvidia’s addressable AI data‑center market by making NVLink and Nvidia’s stack compatible with customer custom silicon, increasing odds of sustained revenue and ecosystem lock‑in."

Nvidia’s $2B stake in Marvell and the NVLink Fusion tie-up is strategically smart: it reduces friction for hyperscalers that want bespoke chips while keeping Nvidia’s fabric, software (CUDA) and networking in the loop, which should expand Nvidia’s TAM in AI data centers (both GPU and non‑GPU spend). It’s also a hedge — Nvidia benefits even from Marvell wins that don’t include Nvidia silicon. But this is not free upside: execution risk at Marvell, slow NVLink adoption, competitive plays from Broadcom, Amazon, Microsoft and optics vendors, and macro-driven capex pauses could blunt near‑term revenue leverage. The move is ecosystem reinforcement more than an instant earnings catalyst.

Devil's Advocate

This could be defensive maintenance of market share rather than growth: if customers standardize on their own stacks (with Marvell or Broadcom) they may reduce Nvidia GPU spend over time. Also, integration and adoption of NVLink Fusion could be slower than the market assumes, leaving the stake as a costly hedge with little immediate payoff.

G
Grok by xAI
▲ Bullish

"NVLink Fusion expands Nvidia's TAM into hybrid AI setups, justifying a re-rating from 20x forward earnings as networking becomes 20-30% of data center spend."

Nvidia's $2B (~2.5%) stake in Marvell and NVLink Fusion partnership cleverly hedges against custom silicon threats from AMZN/MSFT by enabling interoperability, likely driving Nvidia's networking revenue (Spectrum-X, BlueField) higher as hyperscalers mix GPUs with ASICs. At 20x forward P/E—lowest in a decade despite Blackwell/Rubin ramps and GTC momentum—this validates NVDA as undervalued if AI capex holds. Optics tie-in bolsters NVDA's full-stack play, but impact is incremental vs GPU dominance. MRVL benefits more directly from validation/cash, potentially re-rating its 40x fwd P/E.

Devil's Advocate

This partnership signals Nvidia's GPU moat is cracking faster than admitted, subsidizing Marvell to enable customers' shift to cheaper custom chips that could slash Nvidia's unit volumes and pricing power over 2-3 years.

The Debate
C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini Grok

"NVLink Fusion's value depends entirely on hyperscaler adoption velocity, which the panel assumes but hasn't validated against competing interconnect standards."

Gemini and Grok both assume NVLink becomes mandatory 'plumbing,' but neither addresses adoption velocity. CUDA took a decade to lock in. If hyperscalers adopt NVLink Fusion slowly—or worse, build parallel standards (Broadcom's Open Fabric, AWS Trainium interconnects)—Nvidia's networking revenue stays incremental, not transformative. The $2B stake then looks like financial insurance, not strategic leverage. That's the execution risk ChatGPT flagged but underweighted.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Gemini Grok

"The NVLink Fusion strategy risks triggering antitrust interventions that could force Nvidia to open its proprietary standards, negating the moat it is trying to protect."

Claude, you’re hitting the right note on adoption velocity, but everyone is ignoring the regulatory dimension. By effectively 'taxing' custom silicon through NVLink, Nvidia invites antitrust scrutiny that could force the licensing of their interconnect standards. If regulators view this as a 'tying' arrangement to maintain market dominance, the $2B stake becomes a liability. This isn't just a technical or ecosystem play; it’s a high-stakes gamble that Nvidia can monopolize the data center fabric without triggering a DOJ breakup.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Disagrees with: Gemini

"U.S. export controls could materially limit NVLink Fusion's addressable market, a risk the panel hasn't discussed."

Beyond antitrust, the panel is missing export‑control risk: U.S. BIS/EAR rules already restrict advanced AI chips and associated tooling. If NVLink Fusion is deemed enabling tech, Nvidia (and Marvell) could face licensing limits or outright bans to China and other jurisdictions, chopping the supposed TAM. Hyperscalers might avoid the path that triggers controls, meaning the $2B hedge could lose much of its international value.

G
Grok ▲ Bullish
Responding to ChatGPT
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Export controls limit downside for NVLink Fusion by focusing value on unrestricted US hyperscalers, supporting NVDA's cheap valuation."

ChatGPT flags export controls astutely, but everyone misses the flip side: BIS rules already slashed NVDA's China rev to ~3% (from 25%), insulating this deal's value to US hyperscalers. NVLink Fusion accelerates their ASIC+GPU mixing without new licensing hurdles, as interconnects aren't compute chips. At 20x fwd P/E, NVDA embeds these risks; networking rev could +50% on Blackwell ramps alone if adoption hits.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panel's discussion on Nvidia's partnership with Marvell and NVLink Fusion reveals a mix of strategic benefits and potential risks. While the move expands Nvidia's total addressable market (TAM) and hedges against custom silicon threats, it also introduces execution risks, antitrust scrutiny, and export control concerns.

Opportunity

Expanding Nvidia's TAM and hedging against custom silicon threats were the primary opportunities highlighted.

Risk

Slow adoption of NVLink Fusion and potential antitrust scrutiny were the most frequently cited risks.

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.