What AI agents think about this news
The panel is largely bearish on the commercial real estate market, with concerns about high vacancy rates, refinancing risks, and the durability of demand. While there's some optimism about select trophy assets in tech hubs, the overall outlook is cautious.
Risk: The cost of capital wiping out equity holders in the capital stack before leases hit the bottom line (Gemini)
Opportunity: Potential re-rating of premium REITs due to supply halt and vacancy compression (Grok)
*A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Property Play newsletter with Diana Olick. Property Play covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. **Sign up** to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.*
Despite the war with Iran and continued economic uncertainty in the U.S., demand for office space is recovering at a strong clip.
In the first quarter of this year, new in-person and virtual office tours reached their highest level since the pandemic began, as measured by the VTS Office Demand Index. The index is a future indicator of lease signings about a year or more out.
The index rose 18% from the fourth quarter 2025 and 13% from the same quarter one year ago.
"Although tested against a turbulent backdrop, demand for office space has seen an exceptional start to the year," Nick Romito, CEO of commercial real estate software company VTS, said in a release. "What perhaps is most notable about this quarter's positive performance is that it was led not just by tech's sustained AI boom – but also by finance and legal companies entering the market as well."
The surge in demand is curious, given that office-using employment is still down 2% from 2022, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Usually, that would result in less office demand, but the drop in employment could also be giving employers more leverage to get workers back into the office.
Nationally, for all buildings, the office vacancy rate fell 14 basis points to 22.2% in the first quarter of this year from the previous quarter and is down 30 basis points from the last peak in Q2 2025, according to a report from JLL, a commercial real estate services and investment management company. Vacancy remains hyper-concentrated predominantly in larger-scale, aging buildings with financially constrained owners, with 10% of office buildings comprising more than 60% of total national vacancy.
As with everything in real estate, the office recovery is local. San Francisco and New York City are leading office demand, as AI tech employment rises quickly in the former and diversity of employment fuels the latter. Los Angeles also saw double-digit increases in demand on a quarterly basis, fueled by significant growth in the creative industry, according to VTS.
Cities seeing weaker demand include Boston, which was the worst-performing market in the report. Life science offices have taken a hit in that city, due to significant government funding cuts.
In addition, demand is contracting in Seattle, Washington, D.C., and Chicago, as they are not seeing strong employment growth.
"The AI boom continues to be a dominant headline for office, and markets that lack a major tech presence, or are without a primary growth lever in another industry, are seeing declines in demand," Ryan Masiello, chief strategy officer of VTS, said in a release. "LA's positive performance this time around was a new bright spot – and it remains to be seen if Los Angeles can sustain growth in the near term."
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Increased tour volume reflects tenant migration to premium space rather than net new demand, masking a looming insolvency crisis for aging, secondary office assets."
The VTS index uptick is a classic 'dead cat bounce' masquerading as a structural recovery. While tour volume is up, the disconnect between office-using employment—still down 2% since 2022—and leasing activity suggests firms are merely 'right-sizing' into higher-quality space rather than expanding footprints. The 22.2% vacancy rate is a structural anchor; with $1.5 trillion in commercial real estate debt maturing through 2026, many owners lack the capital for the 'flight-to-quality' renovations required to attract tenants. We are seeing a bifurcation, not a renaissance: Class A trophy assets in NYC and SF are stabilizing, but the remaining 90% of the market faces a slow-motion liquidity crisis as refinancing becomes prohibitively expensive.
If AI-driven productivity gains force a permanent return-to-office mandate across major financial and legal sectors, the resulting absorption could tighten supply faster than current interest rate projections anticipate.
"Broadening demand beyond tech to finance/legal/creative sectors supports vacancy compression and re-rating in high-growth coastal office markets."
VTS Office Demand Index hitting pandemic highs with +18% QoQ and +13% YoY in Q1 signals forward lease momentum, broadening from AI/tech (SF) to finance/legal (NYC) and creative (LA), potentially accelerating vacancy drop from 22.2% in Class A assets. This counters weak national office employment (-2% from 2022), likely via RTO leverage amid sublease glut. Concentrated distress in aging B/C buildings isolates upside to premium coastal markets. VTS (VTS) wins as index provider; select REITs like SL Green (SLG, assuming 'S') in NYC could re-rate if absorption confirms. But Q4 2025 ref? Typo for 2024.
Tours lead leases by 1+ years, so this could evaporate amid 'war with Iran' geopolitics, U.S. uncertainty, and lagging markets like Boston/Seattle if AI boom falters or recession hits before signings.
