What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agree that both PLTR and CRWD are overvalued, with significant risks and uncertainties, but they differ on which stock is a better investment. The main concerns are high valuations, execution risks, and competition from tech giants.
Risk: High valuations that leave no room for execution stumbles and intense competition from tech giants.
Opportunity: PLTR's potential platform-shift inflection point and CRWD's predictable, subscription-based ARR and massive telemetry.
Key Points
Palantir’s AIP and Ontology framework are emerging as key competitive advantages in enterprise AI adoption.
CrowdStrike’s AI-powered Falcon platform is gaining traction across cloud security, identity protection, and SIEM.
While both trade at premium valuations, Palantir offers higher growth potential, whereas CrowdStrike offers more stable, predictable growth.
- 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies ›
Artificial intelligence (AI) spending has grown at an impressive pace in recent years. In fact, research firm Gartner estimates global AI spending will soar 44% year over year from around $1.7 trillion in 2025 to over $2.5 trillion in 2026.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
That surge in spending has opened opportunities for both companies building AI systems and those securing them. Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) leverages data, analytics, and AI to help governments and businesses analyze operational data and make informed decisions. CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) helps protect companies' technology systems from cyber threats.
The question for investors is which company has the stronger opportunity heading into 2026.
The case for Palantir
Palantir has emerged as one of the fastest-growing enterprise AI companies, driven mainly by the rapid adoption of its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP). AIP helps government agencies and enterprises connect large language models with their internal data and business processes. This enables AI-driven decision-making across workflows and business functions.
Palantir differentiates itself from other enterprise AI companies through its ontology framework. Ontology helps relate the company's digital data to its real physical assets, relationships, and business processes. Hence, the software understands how different parts of the business work together. When AI tools work on top of that structure, they can help automate decisions rather than just analyze data.
This approach has translated into rapid financial growth. Palantir's revenues soared 56% year over year to roughly $4.5 billion, while operating income was up 32% year over year to $1.4 billion in fiscal 2025 (ending Dec. 31, 2025). Management is also guiding for fiscal 2026 revenues of $7.19 billion at the midpoint, implying 61% year-over-year growth.
In fiscal 2025, Palantir saw U.S. revenues grow 75% year over year to $3.32 billion, with U.S. commercial revenues jumping 109% year over year as companies began rolling out AIP across more departments.
Palantir is also seeing its existing customers expand usage of its products. The company closed $4.3 billion in total contract value in the fourth quarter, up 138% year over year. The company's net dollar retention rate was 139%, up 5 percentage points year over year. This metric implies that existing customers, as well as new customers acquired in the fourth quarter of the previous year, collectively increased spending on Palantir's solutions by 39% on a year-over-year basis.
Palantir's long-term relationships with government and defense agencies have also helped create a sticky customer base.
Considering all the factors, Palantir is proving to be a core AI platform for organizations globally.
The case for CrowdStrike
As companies deploy AI systems, expand cloud infrastructure, and connect more devices to the enterprise network, the potential for cyber threats is also rising.
Cybersecurity player CrowdStrike is positioned to benefit from this opportunity, as it helps organizations detect, prevent, and respond to cyber threats across their digital infrastructure. The company's Falcon platform helps secure devices, cloud-based workloads, and user identities through a cloud-native system. Falcon includes a security information and event management (SIEM) solution, which analyzes security data across the organization's digital network to detect suspicious activity.
CrowdStrike has embedded AI capabilities into the Falcon platform through Charlotte AI. This virtual AI assistant acts like an AI-powered security analyst, helping teams investigate threats, prioritize alerts, and respond faster through natural language queries. Beyond Charlotte, CrowdStrike has also built an agentic security platform with 10 additional AI agents, each designed with specific security skills to perform security roles. Together, these agents act like a digital security team working alongside human analysts.
CrowdStrike's financial results show strong demand for these tools. The company reported fiscal 2026 (ending Jan. 31, 2026) revenues of $4.8 billion, up 22% year over year. Subscription revenue increased 21% year over year to roughly $4.5 billion. The company also added nearly $1 billion in net new annual recurring revenue (ARR) in fiscal 2026, up 25% year over year. This is a key metric to track the pace of subscription growth.
