AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel generally agrees that the article oversimplifies Social Security claiming strategies by focusing solely on delayed claiming. They highlight crucial factors such as longevity risk, solvency issues, tax implications, and individual circumstances that should be considered. The optimal strategy may vary based on personal health, financial situation, and future policy changes.

Risk: Longevity risk and potential future benefit cuts due to Social Security Trust Fund depletion

Opportunity: Tax-efficient strategies involving delayed claiming and Roth conversions, especially for high-net-worth individuals

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

  • Retired workers can maximize their monthly Social Security income by claiming at age 70, but they become eligible for benefits at age 62.
  • The average 70-year-old man receives $2,530 per month in benefits, while the average 70-year-old woman receives $2,204 per month.
  • The average 62-year-old man receives $1,573 per month in benefits, while the average 62-year-old woman receives $1,286 per month.
  • <a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=6da49990-595d-4cce-b339-dfb693933f5c&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaedikp0000068%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ftm_veh%3Dkeypoints_pitch_feed_partner%26ftm_pit%3D17994">The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›</a>

In any given year, more than 20% of newly awarded retirees generally claim Social Security benefits at age 62 (i.e., as early as possible). In turn, they receive the smallest possible benefit based on their personal circumstances. Meanwhile, fewer than 10% of newly awarded retirees maximize their benefit by delaying until age 70.

Read on to learn exactly how much claim age affects Social Security payouts for retired men and women.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. <a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=44d0c897-190d-4736-8f53-52c1e25ecd12&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fa-sa-ai-boom-nvidias%3Faid%3D10891%26source%3Disaediica0000068%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-ai-boom%26ftm_veh%3Dtop_incontent_pitch_feed_partner%26ftm_pit%3D18906&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">Continue »</a>

Image source: Getty Images.

Here's the average Social Security benefit for retired men and women at different ages

The Social Security Administration publishes anonymized <a href="https://www.fool.com/retirement/social-security/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">benefit</a> data for transparency and to educate the public. The information in the chart below comes from a biannual report that was most recently updated in December 2025. It shows the average monthly Social Security benefit paid to retired workers aged 62 to 70.

| Age | Average Retired-Worker Benefit (Men) | Average Retired-Worker Benefit (Women) | | --- | --- | --- | | 62 | $1,573 | $1,286 | | 63 | $1,581 | $1,300 | | 64 | $1,625 | $1,342 | | 65 | $1,772 | $1,457 | | 66 | $1,998 | $1,629 | | 67 | $2,234 | $1,802 | | 68 | $2,272 | $1,837 | | 69 | $2,322 | $1,877 | | 70 | $2,530 | $2,024 |

Data source: Social Security Administration.

There are two noteworthy trends in the chart. First, the average retired-worker benefit generally increases from ages 62 and 70. The primary reason for that is differences in claim age. Workers are <a href="https://www.fool.com/retirement/social-security/how-much-social-security-increase-after-62/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">entitled to Social Security at age 62</a>, but they are not entitled to the largest possible benefit based on their lifetime earnings until age 70.

Second, the average retired-worker benefit paid to men tends to be higher than the average retired-worker benefit paid to women at any given age. The primary reason for that is differences in lifetime earnings. Men tend to earn more than women, though the gender pay gap has narrowed slightly in recent decades, so the discrepancy is more pronounced in older age groups. For instance, the average retired-worker benefit paid to men is 25% higher at age 70, but 22% higher at age 62.

Here's how Social Security retired-worker benefits are calculated

The Social Security Administration considers both the variables I just mentioned when calculating retired-worker benefits: lifetime earnings and claim age. The two-step process detailed below explains exactly how those two variables come together to influence the final payout.

  • Step 1: A formula is applied to the inflation-adjusted earnings from the 35 highest-paid years of a worker's career to determine their <a href="https://www.fool.com/terms/p/primary-insurance-amount/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">primary insurance amount</a> (PIA). The PIA is the benefit a worker will get if they start Social Security at <a href="https://www.fool.com/retirement/social-security/full-retirement-age/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">full retirement age</a> (FRA), which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later.
  • Step 2: The PIA is adjusted for early or delayed retirement. Retirees who claim Social Security before FRA get a smaller benefit, meaning they receive less than 100% of their PIA. Workers who start Social Security after FRA get a bigger benefit, meaning they receive more than 100% of their PIA.

There are two important conditions to keep in mind. First, eligibility for retirement benefits begins at age 62, so no one can claim earlier. Second, delayed retirement credits stop accumulating at age 70, so no one should ever claim later.

