What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Oklo (OKLO) and NuScale (SMR) as direct plays on AI data center demand due to regulatory hurdles, licensing timelines, capital intensity, and supply-chain constraints, particularly the HALEU fuel bottleneck for Oklo.
Risk: HALEU fuel supply bottleneck and geopolitical risks
Opportunity: None identified as a consensus
Key Points
AI data centers require massive amounts of power, so demand will rise.
One nuclear stock in particular stands to benefit most from this increased demand.
- 10 stocks we like better than Oklo ›
Earlier this year, Elon Musk's SpaceX filed an application with the U.S. government to launch up to a million data centers into Earth's orbit -- something no country or corporation has even been able to accomplish even once.
This move may have partially been meant to build hype around a potential SpaceX IPO. But it's not all smoke and mirrors. The AI revolution is being made possible by a rapid global buildout of data center infrastructure. These data centers require increasing amounts of energy to operate. And operating a data center in space would, at least theoretically, dramatically lower cooling costs while allowing the facility to take advantage of near limitless amounts of free solar energy.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
No one knows whether SpaceX will succeed in this lofty vision. But one thing is for sure: Here on Earth, massive amounts of new energy will be needed to fuel the global AI data center buildout. Experts, therefore, are increasingly bullish on nuclear energy. Bank of America analysts believe the coming nuclear renaissance represents a $10 trillion opportunity.
Nuclear energy innovators, including Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) and NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR), should directly benefit from this coming nuclear renaissance. Both are worthwhile investments for aggressive growth investors looking for maximum upside potential. But if you want to bet only on the best nuclear stock, one of these businesses sticks out as the obvious choice.
Oklo is a cleaner bet on AI than NuScale Power
I'm a fan of both Oklo and Nuscale Power. But when it comes to betting on the AI revolution, the choice is clear: Oklo is much better positioned to capitalize on the global buildout of AI data centers.
While their specific technological approaches differ, both Oklo and NuScale Power specialize in small modular reactor technology, or SMRs. Compared with conventional nuclear power plants, SMRs have -- at least on paper -- lower initial construction costs, shorter initial construction times, improved safety metrics, and greater ease of scaling over time.
Here's where Oklo's approach and Nuscale Power's approach differ.
NuScale Power is mostly focused on large, utility-scale projects. It has a deal with the Tennessee Valley Authority, for example, to deploy a 6GW system that it hopes to get online in the early 2030s -- though we are still waiting on timeline specifics. Oklo, meanwhile, is more focused on delivering smaller systems better suited to data center needs. For example, it signed a deal with Meta Platforms for a 1.2GW system that should come online by 2030.
NuScale Power and Oklo both have a chance to contribute toward meeting the rising energy needs of the AI data center industry. Oklo's business model, however, is simply more targeted to meet this specific opportunity. It's no wonder that Sam Altman -- the founder and CEO of OpenAI, one of the world's heaviest users of data center capacity -- was the Chairman of Oklo for many years.
If I'm picking one nuclear stock to benefit directly from the AI revolution, I'm sticking with Oklo.
Should you buy stock in Oklo right now?
Before you buy stock in Oklo, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oklo wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026. *
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool recommends NuScale Power. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Both Oklo and NuScale are pre-revenue or near-revenue companies betting on 2030+ commercialization in a sector where regulatory delays are the norm, yet the article presents their AI data center thesis as de facto bullish without quantifying execution risk or comparing cost-competitiveness to alternatives."
The article conflates two separate theses: (1) AI data centers need massive power, true; (2) SMRs will supply it, unproven. Oklo has zero operational reactors and a 2030 target for Meta's 1.2GW system—six years away with regulatory and construction risk baked in. NuScale's TVA deal is even further out (early 2030s) and faces similar hurdles. The $10 trillion BofA figure is a TAM claim, not a revenue forecast. Both stocks are priced on *belief* in execution, not demonstrated capability. The article also omits that traditional nuclear and renewables+storage remain far cheaper per MW today.
If AI capex urgency forces utilities and hyperscalers to accept higher-cost power to guarantee supply reliability, and if Oklo/NuScale clear regulatory hurdles faster than consensus expects, the 2030 timeline could compress—making current valuations look cheap in hindsight.
"Oklo's 'advantage' is currently based on speculative partnerships and unproven regulatory pathways rather than operational or technological superiority over NuScale."
The article frames Oklo (OKLO) and NuScale (SMR) as direct plays on AI data center demand, but it ignores the massive regulatory and technical chasm between a 'deal' and a commissioned reactor. NuScale holds the only NRC design certification for an SMR, while Oklo’s initial application was rejected in 2022. While Oklo’s liquid-metal fast reactor design is theoretically more efficient for localized data center power (15-50MW modules), it relies on HALEU fuel, which currently lacks a domestic supply chain independent of Russia. Investors are buying speculative power purchase agreements (PPAs) rather than proven energy delivery, making these high-beta 'story stocks' rather than utility-grade infrastructure plays.
