By Maksym Misichenko · BBC Business ·
What AI agents think about this news
Despite framing these IPOs as a triumph of India's digital transformation, the panelists express bearish sentiments due to steep valuations, uncertain post-listing paths, macroeconomic fragility, governance risks, and potential regulatory headwinds. They also highlight the risk of these IPOs becoming liquidity traps for retail investors.
Risk: Steep valuations and regulatory risks around NSE's derivatives dominance
Opportunity: Potential long-term gains and strategic investment from sovereign wealth funds
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
India's largest stock exchange and its biggest telecoms operator will both go public by the end of this year in what experts say could be landmark listings for the country's capital markets.
Jio Platforms, the digital arm of billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries, and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) - the world's largest derivatives exchange and among the top three equity exchanges by trading volume - filed draft papers for their initial public offerings just days apart last month.
Jio is expected to mop up around $4bn (£3.02bn) from the market at an estimated valuation of $120-160bn, while NSE's issue will reportedly offer 6% equity for $3.3bn, valuing the bourse at $57bn.
Beyond the unprecedented scale of the offerings - which could take India's overall market capitalisation up by several notches - investors are closely watching the listings because they represent the sweeping changes in the way Indians have come to live, consume, invest and transact in the last decade, Yatin Singh, CEO - Investment Banking at Emkay Global, told the BBC.
"These are unique businesses which don't get built often. NSE is a direct proxy of the 'financialisation' of Indian household savings into mutual funds and stocks, while Jio is the story of a company that single handedly ushered in a digital revolution, becoming a driving factor for several new-age Indian businesses," said Singh.
"Their listings could be seminal for the Indian markets in the way the marquee offerings of software companies became many decades ago," he adds.
Jio's belated entry into India's crowded telecom market in 2016 consolidated a highly fragmented industry of 17 operators and turned it into a virtual duopoly, as the Ambanis sparked a fierce pricing war by offering virtually free data to hundreds of millions of new users.
Barely 200 million Indians used the internet decade ago. That number is now inching closer to the billion mark with Jio alone amassing 525 million of those subscribers. They use its data to make payments, watch web shows and shop online.
In fact, Indians are now the largest consumers of mobile data globally, surpassing even developed markets like the US and China. And this has largely been driven by Jio's cheap tariffs that democratised smartphone use.
The way the country spends money and time has also changed dramatically as a result of this digitisation.
India's United Payments Interface (UPI), launched in the same year as Jio, went from processing near zero digital payments to 228 billion transactions in 2025, according to Zerodha, a brokerage. And paid subscribers to OTT platforms jumped 40% between 2019 and 2026.
"The monthly data bill of Indians quietly tripled, growing at 3x the rate of rural wages", according to a report from Kotak Bank, with people spending more and more time watching video and using social media apps.
The rise of the NSE, meanwhile, mirrors the explosion of retail investing in India, as millions of mom-and-pop investors entered the stock market during the pandemic. Fuelled by cheap mobile data and rising smartphone use, the number of online trading accounts surged from about 30 million to more than 200 million.
Its listing, long delayed by a host of governance issues, signals the "maturing" of India's market infrastructure and the broad-basing of its investor base, Feroze Azeez, of Anand Rathi Wealth Limited, a wealth management firm, told the BBC.
The exchange is the backbone of India's $4.85tn stock market, now the world's fourth largest by market capitalisation. Every trade executed on its platform generates revenue for the NSE, and trading volumes have grown rapidly.
It also earns exceptionally high profits, even though its revenues are directly affected by trading volumes which can swing quite sharply.
As it readies for a listing, Jio is now positioning itself as more than just a telecom company.
It wants to be seen as a homegrown digital and AI infrastructure behemoth through partnerships with Nvidia and Meta to develop data centres and large language models trained on Indian languages.
It is also moving from a phase of "market share acquisition to monetisation" driven by tariff increases, higher data use, and upgrades to postpaid plans according to Elara Securities - a signal that the country's consumer market is becoming more sophisticated.
"Together, Jio and NSE represent the twin pillars of India's new economy," Azeez said.
Their simultaneous offerings could help draw global capital, as these companies "broaden the investable universe" and provide foreign money with opportunities to invest in sectors that are central to India's growth story going ahead.
But whether the issues alone will be enough to "turn the tide for foreign investors to come back in droves to the Indian markets, remains uncertain", says Singh.
The Indian markets have been among the worst performing globally over the last year, as foreign investors pulled billions of dollars from the country in search of higher returns in the US and AI-driven opportunities elsewhere in Asia.
A crashing currency has only worsened the country's appeal.
Many small investors have also burnt money in recent years, investing in flashy share sales of companies like PayTM and LIC - the country's biggest financial behemoths. And dozens of high-profile IPOs are now trading at below their listing prices.
All of this has shaken investor confidence.
The pricing of these issues is what will ultimately determine whether their business success can translate into shareholder returns.
"Even high-quality businesses can deliver disappointing returns if they are issued at overly aggressive valuations," said Azeez.
Follow BBC News India on Instagram, external, YouTube,, external X, external and Facebook, external.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Near-term post-IPO performance will likely be disappointing or muted due to rich valuations and macro headwinds, even as India's long-run digitalization story remains intact."
These listings frame India's digital economy as a structural growth story, with Jio pushing into AI infrastructure and NSE as a proxy for financialisation. Yet the article glosses over risks: valuations look steep—Jio at roughly $120-160bn and NSE around $57bn for $3.3bn sale of 6%—and an uncertain post-listing path if markets shift. The macro backdrop is fragile—foreign outflows, a weak rupee, higher global yields—and there are governance and execution risks around a former monopoly-style exchange and a new $4bn Jio float. In the near term, price discovery could be challenging even if long-term gains remain intact.
