AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel generally agreed that small caps and international stocks' outperformance may not persist due to underlying risks, with a focus on fiscal deterioration and potential repricing of commercial real estate debt.

Risk: Fiscal deterioration and potential repricing of commercial real estate debt held by small-cap banks

Opportunity: No clear opportunity was identified by the panel

Read AI Discussion

This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →

Full Article Yahoo Finance

In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool retirement expert Robert Brokamp discusses the following:

- The S&P 500 is near all-time highs, but small caps and international stocks are doing even better so far in 2026.

- A new study finds that retiring before 65 may accelerate cognitive decline.

- The U.S. government’s debt-to-GDP ratio is now over 100%, nearing the all-time high set after the end of World War II.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

| Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on a little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly," providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue » |

A full transcript is below.

Should you buy stock in Morningstar right now?

Before you buy stock in Morningstar, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Morningstar wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $469,293! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,381,332!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 993% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 16, 2026. *

This podcast was recorded on May 9, 2026.

Robert Brokamp: Making the most of your 401(k) and does retirement make your brain decay? That and more on this Saturday’s Personal Finance edition of The Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing podcast. I'm Robert Brokamp. This week, I lay out 11 steps to making sure you’re maximizing the value of your work-based retirement plan, but first up, some headlines that caught my eye this past week.

The S&P 500 is up 6.4% so far this year, while the S&P 600 index of Small Caps is up 15.7%, and the FTSE Global All Cap ex-US Index of international stocks is up 10.6%. I came across a couple of articles this week, and both of these asset classes that I thought were worth highlighting. The first was published on wealthmanagement.com and comes from Larry Swedroe. He points out that the so-called small-cap premium, and that's the amount that small companies have historically outperformed large companies, seems to have disappeared in recent years, and many have questioned whether it actually ever existed. Larry cites a study from the Bridgeway Capital Management Group, which argues that the problem isn't the premium itself, but how we define small cap.

Their key insight, two groups are dragging down returns and obscuring a premium that is actually robust and persistent. The first group are labeled Fallen Angels, which are former large caps that recently crashed in value. If you take out the stocks that became Fallen Angels over the traveling for years, the returns of small caps improve by 1.57% annually since 1960. The other group is new market entrants, like IPOs, SPACs, Spin-Offs, which tend to underperform often by 2% to nearly 6% per year. Moving on to international stocks, a recent article from Morningstar’s Christine Benz pointed out that after years of underperformance, non-U.S. stocks surged in 2025, returning 32% for the year, compared to 18% for U.S. stocks. This marked a dramatic reversal from the prior stretch. When you go from 2009-2024, non-U.S. stocks returned about 7.6% compared to 14.5% for domestic equities. But beyond better recent returns, international stocks also began to decouple from the U.S. market, which enhances their value as diversifiers.

The Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US index had a 0.92 correlation with U.S. stocks over the three-year period ending in 2022, but that figure dropped to 0.71 by the end of 2025. For those who slept through statistics class, remember that a correlation of one means that two investments move in lockstep, so a lower number means less correlation and potentially more diversification. Merging markets have generally exhibited even lower correlations with U.S. equities, partly because their dominant sectors, such as energy and basic materials, differ from the tech-heavy U.S. market, and because countries like China follow a different economic cycle.

On a related note, I thought I'd mentioned a recent chart from Paul Kudronski, which highlighted that no other country invests in the stock market like Americans. Fifty-five percent of U.S. households have exposure to the stock market. The next three countries with the highest levels of stock ownership are Canada at 49%, Australia at 37%, and the U.K. at 33%. Americans invest in the stock market, mostly so we can retire. But retirement might not be so good for us. This brings us to our next item, which is a study from the University of California, Irvine entitled, "Does employment slow cognitive decline?" The answer is, yes, the study included approximately 40,000 older adults from 1996-2018 and found that, "correlational evidence suggests that leaving the workforce before retirement age could accelerate the pace of cognitive decline" and that, "employment near retirement age appears to reduce the risk of cognitive decline, which can in turn forestall the onset of dementia." The effects are particularly concentrated among men ages 51-64. This is just a recent example of many studies, which have found that retirement may not be so healthy for people physically, mentally, psychologically, or socially.

