The panel consensus is bearish on Oracle's stock, with key risks including the durability of AI capex, margin compression under the bring-your-own-hardware model, and competition from hyperscalers like AWS and Azure.
Risk: The durability of the AI capex cycle and the sustainability of margins under the bring-your-own-hardware model.
Opportunity: None identified
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Key Points
- Oracle has a massive revenue backlog that will ensure stronger growth for the company over the next three years.
- The company has found a smart way to reduce the pressure on its balance sheet while sustaining its aggressive data center build-out.
- Oracle's accelerating earnings growth and attractive valuation indicate that the stock is poised …
Read more
Key Points
- Oracle has a massive revenue backlog that will ensure stronger growth for the company over the next three years.
- The company has found a smart way to reduce the pressure on its balance sheet while sustaining its aggressive data center build-out.
- Oracle's accelerating earnings growth and attractive valuation indicate that the stock is poised for a big jump.
- 10 stocks we like better than Oracle ›
The artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure boom has supercharged Nvidia and Micron Technology's growth in recent years, as both companies sell mission-critical chips deployed in AI data centers for model training and inference.
Not surprisingly, investments in Nvidia and Micron have been highly lucrative for investors. Importantly, both semiconductor stocks still have room for more upside, fueled by further growth in AI infrastructure investments.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
However, there is one AI infrastructure stock that has failed to capitalize on this fast-growing space despite its impressive numbers. Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) are down 52% over the past year. But a closer look at the company's latest quarterly report suggests investors may be underestimating its potential. Here's why.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Oracle's incredible growth is going to send the stock on a bull run
Oracle released its fiscal 2027 first-quarter results (for the three months ended Aug. 31) on Sept. 10. The company's revenue increased 30% year over year to a record $19.3 billion. Additionally, the company's non-GAAP earnings per share rose 30% year over year to $1.92.
Analysts would have settled for $1.75 in earnings per share. However, it seems that the company's business model of asking customers to prepay for AI accelerator chips or to bring their own hardware is having a positive impact on its bottom line. Even Oracle's revenue exceeded the $19.14 billion consensus estimate, suggesting that it is converting its backlog into revenue at a solid pace now.
The good news for Oracle investors is that its revenue backlog continues to improve. The company's remaining performance obligation (RPO), which is the total value of unfulfilled contracts at the end of a quarter, increased by $209 billion from the year-ago quarter. The metric now stands at a massive $664 billion, paving the way for solid long-term growth in revenue and earnings.
Even better, Oracle notes that the conversion of RPO into revenue is poised to accelerate over the remainder of fiscal 2027. The company now expects to convert half of its RPO into revenue over the next three years, compared to the earlier estimate of 46%. So, Oracle is on track to generate $332 billion in revenue over the next three years, translating into an annual run rate of almost $111 billion.
That points to a significant improvement over Oracle's fiscal 2026 revenue of $67.4 billion. What's more, Oracle management's comments indicate that the stronger jump in revenue will also give its bottom line a nice boost. CFO Hilary Maxson noted on the latestearnings callthat the "new RPO will not impact our capex or revenues until fiscal 2028 or beyond."
The company's bring-your-own-hardware/prepayment business model is therefore bearing fruit. This is also evident from Oracle's improving non-GAAP operating income, which increased 21% year over year in fiscal Q1 on a trailing-twelve-month basis. That was a significant improvement over the year-ago period's growth rate of 8%.
As such, I won't be surprised to see Oracle exceeding its guidance in fiscal 2027. The company anticipates a 34% year-over-year increase in revenue to $90 billion this fiscal year, while non-GAAP earnings are expected to increase by 18% to $8.10 per share. However, the fiscal Q1 performance clearly suggests that Oracle is on track to outperform that.
More importantly, Oracle's conversion of backlog into revenue will send the stock significantly higher over the next three years.
Here's how Oracle can become a multibagger
As Oracle's capital expenses taper off and backlog conversion accelerates, its bottom-line growth will also pick up. This explains why analysts are expecting a substantial step-up in earnings growth over the next couple of fiscal years.
ORCL EPS Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YCharts
Oracle's earnings growth rate could double in fiscal 2028, as evident from the chart above, followed by a 43% increase in fiscal 2029. Oracle trades at 18 times forward earnings, lower than the tech-laden Nasdaq-100 index's forward earnings multiple of 24. A pick-up in earnings growth should be rewarded with a higher valuation.
Assuming Oracle trades at 30 times earnings after three years and its earnings per share reach $15.77 in fiscal 2029, the stock could jump to $473. That's over 3x where Oracle stock is right now. So, savvy investors can consider buying this beaten-down stock right away and holding it for the long run, considering its healthy upside potential.
Should you buy stock in Oracle right now?
Before you buy stock in Oracle, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oracle wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $387,158! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,365,749!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 932% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of September 21, 2026. *
Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Micron Technology, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“Oracle could deliver multi-year earnings growth and a re-rating if backlog converts smoothly and the BYOH prepaid model sustains demand, but that hinges on AI spend staying durable.”
Oracle is pitched as a surprising AI infrastructure winner, anchored by a $664B RPO and its bring-your-own-hardware/prepaid model that could turn backlog into revenue with lean capex. If the company converts about half of its backlog into revenue over three years, the implied $111B annual run rate and continued margin expansion could justify a meaningful multiple re-rating. The plan hinges on durable AI spend and orderly data-center deployment. Risks include over-optimistic backlog quality, potential margin compression from BYOH arrangements, and a cyclic AI capex slowdown that could puncture the ramp. Still, the setup offers an asymmetric upside versus Nvidia/Micron if assumptions hold.
