By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agree that Oracle's $638B RPO signals significant future revenue potential but disagree on the likelihood of risks materializing, particularly around OpenAI's solvency and the potential for stranded assets if AI demand falters.
Risk: Stranded assets due to demand evaporation and potential impairment of OpenAI's $300B commitment
Opportunity: Massive future revenue potential if a significant portion of RPO converts into revenue within a 2-3 year window
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Developing artificial intelligence (AI) software requires substantial computing power, which is usually delivered through data centers that house thousands of specialized chips and components. Most businesses don't have the financial resources to build this infrastructure, so they rent it from cloud providers like Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) instead.
Oracle's data centers are among the fastest and most cost-efficient in the AI industry, so the company has amassed an order backlog of $638 billion from customers waiting for more capacity to come online. However, there are concerns that some of these customers won't be able to fulfill their commitments, which is concerning because Oracle has taken on a truckload of debt to build more infrastructure.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Oracle stock is currently down 62% from its all-time high, and hit a fresh 52-week low last Friday. Could this be the ultimate buying opportunity, or are the risks simply too high?
Why Oracle's data centers are so popular
Oracle's data centers house a wide selection of graphics processing units (GPUs) from top suppliers like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, giving AI developers multiple options. Plus, the company has built some of the largest GPU clusters in the industry, allowing customers to scale up to over 131,000 chips simultaneously to run the most sophisticated AI models.
Moreover, Oracle uses software-powered automation to operate its data centers, enabling it to bring new locations online much faster than competitors that rely on human-led processes. The company's infrastructure also uses a proprietary random direct memory access (RDMA) networking technology, which moves data between chips and devices faster than traditional Ethernet networks.
All of this translates to lower costs and faster processing speeds, an ideal formula for AI developers that usually pay for computing capacity by the minute. As a result, AI leaders like OpenAI, Elon Musk's xAI, Cohere, and Meta Platforms have become some of Oracle's top customers.
Oracle's largest customer might be short on cash
Oracle generated $19.2 billion in total revenue during its recent fiscal 2026 fourth quarter (ended May 31), a 21% increase from the year-ago period. Its cloud infrastructure segment accounted for $5.8 billion of that total, and it grew at a significantly faster pace of 93%.
But the headline number in the report was Oracle's remaining performance obligations (RPO), which jumped 363% to a record $638 billion. RPO reflects the value of signed contracts for services that haven't been delivered yet, so it's like an order backlog, and it's often used as a predictor of future revenue.
But last September, The Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI alone might account for $300 billion of Oracle's RPO. The start-up has just $25 billion in annualized revenue, and it's losing money, so it's unclear how it plans to fund such a major commitment. Even its most recent capital raise brought in just $122 billion from investors, which isn't anywhere near enough.
It appears Oracle is aware of that very issue. The company says it plans to recognize just 12% of its RPO as revenue over the next 12 months, followed by a further 34% in the 24 months after that. Simply put, less than half its RPO is expected to become revenue within the next three years, which is a very long time in a fast-moving industry like AI.
There's no guarantee Oracle's customers will even need as much computing capacity by then, and the company appears to recognize that risk. Its fiscal 2026 annual report actually warned investors of the risk of overestimating customer demand, and that it won't be able to repurpose its data centers for other workloads if parties like OpenAI don't fulfill their obligations.
Should investors buy Oracle stock on the dip?
At first glance, Oracle looks cheap right now. Based on the company's fiscal 2026 earnings of $5.83 per share, its stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 19.7. That is a discount to both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100 indexes, which have P/E ratios of 25.2 and 33.1, respectively.
But it's very hard to value Oracle at the moment due to uncertainty around its RPO. To make matters worse, the company is carrying over $122 billion in long-term debt and recently announced plans to raise a further $40 billion through a mix of debt and equity to fund more data centers. Therefore, if it fails to convert its RPO into revenue, it could be left with piles of toxic debt that can't be refinanced. That is a big reason why investors are shunning its stock.
As a result, I wouldn't be in a hurry to invest in Oracle right now.
Should you buy stock in Oracle right now?
Before you buy stock in Oracle, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oracle wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $377,990!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,269,518!*
That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul.
Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Oracle's massive RPO is back-loaded, customer-concentrated, and poorly matched to its rising debt load, making the current 19.7x P/E appear expensive rather than cheap."
Oracle's $638B RPO looks impressive but is heavily skewed toward OpenAI (~$300B per WSJ), a money-losing startup whose $122B raise still leaves a massive funding gap. ORCL's cloud revenue grew 93% last quarter, yet the company plans to recognize <50% of RPO over three years while carrying $122B debt and planning another $40B raise. At 19.7x FY26 EPS versus S&P 500 at 25.2x, the 62% drawdown from highs reflects legitimate balance-sheet and customer-credit risk in a fast-evolving AI capex cycle. The article correctly flags overcapacity and repurposing challenges if hyperscaler demand falters.
The article underplays Oracle's differentiated RDMA clusters and automation edge that already landed commitments from Meta, xAI, and Cohere; if even half the backlog materializes amid insatiable AI training demand, ORCL could re-rate to 25x+ forward earnings while debt is serviced by 30%+ cloud growth.
"The article contains a critical factual error regarding Oracle's stock price, and the company's reliance on high-risk AI startups for its massive RPO creates a dangerous credit-concentration risk."
