What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agree that the Ares fund's recent performance and redemption requests signal liquidity mismatches and potential issues in private credit, but they differ on the severity and urgency of the situation. The fund's gate on redemptions is seen as a temporary measure to avoid fire sales, but it may also lock in losses and deter future retail inflows.
Risk: The single biggest risk flagged is the potential for underlying credit deterioration in the fund's portfolio, particularly in software loans, which could lead to covenant breaches and further losses. Additionally, persistent gates could deter future retail inflows, hindering the growth of business development companies (BDCs).
Opportunity: The single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts to boost coverage ratios and alleviate liquidity pressures in the fund's portfolio. Additionally, the upsizing of Blackstone's CLO to $450M suggests that institutional investors still see value in private credit.
One Day After Gating, Ares Private Credit Fund Posts Biggest Monthly Loss In History, As Blankfein Warns Of "Reckoning"
The market barely had time to process news that alternative investing giant, Aresm had joined the private credit "gate parade" - where fund after multi-billion fund informed investors they would get only a fraction of their requested redemption from money invested in Software "not so perfectly money good" private credit loans - before finding out that the same Ares private credit fund, posted its steepest monthly loss on record in February, providing further evidence of the rapid decompression in the $1.8 trillion private credit market (which Goldman valiantly defended overnight, in what may prove very quickly to have been a futile endeavor).
The Ares Strategic Income Fund, a non-traded business development company launched in December 2022, lost 0.68% in February, according to Bloomberg calculations based on the fund’s regulatory filings.
February was the worst month for the broader leveraged loan market since September 2022, as the private credit shoes started to fall one after the other. Just this weekend we reported that "Blackstone's Flagship Private Credit Fund, World's Largest, Posts First Monthly Loss Since 2022." And suddenly everyone is rushing to remark their fund from myth to something resembling a market (of course it will take them months to get there).
Including a small loss in January, the Ares fund, which manages nearly $23 billion of assets, is down 0.7% so far this year.
The fund’s decline reflects the broader selloff in public debt markets, which Ares uses to assign prices to its assets, rather than losses on any specific investments, Bloomberg sources said, although if its software investments are even in the remotely same ballpark as other funds, watch out below.
Ares - aptly named after the ancient Greek god of war - officially launched ASIF on its wealth management platform and through investment advisers in April 2023 as part of a move to broaden its reach among individual investors (read: to get retail suckers in)..
As noted above, the Ares "performance issue" is not an isolated case. A similar fund managed by Blackstone also just recorded its worst monthly performance in over three years in February, which Blackstone attributed to wider spreads across public and private markets, as well as unrealized losses on individual names.
Both funds are still outperforming the leveraged loan market, which has delivered returns of -0.82% in February and -1.08% for the year through February, according to the S&P UBS Leveraged Loan Index. However, their outperrformance won't last if the pressure is finally one to admit the truth about the rather sordid affair taking place with cash flows in a world of AI disruption and ahead of what may be a brutal stagflationary recession which could lead to default as high as 15% across the Private Credit space according to UBS.
Meanwhile, as reported last night, amid mounting panic over the entire industry's long-term viability which has led to a surge in individual investor redemptions from private credit, Ares followed in the footsteps of many of its rivals and decided to cap withdrawals from ASIF at 5% of the fund’s net assets, after investors asked to pull out 11.2%. In other words more than half of the redemption requests were gated.
In a letter to investors announcing its decision, Ares pointed out the fund has delivered annualized returns of 10.6% since inception through the end of January and affirmed its dividend through June. Unfortunately, what investors were much more focused on is that the fund has pre-gated future redemptions as well, indicating it will only allow 5% redemptions max next quarter, when the cumulative "bank run" is already well over 10%.
Yet even now, greater fools are in abundance, and Blackstone's attempt to repackage its loans as bonds in hopes of finding a new batch of gullible investors has worked: Bloomberg reports that not only did the world's largest private credit fund successfully find enough investor demand to plug a $400 million hole, it even managed to upsize the new collateralized loan obligation deal, finding enough demand for the debt to boost its size by $50 million to $450 million from $400 million.
The largest portion of the offering, rated AAA, was sold to investors at a premium of 1.28 percentage point over a floating interest-rate benchmark. That’s a similar risk premium to previous CLOs issued by BCRED.