The chart below details the relationship between birth year and full retirement age. It also shows the benefit (as a percentage of PIA) retired workers in each age group will get if they claim Social Security at ages 62 and 70. In other words, the chart details the smallest and largest possible payouts across different age groups.

| Birth Year | Full Retirement Age | Benefit at Age 62 | Benefit at Age 70 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1943-1954 | 66 | 75% | 132% | | 1955 | 66 and 2 months | 74.2% | 130.6% | | 1956 | 66 and 4 months | 73.3% | 129.3% | | 1957 | 66 and 6 months | 72.5% | 128% | | 1958 | 66 and 8 months | 71.7% | 126.6% | | 1959 | 66 and 10 months | 70.8% | 125.3% | | 1960 and later | 67 | 70% | 124% |

Data source: Social Security Administration.

The chart above makes it clear that Social Security benefits are highly dependent on claim age. Indeed, retired workers born in 1960 or later can increase their payout by 77% by claiming Social Security at age 70 rather than age 62.

Consider this example: The average retiree had a PIA of $2,116 in 2024. Assuming a birth year of 1960 or later, that person would receive $1,481 per month if they started Social Security at age 62 (i.e., 70% multiplied by $2,116). But the same person would receive $2,624 per month if they started Social Security at age 70 (i.e., 124% multiplied by $2,116).

The precise dollar amounts will vary widely due to differences in lifetime earnings, but the percent increase will remain constant. In this case, $2,624 is 77% larger than $1,481.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known <a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=5bc8569d-26cb-41c1-93d8-98f54ac4e238&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">"Social Security secrets"</a> could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.

One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

<a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=5bc8569d-26cb-41c1-93d8-98f54ac4e238&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ryr-ss-intro-report%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=a3555d87-c0b1-4103-8431-c842e71b51ed">View the "Social Security secrets" »</a>

The Motley Fool has a <a href="https://www.fool.com/legal/fool-disclosure-policy/">disclosure policy</a>.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"The mathematical benefit of delaying Social Security must be weighed against the non-zero probability of future legislative benefit adjustments and individual longevity risk."

The article presents a standard 'wait-to-claim' optimization strategy, but it ignores the massive longevity risk and the solvency crisis facing the Social Security Trust Fund. While delaying to age 70 mathematically maximizes monthly payouts, it assumes the system remains fully funded and that the beneficiary maintains long-term health. For the average retiree, the 'break-even' age often exceeds 80. With the Social Security Trustees projecting reserve depletion by the mid-2030s, legislative adjustments to benefits or tax rates are inevitable. Relying solely on delayed claiming without accounting for potential future benefit haircuts or means-testing is a significant strategic blind spot for retirement planning.

Devil's Advocate

Delaying claims acts as a high-yield, inflation-protected annuity that effectively hedges against the risk of outliving one's private savings, which is a far greater threat than a hypothetical legislative reduction in benefits.

broad market
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"Low SS averages and solvency risks underscore why equities must bridge the retirement savings gap for most Americans."

SSA's December 2025 data shows retired men at 70 averaging $2,530/mo vs. $1,573 at 62 (61% higher), women $2,024 vs. $1,286 (57% higher), largely due to delayed credits boosting PIA up to 124% at 70 for FRA=67. But these cross-sectional snapshots embed selection bias: later claimers often have higher lifetime earnings, inflating the gap beyond pure timing effects. Article glosses over SS trust fund depletion by 2035 (2024 Trustees Report projects 21% cut absent reform), healthcare costs pre-70, and breakeven longevity of 80-82 where delaying pays off cumulatively. Pushes need for 401(k)s/stocks, as SS covers ~40% average replacement rate.

Devil's Advocate

For healthy long-lived workers with spousal coordination, delaying reliably delivers 50-77% higher lifetime payouts, and bipartisan politics likely averts major cuts via tax hikes or tweaks.

broad market
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"The article treats claiming age as a pure financial optimization when it's actually a mortality bet—and for below-median-lifespan cohorts, claiming at 62 and self-insuring is often the superior strategy."

This article presents Social Security claiming strategy as a pure optimization problem, but omits critical mortality and liquidity risks that flip the math for millions. The 77% benefit increase from age 62 to 70 looks compelling on paper—but only if you live past ~80. For someone with below-average life expectancy (lower income, certain health conditions, family history), claiming at 62 and investing the difference often outperforms waiting. The article also ignores that 20%+ of claimants choose 62 for reasons beyond ignorance: immediate cash needs, caregiving obligations, or rational pessimism about longevity. The gender pay gap data is accurate but masks that women's longer lifespans actually make delayed claiming MORE attractive for them—yet the article doesn't highlight this.