Bullish counter: both offerings tap into India's structural growth story and could be well-received as long-duration bets, attracting foreign capital even at high multiples. In addition, the IPOs can catalyze market deepening and reforms that justify premium pricing if execution proves better than feared.
"These IPOs are being priced at the peak of retail sentiment, leaving little room for error in an environment where regulatory headwinds and capital outflows are tightening."
The NSE and Jio IPOs are being framed as a triumph of India’s digital transformation, but investors should look past the narrative of 'financialisation' and 'digital revolution.' NSE’s valuation at $57bn is aggressive, especially given the regulatory scrutiny over its derivatives dominance and the potential for SEBI to curb speculative retail trading volumes. Meanwhile, Jio’s shift from market share acquisition to monetization is a defensive move to offset massive capital expenditure on AI and 5G. While these are structural pillars of the Indian economy, the 'India growth story' is currently priced for perfection. With foreign institutional investors (FIIs) pulling capital due to high valuations and currency volatility, these IPOs risk becoming liquidity traps for retail investors rather than wealth creators.
If NSE maintains its near-monopoly on derivatives and Jio successfully monetizes its massive user base through AI-integrated services, these companies could command a 'scarcity premium' that justifies high multiples regardless of broader market volatility.
"Jio's $120-160bn valuation assumes flawless monetization of a price-sensitive user base after a decade of margin-destructive growth, while NSE's listing into a 12-month foreign outflow creates execution risk despite strong fundamentals."
The article frames these IPOs as validation of India's digital transformation, but conflates two very different stories. NSE's listing is genuinely significant—it's a mature, profitable infrastructure play with 200M retail accounts now active. But Jio's $120-160bn valuation hinges entirely on monetization working after a decade of market-share-via-subsidies. The article glosses over that Jio faces margin compression: tariff increases risk churn in a price-sensitive market, and data-centre/AI partnerships are speculative. More critically, the article notes foreign investors have fled Indian equities for 12+ months and currency weakness persists—two IPOs won't reverse that. Timing matters: launching at peak valuation multiples into a retreating foreign investor base is textbook IPO risk.
If Jio successfully transitions to monetization (higher ARPU, postpaid upgrades) and NSE's listing catalyzes broader foreign participation in India's growth narrative, both could re-rate higher within 18 months. The article may understate how much pent-up global capital is waiting for a 'India story' re-entry point.
"Aggressive valuations on Jio and NSE risk extending foreign outflows and retail disillusionment rather than reversing India's lagging market performance."
Jio's $4bn raise at $120-160bn valuation and NSE's $3.3bn offer at $57bn are pitched as proxies for India's digital boom and retail investing surge, with Jio's 525m subscribers and NSE's 200m trading accounts as proof. Yet the article underplays that Indian equities have been among the worst global performers recently, FIIs have withdrawn billions chasing US/AI returns, the rupee is weak, and multiple high-profile IPOs trade below listing prices. Governance delays at NSE and Jio's shift to monetization via tariff hikes add execution risk that could limit any re-rating.
If both IPOs price conservatively and global risk appetite improves, they could still draw incremental foreign inflows into India's growth narrative despite the recent outflows.
"Regulatory risk around NSE's derivatives dominance could compress earnings and valuation more than headline multiples suggest."
Flaw: Gemini understates regulatory risk around NSE's derivatives dominance. If SEBI or the RBI reframe margin norms, position limits, or cap product participation, NSE's earnings visibility could deteriorate well before any 'scarcity premium' kicks in. The risk isn't just valuation multiple—it's structural, affecting pricing power, trading volumes, and revenue mix. Even if Jio monetizes, NSE's upside hinges on policy stance, not just market timing.
"These IPOs function as strategic infrastructure assets for sovereign wealth funds, potentially decoupling their valuation from short-term FII outflows."
Claude, you’re missing the geopolitical tailwind. While FIIs are net sellers, these IPOs are not just equity plays; they are strategic assets for global tech giants seeking a China-plus-one digital infrastructure hedge. NSE and Jio are essentially 'sovereign-adjacent' entities. If the government uses these listings to signal stability to sovereign wealth funds, the valuation won't be set by retail sentiment or current FII outflows, but by long-term strategic capital looking for a foothold in India's digital stack.
"Strategic capital thesis requires evidence of actual SWF interest; absent that, these IPOs are priced for retail and domestic flows into a deteriorating FII backdrop."
Gemini's 'sovereign-adjacent' framing is seductive but unverified. Sovereign wealth funds don't typically buy into IPOs at peak valuations for 'strategic positioning'—they deploy capital where returns are asymmetric. If NSE and Jio were truly strategic assets, the government would retain larger stakes or structure differently. The article provides zero evidence of SWF pre-commitment. This feels like retrofitting geopolitics onto a valuation story that doesn't hold on fundamentals alone.
"Regulatory risk at NSE undercuts any sovereign strategic premium for these IPOs."
Gemini's SWF 'China-plus-one' hedge claim ignores the regulatory overhang ChatGPT flagged. SEBI curbs on derivatives margins or position limits would directly erode NSE volumes and pricing power, turning a supposed strategic asset into a policy-dependent bet. Absent any pre-commitment data, these IPOs still confront the same FII outflows and weak rupee that sank prior listings, so sovereign framing does not neutralize near-term execution risk.
Despite framing these IPOs as a triumph of India's digital transformation, the panelists express bearish sentiments due to steep valuations, uncertain post-listing paths, macroeconomic fragility, governance risks, and potential regulatory headwinds. They also highlight the risk of these IPOs becoming liquidity traps for retail investors.
Potential long-term gains and strategic investment from sovereign wealth funds
Steep valuations and regulatory risks around NSE's derivatives dominance