The increase in the size of the offering by the firm that shook down its employees a few weeks ago to fund the redemption shortfall from the very same fund, indicates that despite concerns about the risks in private credit, institutional investors are still happy to invest in deals backed by pools of those loans confident that a bottom has finally been found.
Or maybe not.
According to former Goldman Sachs CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, the accumulation of unsold private assets on investors’ balance sheets is a warning that some may be overvalued — and a spark could trigger a widespread markdown
“At some point there needs to be a forcing function or a reckoning that causes you to come to grips with what your balance sheet really is worth,” Blankfein said in a Bloomberg Television interview with Francine Lacqua.
The former Wall Street chief, who spent much of his career as a trader before leading Goldman during the financial crisis, when he was pitching subprime-backed RMBS deals to some investors while also pitching ways how to short those same subprime-backed RMBS to other investors (all of which culminated in a very theatrical congressional hearing), made his comments as the disruption caused by artificial intelligence and pockets of alleged fraud have caused jitters in private markets. The CEO also warned that the likelihood of a larger blowup has risen with the length of time since previous crises.
“The analogy I like to give is you accumulate tinder on the floor of the forest and eventually a spark will come,” Blankfein said. “But the longer between intervals where there’s a spark that sets it on fire, the more that accumulates.”
Maybe we should call what comes next a fire...sale. In which case, don't worry Lloyd: it already started.
The former Goldman CEO has also voiced concerns about the growth of private credit in the portfolios of individual investors. “When you lose money for individual consumers — i.e. taxpayers and citizens — people in government get very, very upset,” he said earlier this month, sensing with delightful accuracy what comes next...
* * * 3 MONTHS OF DIVERSE FOOD // USE CODE THANKYOU10 FOR 10% OFF
Tyler Durden
Wed, 03/25/2026 - 23:25
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Ares and peers face a 12-18 month reckoning as illiquidity forces mark-to-market on software/AI-exposed loans, but current losses are mostly mechanical spread widening, not proof of a 2008-scale blowup yet."
This article conflates three distinct problems: (1) mark-to-market losses from rising spreads in public debt (mechanical, not fundamental), (2) redemption gates (a liquidity management tool, not proof of insolvency), and (3) alleged underlying credit deterioration. The Ares fund is down 0.68% in one month and -0.7% YTD—material but not catastrophic. The article provides zero evidence of actual defaults in the $23B portfolio; it speculates about software loans based on anecdotes. Blackstone's ability to upsize a CLO to $450M suggests institutional investors still price private credit risk rationally. Blankfeil's 'reckoning' warning is real but vague—timing is everything, and the article offers no catalyst or timeline.
If private credit truly faces 15% default rates (per UBS, cited but not sourced here), then mark-to-market losses are the *beginning*, not the end, and gates are rational risk management by managers who see the cliff coming. The article's snark about 'gullible investors' may mask that CLO buyers are sophisticated and pricing in exactly this tail risk.
"The 'gate parade' reveals a systemic liquidity mismatch where illiquid, opaque loans are being sold to retail investors under the guise of stable, high-yield income."
The gating of the Ares Strategic Income Fund (ASIF) and the record 0.68% monthly loss signal a critical liquidity mismatch in private credit. While the loss appears small, it is a lagging indicator; private credit valuations are 'marked-to-model' rather than 'marked-to-market,' meaning the 11.2% redemption request reflects investor fear that the underlying assets—especially in software—are overvalued. The 5% quarterly redemption cap (the 'gate') creates a 'hotel California' effect where capital is trapped while NAV (Net Asset Value) potentially drifts lower. Blankfein’s 'tinder' analogy is apt: as retail investors realize they cannot exit, the pressure on secondary markets will force the very markdowns Ares is currently avoiding.
The fund is actually outperforming the S&P UBS Leveraged Loan Index, and the successful $450 million CLO upsizing suggests institutional appetite for these assets remains robust despite retail jitters. If the Fed pivots to rate cuts, the interest coverage ratios for these floating-rate borrowers will improve, potentially averting the 15% default wave UBS fears.
"Gating plus mark-to-public-market losses expose a dangerous liquidity mismatch in private credit that risks material markdowns and investor pain if redemptions persist or public spreads remain dislocated."
