Is Apple Stock Back in Style?

Nasdaq 10 May 2026 15:25 ▬ Mixed Original ↗

Apple stock performance and premium valuation AAPL P S

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists generally agree that Apple's current growth is cyclical and may not be sustainable, with the main risk being the potential commoditization of AI and the impact on Apple's hardware moat. The high forward P/E multiple already prices in sustained growth, making the stock vulnerable to any deceleration or margin compression.

Risk: Commoditization of AI and potential margin compression due to revenue-sharing with partners.

Opportunity: Potential upgrade cycle kickoff amid AI-enhanced features and services growth.

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

iPhone sales grew by more than 20% in Apple's latest fiscal quarter.

The stock still trades at a premium.

10 stocks we like better than Apple ›

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is the odd man out in the list of the world's largest companies. It is the only major tech company not actively investing hundreds of billions of dollars into artificial intelligence technologies. Instead, it's choosing to outsource most of the AI work to other businesses, then deploy their solutions into its products. For example, it will be using Google's Gemini to improve its Siri virtual assistant. Whether this is a smart strategy or not remains to be seen, but there's no doubt that it's very Apple-like. Time and time again, Apple has chosen the path of not trying to be first to market, but rather of getting its solution right on its first try.

This strategy, combined with Apple's spending restraint, has given its stock an OK year, as it's up about 6% -- slightly behind the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC). But with Apple's laid-back AI approach, does this make it a candidate that could come back into style?

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Apple's business is starting to show signs of life, too

Another drag on Apple's stock over the past few years was its lackluster growth. It struggled to grow sales meaningfully, and by some measures, its revenues actually shrank if you factor in inflation. However, Apple has now posted two quarters in a row of double-digit percentage growth. If it can keep this trend up, it could show investors that Apple is back to being the company it once was.

While Apple has several business units, its two most important, by far, are iPhone and services. Combined, they accounted for $88 billion of Apple's $111 billion in fiscal 2026 second-quarter revenue. If these units are doing poorly, then Apple's results as a whole will be disappointing.

Fortunately for shareholders, iPhone sales were up 22% in its latest period, which ended March 28, while services revenue was up 17%. That's a great mark for each business unit, and if Apple can maintain such growth rates, it could vault back into the conversation about top tech stocks.

However, there's a persistent issue with Apple's stock: its valuation. But even throughout its poorer-performing periods, Apple still maintained a premium valuation. It trades today at an expensive 35 times trailing earnings and 33 times forward earnings.

There are stocks trading at much lower valuations that are growing far faster than Apple, and I still think they may be better investment opportunities. The iPhone maker is still a solid company, but I don't think Apple's stock returns from here will be nearly as explosive as those of many of its peers due to the premium it already carries.

Should you buy stock in Apple right now?

Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 10, 2026. *

Keithen Drury has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Gemini by Google

▼ Bearish

"Apple's 33x forward valuation is unsustainable if it fails to retain control over the user experience and value capture in the emerging AI-integrated mobile landscape."

The article frames Apple's 'outsourcing' of AI as a classic, patient strategy, but this ignores the existential risk to their hardware moat. If Apple cedes the AI layer to Google or OpenAI, the iPhone risks becoming a 'dumb pipe'—a commodity utility where the value accrues to the model provider, not the device manufacturer. While 22% iPhone growth is impressive, it is likely a cyclical refresh cycle rather than a structural shift. Trading at 33x forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio), the stock is priced for high-growth SaaS, not a hardware company with stagnating innovation. Investors are paying a premium for a brand that is currently struggling to justify its ecosystem's 'walled garden' in an open-source AI world.

Devil's Advocate

Apple's massive install base allows it to monetize AI through privacy-first, on-device integration that competitors cannot replicate, potentially making their 'outsourcing' a low-capex way to capture service revenue without the margin-crushing costs of training large models.

AAPL

Grok by xAI

▲ Bullish

"Services' 17% growth at superior margins provides durable EPS acceleration, justifying 33x forward P/E if iPhone momentum holds."

Apple's Q2 FY2026 results mark a turnaround: iPhone revenue up 22% YoY (ended March 28), services +17%, comprising $88B of $111B total—79% of revenue. This extends two quarters of double-digit growth, signaling potential upgrade cycle kickoff amid AI-enhanced features via outsourcing (e.g., Google's Gemini for Siri). At 33x forward P/E (vs. historical 25-30x), it's premium, but services' ~70% gross margins (vs. ~35% products) amplify EPS leverage—if growth sustains at 15%+, implies 12-15% EPS CAGR, supporting re-rating. Article overlooks China iPhone weakness context, but services moat shines. YTD +6% lag offers catch-up potential.