The strongest counter-argument is that the NRC's new Part 53 regulatory framework could fast-track Oklo’s non-light water design, allowing them to bypass NuScale's first-mover advantage while leveraging Sam Altman’s capital to secure the HALEU supply chain.
"Execution — regulatory certification, committed financing, and long-term offtake contracts — will determine the winning SMR equity, not the company with the best marketing or “AI synergy” narrative."
The article leans on headline-friendly narratives (AI data centers + SpaceX hype) to push Oklo (OKLO) as the superior SMR bet, but it glosses over the hard realities: licensing timelines, capital intensity, supply-chain constraints, and the fact that hyperscalers typically buy green power via PPAs rather than underwriting bespoke on‑site nukes. NuScale (SMR) may look less sexy, but utility-scale contracts (e.g., TVA) and proven regulatory progress can translate to earlier, steadier revenue. The Meta 1.2GW reference deserves scrutiny (is it a direct Oklo deployment or a broader procurement plan?). Bottom line: SMR winners will be the firms that convert designs into certified, financed, contracted projects — not the ones with the flashiest PR.
If Oklo nails a Meta-style offtake and demonstrates a working modular plant, it could lock in hyperscaler demand and command outsized multiples; modular, on-site power is exactly what some data centers will pay a premium for.
"NuScale's NRC certification provides a critical execution edge over Oklo, which remains mired in regulatory delays."
The article touts OKLO as superior to SMR for AI data centers due to smaller reactors and a Meta deal, but glosses over regulatory hurdles: NuScale's VOYGR SMR is the only design certified by the NRC (2023), enabling near-term deployments, while Oklo withdrew its Aurora application in 2022 over safety issues and refiled without approval yet. Both are pre-revenue, cash-burning (Oklo's Q1 2024 net loss $9M), with 2030 timelines amid competition from cheaper gas/renewables. BofA's $10T nuclear opportunity is real but sector-wide; these are speculative plays trading at 20-50x projected sales.
If Oklo secures swift NRC approval via Altman connections and lands binding hyperscaler contracts, its microreactors could dominate on-site AI power, outpacing NuScale's slower utility path.
"HALEU fuel supply, not NRC approval, is the binding constraint for Oklo's 2030 timeline."
Grok flags Oklo's 2022 withdrawal as a safety issue, but that's imprecise—Oklo voluntarily paused to incorporate NRC feedback, not due to failed safety review. More critical: nobody's quantified the HALEU supply bottleneck Gemini raised. Even if Oklo gets NRC approval in 2025, domestic HALEU production (currently ~20kg/year) can't scale to multi-GW deployments by 2030 without massive DOE investment. That's the real gating factor, not reactor design.
"The HALEU supply chain is a single point of failure that subjects SMR timelines to federal budget and geopolitical risks."
Claude and Gemini are right to highlight the HALEU bottleneck, but they are underestimating the geopolitical risk. If the U.S. continues banning Russian uranium imports, the DOE's $2.7 billion HALEU enrichment plan becomes a federal dependency for Oklo. This isn't just a supply issue; it's a political one. If federal funding pivots or domestic enrichment lags, Oklo's 2030 Meta timeline isn't just delayed—it's dead on arrival. We are betting on Congressional budget consistency, not just physics.
"Scaling HALEU for GW-scale SMR deployment requires more than DOE funding—fuel fabrication, qualification, transport licensing, and workforce scaling are multi-year bottlenecks that likely prevent 2030 gigawatt deployments."
Budget risk is necessary but insufficient framing—even with DOE funding, scaling HALEU needs not just enrichment but fuel fabrication, qualification, transport licensing, and workforce scaling, each adding multi-year lead times and single-point failure risks. Also, private capital (Altman) can accelerate specific offtakes but can't substitute for a broad commercial supply chain needed for GW-scale deployments by 2030. In short: fuel logistics and regulation are the real gating constraints, not just money.
"NuScale dodges HALEU risks but its scale and grid focus ill-fit hyperscaler on-site power needs."
Panel's HALEU obsession unfairly tars NuScale (SMR), which uses standard LEU fuel with established supply chains—no Russian dependency or DOE crutch needed. But ChatGPT misses: NuScale's 77MW modules suit utility grids (e.g., TVA), not data centers demanding Oklo-style 15MW on-site reactors for rapid deployment. This mismatch caps SMR's AI relevance versus OKLO's modular edge, even if fuel flows.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is bearish on Oklo (OKLO) and NuScale (SMR) as direct plays on AI data center demand due to regulatory hurdles, licensing timelines, capital intensity, and supply-chain constraints, particularly the HALEU fuel bottleneck for Oklo.
None identified as a consensus
HALEU fuel supply bottleneck and geopolitical risks