This is a liquidity story, not (yet) a pure credit collapse. Ares’ ASIF (launched Dec 2022, ~$23bn AUM) posting a -0.68% February and gating redemptions (5% cap vs 11.2% requests) highlights a classic maturity/liquidity mismatch: long-dated, illiquid private loans priced using public leveraged‑loan marks. That combination forces either gates or fire‑sales when retail flows surge. Institutional demand for CLO tranches (Blackstone upsized to $450m; AAA at +128bp) buys time but doesn’t erase valuation uncertainty. Missing context: loan covenants, sector/vintage concentration, leverage, realized vs unrealized losses, sponsor liquidity and whether marks reflect fundamental impairment or transient spread moves.
February losses are economically modest (-0.68%) and gating is a measured stabilizer — not evidence of imminent systemic failure; active CLO issuance and continued investor appetite suggest the market can absorb the stress and marks could recover if spreads tighten. Many losses are unrealized and tied to public market spreads rather than borrower defaults.
"ASIF's losses mirror public market volatility for valuation purposes, with the fund outperforming leveraged loan benchmarks and gating protecting long-term NAV."
Ares Strategic Income Fund's (ASIF) 0.68% February loss—its worst month since 2022 launch—is driven by public debt market spreads widening (per Bloomberg sources), not realized private loan losses, with the $23B non-traded BDC still outperforming the S&P UBS Leveraged Loan Index (-0.82% Feb, -1.08% YTD). Gating redemptions at 5% vs. 11.2% requests is standard for illiquid funds to avoid fire sales, and Blackstone's CLO upsizing to $450M shows institutional demand persists. Blankfein's 'reckoning' echoes forest-fire analogy but ignores private credit's ~2-3% historical defaults vs. article's speculative 15% UBS stagflation call. Retail inflows were always frothy; this decompresses valuations toward reality.
If 'not so perfectly money good' software loans (as hinted) face AI-driven cash flow disruptions, unrealized marks could turn realized, amplifying defaults in a recession and pressuring even CLO-backed structures.
"Gates prevent mark-to-market discovery, not losses—if software fundamentals crack, covenant breaches will force the reckoning faster than retail redemptions."
ChatGPT flags the missing covenant data—critical. But all panelists assume marks will hold if spreads tighten. That's backwards: if software borrowers face AI disruption, covenant breaches happen *before* spreads widen further. The gate doesn't stabilize; it locks in losses while underlying credit deteriorates silently. Blankfiel's 'tinder' isn't just retail panic—it's rational if Q1/Q2 earnings miss triggers covenant waivers.
"Redemption gates prevent a 'liquidity death spiral' where the best assets are sold first, leaving remaining investors with the highest-risk credit."
Gemini and ChatGPT characterize the gate as a 'Hotel California' liquidity trap, but they ignore the structural necessity of the 5% cap for protecting remaining LPs. If Ares met the full 11.2% redemption request, they would be forced to sell their most liquid, highest-quality 'Level 2' assets first, leaving the fund concentrated in the very 'toxic' software loans Claude fears. The real risk isn't the gate—it's the adverse selection of the remaining portfolio after the exit.
[Unavailable]
"Gates are bridged by facilities, not forcing sales, but prolonged use risks choking retail inflows to private credit."
Claude fixates on speculative AI disruption in software loans, but Ares' $23B portfolio spans multiple sectors with no disclosed concentration breaches; UBS's 15% default fear is stagflation scenario, not base case. Gemini's adverse selection logic holds only if Ares sells assets now—instead, credit facilities likely bridge gates, buying time for Fed cuts to boost coverage ratios. Unflagged risk: persistent gates could deter $100B+ annual retail inflows critical to BDC growth.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists agree that the Ares fund's recent performance and redemption requests signal liquidity mismatches and potential issues in private credit, but they differ on the severity and urgency of the situation. The fund's gate on redemptions is seen as a temporary measure to avoid fire sales, but it may also lock in losses and deter future retail inflows.
The single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts to boost coverage ratios and alleviate liquidity pressures in the fund's portfolio. Additionally, the upsizing of Blackstone's CLO to $450M suggests that institutional investors still see value in private credit.
The single biggest risk flagged is the potential for underlying credit deterioration in the fund's portfolio, particularly in software loans, which could lead to covenant breaches and further losses. Additionally, persistent gates could deter future retail inflows, hindering the growth of business development companies (BDCs).