The article’s premise is factually flawed: Oracle (ORCL) is nowhere near a 52-week low, currently trading near all-time highs, not down 62%. This renders the 'buy the dip' narrative nonsensical. The real story isn't a crash, but the massive leverage risk embedded in their $638 billion RPO. While Oracle’s RDMA-based infrastructure is technically superior for large-scale GPU clusters, they are effectively acting as a venture-debt financier for cash-burning AI startups. If the AI hype cycle cools or OpenAI’s funding dries up, Oracle’s balance sheet—already burdened by significant long-term debt—will face a massive impairment risk. Investors are currently ignoring the credit risk of their customer base.
If Oracle’s infrastructure effectively becomes the 'utility' layer of the internet, their massive capital expenditure will create an insurmountable moat that justifies the debt load as a necessary cost of market dominance.
"Oracle's debt load is a *timing* risk, not a solvency risk, and the market is pricing in near-total RPO failure when 46% conversion over 3 years would justify a 25-30x multiple."
The article conflates two separate risks and conflates valuation with risk. Yes, OpenAI's $300B commitment is underfunded—but that's a *customer* solvency problem, not Oracle's. Oracle gets paid upfront for capacity it builds; if OpenAI can't pay later, Oracle has already deployed capital but hasn't recognized the revenue yet. The real risk: stranded assets if demand evaporates. But the article buries the actual bullish case—93% cloud infrastructure growth, $638B RPO even if only 46% converts in 3 years is $293B in future revenue, and Oracle's debt-to-EBITDA is manageable if conversion rates hold. The 19.7x P/E on $5.83 EPS is genuinely cheap for 20%+ growth, especially against Nvidia at 60x+. The 52-week low may reflect panic, not fundamentals.
If AI capex cycles compress faster than expected—or if customers like Meta and xAI build captive infrastructure instead—Oracle's utilization could crater, leaving it servicing $122B debt against underutilized data centers with no alternative use cases.
"Oracle could re-rate if it accelerates RPO-to-revenue conversion and sustains high cloud-infrastructure growth, supported by its GPU scale, automation, and RDMA moat."
Oracle's $638B RPO signals massive future revenue potential, but the conversion timeline is prolonged (only ~12% recognized in 12 months, 34% in 24 months). The debt load (~$122B with a plan to raise ~$40B) raises liquidity and refinancing questions if AI demand stalls. Yet Oracle's edge—massive GPU-scale capacity (131k chips), automation, and RDMA networking—could yield lower costs and faster scaling than peers if AI compute demand remains durable. If Oracle can sustain cloud-infrastructure growth and convert a meaningful portion of RPO into revenue within a 2–3 year window, the stock could re-rate on cash-flow visibility despite near-term financing headwinds.
The RPO is a forward-looking risk proxy, not guaranteed revenue; a large OpenAI-led portion could evaporate if funding or demand falls, and the elevated debt burden plus capex needs heighten liquidity risk if revenue realization slows.
"OpenAI impairment risk cascades directly into Oracle's debt covenants via RPO accounting mechanics."
Gemini, the 62% drawdown claim is from the article's framing of the recent peak, not literal 52-week low. More critically, nobody has flagged the second-order effect: if OpenAI defaults, Oracle's $300B RPO write-down triggers debt covenant tests on the new $40B raise, accelerating a credit downgrade spiral in an already tight AI financing market.
"Oracle faces 'wrong-way risk' where their credit profile is tied to the solvency of their most leveraged AI customers."
Claude, your dismissal of the customer solvency risk is dangerous. Oracle isn't just a landlord; they are financing the build-out. If OpenAI defaults, Oracle isn't just losing future revenue—they are left with specialized, high-depreciation hardware and a massive debt service burden. This creates a 'wrong-way risk' where Oracle’s credit quality is positively correlated with the solvency of the very startups they are funding. If the AI bubble deflates, Oracle’s balance sheet is the primary casualty.
"Oracle's risk isn't customer solvency per se—it's whether OpenAI's funding closes before Oracle must recognize the RPO write-down under ASC 606."
Gemini's wrong-way risk is real, but Claude's upfront-payment framing matters: Oracle recognizes revenue as capacity is delivered, not when OpenAI pays invoices. The covenant risk Grok flags is sharper—a $300B RPO impairment forces balance-sheet restatement, triggering debt tests. But this assumes OpenAI defaults *before* converting material RPO to recognized revenue. If OpenAI raises the $40B gap (likely, given Saudi/UAE appetite), the impairment never materializes. The timing of funding versus revenue recognition is the hinge nobody pinned down precisely.
"Hardware-supply and cost dynamics could throttle Oracle’s backlog conversion and liquidity, independent of OpenAI's funding."
A meaningful overlooked angle is the supply/demand rhythm for the GPUs and data-center hardware Oracle must buy to satisfy RPO. If chip supply tightens or costs rise (geopolitical/export controls, new-gen GPUs, longer lead times), Oracle faces slower backlog conversion and compressed margins even with durable demand. That could trigger covenant pressure and liquidity risk long before OpenAI’s funding pace becomes decisive.
The panelists agree that Oracle's $638B RPO signals significant future revenue potential but disagree on the likelihood of risks materializing, particularly around OpenAI's solvency and the potential for stranded assets if AI demand falters.
Massive future revenue potential if a significant portion of RPO converts into revenue within a 2-3 year window
Stranded assets due to demand evaporation and potential impairment of OpenAI's $300B commitment