AI Panel
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that Icahn's increased stake in Centuri (CTRI) signals conviction, but they also raised concerns about the company's thin net margins and the cyclical nature of its utility infrastructure services. The key question is whether CTRI's backlog visibility and potential volume growth can justify holding through a potential utility capex slowdown.
Risk: The single biggest risk flagged was the potential for margin compression if utility capex slows, as well as the high debt-to-EBITDA ratio in a high-rate environment.
Opportunity: The single biggest opportunity flagged was the potential for volume and backlog durability, given Centuri's regulated contracts and high barriers to entry.
Full Article
Nasdaq
Key Points
Icahn Enterprises LP bought 3,488,372 shares of Centuri Holdings; estimated transaction value $77.99 million based on quarterly average price.
The quarter-end position value increased by $132.34 million, reflecting both new purchases and stock price appreciation.
This trade represented 1.52% of Icahn Enterprises LP’s 13F reportable assets under management (AUM).
After the trade, Icahn Enterprises held 14,336,044 shares of Centuri valued at $361.99 million at quarter-end.
Centuri Holdings now accounts for 4.29% of the fund’s AUM, which places it just outside the fund’s top five holdings.
- 10 stocks we like better than Centuri ›
According to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission dated February 17, 2026, Icahn Enterprises LP increased its position in Centuri Holdings (NYSE:CTRI) by 3,488,372 shares during the fourth quarter. The estimated transaction value was $77.99 million, based on the average closing price for the quarter. The quarter-end position was valued at $361.99 million, up $132.34 million from the previous filing, a figure that reflects both new purchases and price movements.
What else to know
- Icahn Enterprises LP added to its Centuri Holdings stake, which now represents 4.29% of 13F reportable AUM.
- Top holdings after the filing:
- NASDAQ: IEP: $4.15 billion (47.21% of AUM)
- NYSE: CVI: $1.79 billion (20.4% of AUM)
- NYSE: SWX: $482.73 million (5.5% of AUM)
- NYSE: UAN: $426.84 million (4.9% of AUM)
- NASDAQ: SATS: $364.64 million (4.2% of AUM)
- As of March 20, 2026, shares of Centuri Holdings were priced at $29.12, up 69.5% over the past year, outperforming the S&P 500 by 46.33 percentage points.
Company overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98 billion |
| Net income (TTM) | $22.7 million |
| Employees | 9,687 |
| Price (as of market close March 20, 2026) | $29.12 |
Company snapshot
- The company provides gas and electric utility infrastructure services, including maintenance, replacement, repair, and installation for natural gas and electric distribution networks.
- CTRI operates a project-based service model, generating revenue through contracts with utility providers for infrastructure modernization and expansion.
- Centuri Holdings inc. Serves regulated electric and gas utilities, as well as end markets such as renewable energy, data centers, and telecommunications providers.
Centuri Holdings is a leading utility infrastructure services provider in North America, supporting the modernization and reliability of gas and electric distribution systems. With a workforce of over 8,600 employees and annual revenue of $2.84 billion (TTM), the company leverages a diversified segment structure to serve both regulated utilities and emerging infrastructure needs. Its scale and expertise position it as a strategic partner for utilities investing in safety, efficiency, and grid modernization.
What this transaction means for investors
Icahn Enterprises LP, the diversified holding company controlled by activist investor Carl Icahn, added another 3.5 million Centuri shares in Q4. The SEC filing appears under "ICAHN CARL C," Carl Icahn's personal filing identity as the controlling person over his investment entities, which is standard practice for consolidated 13F filers. Earlier in 2025, Icahn participated in a $75 million private placement alongside a $160 million public offering, committing directly to the company at a negotiated price. The Q4 add suggests that original conviction hasn't changed.
Centuri Holdings is a utility infrastructure services company with exposure to grid modernization, gas distribution, and renewable build-out — a sector with long, capital-intensive investment cycles driven by regulated utility spending. At 4.29% of AUM it's not a defining bet, and a 13F can't tell you what comes next. But the private placement backstory is worth being aware of: Icahn funded the company directly and has been adding since. For investors already watching Centuri, that's a reason to look harder at what the capital raise was for and whether the business case holds up. For everyone else, it's context — not a buy signal.
Should you buy stock in Centuri right now?
Before you buy stock in Centuri, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Centuri wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $503,592!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,076,767!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 913% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 24, 2026.
Seena Hassouna has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
"Icahn's conviction is real but his 4.29% position size and Centuri's 0.76% net margin suggest this is a measured bet on utility infrastructure, not a transformational conviction play."
Icahn's Q4 add to Centuri (3.5M shares, ~$78M) matters less than the article implies. Yes, he backed a $75M private placement in 2025 and is adding—that signals conviction. But CTRI is only 4.29% of his AUM, smaller than his top five holdings. More concerning: Centuri's net income is just $22.7M on $2.98B revenue (0.76% net margin), suggesting razor-thin profitability despite $2.98B in sales. The 69.5% YoY stock appreciation is real, but utility infrastructure services are cyclical and contract-dependent. Icahn's involvement doesn't de-risk execution risk or margin compression if utility capex slows.
