AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists agree that ServiceNow's partnership with Nvidia for agentic AI is strategic, but they differ on whether ServiceNow can capture the value and maintain its pricing power. The 30% YTD decline reflects market concerns about slowing growth and margin compression.

Risk: The potential commoditization of ServiceNow's orchestration layer if AI agents can navigate data and systems directly, and the 'Nvidia tax' leading to margin contraction.

Opportunity: ServiceNow's 30-year install base in enterprise process governance, which could prevent autonomous system-to-system interaction and maintain its role as a control plane.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points
Jensen Huang's vision of AI agents everywhere aligns perfectly with ServiceNow's core business model.
ServiceNow's stock has been dragged down by the SaaS sell-off, but its plummet is undeserved.
Investors are afraid of AI disrupting SaaS companies, but ServiceNow's platform enables AI business disruption.
- 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
Years ago, E.F. Hutton ran a commercial that proclaimed, "When E.F. Hutton speaks, people listen." We could perhaps replace E.F. Hutton with Jensen Huang in that statement today. When the Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO speaks, people listen. And Huang spoke at length at his company's 2026 GTC AI conference last week.
Unsurprisingly, Huang's remarks gave Nvidia shareholders reasons for optimism about the future. However, he also delivered fantastic news for a beaten-down AI stock -- ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW).
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
The massive sell-off of SaaS stocks has dragged ServiceNow's shares down nearly 30% year to date. Huang, though, painted a picture of a bright future for the AI workflow platform company.
Agents of change
In his keynote address, Huang highlighted several companies working closely with Nvidia. He specifically recognized ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott and his team. However, that shout-out wasn't the best news for ServiceNow investors.
Huang spoke extensively about the promise of agentic AI. He predicted a future where 10 billion digital AI agents work side-by-side with human knowledge workers. Huang said that "AI agents will be everywhere." This vision aligns perfectly with ServiceNow's core business model.
Nvidia is enabling AI reasoning models to be integrated into any organization's agentic AI framework, according to Huang. The GPU maker's technology (called NIMs, for Nvidia Inference Microservices) will help ServiceNow rapidly develop and scale enterprise AI agents for its platform. As a result, ServiceNow's products should be even stickier for the company's clients.
In addition, Nvidia is essentially reinventing the enterprise computing stack by creating a new AI infrastructure for enterprise. New features include semantic-based storage systems and workstations built from the ground up to support agentic AI. This new infrastructure should help ensure that the necessary computing power is available to run ServiceNow's most advanced applications.
An undeserved plummet
A few weeks ago, Huang was asked about the SaaS stock sell-off in an interview with CNBC. He stated, point-blank, "I think the market's got it wrong." One key reason behind his view was the potential of agentic AI. Huang explained, "These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody's going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow."
I agree with Nvidia's CEO on this 100%. Sure, AI will disrupt some SaaS companies' business models. However, I don't believe that organizations will easily replicate ServiceNow's long history of modeling business processes, integrating with third-party systems, and extensive security compliance.
ServiceNow's McDermott hit the nail on the head with his comments in the company's fourth-quarter conference call. He said, "AI doesn't replace enterprise orchestration. It depends on it. It depends on governance. It depends on scale." McDermott is right, in my view.
Huang told CNBC that he expects the use of tools such as those marketed by ServiceNow will increase as AI proliferates. He predicted that AI agents will use tools more, rather than less, especially as software developers incorporate expert AI agents that run natively on their platforms.
Two great AI picks-and-shovels plays.
Like many investors, I view Nvidia as one of the best picks-and-shovels plays for profiting from the AI boom. The company's GPUs are critical for powering AI model training and inference.
However, I also think that ServiceNow is a great AI picks-and-shovels stock. The company is positioning its platform as an indispensable component for enterprises. McDermott stated in ServiceNow's Q4 update, "We are building the AI control tower for business reinvention so enterprises can operate securely in an agentic AI world."
Some investors have dumped ServiceNow stock amid fears of AI disruption. The reality is, though, that ServiceNow offers the leading platform enabling AI disruption in businesses. If you're willing to ignore the noise, buying this beaten-down AI stock could pay off handsomely over the next few years.
Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 24, 2026.
Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia and ServiceNow. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"Nvidia's endorsement of agentic AI is bullish for the *concept*, not proof ServiceNow will outperform larger, better-capitalized enterprise platforms in capturing that value."

The article conflates Nvidia's endorsement of agentic AI with ServiceNow's inevitable success—a logical leap. Yes, Huang praised McDermott and agentic AI aligns with NOW's workflow platform. But the article provides zero evidence that ServiceNow will capture this value better than competitors (Salesforce, Microsoft, Oracle all have enterprise platforms). The 30% YTD decline reflects real SaaS margin compression and slowing growth, not irrational fear. Huang's comment that 'market's got it wrong' is aspirational cheerleading, not data. The article also ignores NOW's valuation: even beaten down, it trades at a premium to peers. Integration with Nvidia's NIMs is speculative—no customer wins announced, no timeline given.

Devil's Advocate

If agentic AI truly requires deep enterprise process modeling and governance (as McDermott claims), ServiceNow's 30-year moat in that domain is real, and early integration with Nvidia's inference stack could create genuine lock-in before competitors react.

NOW
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"ServiceNow's survival depends on becoming the indispensable governance layer for AI agents before those agents learn to bypass traditional SaaS workflows entirely."

