By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on Macy's turnaround prospects. While some see potential in the 'Bold New Chapter' strategy and Berkshire's stake, others caution about the risks of relying on heavy capex, inventory liquidation, and secular retail decline. The real estate play is seen as a potential opportunity but also carries risks.
Risk: The heavy capex demands and potential execution risks associated with the store reimagining and real estate monetization strategies.
Opportunity: The potential for Macy's to successfully monetize its under-monetized real estate and use it to fund the turnaround.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Malls and department stores are seen by many as fading relics of the past, but don't tell that to Macy's (NYSE: M).
The clothing retail store chain just had its best first quarter in years, and its stock price is up 85% over the past 12 months. It even caught the attention of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRKA) (NYSE: BRKB), which added its first-ever stake in Macy's in the first quarter.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Revenue increased 2% in the quarter to $4.9 billion, while its comparable (or same-store) sales rose 3%. Macy's store comp sales were up 1.6%, but the company's Bloomingdale stores saw comp sales surge 10.2% while its beauty property, Blue Mercury, saw same-store sales jump 6.4%.
Net income rose 66% to $63 million while earnings per share increased 77% to $0.23 per share.
The retailer has now had two straight quarters of earnings growth after declining earnings for much of the previous three years. Here are three reasons why Macy's stock is headed in the right direction.
Much of the improvement stems from its Bold New Chapter initiative, launched two years ago. It focused on cutting costs by reducing the number of underperforming stores and focusing on a core group of 350 stores. That meant closing roughly 150 locations.
At the same time, the plan called for opening new locations of its luxury brands, Bloomingdale's and Blue Mercury, as both have been in high demand. We watched that play out in Q1 as these two brands saw comp sales surge.
The target was low single-digit sales growth, expenses rising by less than 2% to 3%, mid-single digit adjusted annual EBITDA growth, and free cash flow back to pre-pandemic levels. Macy's is hitting its sales and expense targets, and still progressing toward EBITDA and free-cash flow targets.
As part of the Bold New Chapter strategy, Macy's plans to reimagine 200 stores to improve the customer experience. Initially, the company planned to open 125 reimagined stores, but it has been so successful that management upped the number to 200.
The 200 reimagined Macy's locations posted comparable sales increases of 2.4%, higher than the 1.6% comp sales increase for Macy's overall in Q1.
The first quarter's success led Macy's to raise sales and earnings guidance for this fiscal year. The chain now expects $21.5 to $21.75 billion in net sales, up from the previous guidance of $21.4 to $21.65 billion. Further, comp sales are slated to increase 0.5% to 1.5% this fiscal year, up from the previous range of -0.5% to 0.5%.
In addition, adjusted earnings are targeted at $2.00 to $2.20 per share, up from a range of $1.90 to $2.10 per share.
The turnaround plan caught the attention of Berkshire Hathaway, and I'm certain Macy's low valuation was a major reason why Berkshire Hathaway opened a new position.
Macy's stock is trading at 9 times earnings and 10 times forward earnings, making it dirt cheap. Further, the price-to-sales ratio is just 0.27, so Macy's stock is extremely attractive from a valuation standpoint.
As an added bonus, Macy's stock offers a strong dividend yielding 3.45%.
Before you buy stock in Macy's, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Macy's wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $442,220! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,230,114!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 926% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 203% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 12, 2026. *
Dave Kovaleski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Durable comp growth and free cash flow from reimagined stores are the critical tests for Macy's to justify its valuation."
Macys' Q1 strength alarms as a credible turnaround signal, supported by the Bold New Chapter: fewer stores, sharper targeting, and bolstered Bloomingdale's/Blue Mercury. Berkshire Hathaway taking a stake adds a veneer of credibility, and the 9x earnings/10x forward earnings multiple plus a 3.45% dividend keep the stock interesting. Yet the article glosses over risks. The macro backdrop for discretionary retail remains fragile, and margin relief depends on heavy capex and cost cuts sustaining into 2025-26. The promised 200 reimagined stores' lift is incremental at best if traffic drivers falter, and e-commerce competition persists. A sustained beat is not yet proven.
The strongest counter: even with the Q1 beat, the improvements may be cyclical rather than structural, and if consumer demand softens or mall traffic shrinks, Macy's cost reductions won't save margins; Berkshire's stake doesn't guarantee an upside if the turnaround stalls.
"Macy's is currently mispriced as a dying retailer, ignoring the margin-accretive potential of its luxury-focused pivot and improved capital allocation."
