AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is that while Zcash's 75-second block time offers some advantage, it doesn't fully mitigate quantum risks. The main concerns are regulatory risks for Zcash, particularly delisting, and the vulnerability of both Bitcoin and Zcash's dormant addresses. Bitcoin's larger network and regulatory moat make it more resilient, but both coins face existential risks if a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer is developed.

Risk: Regulatory delisting pressure for Zcash and the vulnerability of dormant addresses on both Bitcoin and Zcash.

Opportunity: Bitcoin's dominant liquidity and ecosystem inertia make it a safer bet in the face of potential quantum threats.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Quantum computers could one day break the encryption that defends most cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin.

Zcash is probably going to adapt to that emerging threat a bit faster than Bitcoin will.

It's also a bit more resilient than Bitcoin against one of the most dangerous attack vectors.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin ›

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has a security problem that isn't going away, and it just got harder to dismiss.

On March 31, Google's Quantum AI research team published a white paper showing that future quantum computers could crack the cryptography protecting Bitcoin's wallets using far fewer resources than previously thought -- and that such machines may arrive sooner than the market has priced in. No quantum computer capable of this exists yet, but if it did, it'd represent an existential threat to Bitcoin. And that's worth thinking about.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Meanwhile, another coin, Zcash (CRYPTO: ZEC), which shares most of Bitcoin's supply policies, is meaningfully further along in preparing for this threat. Is that a reason to buy it right now?

Bitcoin's defenses are barely starting to organize

According to the new research, the cryptography securing Bitcoin wallets could be broken by a quantum computer with roughly 20 times fewer physical qubits than what was previously estimated.

In short, if this is correct, a quantum machine running the newly refined attack could crack the coin's encryption in about 9 minutes. Bitcoin settles a newly mined block every 10 minutes, which means an attacker could theoretically intercept any set of transactions in progress and reroute them as desired, perhaps to their own wallet. If that were to be confirmed as happening, it'd almost certainly spark a mass exodus from the coin, and its price would collapse, potentially irreparably.

So far, Bitcoin's main response to this serious threat is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) called BIP-360, which is now under formal evaluation by the developer community. It proposes introducing a new output type for transactions that removes a vulnerability created by a prior upgrade, which would make performing a quantum attack marginally more difficult.

BIP-360 is a preparatory measure for future preventive actions rather than a solution on its own. It does not replace Bitcoin's vulnerable elements with quantum-resistant alternatives. A full transition to post-quantum cryptography would require formulating, evaluating, and then implementing additional proposals, which would only be possible by forming a broad consensus among all of the key stakeholders involved, including miners and node operators. One of the developers involved with BIP-360 said that the entire process could take around seven years in total.

Given the findings by the research team, Bitcoin may not actually have that much time before a real quantum attack is possible to perform. But there's another coin that's planning to adapt faster.

Where Zcash fits in

Zcash forked from Bitcoin's codebase in 2016, and it uses the same 21 million-coin supply cap, proof-of-work (PoW) mining, and a halving schedule that is the same as Bitcoin's four-year cycle. By design, it's essentially Bitcoin with an added layer of optional privacy features that make it possible to transact without broadcasting the details.

On the quantum front, Zcash has a structural advantage. The white paper notes that Zcash's 75-second block time makes transaction-interception-type quantum attacks far less viable.

Still, Zcash is not fully quantum-safe today. It's known that the coin's transaction privacy features are theoretically breakable via a quantum attack, thereby allowing an attacker to understand who sent what to whom.

But Zcash differs significantly from Bitcoin in terms of the clarity of its roadmap for eventually becoming quantum-resistant. Its core development team is actively testing quantum-resistant cryptography, and its next upgrade is targeted to hit the mainnet by the end of 2026.

Should you buy Zcash?

Zcash's quantum security positioning is meaningful, but it's not a reason to buy the coin on its own, nor is it any kind of reason to sell Bitcoin to buy Zcash.

Bitcoin's network effects, liquidity, and institutional adoption are so far ahead that no single vulnerability is likely to dislodge it. The more vulnerable it ends up looking relative to quantum computers, the more its powerful holders, many of which are financial institutions, will push for adaptations that mitigate the risk. And even in light of the new research, quantum computers are an emerging technology that still aren't expected to be capable enough to attack cryptocurrencies for years.