RPO is not guaranteed revenue, and conversion could disappoint if AI spend slows, customer tenure lengthens, or pricing pressure increases. The BYOH/prepaid model may compress Oracle's services margins and shift economic risk onto customers, making the upside highly contingent on a sustained capex cycle.
“Oracle's valuation re-rating to 30x is unlikely because the shift toward infrastructure-heavy cloud services will likely compress, rather than expand, long-term operating margins.”
Oracle's pivot to OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure) is clearly gaining traction, evidenced by the massive $664 billion RPO. However, the article's math is dangerously optimistic. It assumes a 30x P/E multiple in three years, which ignores the reality that Oracle is a legacy software giant transitioning to a capital-intensive cloud model, not a pure-play AI startup. While the 'bring-your-own-hardware' model improves cash flow, it also signals that Oracle is becoming a utility provider rather than a high-margin software leader. Trading at 18x forward earnings is fair, but a re-rating to 30x requires sustained margin expansion that may be cannibalized by the intense competition from hyperscalers like AWS and Azure.
The massive RPO could be a vanity metric if long-term contracts are subject to cancellation or if the cost of maintaining these AI-heavy data centers compresses margins faster than revenue scales.
“Oracle's RPO growth is impressive but conflates backlog with margin expansion; the 3x upside requires both flawless execution on capex discipline and a 67% multiple expansion that contradicts the company's historical valuation ceiling.”
Oracle's $664B RPO and 30% revenue growth are real, but the article conflates backlog conversion with sustainable margin expansion. The 3x thesis hinges on two fragile assumptions: (1) RPO converts at claimed rates despite customer concentration risk in hyperscalers, and (2) operating leverage materializes as capex 'tapers'—but Oracle's infrastructure arms race may force sustained heavy spending to compete with AWS/Azure. The 30x forward multiple assumption is also aggressive; Oracle historically trades 16-18x even during growth inflections. The article ignores that much RPO is prepayment for chips Oracle doesn't manufacture—execution risk is real.
If hyperscalers slow AI spending or shift to in-house silicon (as Google/Meta are doing), Oracle's RPO becomes a liability, not an asset—prepaid commitments become stranded. Capex may not taper; it may accelerate.
“Oracle's backlog-driven growth story is real but back-loaded and competitively challenged, making the 3x return thesis overly optimistic on timing and multiple expansion.”
The article highlights Oracle's $664B remaining performance obligation and accelerating RPO conversion as drivers for 30%+ revenue growth and a potential tripling of the stock by FY2029. Yet it underplays that half the backlog converts only over three years, with new RPO not hitting revenue until FY2028 or later. Oracle still faces heavy capex for data centers, margin dilution from its prepay model, and direct competition from AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, which already dominate AI infrastructure spend. The 30x multiple assumption also ignores that Oracle's cloud growth has historically lagged peers despite similar AI tailwinds.
Even if conversion accelerates, sustained 40%+ EPS growth could justify re-rating above 24x if Oracle captures meaningful enterprise AI workloads that hyperscalers overlook.
The Debate
Responding to Gemini
“The 30x P/E is too optimistic; real upside depends on conversion cadence, not just RPO size.”
Spotting value in RPO is fine, but Gemini's 30x target is a bridge too far. The crucial risk is the durability of the AI capex cycle and the sustainability of margins under BYOH; hyperscaler competition could pin Oracle's data-center economics. If AI spending slows or customers push more on-prem, RPO won't convert as fast as needed, compressing upside. So equity re-rating hinges more on actual conversion cadence than headline backlog.
Responding to Claude
“Oracle's reliance on third-party silicon creates a structural cost disadvantage that makes their RPO vulnerable to hyperscaler vertical integration.”
Claude, you hit the critical blind spot: the 'infrastructure arms race.' Everyone is treating Oracle’s RPO as a static asset, but it is actually a hostage to the hyperscalers' silicon strategies. If AWS or Azure pivot to proprietary silicon, Oracle’s reliance on third-party chips creates a massive cost-basis disadvantage. We aren't just looking at margin compression; we are looking at potential structural obsolescence if they cannot maintain price parity while the hyperscalers vertically integrate their entire AI stacks.
Responding to Gemini
“RPO timing advantage may buy Oracle 3 years before hyperscaler vertical integration becomes lethal, but only if it invests in proprietary silicon now.”
Gemini's vertical integration risk is real, but we're conflating two timelines. Hyperscalers' proprietary silicon (Trainium, TPU, Gaudi) takes 3-5 years to scale meaningfully. Oracle's RPO locks in revenue *now* through FY2027-28, before structural obsolescence becomes acute. The real question: does Oracle use this window to build its own silicon moat, or does it become a stranded capex play? The article doesn't address Oracle's silicon roadmap at all.
Responding to Claude
“Oracle faces immediate chip supply risks that could delay RPO conversion regardless of the revenue lock-in timeline.”
Claude assumes Oracle's RPO provides a secure revenue window through FY2028, yet this overlooks the execution risk in chip procurement. With hyperscalers and others competing for limited Nvidia supply, Oracle may face delays or higher costs that erode margins before any silicon moat can form. The article's conversion thesis weakens if hardware availability bottlenecks the ramp, a factor unaddressed in the backlog math.
Panel Verdict
BEARISH Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is bearish on Oracle's stock, with key risks including the durability of AI capex, margin compression under the bring-your-own-hardware model, and competition from hyperscalers like AWS and Azure.
None identified
The durability of the AI capex cycle and the sustainability of margins under the bring-your-own-hardware model.
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.