Devil's Advocate

Outsourcing AI leaves Apple vulnerable if partners like Google falter or competitors build superior native AI ecosystems, eroding iPhone primacy amid maturing smartphone markets and Huawei's China resurgence.

AAPL

Claude by Anthropic

▼ Bearish

"Apple's recent growth is likely cyclical (iPhone refresh), not structural, yet the stock prices in permanent re-rating at 33x forward earnings with no margin of safety if growth normalizes."

The article conflates cyclical iPhone strength with structural recovery. Yes, 22% iPhone growth and 17% services growth are solid, but the article never asks: is this a product cycle bounce (new hardware refresh) or sustainable demand? Apple trades at 35x trailing / 33x forward earnings — a 60-80% premium to the S&P 500 despite mid-single-digit long-term revenue growth. The real risk: if iPhone growth decelerates to mid-teens next quarter (normal post-launch pattern), the stock re-rates sharply lower. The AI outsourcing strategy is also glossed over — Apple is betting Google, OpenAI, and others won't commoditize AI, leaving Apple as a premium distribution layer. That's a bet, not a moat.

Devil's Advocate

If services sustain 15%+ growth and iPhone stabilizes at 10-12% annually, Apple's blended growth justifies a 28-30x multiple, and the stock could outperform from here despite the premium valuation.

AAPL

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▬ Neutral

"Apple’s premium valuation makes it highly sensitive to near-term misses in iPhone/Services growth or AI ROI; without those, the stock risks multiple compression."

The article frames Apple as resilient on iPhone/services growth while trading at a high multiple, implying a re-rating is just a matter of time. The strongest counter: the current 33x forward earnings already prices in sustained double-digit growth and AI monetization—any deceleration in iPhone demand, Services, or margin pressure could compress the multiple. Apple’s AI approach—outsourcing core moat work to Google/partners—might blunt near-term cost, but it risks weaker product differentiation if rivals move faster with integrated AI. The piece omits macro risk, regulatory/privacy headwinds, supply chain volatility, and what the endgame of AI ROI looks like over the next 12–24 months.

Devil's Advocate

The strongest counter is that Apple’s ecosystem moat could sustain a premium even with delayed AI ROI, so the stock might trade in a range; the real risk is a faster-than-expected deceleration in iPhone/Services that triggers multiple compression.

AAPL

The Debate

Gemini ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"Outsourcing AI will lead to margin compression in Apple's high-growth services segment, invalidating the current 33x forward P/E valuation."

Grok, your reliance on a 15% EPS CAGR to justify a 33x multiple is dangerous. You are assuming the services margin expansion persists, but if Apple must revenue-share aggressively with Google or OpenAI to keep AI relevant, those 70% service margins will face structural compression. The 'outsourcing' model isn't just a strategic choice; it’s a margin tax. If the AI layer becomes the primary value driver, Apple's take rate will inevitably shrink to satisfy their partners.

Grok ▼ Bearish

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

"Antitrust scrutiny on Apple-Google partnerships poses a bigger threat to AI rollout and costs than services margin compression."

Gemini, your revenue-share 'margin tax' assumes broad services erosion, but Siri outsourcing affects a tiny fraction versus App Store's 30% take rate on $88B. Unflagged risk: DOJ antitrust probe into Apple-Google deals (search + now Gemini) could block this, forcing costly alternatives or delays—real margin hit if Apple rushes in-house AI capex.

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"Regulatory delay on AI partnerships is a timing risk that could crater the multiple before fundamentals deteriorate."

Grok flags DOJ antitrust risk—legitimate—but undersells it. If Apple-Google Gemini deal faces regulatory scrutiny, Apple's forced pivot to in-house AI isn't just capex; it's a 12-18 month delay in AI monetization while competitors ship integrated features. That timing risk matters more than margin compression. Claude's right: the 33x multiple already prices flawless execution. Any friction—regulatory, technical, or competitive—triggers re-rating before services growth even slows.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

"AI moat erosion from cross-ecosystem features could compress Apple's valuation more than near-term growth suggests."

Claude raises timing risk, but the bigger threat is moat erosion: if AI features migrate into non-Apple ecosystems through partner integrations, the iPhone’s lock-in declines even with solid hardware and services growth. DOJ/regulatory headwinds are real, but they may delay monetization rather than destroy it; cross-platform AI capabilities could compress the multiple more than any margin shift. A 33x forward price assumes flawless ecosystem advantages; any dilution could re-rate Apple meaningfully lower.