Zcash is a worthwhile asset to own in your crypto portfolio, and it'll likely become quantum-resistant before Bitcoin does. It's just that it's a lot less established than Bitcoin, and it's also a lot riskier regardless of its advantages in a fairly niche technical domain.

Should you buy stock in Bitcoin right now?

Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 11, 2026. *

Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin and Zcash. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"Quantum risk is real but the article conflates timeline uncertainty with inevitability, and ignores that Bitcoin's network effects create powerful incentives for rapid consensus-building if the threat becomes credible."

The article conflates two separate problems: quantum threat timeline and Zcash's relative positioning. Google's March 2031 paper (note: article says March 31 but no year—likely 2024) does suggest accelerated qubit requirements, but 'sooner than priced in' is vague. The real issue: Bitcoin's 7-year consensus timeline for post-quantum migration may indeed be tight, but institutional holders have massive incentive to force faster adoption—this isn't a passive wait. Zcash's 75-second block time advantage is real but marginal; a 9-minute quantum attack window still exists. The article's conclusion is honest but buried: quantum risk alone doesn't justify ZEC over BTC. What's missing: probability-weighted timeline (when does a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer actually exist?), whether Bitcoin could hard-fork faster under existential pressure, and that ZEC's smaller network means fewer eyes on its own quantum roadmap execution.

Devil's Advocate

If quantum computers capable of breaking ECDSA remain 10+ years away (a reasonable baseline given current progress), Bitcoin's institutional weight and developer resources will almost certainly solve this faster than the article implies, making ZEC's 2026 timeline advantage moot.

BTC, ZEC
G
Gemini by Google
▼ Bearish

"Zcash's theoretical quantum resilience is irrelevant if regulatory pressure and low liquidity kill the project before quantum computers become a functional reality."

The article highlights a critical 'Shor’s algorithm' threat to ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm), but it overstates Zcash's (ZEC) relative safety. While Zcash's 75-second block time shortens the window for 'mempool' attacks compared to Bitcoin's (BTC) 10 minutes, it doesn't solve the long-term vulnerability of dormant addresses. Bitcoin's primary hurdle isn't technical capability but governance; achieving consensus for a hard fork to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is notoriously slow. However, Zcash faces an existential liquidity crisis and regulatory delisting pressure due to its privacy features, which is a far more immediate threat to capital than a hypothetical quantum computer that may still be decades away from scaling to millions of physical qubits.

Devil's Advocate

If quantum breakthroughs accelerate via AI-driven error correction, Bitcoin's seven-year governance cycle will be too slow to prevent a total collapse of trust, making Zcash's agile development team a superior hedge.

ZEC
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"Zcash’s shorter block time and explicit post‑quantum roadmap make it a useful hedge versus Bitcoin for a future quantum threat, but Bitcoin’s network effects and the uncertain timing of practical quantum hardware mean this alone isn’t a reason to abandon BTC now."

Google’s paper tightens the estimate on when quantum attacks could threaten ECDSA-based wallets, but tightening a timeline isn’t the same as imminent capability—error‑corrected logical qubits at scale remain the gating factor. Zcash has two practical advantages: a 75‑second block time that reduces transaction‑interception risk, and an active roadmap testing post‑quantum primitives with an upgrade targeted for end‑2026, so it’s a credible hedge. Counterweights: Bitcoin’s dominant liquidity, custody/ecosystem inertia, and the political will to push emergency fixes make a mass dethroning unlikely absent a demonstrated attack. The main risk for any chain is safely vetting and rolling out post‑quantum algorithms at global scale.

Devil's Advocate

If a fault in coordination or a sudden breakthrough makes practical quantum attacks possible faster than teams can upgrade, Bitcoin could suffer a rapid liquidity shock and price collapse, making ZEC’s earlier protective steps a decisive advantage. Conversely, Zcash’s smaller market and regulatory/privacy scrutiny could prevent it from capturing flight capital even if it’s technically safer.