CrowdStrike's new security products are also seeing robust traction. The company's cloud security, next-gen identity, and next-generation SIEM businesses exited fiscal 2026 with a collective ARR of over $1.9 billion, which was up more than 45% year over year. Its cloud security business alone surpassed $800 million in ARR, while next-generation SIEM exceeded $585 million in ARR in fiscal 2026.
CrowdStrike differentiates itself from the competition with its enormous data of real-world security events. The company's Threat Graph system analyzes more than 1 trillion security events daily across roughly 2 trillion data points, helping the company detect patterns and improve its AI models. Since this data is based on real events, it is helping train AI models to effectively detect and stop real-world breaches in real time.
Finally, CrowdStrike's Falcon Flex subscription model has also helped increase adoption. Customers can purchase a bundle of security tools and expand their usage over time. CrowdStrike ended fiscal 2026 with $1.69 billion in ARR from Flex customers, up more than 120% year over year.
Which will dominate 2026?
Palantir currently trades at about 82.5 times forward earnings, while CrowdStrike trades at roughly 69.1 times forward earnings (as of March 15, 2026). While both companies are trading at elevated valuation multiples, the key difference lies in how they monetize growth.
Palantir is benefiting from large, expanding deployments as enterprises adopt AI across their workflows. While such projects can dramatically propel top-line growth, they can also lead to more revenue volatility. On the other hand, CrowdStrike generates the majority of its revenue from recurring subscriptions, since cybersecurity spending is mission-critical.
Hence, both companies can emerge as leaders in 2026. Palantir, however, may appeal more to growth-focused investors with higher risk appetite, while CrowdStrike may suit those who prefer a more balanced risk-reward profile.
Should you buy stock in Palantir Technologies right now?
Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $494,747!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,094,668!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 911% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 20, 2026.
Manali Pradhan, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends CrowdStrike and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Gartner. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"PLTR's 82.5x forward multiple assumes flawless execution in a market where Microsoft, Salesforce, and Oracle are bundling competing AI layers into existing customer relationships at lower switching cost."
The article frames a false choice between two fundamentally different businesses at dangerously elevated multiples. PLTR at 82.5x forward P/E is pricing in not just 61% revenue growth but sustained margin expansion and market-share dominance in enterprise AI — a crowded field where adoption timelines remain uncertain. CRWD at 69x is more defensible given 21% revenue growth and mission-critical positioning, but the 2024 outage risk (glossed over here) exposed operational fragility. Neither valuation leaves room for execution stumbles. The article's claim that PLTR offers 'higher growth potential' ignores that government contracts face budget cycles and competitive pressure from Microsoft/Salesforce/Oracle bundling AI into existing suites.
Both companies could justify these multiples if AI spending truly accelerates to $2.5T by 2026 and enterprise adoption accelerates faster than historical precedent — in which case PLTR's 139% net dollar retention and ontology moat could drive 50%+ CAGR for years.
"Palantir’s ontology framework creates a deeper, more defensible competitive moat than CrowdStrike’s feature-based cybersecurity platform."
The article frames this as a growth-versus-stability trade, but it ignores the fundamental difference in 'moat' durability. Palantir’s ontology-based approach is essentially an operating system for the enterprise; once integrated, the switching costs are astronomical, effectively locking in government and Fortune 500 budgets. Conversely, CrowdStrike operates in a hyper-competitive, commoditized cybersecurity landscape where 'good enough' protection often beats 'best-in-class' if the price is right. While CRWD’s 22% growth is solid, PLTR’s 61% guidance suggests a platform-shift inflection point. At 82x forward P/E, Palantir is priced for perfection, but if they maintain that 139% net dollar retention, the valuation gap will compress rapidly through sheer earnings expansion.
Palantir’s reliance on massive, high-touch enterprise contracts creates significant 'lumpy' revenue risk, whereas CrowdStrike’s subscription-heavy model provides a much safer floor during a potential IT spending contraction.
