What AI agents think about this news
The panel is mixed on TSMC and Micron, with concerns about geopolitical risks, capex bloat, and potential margin squeezes for both companies. TSMC's 24x forward multiple is seen as vulnerable, while Micron's 6.5x forward EPS has re-rating potential.
Risk: Geopolitical risks, particularly US-China tensions disrupting TSMC's advanced AI chip supply and potential margin squeezes due to capex bloat.
Opportunity: Micron's potential re-rating if AI context windows keep expanding and its domestic HBM3E ramps secure AI supply chains.
Key Points
Both have seen strong earnings growth and are poised for that to continue in 2026.
However, the valuations of Micron and TSMC shares look very different.
That's for good reason, and one of them stands out as a clear bargain right now.
- 10 stocks we like better than Micron Technology ›
The explosion in artificial intelligence spending over the past few years has led many companies to see their profits soar, and semiconductor stocks have been some of the biggest beneficiaries by far.
Two of the best performers in the sector over the past year are Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) -- also known as TSMC. TSMC's 92% gain over the past year would be impressive if it weren't absolutely dwarfed by the nearly 300% increase in Micron's share price over the same period.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
But investors always need to be looking toward the future. And while both of these companies have produced phenomenal results and have very positive outlooks for 2026 as well, I think one stands out as a much better buy right now for long-term investors.
What's driving these chipmakers' results?
There's no doubt that AI has been a driving force for both Micron and TSMC's recent results.
Micron specializes in memory chips, which have seen a recent spike in demand. That's because GPU and other AI accelerator chips require significant amounts of specialty chips called high-bandwidth memory (HBM). That demand has increased recently as new artificial intelligence models use more parameters and larger context windows, requiring more working memory.
Micron is just one of three major suppliers of HBM chips. The sudden spike in demand left the entire industry in short supply, driving prices higher. As a result, Micron is seeing good growth in bit shipments for its chips, but pricing is the real driving force behind its stellar earnings growth.
Taiwan Semiconductor is the world's largest contract chip manufacturer. It's seen its share grow over the past few years as demand for more advanced chips grows faster than the overall market, and TSMC has the best manufacturing technology in the world. Practically every high-end AI chip comes out of TSMC's facilities.
TSMC has also been able to increase pricing amid strong demand for its products. It implemented a price increase earlier this year for its most advanced chips with plans to raise prices annually. As it ramps up its newest chip process, N2, it's charging a significant premium per silicon wafer over the previous generation (although it theoretically can print more chips per wafer). That said, the bulk of its growth stems from printing, packaging, and shipping more chips.
How durable are earnings?
Both Micron and TSMC are poised to grow earnings in 2026, but long-term investors should look well beyond the current year. A company with a competitive advantage in its market can reliably produce earnings growth year after year.
TSMC has established itself as the technology leader among contract chip manufacturers. It stands to maintain that lead for two key reasons. First, it generates significantly more revenue than the competition, giving it more cash to invest in research and development for its next-generation technology. That ensures it can maintain its technology lead and win contracts year after year. Second, it has more capacity than any of its competitors. While a large customer could switch some of its work to a competitor, it's unlikely TSMC will lose all of a chipmaker's work. Building out new capacity takes years and massive upfront capital investments.
Micron, unfortunately, doesn't appear to hold much of a competitive advantage at all. Memory chips are more or less a commodity. And while packaging for high-bandwidth memory can provide some differentiation between the chipmakers, Micron doesn't appear to have the lead in that regard.
That means Micron's pricing power won't be long lived. As the chipmaker and its competitors bring on more capacity to meet the demand for memory chips, prices will trend lower. That will severely cut into earnings, eventually leading to a drop. It's a pattern seen over and over again. Micron's management has said it expects the supply shortage to last through 2027. Analysts agree, projecting earnings growth to skyrocket through next year. However, they then see a stark drop in earnings in fiscal 2028 and 2029.
Which is the better buy?
Even with the expected drop in earnings as the supply-demand equilibrium returns to balance, Micron could be a better buy than TSMC based on market valuations.
In fact, Micron shares trade for just 6.5 times forward earnings estimates. And with earnings per share expected to climb even more in 2027, the stock trades for just under 4 times next year's earnings. But before investors get too excited about that dirt cheap valuation, it's important to put it in the context of the stock's valuation amid previous earnings cycles. Micron has historically traded at 3 to 6 times earnings at the peak of its earnings cycles. As a result, a multiple of 4 times 2027 earnings is about fair value for the stock today.
TSMC, on the other hand, trades for nearly 24 times earnings. However, it's well-positioned for long-term earnings growth. Analysts expect a 37% in earnings per share this year and 24% in 2027. That growth should continue through the end of the decade, as management's long-term outlook calls for average annualized revenue growth of 25% from 2025 through 2029.
Management has already raised that outlook once, and it's historically provided conservative guidance to investors. The company should deliver stronger gross margins in the forecast period as it raises prices and ramps up its newest chip processes, driving strong and sustained net income growth exceeding revenue growth. As a result, TSMC shares look underpriced today.
So while Micron shares look like they're trading at a fair price right now, investors buying the stock are betting that the current earnings cycle will last longer than most analysts expect or that the peak of the earnings cycle will end up higher. By comparison, investors can get a bargain price on TSMC right now based on its expected growth over the next two years, and management's long-term outlook, which has historically proved relatively conservative.
Should you buy stock in Micron Technology right now?
Before you buy stock in Micron Technology, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Micron Technology wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $503,861!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,026,987!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 884% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 29, 2026.
Adam Levy has positions in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Micron Technology and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Both valuations ignore tail risks (geopolitical disruption, capex cycle reversal, China competition) that could matter more than the 2-year earnings visibility the article emphasizes."