The article frames Jensen Huang’s endorsement as a fundamental catalyst for ServiceNow (NOW), but we must distinguish between architectural alignment and actual revenue capture. While 'agentic AI' is the buzzword of 2026, the real story is ServiceNow’s transition from a workflow tool to an 'orchestration layer.' By integrating Nvidia’s NIMs (Inference Microservices), NOW aims to prevent the commoditization of SaaS by becoming the gatekeeper for enterprise AI agents. However, the '30% YTD sell-off' mentioned suggests the market is pricing in a structural threat: if AI agents can eventually navigate raw data and legacy systems directly, the need for NOW’s expensive, proprietary middleware diminishes. This is a battle for the 'Control Tower' position.

Devil's Advocate

If LLMs become proficient enough at autonomous system-to-system interaction, the multi-billion dollar 'orchestration' layer ServiceNow provides becomes redundant overhead rather than a necessity.

NOW
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"ServiceNow is well positioned to become the enterprise control plane for agentic AI, but that outcome depends on its execution speed, go-to-market for agent integrations, and its ability to defend against hyperscaler competition and pricing pressure."

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly aligning agentic AI with ServiceNow validates a strategic fit: ServiceNow’s workflow/orchestration platform is a natural control plane for AI agents, and Nvidia’s NIMs and new enterprise stack could materially lower engineering friction for large deployments. That said, the bullish read assumes ServiceNow can (1) productize and monetize deep agent integrations quickly, (2) retain pricing power while absorbing AI compute/partner costs, and (3) fend off hyperscalers and point-solution vendors racing to embed similar orchestration. Time-to-adoption, integration complexity, and competitive moves from AWS/Google/Microsoft are the main execution and timeline risks missing from the article.

Devil's Advocate

AI could actually commoditize some orchestration functions if large cloud vendors bake agent frameworks into their stacks or if generalist models reduce the need for bespoke workflow modeling, leaving ServiceNow with margin pressure and slower revenue upside.

ServiceNow (NOW)
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"Huang's praise tailwinds NOW but hinges on unproven AI revenue acceleration amid persistent SaaS headwinds."

Jensen Huang's GTC keynote shoutout to ServiceNow (NOW) as a key agentic AI partner, powered by Nvidia's NIM microservices, validates its platform's role in enterprise AI orchestration – a bullish signal amid 30% YTD decline from SaaS derating. Huang's dismissal of AI disruption fears echoes NOW CEO McDermott's Q4 view that AI depends on governance platforms like NOW's. This could drive stickier products and re-rating, especially with semantic storage infrastructure easing scaling. However, the article omits NOW's growth deceleration signals from recent quarters and lack of quantified AI revenue impact, leaving upside speculative until earnings prove monetization.

Devil's Advocate

Huang's track record spotting winners like NOW means this endorsement could spark a rapid multiple expansion, as agentic AI demand explodes and SaaS fears prove overblown.

NOW
The Debate
C
Claude ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini

"ServiceNow's moat isn't orchestration; it's enterprise risk governance—the thing that prevents AI agents from breaking compliance."

Gemini nails the real risk: if LLMs achieve autonomous system-to-system interaction, NOW's orchestration layer becomes overhead, not moat. But everyone's underweighting the inverse: ServiceNow's 30-year install base in enterprise process governance is precisely what prevents that autonomy. Agents still need guardrails, compliance mapping, and process validation—NOW owns that. The question isn't whether agents work; it's whether enterprises deploy them without NOW's control plane. That's harder than the article suggests.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Grok

"ServiceNow faces a margin squeeze if it cannot pass through the high compute costs of Nvidia-integrated agentic AI to price-sensitive enterprise customers."

Claude and Gemini are debating the 'orchestration' layer, but they are ignoring the margin-destroying cost of the 'Nvidia tax.' If ServiceNow integrates Nvidia's NIMs, who captures the value? If NOW can't pass through the massive compute costs of running these agents to enterprise customers already suffering from 'SaaS fatigue,' their margins will contract even if revenue grows. We are looking at a potential profitless revenue surge that the market will punish, not reward.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Binding ServiceNow to Nvidia's NIMs creates supplier concentration risk that can hurt NOW's economics, timelines, and regulatory exposure."

Gemini flagged the 'Nvidia tax'—true, but a bigger, under-discussed risk is supplier concentration and strategic dependency: if ServiceNow ties its agent stack to Nvidia NIMs, Nvidia gains pricing and roadmap leverage, can prioritize hyperscalers, and create single-vendor failure modes (supply shortages, export controls, antitrust). That dependency could force NOW into adverse commercial terms or slow rollouts—an execution and regulatory risk the panel hasn't emphasized.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to ChatGPT
Disagrees with: ChatGPT

"ServiceNow's multi-cloud AI integrations substantially reduce single-vendor dependency on Nvidia."

ChatGPT rightly flags Nvidia dependency, but overlooks ServiceNow's multi-vendor strategy: Vancouver platform embeds agentic AI via AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Azure—not NIMs alone—spreading compute costs and roadmap risks. Unmentioned: this diversification could accelerate adoption, but Q1 guidance (22% growth) must inflect higher for re-rating, or 30% YTD drop deepens.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panelists agree that ServiceNow's partnership with Nvidia for agentic AI is strategic, but they differ on whether ServiceNow can capture the value and maintain its pricing power. The 30% YTD decline reflects market concerns about slowing growth and margin compression.

Opportunity

ServiceNow's 30-year install base in enterprise process governance, which could prevent autonomous system-to-system interaction and maintain its role as a control plane.

Risk

The potential commoditization of ServiceNow's orchestration layer if AI agents can navigate data and systems directly, and the 'Nvidia tax' leading to margin contraction.

Related Signals

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.