Macy's (M) Q1 results signal a successful pivot from a bloated department store model to a leaner, luxury-tilted entity. The 10.2% comp surge in Bloomingdale's and 6.4% in Bluemercury confirm that the 'Bold New Chapter' isn't just cost-cutting, but a genuine shift in revenue mix toward higher-margin segments. Trading at ~9x forward P/E with a 3.45% yield, the stock is priced for terminal decline, not a turnaround. If management sustains this operational efficiency, a re-rating toward 12-13x is plausible. However, investors must distinguish between cyclical recovery and structural health; the reliance on store 'reimagining' is a capital-intensive gamble that may not offset the secular decline of physical retail foot traffic.
The 'turnaround' may simply be a temporary reprieve driven by aggressive inventory liquidation and cost-cutting that sacrifices long-term brand equity for short-term EPS beats.
"Macy's operational execution is improving, but the stock's valuation discount may reflect genuine structural risk rather than market inefficiency."
Macy's Q1 beat is real—2% revenue growth, 3% comp sales, 77% EPS growth—but the article conflates operational improvement with investment thesis. The 9x P/E looks cheap until you ask: why is it cheap? Department stores face structural headwinds (e-commerce, mall traffic decline, inventory risk). Berkshire's entry is meaningful but not endorsement of valuation—it's a deep-value bet on execution. The 200 reimagined stores posting 2.4% comps vs. 1.6% overall is encouraging, but that's still low single-digit growth in a 2-3% GDP environment. The article omits debt levels, working capital trends, and whether this turnaround is durable or a cyclical bounce.
If department stores are structurally declining, one good quarter doesn't reverse a 20-year trend—Macy's could be a value trap where cheap valuation reflects rational market skepticism, not opportunity.
"Core Macy's remains structurally challenged and one strong quarter does not yet prove the turnaround is sustainable."
Macy's Q1 comps of 3% mask weakness in the core banner at just 1.6%, with growth concentrated in Bloomingdale's and Bluemercury. The Bold New Chapter store closures and 200-store reimaginings are still early-stage, and the raised guidance remains modest at 0.5-1.5% comps. At 9x trailing and 10x forward earnings the valuation looks cheap only because department-store secular decline, online competition, and execution risk on free-cash-flow recovery are not priced out. Berkshire's new stake adds visibility but does not alter the structural headwinds facing the 350-store footprint.
The reimagined stores already deliver 2.4% comps and two straight quarters of earnings growth could mark the start of a durable inflection if expense discipline holds.
"Two quarters of earnings growth may reflect non-recurring factors, not a durable margin/traffic inflection."
To Grok: I think your take on a durable inflection rests on too thin a reed. Two straight quarters of earnings growth could be inventory liquidation and front-loaded cost saves—not a true margin uplift or traffic rebound. The 200-store reimagining demands heavy capex and working capital; without a sustained top-line reacceleration, FCF could disappoint and the Berkshire stake won’t compensate. The bear case hinges on reversion to single-digit comps and fading promotional lift.
"The investment thesis hinges on real estate asset monetization rather than retail comp growth."
Claude is right to flag the debt, but we are ignoring the real estate play. Macy's isn't just a retailer; it's a massive, under-monetized land bank. The 'Bold New Chapter' is essentially a liquidation of underperforming assets disguised as a store refresh. If they successfully monetize the flagship real estate, the P/E multiple is irrelevant because the NAV (Net Asset Value) provides a massive margin of safety that pure retail metrics completely miss.
"Real estate NAV is a margin of safety only if Macy's can monetize without cannibalizing the turnaround—the article provides zero evidence they're pursuing that strategy."
Gemini's real estate NAV play is seductive but unpriced for a reason: Macy's flagships are iconic but illiquid, and monetizing them mid-turnaround risks brand equity and foot traffic to the remaining stores. If they're forced to sell prime real estate at distressed valuations to fund the reimagining capex, the NAV margin of safety evaporates. Where's the evidence they're actually monetizing, not just holding?
"Monetizing real estate to fund reimagining capex risks worsening traffic issues rather than creating a margin of safety."
Gemini's real estate NAV argument connects directly to the capex demands ChatGPT highlighted, but ignores that selling flagships mid-turnaround could accelerate foot traffic decline in remaining stores rather than provide a safety net. The 200 reimaginings already require heavy investment; distressed sales would compound execution risk instead of offsetting secular retail weakness.
The panel is divided on Macy's turnaround prospects. While some see potential in the 'Bold New Chapter' strategy and Berkshire's stake, others caution about the risks of relying on heavy capex, inventory liquidation, and secular retail decline. The real estate play is seen as a potential opportunity but also carries risks.
The potential for Macy's to successfully monetize its under-monetized real estate and use it to fund the turnaround.
The heavy capex demands and potential execution risks associated with the store reimagining and real estate monetization strategies.