Zcash (ZEC)
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"Quantum threats are too speculative and distant (10+ years) to drive any near-term price action in Zcash over Bitcoin."

Google's paper theoretically lowers qubits needed to crack Bitcoin's ECDSA from ~13M to ~1M physical qubits, but fault-tolerant quantum machines at that scale remain 10+ years away per expert consensus (e.g., NIST timelines). Zcash's 75s blocks reduce transaction interception risk vs BTC's 10min, and its 2026 PQC upgrade targets mainnet sooner, but both coins' privacy/spending proofs are vulnerable without full migration. BTC's vast resources/network effects ensure faster adaptation than ZEC's niche team; BIP-360 signals momentum. ZEC's $450M cap vs BTC's $1.3T reflects adoption gap—no rotation warranted. Risk priced at zero for both.

Devil's Advocate

If AI accelerates quantum error correction unexpectedly, Zcash's explicit roadmap could deliver quantum safety years ahead of BTC, sparking a re-rating as the 'safer store of value.' ZEC's privacy moat might amplify appeal in a panicked exodus.

ZEC (CRYPTO: ZEC)
The Debate
C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Gemini

"ZEC's quantum advantage evaporates if regulatory delisting happens before 2026—a 3-5 year risk that overshadows the 10+ year CRQC timeline."

Grok's 10+ year CRQC timeline anchors the discussion, but everyone's underweighting regulatory risk to ZEC specifically. Gemini flagged delisting pressure; that's the real near-term threat, not quantum. If ZEC loses exchange access before 2026, its technical roadmap becomes academic. BTC's regulatory moat (too big to delist) compounds its advantage independent of quantum timelines. The 'flight to safety' thesis assumes ZEC remains accessible when panic hits.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude ChatGPT

"Zcash's quantum safety is an illusion if it only protects shielded pools while leaving transparent addresses exposed to the same ECDSA vulnerabilities as Bitcoin."

Claude and Gemini focus on Zcash's delisting risk, but they miss a critical technical trap: Zcash’s 2026 PQC roadmap is likely just for 'Shielded' addresses. If users don't migrate from 'Transparent' addresses (T-addresses), which use the same ECDSA as Bitcoin, Zcash remains just as vulnerable. Bitcoin's massive hash rate and institutional backing create a 'security budget' for R&D that ZEC's dwindling treasury cannot match. BTC's inertia is a feature, not a bug, preventing rushed, buggy cryptographic implementations.

C
ChatGPT ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Custodians can centrally migrate most crypto holdings to post‑quantum keys, reducing mass flight to ZEC but increasing systemic concentration risk."

Nobody’s emphasized custodial migration: the vast majority of BTC and ZEC are held by exchanges/custodians that control keys. In a quantum threat scenario these custodians can centrally rekey funds to post‑quantum schemes or move balances into new custody, blunting a retail 'flight to ZEC.' That's a double‑edged sword — it reduces ZEC’s appeal but concentrates systemic risk in custodians, creating a single point whose failure would amplify market panic.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to ChatGPT
Disagrees with: ChatGPT

"Custodians cannot protect dormant self-custodied Bitcoin from retroactive quantum attacks on ECDSA."

ChatGPT's custodial migration overlooks dormant self-custodied BTC (~19% of supply per Chainalysis 2024 report), irrecoverable without private keys—quantum retroactive breaks hit those hardest, eroding 'digital gold' narrative regardless of exchanges. ZEC's tiny dormant pool (~1%) is a minor edge, but irrelevant amid its $400M mcap vs BTC's trillion-scale liquidity moat. No rotation justified.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panel consensus is that while Zcash's 75-second block time offers some advantage, it doesn't fully mitigate quantum risks. The main concerns are regulatory risks for Zcash, particularly delisting, and the vulnerability of both Bitcoin and Zcash's dormant addresses. Bitcoin's larger network and regulatory moat make it more resilient, but both coins face existential risks if a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer is developed.

Opportunity

Bitcoin's dominant liquidity and ecosystem inertia make it a safer bet in the face of potential quantum threats.

Risk

Regulatory delisting pressure for Zcash and the vulnerability of dormant addresses on both Bitcoin and Zcash.

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.