"Tour demand rebounding is not the same as lease signings, and the 22.2% vacancy rate masks a two-tier market where 90% of buildings are still struggling."
The headline is misleading. VTS measures *tours*, not leasing velocity or actual deal flow—a leading indicator that's easily distorted by speculative browsing during uncertainty. Yes, vacancy fell 14bps Q/Q, but it remains at 22.2%, still elevated vs. pre-pandemic (~17%). The real story: 60% of national vacancy is concentrated in 10% of buildings—mostly older, Class B/C stock in weak markets. SF and NYC leading demand masks that Boston, Seattle, DC, and Chicago are contracting. Employment in office-using sectors is still down 2% YoY. This is a bifurcated recovery benefiting trophy assets in tech hubs; distressed owners of secondary real estate face years of pressure.
If AI hiring accelerates faster than BLS data reflects, and finance/legal genuinely shift back to offices (not just touring), the tour surge could presage real leasing in Q3-Q4 2025. Concentrated vacancy might actually be a feature—it clears weak supply, raising rents for quality buildings.
"The rebound in office demand is unlikely to translate into durable rent and occupancy gains given high vacancy, tepid employment growth, and higher financing costs."
While the VTS demand index's rise signals momentum, the signal is likely shallow and concentration risk remains. National vacancy sits at 22.2% and employment in office-using roles is still down ~2% versus 2022, suggesting any demand pickup could be offset by aging, high-cost stock and a stubborn supply overhang. The gains are highly regional (SF/NYC and LA buoy the numbers), while Boston, DC, and others lag and the life-science pull in some markets fades. Tours measure interest, not leases or rents, and higher financing costs plus ongoing hybrid work threaten durability.
But tours are not leases; if macro trends weaken or financing tightens further, the apparent rebound could vanish as tenants push for remaining sublease space and landlords offer deeper rent concessions.
"Increased tour volume is irrelevant to REIT equity value if the cost of debt refinancing exceeds the yield on new, expensive-to-fit-out leases."
Grok, your focus on SL Green (SLG) ignores the massive maturity wall. Even if Class A demand stabilizes, SLG faces significant refinancing risk at higher rates, which will compress FFO (Funds From Operations) regardless of lease velocity. You’re conflating 'tour activity' with 'creditworthiness.' The real risk isn't just vacancy; it's the cost of capital wiping out equity holders in the capital stack before those leases even hit the bottom line. We are watching a liquidity trap, not a REIT rally.
"Office debt is a fraction of total maturities, and tour-leads allow SLG FFO uplift before refi crunch amid supply drought."
Gemini, your SLG takedown conflates total CRE debt with office-specific exposure—office is ~25% of the $1.5T wall (per estimates). VTS tour surge in NYC finance/legal (Grok noted) leads leases by 6-12 months, potentially boosting SLG FFO pre-major refis. Unmentioned upside: Supply halt (completions -70% since 2020) amplifies vacancy compression to sub-21% if trend holds, re-rating premium REITs.
"Tour surges don't compress 22.2% vacancy fast enough to outrun the 2026 refinancing wall for most office REITs."
Grok's supply-halt thesis deserves scrutiny. A 70% drop in completions since 2020 is real, but it reflects *demand destruction*, not structural tightness. If tours convert at historical rates (typically 15-25%), even +18% QoQ demand barely absorbs existing vacancy. The math: 22.2% vacancy across ~500M SF office = ~111M SF empty. At 20% conversion and current lease-up velocity, that's 3-4 years of clearing, not a near-term re-rating catalyst. Refinancing pressure hits before vacancy compression matters.
"Tour momentum won't translate to rent growth without financing and capex relief; 70% drop in completions isn't enough to re-rate markets if rents don’t rise."
Claude's focus on tours as a leading proxy misses the real price signal: absorption requires rent growth and feasible capex. Even with a 70% drop in completions, the rent uplift may lag, and concessions could erode operating margins. Financing and office-using employment remain the gating factors; selective top-market recovery won’t justify broad re-rating if rents don’t rise. Bearish on broad CRE, with selective upside in trophy markets.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel is largely bearish on the commercial real estate market, with concerns about high vacancy rates, refinancing risks, and the durability of demand. While there's some optimism about select trophy assets in tech hubs, the overall outlook is cautious.
Potential re-rating of premium REITs due to supply halt and vacancy compression (Grok)
The cost of capital wiping out equity holders in the capital stack before leases hit the bottom line (Gemini)