Devil's Advocate

The article's core math is unassailable: waiting to 70 does produce a 77% larger monthly check, and for healthy high-earners with long family histories, that's genuinely optimal. Dismissing early claimers as uninformed ignores that many face genuine constraints (health, liquidity, family situation) that make 62 rational.

retirement planning narrative / Social Security policy
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▼ Bearish

"The article’s universal recommendation to delay to 70 ignores net benefits after taxes and Medicare premiums and fails to account for life expectancy and individual circumstances; optimal timing is PV- and tax-adjusted, not a blanket rule."

While the article quantifies how delaying can boost benefits, it treats average numbers as universal. It omits netting out Medicare premiums taken from Social Security, taxes on benefits, and the liquidity or health constraints many retirees face. It also ignores survivor/spousal dynamics and the policy risk that future rules could reduce benefits. The headline claim of a 77% PV-like increase is meaningful, but the real decision hinges on present-value and tax effects, life expectancy, and individual circumstances—not a one-size-fits-all push to wait until 70.

Devil's Advocate

Delaying to 70 can be the right call for those with above-average life expectancy, since the higher PV of the annuity and potential survivor benefits can dwarf early claims for many households. In that math, the article’s blunt ‘max out at 70’ is a reasonable shorthand for a large cohort.

broad market
The Debate
G
Gemini ▬ Neutral
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok Claude

"Delaying Social Security is primarily a tax-management tool to optimize withdrawal sequences and minimize lifetime effective tax rates."

Grok and Claude are missing the tax-arbitrage opportunity. Delaying benefits to 70 isn't just about longevity; it’s a tax-efficient strategy to delay taxable income while drawing down 401(k)s in lower tax brackets before RMDs (Required Minimum Distributions) kick in at 73 or 75. By ignoring the interaction between SS timing and the progressive tax code, you all miss why high-net-worth individuals prioritize waiting to 70 regardless of the Social Security Trust Fund’s solvency issues.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Delayed SS benefits amplify the taxable portion of benefits when combined with RMDs, undermining the tax-arbitrage for those with significant retirement accounts."

Gemini, tax-arbitrage via delayed SS sounds clever but ignores the 85% SS tax cliff: higher delayed benefits + RMDs post-73 easily exceed provisional income thresholds ($44k single/$58k joint), taxing most SS while early claiming lets you Roth-convert 401(k)s tax-free in low-bracket years. For 60%+ of retirees with pre-tax savings, this reverses your HNW priority—claim early, convert aggressively.

C
Claude ▬ Neutral
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Tax-efficient SS timing requires asset sequencing, not just benefit timing—a constraint the article and panel have largely sidestepped."

Grok's Roth-conversion arbitrage is sharper than Gemini's framing, but both miss the sequencing constraint: you can't convert aggressively *and* delay SS to 70 simultaneously if you're income-sensitive. The real play is claiming at 62, converting in years 1–10 while provisional income stays low, then letting delayed credits accrue on a *smaller* PIA. This flips the tax math entirely—but only works if you have liquid non-401(k) assets to bridge to 70. Most retirees don't.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"The '85% tax cliff' is a simplification; SS taxation is tiered and the tax arbitrage from delaying to 70 depends on MAGI, RMDs, and IRMAA, not a universal win."

Challenging Grok’s ‘85% SS tax cliff’: it isn’t a hard cliff but a tiered phasing based on provisional income, so many households don’t face 85% of benefits being taxed. More importantly, delaying to 70 often boosts RMDs and Roth conversions, which can push MAGI into higher brackets and trigger Medicare IRMAA surcharges. The supposed tax arbitrage is thus highly path-dependent and may erode the apparent advantage for many households, especially high-net-worth ones.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panel generally agrees that the article oversimplifies Social Security claiming strategies by focusing solely on delayed claiming. They highlight crucial factors such as longevity risk, solvency issues, tax implications, and individual circumstances that should be considered. The optimal strategy may vary based on personal health, financial situation, and future policy changes.

Opportunity

Tax-efficient strategies involving delayed claiming and Roth conversions, especially for high-net-worth individuals

Risk

Longevity risk and potential future benefit cuts due to Social Security Trust Fund depletion

Related News

FRA

Here's How Much Social Security You'll Lose by Claiming 5 Years Early

Nasdaq · 1 day, 1 hour ago

3 Surprising Things That Happen When You Claim Social Security at 62

Nasdaq · 1 day, 21 hours ago

This is the Average Social Security Benefit at Every Age

Yahoo Finance · 2 days, 22 hours ago

Working While Collecting Social Security? Here Are 2 Key Numbers You Need to Keep in Mind.

Nasdaq · 5 days, 2 hours ago

How Much Will Working 1 More Year Add to Your Social Security Checks?

Nasdaq · 6 days ago
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.