That said, there are plenty of happy, healthy retirees. I know many. The ones who seem to do the best, according to the MassMutual retirement happiness study, are more likely to fill their free time with multiple kinds of activities, including spending time with loved ones, exercising, pursuing hobbies, and traveling. Also, make sure you're doing things to keep your brain sharp.

Now let's move on to the number of the week, which is 100.2%. That's the U.S. government's debt-to-GDP ratio, according to data recently released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which noted that the debt held by the public on March 31 was $31.27 trillion, while GDP over the last year was $31.22 trillion. We Americans now spend more on the interest to service our debt than we do on defense or Medicare. According to a statement from the Committee for a Responsible Budget, “the national debt is now larger than the U.S. economy, about twice the historic average. We've heard plenty of alarm bells in the past few years about our fiscal path, but this one rings especially loudly. The real question is whether or not our leaders in Washington will listen. With debt now above 100% of GDP, it's only a matter of time until we pass the all-time record of 106% reached in the immediate aftermath of World War II. This time, the borrowing isn't born from a seismic global conflict, but rather a total bipartisan abdication of making hard choices." Next up, what choices you should make with your 401(k) when Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing continues.

ADVERTISEMENT: Dell PCs with Intel inside are built for the moments that matter, for the moments you plan and the ones you don't built for the busy days that turn into all night study sessions, the moment you're working from a cafe and realize every outlet is taken. The times you're deep in your flow, and the absolute last thing you need is an auto update throwing off your momentum. That's why Dell builds tech that adapts to the way you actually work, built with a long lasting battery, so you're not scrambling for the closest outlet and built in intelligence that makes updates around your schedule, not in the middle of it. They don't build Tech for Tech's sake. They build it for you. Fine technology built for the way you work @dell.com/delpcs built for you.

Robert Brokamp: If you're like most working Americans, your No. 1 strategy for accumulating enough money to retire is by contributing to a defined contribution plan, such as a 401(k), 403(b), or the Federal Savings Plan. Consequently, when you retire will depend largely on how well you manage the account. Here are 11 tips for making the most of your employer-sponsored retirement plan, and just a note, I'm going to use the term 401(k) to apply to all types of defined contribution accounts.

Step Number 1, save enough and get the full match. The consensus among experts these days is that workers should aim for a savings rate of 15% of their household income and even higher if they're getting a late start on saving for retirement. Fortunately, the majority of workers don't have to come up with that 15% all on their own. More than 90% of employers match contributions, with the most common formula being a match of $0.50 for every dollar saved up to a savings rate of 6%. Those workers need to save 12%, and then the employer kicks in 3%. Unfortunately, most people aren't saving 15%. In fact, a third of employees don't even contribute enough to receive the full match, according to Vanguard. At the very least, make sure you're grabbing that free money your employer is offering.

Step No. 2: Choose the right type of account. Most 401(k)s allow for both traditional and Roth contributions. Your first decision is, when do you want your tax break? If you want it today at the cost of paying taxes on withdrawals and retirement, then go with the traditional account. But then do something smart with the money you save by having a lower tax bill this year. Use it to save even more money for retirement or some other goal like college. Just don't squander it. On the other hand, if you're willing to give up a tax break today in exchange for tax-free withdrawals in retirement, perhaps because you expect to be in a higher tax bracket in retirement, then go with the Roth. The other benefit of the Roth is that you aren't forced to take required minimum distributions at age 73 or age 75, if you were born in 1960 or later. This doesn't have to be an either-or decision. You can contribute to both the traditional and the Roth account as long as the combined amount doesn't exceed your annual contribution limit.

Additionally, some plans nowadays allow employees to decide the type of account that the employer match goes into. For the large majority of us, the match goes into a traditional account. That way, it's not taxable income to us, but the withdrawals will be taxed. If your plan allows you to have the match deposited into a Roth account, the match will be added to your taxable income for the year, but then the withdrawals will be tax-free. I'll also point out that there are some situations in which an employee actually has a choice of the account provider, and this is most common for teachers, where some school districts allow for more than one 403(b) or 457 provider. A good resource for teachers and other employees of nonprofits is 403(b)s.org, which rates the plans offered by many of the school districts in the U.S.