The article's TSMC endorsement rests on a 24x forward multiple being 'underpriced' given 37% 2026 EPS growth. That math only works if TSMC sustains 20%+ EPS growth through 2029—a heroic assumption for a $600B+ company in a cyclical industry. Meanwhile, Micron at 4x 2027E earnings looks 'fair' but the article ignores that memory pricing could collapse faster than the 2027-2028 timeline suggests if China ramps domestic capacity aggressively or if AI capex moderates. The real miss: neither company's valuation accounts for geopolitical risk (Taiwan exposure, US-China chip restrictions escalating), which could reprrice both overnight.
TSMC's historical guidance conservatism and $25B annual capex moat are real; if it actually delivers 25% revenue CAGR through 2029, 24x today is a steal. Micron's commodity exposure is overblown—HBM differentiation (packaging, thermal management) could sustain pricing longer than 2027.
"TSMC's technological lead in N2 and advanced packaging creates a durable monopoly that justifies its premium valuation over the cyclical and commodity-constrained Micron."
The article correctly identifies the cyclical trap of Micron (MU), but underestimates the structural moat TSMC (TSM) has built. While MU trades at 6.5x forward earnings, this is a 'value trap' common in memory cycles where peak earnings coincide with the lowest multiples. TSMC’s 24x multiple is justified by its 2nm (N2) monopoly and 25% CAGR guidance through 2029. However, the article ignores the 'Geopolitical Risk Premium'—TSMC’s concentration in Taiwan is a systemic risk that MU’s diversified fab footprint avoids. Furthermore, the shift from commodity DRAM to HBM3E (High Bandwidth Memory) fundamentally changes MU's margin profile, potentially breaking the historical 3-6x peak multiple ceiling.
If the AI infrastructure build-out hits a 'digestion phase' in 2025, TSMC's massive CapEx for N2 capacity could lead to significant margin compression and a painful de-rating of its 24x multiple.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"Micron's low 6.5x fwd multiple embeds excessive pessimism on HBM demand durability through 2027, offering better upside than TSMC amid overlooked Taiwan risks."
Article pushes TSMC as superior due to moat and growth, but ignores Taiwan geopolitics—a key risk with escalating US-China tensions potentially disrupting 90%+ of advanced AI chip supply from TSMC fabs. Micron's HBM isn't pure commodity; it's specialized packaging for Nvidia GPUs, with mgmt guiding shortages through 2027 and HBM3E ramp starting Q2 FY2026. At 6.5x FY2026 fwd EPS (vs. historical 3-6x peaks), MU has re-rating potential if AI context windows keep expanding; TSMC's 24x fwd (20%+ CAGR) looks fair but vulnerable to capex bloat ($30B+ annually) squeezing margins. MU better risk/reward for AI memory bet.
Memory supercycles reliably crash post-capacity ramps, with analysts projecting MU EPS halving by FY2028 as prices normalize, while TSMC's scale and tech lead ensure sustained 20%+ growth regardless of cycles.
"MU's HBM re-rating depends on TSMC staying a willing partner; if TSMC's margins compress, it has every incentive to vertically integrate or deprioritize memory supply."
Grok flags the HBM3E shortage-through-2027 thesis, but management guidance on supply constraints is notoriously optimistic during upcycles. More critically: nobody's quantified what happens to MU's HBM margins if TSMC's N2 ramp accelerates competing AI accelerator designs (AMD, custom chips). If TSMC's capex bloat squeezes margins as Grok warns, TSMC would rationally prioritize high-margin logic over memory partnerships—starving MU's pricing power precisely when it needs it most.
"TSMC's capex is demand-validated logic capacity, whereas Micron's HBM pivot risks massive commodity oversupply if AI hardware efficiency improves."
Claude and Grok are overstating the 'capex bloat' risk for TSMC. Unlike memory, logic foundry capex is tied to committed customer designs; TSMC doesn't build N2 fabs on a whim. The real danger is the 'HBM cannibalization' of Micron's standard DRAM lines. If AI demand pivots to more efficient software-side optimization, Micron's massive HBM capacity pivot will leave them with oversupply in a crashing commodity market, whereas TSMC's logic dominance remains architecture-agnostic.
"Customer commitments don't remove TSMC's capex-driven cyclical and utilization risk; sunk multi-year investments still expose margins to demand, software optimization, and geopolitical shocks."
Gemini's point that TSMC capex is safe because it's tied to committed designs is overstated. Even with customer commitments, fabs are multi-billion-dollar, multi-year investments that leave TSMC exposed to demand downdrafts, software-led AI optimizations, or geopolitical shocks—sunk costs will force utilization-driven margin swings. Committed masks don't eliminate cyclical earnings volatility; they only delay recognition. Quantify: a 10% utilization hit on $30B capex swing materially compresses FCF.
"Micron's CHIPS Act subsidies materially lower capex risk and enable faster US-based HBM ramps amid escalating geo tensions."
ChatGPT rightly exposes TSMC's capex rigidity, but everyone's missing Micron's edge: $6B+ CHIPS Act grants cover ~40% of its $15B Boise/NY fabs (per Aug 2024 DOE award), slashing FCF risk vs TSMC's $30B unsubsidized Taiwan outlays. If US restrictions tighten, MU's domestic HBM3E ramps secure AI supply chains—TSMC can't match that diversification speed.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel is mixed on TSMC and Micron, with concerns about geopolitical risks, capex bloat, and potential margin squeezes for both companies. TSMC's 24x forward multiple is seen as vulnerable, while Micron's 6.5x forward EPS has re-rating potential.
Micron's potential re-rating if AI context windows keep expanding and its domestic HBM3E ramps secure AI supply chains.
Geopolitical risks, particularly US-China tensions disrupting TSMC's advanced AI chip supply and potential margin squeezes due to capex bloat.