What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Robinhood (HOOD), with the main concern being its overreliance on volatile transaction revenue from speculative crypto and options, which could lead to a significant drop in its P/S ratio.
Risk: Overreliance on volatile transaction revenue from speculative crypto and options
Opportunity: None identified
Key Points
Investors who use the Robinhood platform have a history of engaging in speculative, high-risk trading in cryptocurrencies and the options market.
This creates a very unstable revenue base for the company, which is partly why its stock has plummeted by 51% since last October.
Robinhood stock is still trading at an elevated valuation, which could open the door to further downside from here.
- 10 stocks we like better than Robinhood Markets ›
Last year and earlier this year I wrote articles predicting a crash of 50% (or more) in Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) stock. After peaking last October, the stock is now down by around 51%.
Robinhood operates a popular investing platform where its clients can buy and sell stocks, options, cryptocurrencies, and more. The basis for my prediction was simple: Robinhood experienced a significant increase in value during 2025 mainly because of a surge in its cryptocurrency revenue, meaning its clients were engaging in speculative, high-risk trading, which history suggested simply wasn't sustainable.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Now that Robinhood has lost more than half of its peak value, what will happen next? Here's what I think.
Crypto trading is an unreliable source of revenue growth
The majority of Robinhood's revenue comes in the form of transaction fees, which it earns every time a client buys or sells a financial asset, whether it's a stock, an options contract, or a cryptocurrency. Donald Trump's presidential election win in November 2024 drove a tsunami of investment into the crypto markets, because he campaigned on a series of policies that stood to benefit the industry.
This contributed to a surge in Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue, which rocketed 732% (year over year) higher during the fourth quarter of 2024, hitting a record high of $358 million. It represented more than half of the company's total transaction revenue for the period. Something similar happened during the speculative crypto frenzy in 2021, which sent Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue soaring by 4,560% during the second quarter of that year. But just one year later, as crypto markets tanked, it was down by 75%.
History appears to be repeating itself. In the fourth quarter of 2025, Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue fell 38% compared to its peak in the fourth quarter of 2024, coming in at just $221 million. The company's overall transaction revenue still climbed modestly due to a sharp gains in other areas of its business, like options trading and prediction market betting, but these activities are also highly speculative.
The total value of all cryptocurrencies in circulation stands at $2.5 trillion as I write this, which is down sharply from the 2025 peak of $4.4 trillion. The Trump administration's pro-crypto policies haven't created much tangible value for the industry, and since most coins and tokens still lack a true use case, they have struggled to hang onto their post-election gains.
None of the major coins have escaped the carnage, not even Bitcoin or Ethereum, which are both down more than 40% from their all-time highs. These steep losses are likely to keep many investors on the sidelines, which could result in a further reduction in Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue.
Robinhood's valuation leaves room for further downside
Robinhood stock peaked at more than $150 last October. At the time, its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio had soared to more than 30, which was almost triple its average of about 11.5 since the stock went public in 2021. Therefore, its valuation was completely unsustainable.
Despite the 51% decline in the stock during the past few months, its P/S ratio is still at an elevated level of 15.3.
That means Robinhood would have to decline by a further 25% just to trade in line with its long-term average P/S ratio of 11.5. I'm not suggesting that will happen for certain, but I will say a high valuation reduces the odds of a rally in the near future, especially with one of the company's core revenue drivers -- crypto trading -- in decline.
On a more positive note, Robinhood's entry into the prediction market sector (in partnership with Kalshi) has expanded the company's reach, because it lets clients bet on the outcome of sports matches, elections, and more. Robinhood ended the fourth quarter of 2025 with $435 million in annualized revenue from its prediction business, which more than tripled from the third quarter just three months earlier.
The prediction business could help Robinhood attract more clients, which would be good news considering its monthly active user base declined last year. But there is one caveat: According to research by The Motley Fool, the overwhelming majority of sports bettors lose money over time, which isn't ideal if Robinhood is trying to attract repeat customers.
In summary, I think further downside is the path of least resistance for Robinhood stock.
Should you buy stock in Robinhood Markets right now?
Before you buy stock in Robinhood Markets, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Robinhood Markets wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $510,710!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,949!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 927% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 20, 2026.
Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin and Ethereum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"HOOD's valuation discount from peak is real but incomplete; the 25% downside math assumes crypto revenue stays depressed and prediction markets plateau, both contestable given Q4 2025 momentum in the latter."
The author's thesis is mechanically sound: crypto revenue collapsed 38% Q4-to-Q4, P/S ratio at 15.3x still exceeds the 11.5x historical average, and speculative revenue streams are volatile. However, the article conflates 'elevated valuation' with 'downside certainty'—a common error. HOOD's Q4 2025 prediction market revenue hit $435M annualized (tripling Q3-to-Q3), and options trading accelerated. If prediction markets sustain 30%+ quarterly growth and options volume holds, the P/S compression math inverts. The author also omits that HOOD's user engagement metrics and wallet balances likely expanded despite monthly active user declines—a distinction that matters for stickiness.
If crypto stabilizes above $2.5T and Trump's policy agenda accelerates deregulation, HOOD's 'speculative' revenue mix becomes a feature, not a bug—and 15.3x P/S could re-rate upward to 18-20x on visibility of $600M+ annualized crypto revenue. The author is anchoring to a 2021-2022 cycle that may not repeat.