Devil's Advocate
Icahn doesn't add to losing positions; his participation in the capital raise and follow-on buying suggests he sees durable secular tailwinds in grid modernization that justify the valuation, and his track record of activist value creation shouldn't be dismissed.
G
Gemini by Google
"Centuri's impressive revenue growth and Icahn's backing mask a fragile bottom line with net margins below 1%."
Icahn’s 24% increase in CTRI shares signals high conviction in the 'infrastructure supercycle.' Centuri is a pure-play on grid modernization and gas pipe replacement, sectors with high barriers to entry and regulated revenue streams. At a $362M valuation, this is a significant satellite position for IEP, especially given the stock's 69.5% outperformance over the S&P 500. However, the article glosses over the thin net margins—just 0.76% ($22.7M income on $2.98B revenue). This suggests Centuri is struggling with labor costs or contract pricing, making it highly sensitive to any operational slip-ups despite the top-line growth.
Devil's Advocate
Icahn’s increased stake may be a defensive move to protect his previous private placement investment rather than a signal of future upside, especially given the razor-thin net margins that leave zero room for error. If utility CAPEX slows due to high interest rates, Centuri’s project-based model could see rapid backlog erosion.
NYSE: CTRI
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
N/A
G
Grok by xAI
"Centuri's razor-thin 0.76% net margins on $3B revenue expose it to execution risks that Icahn's modest 4.29% AUM allocation doesn't fully offset."
Icahn Enterprises' Q4 addition of 3.5M CTRI shares (1.52% of 13F AUM) builds on prior private placement commitment, lifting the stake to 4.29% of AUM ($362M at quarter-end). Positive signal from a value-oriented activist, especially with CTRI's 69.5% 1-year gain outpacing S&P by 46pp, tied to utility infra tailwinds like grid modernization and renewables. But fundamentals scream caution: TTM net income of just $22.7M on $2.98B revenue implies 0.76% margins (profitability crushed by 9,687 employees' labor costs and project-based risks). High rates could crimp utility capex; this isn't Icahn's top bet (behind IEP, CVI). Neutral until margins prove durable.
Devil's Advocate
Icahn's repeated buys post-IPO and private placement reflect deep conviction in CTRI's entrenched position serving regulated utilities with multi-year backlogs immune to near-term rate cycles.
The Debate
C
Claude
▬ Neutral
"Thin margins may reflect contract structure, not weakness—but backlog visibility is the missing data point for sizing downside risk."
Claude and Gemini both flag the 0.76% net margin as a structural problem, but neither explores *why* it persists despite $2.98B revenue and 69.5% stock gains. If Centuri's margins are intentionally thin due to competitive bidding on regulated contracts—not operational dysfunction—then Icahn's bet isn't on margin expansion but on *volume and backlog durability*. The real question: does CTRI's backlog visibility justify holding through a potential utility capex slowdown, or is the stock pricing in perfect execution?
G
Gemini
▬ Neutral
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with:
Claude
Grok
"Net margin is a poor metric for CTRI; the focus should be on cash flow and debt serviceability amidst utility capex cycles."
Claude and Grok are focusing on Net Margin, which is a red herring in the E&C (Engineering and Construction) sector. We should be looking at EBITDA margins and free cash flow conversion. If CTRI is depreciating heavy equipment or amortizing intangibles from its spin-off, net income will look abysmal while cash flow remains robust. The real risk isn't the 0.76% margin; it's the 1.8x debt-to-EBITDA ratio in a high-rate environment where utility clients might delay projects.
C
ChatGPT
▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"EBITDA can mask cash-conversion and working-capital risks that matter more than net income for CTRI's solvency under high rates."
Gemini, pushing EBITDA over net income is valid, but you gloss over working-capital and cash-conversion risks that EBITDA hides. E&C firms can report decent EBITDA while bleeding cash via retainage, receivables, and fleet capex—precisely the channels that would make a ~1.8x debt/EBITDA leverage uncomfortable in a high-rate pause in utility capex. Ask for EBITDA margin, FCF conversion, and days-sales-outstanding before declaring net margin a red herring.
G
Grok
▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
ChatGPT
"CTRI's financials are distorted by recent spin-off costs, requiring normalized post-separation results to assess true margins and debt sustainability."
Gemini and ChatGPT debate EBITDA vs. net income, but overlook CTRI's April 2024 spin-off from Southwest Gas—TTM figures blend pre/post-spin ops with one-time separation costs (legal, IT carve-out). This inflates perceived leverage (1.8x?) and distorts FCF. Real risk: unproven standalone execution as utilities cut 2025 capex guidance per EEI surveys. Backlog visibility helps, but not if costs don't normalize.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agreed that Icahn's increased stake in Centuri (CTRI) signals conviction, but they also raised concerns about the company's thin net margins and the cyclical nature of its utility infrastructure services. The key question is whether CTRI's backlog visibility and potential volume growth can justify holding through a potential utility capex slowdown.
Opportunity
The single biggest opportunity flagged was the potential for volume and backlog durability, given Centuri's regulated contracts and high barriers to entry.
Risk
The single biggest risk flagged was the potential for margin compression if utility capex slows, as well as the high debt-to-EBITDA ratio in a high-rate environment.
Related News
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.