Step Number 3: Save more each year. Everyone loves getting a raise, but a 2020 report from Morningstar found that it actually can postpone a worker's retirement. Why? Because many people use a raise to increase the cost of their lifestyle, which in turn increases how much they need to have saved before they can retire because everyone wants to maintain their lifestyle in retirement. The report found that even workers who save a percentage of their income, say, 10% or so, contribute more to their 401(k)s after a raise, but it's often not enough. They also need to increase their savings rate. Morningstar suggested a few guidelines with the most effective being a rule that they dubbed, spend twice your years to retirement. For example, if you plan to retire in 15 years, spend 30% of your raise, but then contribute the remaining 70% to your 401(k).

Step Number 4, max out the account early or don't. As the old saying goes, it's not about timing the market but time in the market. After all, the S&P 500 has historically made money in about three out of every four years. In most scenarios, the sooner you invest your money, the more money you'll eventually have. Therefore, contributing the maximum to your 401(k) as soon as possible, rather than gradually over the course of the year, should result in a bigger nest egg in retirement.

However, before you pursue this strategy, it's very important to make sure this won't reduce the match you will receive from your employer. In most situations, the match is distributed on a per-paycheck basis. If you max out your 401(k) early, you may miss out on some of those matching contributions. The key here is to find out if your plan offers what is known as a true-up, in which any missed matches are deposited toward the end of the year. If your plan doesn't offer a true-up, then you should avoid maxing out the account before the final paycheck of the year. Since we're on the topic, the 401(k) contribution limits in 2026 are $24,500 for workers who are 49 and younger, $32,500 for ages 50-59 and 64 and older, and $35,750 for ages 60-63. The worker’s age on December 31 determines the applicable limit.

Step Number 5, create a mega backdoor Roth if your plan allows it. In addition to those aforementioned limits, there's another all in limit in 2026 of $72,000 plus the relevant catch-up limit for those who are 50 and older or 100% of compensation, whichever is less. This includes the employee and employer contributions. If your account hasn't reached that annual limit, you can make additional so-called after-tax contributions if your plan allows. Now, don’t confuse those after-tax contributions with Roth contributions, which are also technically after-tax, but the growth on these after-tax contributions is tax-deferred. That is, you don't pay taxes until you make the withdrawals, which are taxes ordinary income. Furthermore, when you leave your employer, you can segregate these after-tax contributions from the growth and transfer the former assets into a Roth IRA and the latter into a traditional IRA.

Technically, actually, what you're doing is you're converting those after-tax contributions to a Roth. However, because the converted amount doesn't involve any pretax money or growth, the conversion won't cost you anything. On top of all that, some plans allow for in-plan Roth conversions of these after-tax contributions, which then allow them to accumulate tax-free. This strategy is often called the mega backdoor Roth. This can get very

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▼ Bearish

"The current rotation into small caps and international equities is a temporary valuation play that ignores the macro-headwind of U.S. fiscal instability which will eventually force a broad market repricing."

The narrative that small caps and international stocks are 'decoupling' to provide a safe haven is overly optimistic. While the S&P 600's 15.7% YTD performance looks attractive, the underlying debt-to-GDP ratio of 100.2% suggests a systemic fiscal fragility that will eventually force a liquidity crunch, regardless of asset class. The 'Fallen Angel' argument for small-cap outperformance is a data-mining exercise that ignores the reality of higher refinancing costs for smaller firms in a high-interest-rate environment. Investors chasing these 'diversifiers' are likely walking into a trap where correlation goes to 1.0 during the next inevitable volatility spike as the U.S. fiscal deficit crowds out private capital.

Devil's Advocate

If the U.S. economy achieves a soft landing while global growth accelerates, the valuation discount on international equities and the 'small-cap premium' could trigger a massive, sustained rotation away from expensive U.S. mega-caps.

broad market
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"N/A"

[Unavailable]

C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"A 100%+ debt-to-GDP ratio with interest spending exceeding defense budgets is a structural headwind that equity valuations have not yet priced in, regardless of near-term sector rotation."