"Robinhood's transition toward recurring subscription revenue and banking services makes its historical P/S ratio an obsolete metric for assessing its current valuation."
The bear case for Robinhood (HOOD) relies heavily on mean-reversion of its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, but it ignores the fundamental shift in the company's business model. Robinhood is successfully transitioning from a volatile, transaction-dependent brokerage to a recurring-revenue powerhouse. With Gold membership subscriptions and net interest income providing a more stable floor, the P/S ratio is a flawed metric for a firm rapidly expanding its net interest margin and banking services. While crypto volumes are indeed cyclical, the platform's integration of prediction markets and retirement accounts suggests they are successfully capturing a larger 'share of wallet' from a maturing user base, which justifies a premium valuation over historical averages.
If the retail investor cohort suffers a prolonged liquidity crunch due to broader macroeconomic headwinds, Robinhood's pivot to subscription-based revenue will not be enough to offset the collapse in high-margin speculative trading fees.
"Robinhood’s valuation still prices in elevated, unstable transactional revenue (crypto/options), so absent durable, recurring revenue or a crypto rebound, further downside is the path of least resistance."
The article’s core thesis is right: Robinhood (HOOD) remains vulnerable because a large slice of revenue is transactional and tied to speculative crypto and options activity that can evaporate. Crypto transaction revenue spiked in 2024 and has already fallen (the article cites a 38% drop from the 2024 peak), and MAUs declined — both weaken the revenue base. Valuation-wise a 15.3 P/S vs. a 11.5 historical average implies roughly 25% downside to normalize. Offsetting forces exist (options growth, prediction-market annualized revenue of $435M, interest and lending), but the company needs sustainable, higher-margin recurring revenue or sizable cost cuts to avoid further multiple compression.
If options volumes and the prediction-market business scale profitably and crypto rebounds, revenue stability could materially improve and justify the current multiple; plus, tighter cost control or buybacks could re-rate the stock higher.
"HOOD's elevated 15.3x P/S ratio, versus 11.5x historical average, courts 25% further downside as crypto transaction revenue contracts."
The article nails HOOD's core risk: overreliance on volatile transaction revenue from speculative crypto (Q4 2025: $221M, -38% from Q4 2024 peak) and options, mirroring 2021's boom-bust cycle. P/S at 15.3x—still 33% above 11.5x post-IPO average—implies ~25% downside to normalize, especially with crypto market cap cratering to $2.5T from $4.4T peak and BTC/ETH off 40% from ATHs. Prediction markets ($435M ARR, +3x QoQ) add speculative upside but won't offset if users flee losses. Omitted: HOOD's interest revenue (cash sweeps, margin) now ~40% of total, providing stability absent in article's transaction-only lens.
HOOD's record net deposits and expanding international footprint (e.g., UK launch, Bitstamp acquisition) signal user stickiness beyond crypto frenzies, while AI-driven personalization and stablecoins could unlock recurring fees and boost margins to peer levels.
"Revenue diversification into interest income only justifies premium valuation if margins don't compress—a critical gap in the pro-HOOD case."
Google and Grok both claim HOOD's interest/NII revenue provides stability, but neither quantifies the margin profile. If NII is 40% of revenue at 60% gross margin while crypto transaction fees are 30% of revenue at 85%+ margin, the shift toward 'stability' actually destroys unit economics. The article's P/S compression risk intensifies if the revenue mix tilts toward lower-margin banking services. Need actual margin data by segment to validate the 'recurring revenue' thesis.
"The shift toward lower-margin banking revenue justifies multiple compression, not a premium valuation."
Anthropic is right to highlight the margin-mix trap. Google and Grok ignore that banking-as-a-service usually carries higher overhead and lower margins than pure-play brokerage. As HOOD shifts toward net interest income and banking, the 'quality' of revenue changes, potentially warranting a lower P/S multiple, not a premium. If the shift to recurring revenue comes at the expense of high-margin speculative trading, the current 15.3x P/S is fundamentally unsustainable regardless of user stickiness.
"Net interest income is macro-sensitive and can vanish quickly with rate cuts or credit stress, so it shouldn't be valued like stable subscription revenue."
Google's 'recurring NII' defense ignores that net interest income is highly rate-dependent and therefore not a recession-proof subscription analogue. If the Fed cuts rates or deposit mix shifts (more sweep cash to partner banks, higher retail deposit betas), NII can compress rapidly; conversely, credit losses in a downturn can widen funding costs and shrink margins. Treat NII as macro-correlated, not stable recurring revenue.
"HOOD's prediction markets face CFTC regulatory risks that could prevent them from meaningfully offsetting crypto weakness."
All fixate on NII margins and crypto volatility, but ignore prediction markets' regulatory tightrope: CFTC scrutiny (e.g., Kalshi lawsuits) could cap or kill HOOD's $435M ARR growth before it offsets declines. Without clear approvals, it's no reliable stabilizer—amplifying 25% P/S downside if volumes stall.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is bearish on Robinhood (HOOD), with the main concern being its overreliance on volatile transaction revenue from speculative crypto and options, which could lead to a significant drop in its P/S ratio.
None identified
Overreliance on volatile transaction revenue from speculative crypto and options