"CrowdStrike’s subscription-heavy, telemetry-driven model makes it better positioned to turn AI-driven security demand into predictable, scalable cash flow than Palantir’s project-oriented AI deployments."
I come out bullish on CrowdStrike (CRWD) relative to Palantir because the article understates how valuable predictable, subscription-based ARR and massive telemetry (Threat Graph) are when AI becomes table stakes in security. CrowdStrike’s nearly all-subscription revenue base, large net-new ARR gains, and product bundling (Falcon Flex) reduce execution risk versus Palantir’s lumpy, project-like AI deployments and government-heavy relationships. That said, both trade at lofty forward P/Es (article cites ~82.5x PLTR and ~69.1x CRWD), so near-term returns depend on continued ARR acceleration, margin expansion, and fend-off from hyperscalers embedding security.
CrowdStrike’s valuation already prices near-perfect execution; increased competition from Microsoft/AWS/Google or a macro pullback in enterprise IT spend could quickly compress multiples. Also, Palantir’s ontology and large-government foothold could win long multi-year deals that re-rate its growth trajectory.
"CrowdStrike's data moat and recurring cyber revenue position it to outpace Palantir's volatile AI growth in 2026 as security becomes AI's gatekeeper."
Article touts PLTR's explosive 61% FY26 revenue guide to $7.19B and 139% NDR as AI dominance signals, but glosses over 82.5x forward P/E pricing in zero errors amid enterprise AI commoditization risks from AWS, Azure integrations. CRWD's 22% growth to $4.8B FY26, $1B NNARR add, and $1.9B new product ARR (45%+ growth) leverage unmatched Threat Graph (1T events/day) for must-have cyber defense as AI expands attack surfaces—cyber is non-discretionary vs. PLTR's workflow bets. U.S. commercial reliance (109% growth) exposes PLTR to capex cycles; both multiples (CRWD 69x) scream caution.
PLTR's ontology-AIP combo could bootstrap AI ops at hyperscale before security bottlenecks, with $4.3B Q4 contract value (138% YoY) signaling irreversible lock-in that CRWD lacks in breadth.
"Switching costs matter less when cheaper substitutes approach parity; PLTR's moat is narrower than 82.5x P/E assumes."
Google conflates switching costs with moat durability—ontology integration doesn't guarantee renewal if Palantir's next-gen competitors (Microsoft Copilot Stack, Salesforce Einstein) offer 80% capability at 40% cost within 18 months. 'Locking in budgets' assumes zero disruption risk; government IT cycles and commercial pressure from bundled competitors could force renegotiation faster than NDR metrics suggest. Grok's capex-cycle exposure is real, but underweights it.
"Palantir's reliance on custom ontology engineering creates a scalability bottleneck that makes their high valuation unsustainable."
Google, your 'operating system' thesis for Palantir ignores the actual friction of AIP deployments. Unlike SaaS, Palantir’s ontology requires deep, custom data engineering, making it a professional services-heavy model in disguise. This creates a hidden 'delivery ceiling' that limits scalability compared to CrowdStrike’s automated, cloud-native Threat Graph. If Palantir cannot decouple revenue growth from headcount-intensive implementation, that 82x multiple will collapse when margins fail to expand as fast as top-line revenue suggests.
[Unavailable]
"PLTR's U.S.-heavy revenue base heightens political and macro risks versus CRWD's global diversification."
Panelists underplay Palantir's geographic concentration: 83% U.S. revenue exposes it to federal budget squeezes and election volatility, amplifying capex-cycle risks I flagged. CRWD's ~30% international mix (EMEA/APJ) buffers macro shocks, with Q2's $1B NNARR post-outage underscoring subscription stickiness over PLTR's lumpy deals.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agree that both PLTR and CRWD are overvalued, with significant risks and uncertainties, but they differ on which stock is a better investment. The main concerns are high valuations, execution risks, and competition from tech giants.
PLTR's potential platform-shift inflection point and CRWD's predictable, subscription-based ARR and massive telemetry.
High valuations that leave no room for execution stumbles and intense competition from tech giants.