This is a retirement-focused podcast masquerading as market commentary. The real news buried here: U.S. debt-to-GDP hit 100.2%, approaching WWII peaks, yet the market barely reacted. Small caps (+15.7% YTD) and international stocks (+10.6%) are outpacing the S&P 500 (+6.4%), suggesting either genuine rotation or crowded trades unwinding. The cognitive decline study is interesting but speculative—correlation ≠ causation, and selection bias (healthy people work longer) isn't addressed. The 401(k) advice is sound but generic. The real tension: if fiscal deterioration accelerates, does equity outperformance persist, or does debt service crowding-out trigger a repricing?

Devil's Advocate

The article cherry-picks 2025 international performance (32% return) after a 15-year underperformance stretch, yet provides no forward catalyst—just lower correlation, which is not the same as alpha. Small-cap outperformance excluding 'Fallen Angels' is methodologically suspicious: you're removing the worst performers and claiming the premium is 'robust,' which is data mining.

broad market
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"Tax-advantaged retirement account optimization matters far more for outcomes than chasing quarterly winners in small caps or international stocks."

The episode touts 2026 gains in small caps and ex-US while flagging a cognitive-retirement study and a debt milestone. The contrarian read: the small-cap premium is not proven to persist; recent outperformance may reflect cyclical rally and post-crisis reallocation, not a structural edge. International diversification helps now, but currency swings, valuation dispersion, and country-specific risks can reverse. The brain study is correlational and may reflect health selection effects; the debt-to-GDP over 100% hints at potential policy shifts that could raise taxes or crowd out growth. For retirement planning, maximize employer match and tax diversification, but avoid over-committing to risky segments without plan-specific checks.

Devil's Advocate

But a stronger counterpoint is that if rates stabilize and growth re-accelerates, small-cap and ex-US equities could re-ignite and outperform again, so treating them as riskier headwinds may underprice potential upside.

broad market
The Debate
G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Small-cap volatility is driven by regional bank exposure to commercial real estate rather than broad fiscal debt-to-GDP ratios."

Gemini’s focus on the debt-to-GDP ratio misses the primary driver of small-cap performance: the Russell 2000’s heavy concentration of regional banks. These institutions are the true transmission mechanism for fiscal policy. If the Fed pivots, it isn't just about 'liquidity'; it’s about the massive repricing of commercial real estate debt held on these balance sheets. We are looking at a binary outcome for small caps, not a slow-motion fiscal trap.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral

[Unavailable]

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Regional bank CRE exposure is a timing risk, not a structural small-cap bull case—and rate cuts that 'solve' it accelerate the fiscal trap everyone's ignoring."

Gemini's binary CRE repricing thesis is sharper than the fiscal crowding-out argument, but it conflates two separate risks. Russell 2000 regional banks hold ~$2.1T CRE exposure; a 15-20% repricing hurts, but isn't systemic without cascading defaults. The real risk: if Fed cuts rates to cushion CRE, it re-inflates small-cap multiples while leaving fiscal deterioration unaddressed. That's not binary—it's a slow bleed disguised as relief.

C
ChatGPT ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Binary CRE risk framing understates the real risk: gradual liquidity tightening matters more for small caps than an abrupt CRE crash."

Gemini, the 'binary CRE repricing' framing misses the broader liquidity-and-lending conduit. CRE stress matters, but banks' capital adequacy, loan loss reserves, and diversified small-cap earnings shield many Russell 2000 constituents from a sudden, all-or-nothing wipeout. If the Fed keeps policy modestly supportive, CRE pain may be gradual, not terminal. The bigger risk is a tightening loan environment that saps capex and equity valuations rather than a CRE crash alone.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panel generally agreed that small caps and international stocks' outperformance may not persist due to underlying risks, with a focus on fiscal deterioration and potential repricing of commercial real estate debt.

Opportunity

No clear opportunity was identified by the panel

Risk

Fiscal deterioration and potential repricing of commercial real estate debt held by small-cap banks

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.